Our dear friend Tara had sent me a letter asking about some didge crafting specifics and after I wrote a long and wordy response my computer failed to send it properly and nothing I could do would bring it back up so that I could just send it again, but I could still see it, so I transcribed it by hand and decided I may as well share this info with everybody. The main portion of her questioning was about lengths and interior dimensions as far as tuning and playing characteristics. So here goes....
As far as lengths and diameters, I'm sure that the sticks you have already can give you a bit of a tutorial on what already seems to work. Basicly, air flow is very similar to water flow so in your mind if it makes it easier to conceive of how water would behave inside a boreshape then that gives you a conceptualization to work with. Pitch is basicly a result of speed. In a top end when the input (volume or amount) is the same, air or water will have to move away to make room for the continued input so in a tight top end the flow rate will be faster resulting in a higher pitch AND higher backpressure and in a more open top end the flow rate will be slower resulting in a lower pitch AND lower backpressure. If the bore is conical and opens up too quickly causing a very short high pressure zone near the mouthpiece followed by a low pressure zone where it opens up the effect will be similar to if the didge length is cut near the beginning point of the low pressure zone, so effectivly the key will be determined by the length of the higher pressure zones. Opening up with a conical bore causes incoming air at the bell which gives a bouncy responsive type of playing action. If the bore remains cylindrical without coning out the effect of the backpressure will be more a result of the air inside the column getting in it's own way thus causing a slower flow (lower pitch) and slower response which is in direct contrast to the quick bouncy response of a conical didge. This cylindrical aircolumn causing it's own flow resistance is another way of adding backpressure yet as I described, it's a different type of backpressure in terms of the response and playing characteristics. A bell is basicly a no pressure zone and can be completely cut off without affecting the key but it would affect the tonal qualities as the bell section acts as a natural amplifier which adds bass tones and volume. A bell is a double edged sword as even though it adds to the power of a didge it also muddles the clarity and precision of the upper asnd mid-range responses. For vocals a more open top end projects with more clarity because the movement inside the bore is not as turbulent, though on an open topend you need to keep a longer section of cylindrical bore so that the backpressure remains high enough for ease of play. A tight topend on a conical bore is more suited to a quick percussive style yet the high backpressure also allows the player to nurse it slowly for airplane ( or meditative, or whitefella) style making it easy for a lazy player to do basicly anything they want with it. This is a style I create most often = awesome stick for beginner through intermediate. My opinion is that your abilities (Tara) and your diaphram strength would allow you to push on a didge with lower backpressure than others would find comfortable so if you're crafting for your own self there's no need to go too tight on the top end unless you're trying to get a first trumpet that comes in at less than an octave above the fundamental. You'll notice that didges with a cylindrical bores havea first trumpet that comes in at way more than an octave jump and conical bores will have trumpets that come in closer to one octave above the fundamental. Simply knowing that bit of info there can help you to craft sticks in which not only your fundamental is intentionally tuned but also your trumpets can be intentionally tuned. Like I mentioned about the pressure zones causing the pitch, you'll get the biggest bang for the buck in the tuning processes at the mouthpiece end of the stick by either cutting shorter (raises the pitch,and generally leaves the trumpet about the same depending on what bore characteristics you're getting closer to by this shortening) , hollowing out (lowers pitch and pushes trumpet further from fundamental), adding length(lowers pitch and can draw the trumpet closer, though generally leaves the distance between fundamental and trumpet about the same), or shrinking the interior diameter (raises pitch and brings the trumpet closer). This is all a very basic description. Your mileage may vary.
