logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

topic posted Sun, November 18, 2007 - 2:14 PM by  Je'si

i'm looking for someone with experience using both of these programs who can tell me how they differ.

i'm familiar with fruity loops as a sample-based drum sequencer and i'm looking for something similar on mac.

is ultrabeat the same in that i can sequence patterns using samples (that i've recorded) to make the rhythm track for an entire song (i.e. not just individual patterns that can be pasted into a track, but a long sequence of patterns to make a whole rhythm line from start to finish?).

thanks!
: )
posted by:
Je'si
Vancouver
  • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

    Wed, November 28, 2007 - 9:00 PM
    I understand that Fruity (like Acid) is in a league all its own. I never really used Fruity but at one point I decided to move over to a Mac when I wanted to get a good, reliable laptop. I had previously used Acid when I was exclusively a PC user and went with Ableton Live since it was good with both platforms. I don't exactly know how ultrabeat works in the most exact sense but I can say that Ableton would do what you are talking about.
    • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

      Wed, December 5, 2007 - 6:32 PM
      I don't know ultrabeat, but I have used Fruity Loops almost exclusively in my last two recordings of
      abstract electronica ( "Purple Hand" and the soon to be released "Orange").

      Fruity Loops or FLStudio as they are now calling it, began life as a simple drum machine, sample sequencer
      styled program with an interface much like the old Roland TR808 paradigm.

      The company, however, has been extremely aggressive about adding feature after feature to the program in the last
      four releases so that now, there is extensive midi sequencing possible, drum machine graphic interface sequencing,
      Vst and Vsti instruments, a pretty sophisticated mixer with many different routing possibilities and the ability to
      record all movements made in a real time mix of a program (like Logic, Cubase, Digital Performer, Sonar, et. al.)

      What separates the program from many, however, is the fact that you have massive non-destructive editing capabilities
      of all the sounds you use which makes extremely radical and very, very rapid sound design possible.

      In older days, I would use a sound editor (Sound Forge) with a looping program (Acid) or sequencer program (Cubase)
      and do all of my sound design inside of Sound Forge...........now I don't even bother with Sound Forge anymore (with the exception
      of final mastering stages and dithering because Fruity Loops has become so powerful.

      With every sample (with out affecting the tempo of a piece) you can change it's pitch over a whopping 9 octaves instantaneously,
      you have extensive ADSR capabilities, delays that you can control the cutoff, resonance, pitch, panning, velocity, and feedback (c,r, p,p,v f) of
      in real time, extensive randomization algorithms of c,r, p,p, v, f and extensive randomization of note placement that all have variable
      constraints built into them. This means I can constrain the number of notes in a pattern (one measure of a drum or melodic pattern),
      the octave (or octaves) they are in, and also, which scales they are playing (with an extensive set of chords and different world music scales).
      There is also a 'CUT' and 'CUT BY' function where you can assign any instrument (or multiple instruments) a number which will allow it to
      cutoff any other insrument that has the identical "CUT BY". This is wonderful for having kick drums cut off backwards cymbal sounds , etc.

      In addition , there is a large graphic interface for you you arrange your different patterns so that you can throw together a song form
      extremely quickly.

      It's so fast in terms of programming, that I can throw together a random 7 minute piece of music that is very, very sophisticated sounding
      in 15 or 20 minutes.

      Additionally, you can export or import any midi sequences (if you want to do more sophisticated sequencing in one of the biggee
      DAWs like Logic, Cubase or Digital Performer).

      You can export whole songs or you can export individual patterns (or even individual samples) which is something I love to do when using a hip proprietary software like Tuareg 2 or Granulab.

      The final thing is that this entire package only costs $150 for the Producers Edition which makes it the most inexpensive DAW that has such extensive capabilities on the entire market AND...........................when you purchase it, you have UPGRADES FOR LIFE!!!!!!!
      I bought version 4.0 and just had my mind blown that I was able to download and register version 7.0 for free.

      I can't say enough things about it. I only wish they would port it to OSX but I don't think it's going to happen.

      I teach digital design on both Mac and Windows and I just wish there was something this cool with a similar paradigm on the Mac.
      I'd be using it if there was but so far, there's nothing quite like it. I say this because it is so much faster to teach someone how to start making sophisticated electronic music on Fruity Loops than any other single program I've found on the Mac side and it's so vastly less expensive than something like Pro Tools, Logic or Digital Performer.

      I give it 5 out of 5 stars (and I have no affiliation , officially , with the company by the way..........I paid for it and I'm a huge fan).

