Advertisement
It seems only natural to me that Earth is created as a paradise and that everyone wants to be happy in their own dream of paradise.
I think it is possible to tune to this dream, even through and sometimes especially through the clouds of difficulty or challenge, such is the divinity in all our hearts, that we can balance this Universe simply by accepting that happiness is the force of life.
Talking makes difficult things less difficult and joyful things more joyful - Spider Robinson
* * *
www.youtube.com/watch
My introduction to this phenomenon was simple: A man in the distance pointing up at the sky and shouting, “Look!”
Previous to this event one other person had used the phrase “chem trails” in a conversation and I had easily concluded that she referred to exhaust chemicals from airplanes, adding in their way to the total exhaust from human machines.
In any case I looked up at the sky and saw long trails of smoke from the back of airplanes. I noticed that it lingered for much longer than I had ever seen before. I did not have the impression that airplanes leave trails that last so long. In fact, the trails never disappeared my whole journey home, lasting about an half a hour.
Since then, I have routinely witnessed, by observation, one or several trails being left across the sky, trails that linger and blend into a milky white haze over the sky. Sometimes this happens before a natural cloud front moves in, and so they could be taken for the natural formation of clouds except for the fact that they began at the exhaust end of airplanes.
It does not fit my observations that some airplanes leave exhaust trails that turn into this milky white haze of cloud that often comes to cover the whole sky. I grew up near an airport and planes never did that.
I have also noticed over the last two decades that the sky seems to have changed so that it is now no longer as cobalt or “sky” blue but retains this milky white tinge even on clear days.
These are my observations.
I would invite others to take some time to observe these trails in the sky to see what their observations tell them.
I can only make one definitive conclusion from my own observation and one speculation.
My conclusion, airplanes are yet another machine that emits exhaust fumes that are probably not very good for our health. It would be great to find an alternative to explosion-based propulsion.
My speculation, some airplanes are emitting exhaust that blankets the sky with their fumes or clouds precipitated thereby and it would be a good thing to find out why this happens in some occasions and find a cleaner alternative, since it is quite likely partly or wholly causing an increased opacity in the sky in general, by my observation.
* * * *
Here are some things I have discovered, attempting to discuss observations I and many thousands of others have made regarding phenomena in our sky:
1. People do not always want to know what is going on above their heads, OR, are not interested in any supernal phenomena that may be in any way construed as harmful.
Therefore, it is important to extend to each person the freedom which they have not to engage and/or to disagree with various observations or their implications without making any observations themselves or even having made their own observations. A person can disagree with the nature of this whole subject without having to give any reason. We all have that right. And it is important to respect that right, in particular with this subject matter, I believe.
2. With regards to phenomena in our skies that many people have observed, it is important to pay particular attention, when speaking about it, to be very aware of what you are saying and what you are not saying. Some people, jolted by the implications that may perchance be drawn from the information to follow, can be apt to make argument against any foundation for these observations (observations, mind you, and not philosophical arguments - although, philosophical arguments may indeed be drawn in abundance) based solely upon impugning the intelligence or the motives of the observer.
3. Any observation of the sky or any conclusions from such observation are usually by the lay observer and not by a scientist or atmospheric specialist (or any other profession that might have special expert understanding of atmospheric dynamics). Therefore, any argument based on such observations or any theories reached as to the ramifications of such observations are primarily based on first hand observation by a lay observer and only secondarily supported by pertinent sources of information. Having said that, clearly something on the order of thousands if not tens of thousands of people have made similar observations. And this in itself is persuasive.
4. The word “phenomenon” does not necessarily designate the source to be natural or man-made. Smog could be called a “phenomenon” for instance, and yet very few people would see fit to demand precise scientific evidence from several reputable sources in order to be swayed as to the source of smog. Although such scientific data might be necessary to take corrective action. Observations can provide a lot of quick information in this regard which lends enormous amount of credence to the notion that smog is not, in fact, “natural cloud cover.”