As far as lengths and diameters, I'm sure that the sticks you have already can give you a bit of a tutorial on what already seems to work. Basicly, air flow is very similar to water flow so in your mind if it makes it easier to conceive of how water would behave inside a boreshape then that gives you a conceptualization to work with. Pitch is basicly a result of speed. In a top end when the input (volume or amount) is the same, air or water will have to move away to make room for the continued input so in a tight top end the flow rate will be faster resulting in a higher pitch AND higher backpressure and in a more open top end the flow rate will be slower resulting in a lower pitch AND lower backpressure. If the bore is conical and opens up too quickly causing a very short high pressure zone near the mouthpiece followed by a low pressure zone where it opens up the effect will be similar to if the didge length is cut near the beginning point of the low pressure zone, so effectivly the key will be determined by the length of the higher pressure zones. Opening up with a conical bore causes incoming air at the bell which gives a bouncy responsive type of playing action. If the bore remains cylindrical without coning out the effect of the backpressure will be more a result of the air inside the column getting in it's own way thus causing a slower flow (lower pitch) and slower response which is in direct contrast to the quick bouncy response of a conical didge. This cylindrical aircolumn causing it's own flow resistance is another way of adding backpressure yet as I described, it's a different type of backpressure in terms of the response and playing characteristics. A bell is basicly a no pressure zone and can be completely cut off without affecting the key but it would affect the tonal qualities as the bell section acts as a natural amplifier which adds bass tones and volume. A bell is a double edged sword as even though it adds to the power of a didge it also muddles the clarity and precision of the upper asnd mid-range responses. For vocals a more open top end projects with more clarity because the movement inside the bore is not as turbulent, though on an open topend you need to keep a longer section of cylindrical bore so that the backpressure remains high enough for ease of play. A tight topend on a conical bore is more suited to a quick percussive style yet the high backpressure also allows the player to nurse it slowly for airplane ( or meditative, or whitefella) style making it easy for a lazy player to do basicly anything they want with it. This is a style I create most often = awesome stick for beginner through intermediate. My opinion is that your abilities (Tara) and your diaphram strength would allow you to push on a didge with lower backpressure than others would find comfortable so if you're crafting for your own self there's no need to go too tight on the top end unless you're trying to get a first trumpet that comes in at less than an octave above the fundamental. You'll notice that didges with a cylindrical bores havea first trumpet that comes in at way more than an octave jump and conical bores will have trumpets that come in closer to one octave above the fundamental. Simply knowing that bit of info there can help you to craft sticks in which not only your fundamental is intentionally tuned but also your trumpets can be intentionally tuned. Like I mentioned about the pressure zones causing the pitch, you'll get the biggest bang for the buck in the tuning processes at the mouthpiece end of the stick by either cutting shorter (raises the pitch,and generally leaves the trumpet about the same depending on what bore characteristics you're getting closer to by this shortening) , hollowing out (lowers pitch and pushes trumpet further from fundamental), adding length(lowers pitch and can draw the trumpet closer, though generally leaves the distance between fundamental and trumpet about the same), or shrinking the interior diameter (raises pitch and brings the trumpet closer). This is all a very basic description. Your mileage may vary.
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Wed, March 19, 2008 - 11:52 AMPerfectly described, Chad. I am glad Tara is getting into crafting. Is she going Agave, or hardwoods? -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Wed, March 19, 2008 - 1:32 PMright now she's got some agave canes that she harvested so she'll start with that. Tara is incredibly talented both as a didge player and as an artist and I would assume this is because of the amount of attention and dedication she puts into things.
She also had a question for me about crafting mouthpieces out of amber or silver and both of those approaches are outside of my area of experiance. I expect that on the amber side that JOL might be able to give her advice, and I don't know who to refer her to on the silver route, possibly Scott- a didgeplayer and jeweler living in So.Oregon. -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Wed, March 19, 2008 - 2:10 PMWOW!
Thank you, Chad. I will have to let all that soak in a bit. I think this blending of instinct and knowledge with get me thru the sticks...