      Try it if you have a new Intel Mac and have Windows to boot into.
      • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

        Sat, December 15, 2007 - 6:39 PM
        while I appreciate your enthusiasm, I have to say that FLStudio, while having come a LONG way in the DAW race, doesn't hold a candle to the newest version of Logic. I used FLstudio for years, but it has some very retarded limitations, such as a COMPLETE inability to do automations on ANY external VST's. then there is the issue of it completely shit-bagging your CPU. Logic Studio 8 simplifies the interface to be on par with FL in ease of use, but it has WAY more headroom & professional mixing & mastering capacity, not to mention that PC's, unless you sink at least $3000 into them, SUCK FOR AUDIO. I was completely anti-Mac for a long time. then they stopped being such an elitist company, dropped the price of Logic & now, they fuckin OWN.

        now, if you really want a virtual drum machine with the step sequencer interface, dude, get REASON, & then use it as a rewire instrument in another DAW, like Logic or Cubase. that's the best advice I can offer.
        • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

          Sun, December 16, 2007 - 12:00 AM
          I have heard complaints of Logic's interface with Rewire instruments (like it's a real pain in the ass to set up). Is this true with 8? I definitely have thoughts of writing and basic sequencing with Ableton and rewiring it into Logic for taking care of the hardcore editing and finalizing part of the process.
        • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

          Sun, December 16, 2007 - 2:26 PM
          Hey Sean , all kudos to how wonderful Logic is (and I've heard wonderful things about it and have no direct knowledge of how great it is)

          but a couple of important questions:



          1) Be honest now, what is the last version of FLStudio producers edition that you have intimate knowledge of?

          2) I've heard from several people that Logic is very labyrinthine and has quite a steep and length learning curve when you are first starting out: Can you comment on that: Again, I don't know the answer to this queery, I just have heard it said many times.

          and a couple of observations about your post:

          1) I do have a fair amount of knowledge about REASON and to advics people to use it instead of FRUITY LOOPS , especially as
          a DRUM MACHINE ORIENTED STEP SEQUENCER is just really ill informed. Fruity Loops is probably one of the simplest and most powerful if not THE most powerful drum machine styled programs that exists on the market in both platforms (or all three if we included Linux). Additionally, the speed with which a beginning beginner can program complex songs with complex song forms and complex sound design is nothing short of astonishing. DAWs like LOGIC, CUBASE, DP et. al. DO have deeper programming abilities , specifically when it comes to VST automation and depth of MIDI editing but they are also vastly more difficult to use right out of the box.

          2) The other thing is that price has to be mentioned here. FL may not be as powerful as Logic, but it costs $150 with a powerful lighter package that sells for $99. The last time I checked, LOGIC was about 5 or 6 times as expensive. Additionally, if you are on a budget,
          and you have been using a PC, you are going to have to shell out at least another grand or much more for a new IMac, Macbook or Macbook PRO.

          3) your contention that you need to sink at least $3000 into a PC suck for audio is extremely ill informed. I'm using a 2.4 ghz P4 processor with 2 gigs of memory that was specifically designed for digital audio by Daniel Thomas, the brilliant producer who puts out mostly
          world music oriented collaborative recordings (he's had several chart successes in Europe and Asia with people like Bob Brozman, Martin Simpson, et. al.). This entire system cost me about a thousand bucks and it runs 24 tracks of 24bit 96khz of audio in Cubase flawlessly.
          And this system is archaic compared to what's out their.........it's a single processor system.

          Any day of the week you can buy a rompin' stompin' PC from FRY's for $600-$800 that has dual processors, much faster processing speeds than the system I own currently.

          I'm reallly glad you love your Mac setup. The new intel macs are really incredible and provide one with the best of both worlds with their ability to boot OSX and Win XP or Vista (still funky for audio imho.......I'd say wait for service pack 2 before installing it for audio).

          You have no quibble there, but it's a little dangerous bashing any PC system when you seem not to be either informed of current conditions in that world or currently running such a system professionally.