5. The word “observation” should not be taken to mean, “less valid.” One might demand of an observation rigorous notation by various technological devices and their expert technicians, but this in itself is no excuse to render ourselves void of our senses. A sunrise, for instance, could be argued many ways based on instrumental observation, alone. Whereas if you take the time to watch the sun rise, it is very hard to dispute that the sun has, in fact, risen. Scientific data is important of course. However, it is the nature of scientific or technically acquired data to break things down into smaller parts. Data obtained in this manner, when combined with observation, can lead to a more substantial understanding. When bereft of observation by a living being designed to have almost limitless perception of the whole range of factors of climate and environment (as well as various levels of emotional investment in various beliefs), such a matrix of data can be misapplied in order to render first hand observation subordinate to any part of that data. Human culture is full of examples of what can happen when humans take leave of their first hand sense for secondary media, which can then be used for various motives of greed or power, the fiction of “human natural history” and “modernity is ideal” being good examples, since both subjects only include a very small portion of all the available data even though both subjects as they are taken to be “true” serve only a very few people.
E.g. There is much evidence coming out that humans have lived for thousands of years in a culture far more peaceful and far more healthy than our present day “modern” society. This evidence is not coming down from historians or philosophers but from first hand accounts by the descendents of these “ancient” humans, who are telling us that “early man” did not have to “forage for food” but did indeed live in a paradise world that is still living and growing all around us, everywhere. There are those of us that walked away from this way of living. But this in itself does not mean that modern society is the cure. It is at least equally probably that a return to paradise would alleviate much of our suffering. Humans are not meant to suffer and be sick. There is rather more evidence, conversely, to suggest that “more modern” means “more sick” and that “more traditional” means “more peaceful and healthier.” Much first hand observation supports this. However, historical and scientific data argues rather the opposite conclusions, even though they only go back 10 or 20 thousand years at best in terms of arriving at any speculation as to how humans once lived. If history were written to tell more of the truth as people are reporting it from their direct ancestral lines then it would like more like a descent from paradise into suffering than as an ascent from suffering into paradise, though indeed such an ascent may well be underway. And among the chief conclusions being reached: “our machines make us more sick than they improve our quality of living.“ Even a brief study of cultural texts would indicate that present day humans that live the longest and healthiest lives do not live in our modern society.
* * * * *
My introduction to this phenomenon was simple: A man in the distance pointing up at the sky and shouting, “Look!”
Previous to this event one other person had used the phrase “chem trails” in a conversation and I had easily concluded that she referred to exhaust chemicals from airplanes, adding in their way to the total exhaust from human machines.
In any case I looked up at the sky and saw long trails of smoke from the back of airplanes. I noticed that it lingered for much longer than I had ever seen before. I did not have the impression that airplanes leave trails that last so long. In fact, the trails never disappeared my whole journey home, lasting about an half a hour.
Since then, I have routinely witnessed, by observation, one or several trails being left across the sky, trails that linger and blend into a milky white haze over the sky. Sometimes this happens before a natural cloud front moves in, and so they could be taken for the natural formation of clouds except for the fact that they began at the exhaust end of airplanes.
It does not fit my observations that some airplanes leave exhaust trails that turn into this milky white haze of cloud that often comes to cover the whole sky. I grew up near an airport and planes never did that.
I have also noticed over the last two decades that the sky seems to have changed so that it is now no longer as cobalt or “sky” blue but retains this milky white tinge even on clear days.
These are my observations.
I would invite others to take some time to observe these trails in the sky to see what their observations tell them.
I can only make one definitive conclusion from my own observation and one speculation.
My conclusion, airplanes are yet another machine that emits exhaust fumes that are probably not very good for our health. It would be great to find an alternative to explosion-based propulsion.
My speculation, some airplanes are emitting exhaust that blankets the sky with their fumes or clouds precipitated thereby and it would be a good thing to find out why this happens in some occasions and find a cleaner alternative, since it is quite likely partly or wholly causing an increased opacity in the sky in general, by my observation.