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Wed, March 19, 2008 - 4:23 PMAmber mouthpiece.. that's an interesting idea :D
-
-
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Wed, March 19, 2008 - 4:22 PMChad... You are awesome :). Thanks for sharing this info. It gives a great intuitive groundwork for didge design. -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Wed, March 19, 2008 - 6:44 PMJesus Freak, Isn't your name Ben? I've seen before that you're pretty interested in understanding these physics from a scientific point of view and although I can't give you any formulas for friction loss (or resistance) in a conical air column I can provide you with some pretty fun formulas for figuring out friction loss in water lines and that can help create basic understandings. A conical bore brings into the equation venturi effects which is why the bouncyness thang happens. It doesn't take a scientificly minded person to understand this stuff, I learned it mostly from observation but the tables and formulas part I obtained through Engineering classes in the Fire Department and fire fighters are commonly dumb as a brick. I no. cuz I'm em 1. Even just today I used this knowledge to make decisions for my fire district in ordering new appliances to help us get better water flow from our hydrant system. Hit me up if you're interested. -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Fri, March 21, 2008 - 9:18 AMthe info I wrote on above is for the purpose of creating visualization regarding didj tuning. I'm not trying to explain the physics of how a didj works, just concepts that help give some visualization to the tuning processes. The Incredible Robert Kelly can illuminate the physics regarding soundwaves if anyone is brave enough to try to comprehend that end of things, though Robert and I both agree that these physics are easy enough to figure out for straight cylinders but absoloutly mind boggling when applied to conical bores and bores with variations similar to the interior of real didjeridu. The best tool for this is intuition guided by observation and experiance. -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Fri, March 21, 2008 - 11:29 AMActually, I'd rather talk about gardening, solar cooking or music ;)
But many years ago I became aware that all things, and all life, is really composed of vibrational energy. After that awareness really sunk in with me, learning the mechanics of how it worked was no longer just a dry textbook, it became a portal to an increased understanding and appreciation for the wonders of nature and existence...... of course you need to keep a balance of mind and heart.....
I absolutely agree with you Chad, the best way to learn didj crafting is to just do it!
On my part, I will always value the time and knowedge you have so openly shared with me on my own didj journey :) Thanks!
peace and respect,
robert
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Mon, May 19, 2008 - 6:20 AMThe equations for an arbitary shaped cylindrical bore are juicily grungy! To get a solution on a computer you have to use finite element analysis. The problem becomes much more complex for a bendy didj with a complex bore shape, and would require a supercomputer simulation of the same order of complexity that they use for space shuttle re-entry. Not only does the sound flow, it bounces around and interferes with itself!
-
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Fri, March 21, 2008 - 4:36 PMi also wanted to point out a book that Ben Hicks has about the didg, maybe the history of the didg, not sure, but there are chapters by a bunch of different people on how to contruct didg's and there is a whole insanely intense chapter about the physics of it all. it took me a while (well i guess im still working on it) but its real good. enjoy and good craftin!
Jesse -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Fri, March 21, 2008 - 6:59 PMJesse, that's a great point, that is a great book. And Bens' contribution on split and hollow crafting is great!
There are chapters by more than just Ben though. Guan Lim worked to contribute information passed on by Djalu Gurruwiwi, of the Galpu Yolngu regarding traditional aspects of use and crafting a yidaki.
Dr Frank Geipel and others have some extensive exploarations into the physics involved in the didj.
A lot of very good information to absorb...thanks for the reminder!
The book is:
The Didgeridoo Phenomenon
David Lindner
ISBN 3-933825-42-3
namaste,
robert -
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Mon, March 24, 2008 - 11:56 PMHi Chad,
Thank you for writing all of this out and sharing it. I've been curious about didge making for awhile but have yet to take the dive. I've been refinishing a couple of didgeridoos and have had a great time working with them. These "practice runs" have encouraged me to try more in didge making and woodworking in general. It's awesome that you share so much. Thank you, again!
Cheers,
Pam
-
-
-
Re: the emptiness inside
Tue, March 25, 2008 - 12:31 AMYep. Ben I am. :). I've already done some calculations involving the losses due to friction, although I have to admit I've mostly just "borrowed" them from various scholarly articles without understanding them 100%. I'm always interested in learning something new, although it usually sticks with me best when its something that I'm actively looking into, and the didge physics project is currently on the backburner. My most recent "exploration" of the subject (a few months ago) was figuring out how to model the pressure waves inside an arbitrary bore. I got a decent start, and I plan on doing more with it in the future but right now I'm mostly concentrating just on playing didge, and also doing some practicing on my new bodhran :D
-
-