people are trying to set precedents for internet censoring. i'm sure that just like the abortion issues in south dakota, stuff like this is designed to go to the supreme court.

first of all, we should find out who put the police officer up to "monitoring" myspace, was this an idea sparked by the group of teens in southern california who busted a convicted child molester with a bogus rendevous with a fictitious under-age girl? i dunno, it just seems the federal gov't is looking for those tiny loopholes to better promote the cause of "controlling the internets". off hand i can think of 10 other sites on the web that might get their wrists slapped, but myspace ventures into the fine area of freedom of expression. bah!

on the other hand, if the girls were up to something greater, then maybe, but i didn't get that from the article. violating a curfew? i mean, c'mon?!

what i'm waiting for is for someone to sue over the legitamacy of scientology (or something along that line), 'cause we all want to see a court battle over things that can't be proven. but in these times, i'm pretty sure we might see it.

yeah, i'm *sure* that coip was 'monitoring', and when she ignored his nasty messages, he busted her.

end of story.