I think it is possible to tune to this dream, even through and sometimes especially through the clouds of difficulty or challenge, such is the divinity in all our hearts, that we can balance this Universe simply by accepting that happiness is the force of life.
Talking makes difficult things less difficult and joyful things more joyful - Spider Robinson
* * *
www.youtube.com/watch
My introduction to this phenomenon was simple: A man in the distance pointing up at the sky and shouting, “Look!”
Previous to this event one other person had used the phrase “chem trails” in a conversation and I had easily concluded that she referred to exhaust chemicals from airplanes, adding in their way to the total exhaust from human machines.
In any case I looked up at the sky and saw long trails of smoke from the back of airplanes. I noticed that it lingered for much longer than I had ever seen before. I did not have the impression that airplanes leave trails that last so long. In fact, the trails never disappeared my whole journey home, lasting about an half a hour.
Since then, I have routinely witnessed, by observation, one or several trails being left across the sky, trails that linger and blend into a milky white haze over the sky. Sometimes this happens before a natural cloud front moves in, and so they could be taken for the natural formation of clouds except for the fact that they began at the exhaust end of airplanes.
It does not fit my observations that some airplanes leave exhaust trails that turn into this milky white haze of cloud that often comes to cover the whole sky. I grew up near an airport and planes never did that.
I have also noticed over the last two decades that the sky seems to have changed so that it is now no longer as cobalt or “sky” blue but retains this milky white tinge even on clear days.
These are my observations.
I would invite others to take some time to observe these trails in the sky to see what their observations tell them.
I can only make one definitive conclusion from my own observation and one speculation.
My conclusion, airplanes are yet another machine that emits exhaust fumes that are probably not very good for our health. It would be great to find an alternative to explosion-based propulsion.
My speculation, some airplanes are emitting exhaust that blankets the sky with their fumes or clouds precipitated thereby and it would be a good thing to find out why this happens in some occasions and find a cleaner alternative, since it is quite likely partly or wholly causing an increased opacity in the sky in general, by my observation.
* * * *
Here are some things I have discovered, attempting to discuss observations I and many thousands of others have made regarding phenomena in our sky:
1. People do not always want to know what is going on above their heads, OR, are not interested in any supernal phenomena that may be in any way construed as harmful.
Therefore, it is important to extend to each person the freedom which they have not to engage and/or to disagree with various observations or their implications without making any observations themselves or even having made their own observations. A person can disagree with the nature of this whole subject without having to give any reason. We all have that right. And it is important to respect that right, in particular with this subject matter, I believe.
2. With regards to phenomena in our skies that many people have observed, it is important to pay particular attention, when speaking about it, to be very aware of what you are saying and what you are not saying. Some people, jolted by the implications that may perchance be drawn from the information to follow, can be apt to make argument against any foundation for these observations (observations, mind you, and not philosophical arguments - although, philosophical arguments may indeed be drawn in abundance) based solely upon impugning the intelligence or the motives of the observer.
3. Any observation of the sky or any conclusions from such observation are usually by the lay observer and not by a scientist or atmospheric specialist (or any other profession that might have special expert understanding of atmospheric dynamics). Therefore, any argument based on such observations or any theories reached as to the ramifications of such observations are primarily based on first hand observation by a lay observer and only secondarily supported by pertinent sources of information. Having said that, clearly something on the order of thousands if not tens of thousands of people have made similar observations. And this in itself is persuasive.
4. The word “phenomenon” does not necessarily designate the source to be natural or man-made. Smog could be called a “phenomenon” for instance, and yet very few people would see fit to demand precise scientific evidence from several reputable sources in order to be swayed as to the source of smog. Although such scientific data might be necessary to take corrective action. Observations can provide a lot of quick information in this regard which lends enormous amount of credence to the notion that smog is not, in fact, “natural cloud cover.”