          With respect, Rick




          • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

            Mon, December 17, 2007 - 12:26 AM
            Hey, Rick...love your response & your points. the last version of FL i was intimately working with was 7. I can tell you this about Logic: the price is now $500 & it is a full 32gb suite of software & plugins & sample packs. & the interface has been simplified tremendously. in regards to my opinions of PC's, they are simply from my personal experience, & having had a good amount of exposure to Macs at school, I became a convert. I was very anti mac for quite some time. & 1 point I found where you where ill informed...you can now get a mac mini for about $500...it's not the big guns, but it will run any DAW you feed it. for me, there have been several factors to my switching teams,as it were. 1st, I have a Dell Inspiron 8500 P4 2.4ghz with 2 gb ram & XP. pretty much top of the line for it's time, it's almost 4 years old. well, since I use my computer for email/internet stuff, it has gotten swamped with all kinds of nasty shit, & it's simply no longer worth it for me to keep dumping money into it when I can use my student aid money on a new duo core iMac & Logic 8. & believe me, man, I am the first one to argue that there shouldn't be any exclusivity in any of this. all of these programs should be freely usable on any computer, in my opinion. but until that happens, for what I do with MIDI Production, & what I intend to do in the future, a Mac is simply the better choice. Cheers!!!
            • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

              Mon, December 17, 2007 - 3:09 AM
              Your machine would work great for you for many audio related things (even if you just used it as a sound design work station)
              if you'd just take it offline.

              Windows just sucks primarily because Gates and Microsoft have been so arrogant and done so much to retard the growth of the
              PC with their virtual monopoly operating system. Consequently, everyone in the world tries to take them down and they are vulnerable to so much spy ware, adware, malware and viruses.

              Take that puppy offline, Sean and you'll have a nice machine for many different things................you can even use Midi from your Mac to run
              things on your PC.

              I'm not in the least anti-Mac (though I think sometimes they are financially elitists but that seems to be changing in the last couple of years).

              The thing is , that the PC has wonderful tools and to dismiss it out of hand just doesn't make sense.

              Unless you are using a new Intel Mac (where you can have the option of both operating systems for audio design), the fact still remains that their is roughly 20 times as many VST and VSTis being developed for Windows as for OSX and most of this is freeware or very inexpensive shareware.

              Glad you love your system and that you love Logic.................................in fact, I'm very close to buying either a Macbook or a Macbook pro
              for my live looping and live video performance purposes so i'll be closer to you soon.

              It's all good, though, and unbelievable music is being made on both Macs and on PCs, including out of date ones like mine and yours.

              Peace!
              • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

                Mon, December 17, 2007 - 3:49 PM
                trust me, Rick, if I could afford not to use it online, I wouldn't. but the fact is that I rely on this machine as my primary vehicle of communications.simple matter of economic logistics. the city where I live has free WiFi city-wide, & I have a lot of friends in different parts of the world that I would be unable to stay in touch with otherwise. I am currently, for the most part, a broke ass college student...I just happen to be fortunate in that the student loan people are giving me a computer allowance in about 2 weeks, so I am finally getting a dedicated audio production computer, thusly keeping this one free for downloading samples, plugins, etc. & I will eventually probably chain the 2 together to run the Windows-only VST's I have on this one. I wholeheartedly agree with your points about Microsoft & Apple...the thing that I think sucks the worst about so much being aimed at taking Microsoft down is that Microsoft are not the ones who suffer from it...quite the opposite...they make a nice chunk of change every time a paying customer gets plagued with this crap. & another simple fact is, I have yet to here of even one successful virus or malware infection of the Mac OS. to me, it makes this decision a no brainer as far as economics is concerned...yeah, the price of the initial investment may be higher with a Mac, but in the long run, you pay less if you are not having to dump hundreds to thousands of dollars in Patches & Antivirus programs. Really, when it comes down to it, there is no universal correct answer. each individual needs to assess for themselves what the best route is. I went the PC route for years, & it consistently left much to be desired. & I should point out that were it not for my experience with FL Studio, I would not have nearly the grasp on MIDI & Sequencing that I do...it was a GREAT set of 'training wheels'...& even, I came to realize, helped me to understand how to read & write musical notation...& I would **HIGHLY** recommend it to ANYONE who desires to get into making music & doesn't have any previous experience. in that context, I agree that it is superior in it's ease of use, no question. I simply found myself after 3 years outgrowing it's limitations.
                • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

                  Tue, December 18, 2007 - 8:45 AM
                  oh yeah...one point I missed...I only suggested Reason as an alternative because A) it's cross platform...runs on either Mac or Windows & B) the Redrum interface is a simple, 16th note step sequencer, just like FL, only with more complex capabilities. since there is no Mac counterpart to FL, I see it as the closest thing for a mac.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

                    Tue, December 18, 2007 - 11:50 PM
                    Yeah, Sean, I hear you about the financially challenged student position that you are in...............I make all of my living
                    from my artistry which is no mean feat in today's economic and artistic climate in the US so I feel you there.