5. The word “observation” should not be taken to mean, “less valid.” One might demand of an observation rigorous notation by various technological devices and their expert technicians, but this in itself is no excuse to render ourselves void of our senses. A sunrise, for instance, could be argued many ways based on instrumental observation, alone. Whereas if you take the time to watch the sun rise, it is very hard to dispute that the sun has, in fact, risen. Scientific data is important of course. However, it is the nature of scientific or technically acquired data to break things down into smaller parts. Data obtained in this manner, when combined with observation, can lead to a more substantial understanding. When bereft of observation by a living being designed to have almost limitless perception of the whole range of factors of climate and environment (as well as various levels of emotional investment in various beliefs), such a matrix of data can be misapplied in order to render first hand observation subordinate to any part of that data. Human culture is full of examples of what can happen when humans take leave of their first hand sense for secondary media, which can then be used for various motives of greed or power, the fiction of “human natural history” and “modernity is ideal” being good examples, since both subjects only include a very small portion of all the available data even though both subjects as they are taken to be “true” serve only a very few people.
E.g. There is much evidence coming out that humans have lived for thousands of years in a culture far more peaceful and far more healthy than our present day “modern” society. This evidence is not coming down from historians or philosophers but from first hand accounts by the descendents of these “ancient” humans, who are telling us that “early man” did not have to “forage for food” but did indeed live in a paradise world that is still living and growing all around us, everywhere. There are those of us that walked away from this way of living. But this in itself does not mean that modern society is the cure. It is at least equally probably that a return to paradise would alleviate much of our suffering. Humans are not meant to suffer and be sick. There is rather more evidence, conversely, to suggest that “more modern” means “more sick” and that “more traditional” means “more peaceful and healthier.” Much first hand observation supports this. However, historical and scientific data argues rather the opposite conclusions, even though they only go back 10 or 20 thousand years at best in terms of arriving at any speculation as to how humans once lived. If history were written to tell more of the truth as people are reporting it from their direct ancestral lines then it would like more like a descent from paradise into suffering than as an ascent from suffering into paradise, though indeed such an ascent may well be underway. And among the chief conclusions being reached: “our machines make us more sick than they improve our quality of living.“ Even a brief study of cultural texts would indicate that present day humans that live the longest and healthiest lives do not live in our modern society.
* * * * *
My introduction to this phenomenon was simple: A man in the distance pointing up at the sky and shouting, “Look!”
Previous to this event one other person had used the phrase “chem trails” in a conversation and I had easily concluded that she referred to exhaust chemicals from airplanes, adding in their way to the total exhaust from human machines.
In any case I looked up at the sky and saw long trails of smoke from the back of airplanes. I noticed that it lingered for much longer than I had ever seen before. I did not have the impression that airplanes leave trails that last so long. In fact, the trails never disappeared my whole journey home, lasting about an half a hour.
Since then, I have routinely witnessed, by observation, one or several trails being left across the sky, trails that linger and blend into a milky white haze over the sky. Sometimes this happens before a natural cloud front moves in, and so they could be taken for the natural formation of clouds except for the fact that they began at the exhaust end of airplanes.
It does not fit my observations that some airplanes leave exhaust trails that turn into this milky white haze of cloud that often comes to cover the whole sky. I grew up near an airport and planes never did that.
I have also noticed over the last two decades that the sky seems to have changed so that it is now no longer as cobalt or “sky” blue but retains this milky white tinge even on clear days.
These are my observations.
I would invite others to take some time to observe these trails in the sky to see what their observations tell them.
I can only make one definitive conclusion from my own observation and one speculation.
My conclusion, airplanes are yet another machine that emits exhaust fumes that are probably not very good for our health. It would be great to find an alternative to explosion-based propulsion.
My speculation, some airplanes are emitting exhaust that blankets the sky with their fumes or clouds precipitated thereby and it would be a good thing to find out why this happens in some occasions and find a cleaner alternative, since it is quite likely partly or wholly causing an increased opacity in the sky in general, by my observation.
posted by:
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