                    For what it's worth, given how sucky the whole spyware/virus situation of PCs, here's what I've done that seems really effective:

                    1) I don't use any microsoft software, if at all possible. Many of the viruses out there target specific browsers.
                    Use Mozilla for everything...............it's free and it rocks for both a browser and an e-mail client
                    2) NEVER open up attachments. PERIOD. POINT. DOT!!!!!! (if a friend sends you something, make sure you
                    connect with them about it a second time to insure that there machine hasn't been hijacked.
                    3) Run Spybot, Search and Destroy regularly (it's free and awesome)
                    4) Do spend money on a good anti virus program (a necessary evil if you are going to be online
                    I can highly recommend Bit Defender.............it has high marks and it's cheaper than a lot of the anti-virus programs.
                    5) Beware of P2P, and torrent downloads...............they are full of spyware and browser hijackers
                    This is also true of sample packs you get from friends. Frequently, they have come off the web and are infected.

                    Hope that helps and good luck with your new Mac.
                    • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

                      Thu, December 20, 2007 - 4:45 PM
                      I think that disconnecting from the internet when you are doing audio production is a good idea... as well as turning off the anti-virus software. those programs usually have various levels of security... but they tend to check everything in real-time... which can slow down the processor considerably.
  • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

    Thu, December 20, 2007 - 4:39 PM

    "such as a COMPLETE inability to do automations on ANY external VST's. then there is the issue of it completely shit-bagging your CPU"

    Which as such... is completely not true. On the top left window, click the file button, go to "last tweaked parameter", go to edit events or link to controller - then its up to you to choose whichever of the 3 different ways there are you can do automation. Don't blame FL when its the VSTi that doesn't support FL's interface code and thus doesn't give you the right click functionality you want. With one more click you have on your screen a menu with everything you could ever want to do on one menu.

    Look, its time everyone shuts the hell up about comparing the softare. Music is art, talking about which software is better is like argueing about what kind of paint is better. it doesn't matter, its just the tools you have to work with. Choose the ones you are most comfortable with and get at it - remember that most of the classics of the genre were created on 32mb samplers and the most ghetto sequencing software you can imagine.

    I use FL because its very quick and easy to work with and I work much faster with its interface than I do with other software.



    "then there is the issue of it completely shit-bagging your CPU."

    Click the file button on the fx plugin, fx track, or synth, click "smart disable". CPU cycles from the vsti's are paused when not in use, just like how Reason works.

    You not being good with the software doesn't mean the software isn't good. Since a few years (FL 5) the software offers you everything the other Daws have (and nothing you can't get through plugins), but with its own simplified interface that doesn't throw a million windows at you. What I like most about it is that there are so many ways to do the same thing, pick what you are most comfortable with..
    • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

      Thu, December 20, 2007 - 5:08 PM
      that, I did not know...I puzzled with those things for a LONG time, & even called in for some advice from others with more experience at the time, & we just couldn't figure them out. thanks for the feedback.
      • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

        Thu, December 20, 2007 - 9:59 PM
        Well, follow Bobby's advice Sean, or go to the Fruity Loops tribe and
        ask ANY question of Pete Lastname who knows as much about Fruity Loops as anyone
        I know.

        And thanks, Bobby, for setting the record straight. I knew what you said was true but just didn't know
        how to explain how do what you pointed out.

        And, at the age of 20. for you to say what you say about software merely being a tool...................that the art that comes out
        is what's important is extremely astute (and an opinion that I haven't heard put forth much from someone your age).

        I'm impressed. Thanks for posting.
    • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

      Thu, December 20, 2007 - 11:53 PM
      oh, & just so you know, Logic 8 is a single window interface, with more than I care to type, to let me cut & paste:

      Logic, remastered.

      Logic Pro 8 is the center of Logic Studio, featuring a redesigned interface that makes it easier than ever to write, record, edit, and mix your music.
      Top new features

      * • A redesigned, single-window interface eliminates clutter and lets you focus on your music.
      * • Multi-take management and Quick Swipe Comping dramatically streamline the overdub process.
      * • Powerful audio editing features such as snap-to-transient, graphical time stretching, and sample-accurate editing in the Arrange window let you work faster and with greater precision.
      * • End-to-end surround production includes multichannel tracks, busses, and support for True Surround software instruments and effects.


      What’s in the Box

      * • DVD containing Logic Pro 8, MainStage, Soundtrack Pro 2, Studio Instruments, Studio Effects, WaveBurner 1.5, Compressor 3, Impulse Response Utility, Apple Loops Utility, QuickTime 7 Pro, and required content
      * • Six content DVDs containing Jam Pack collections, sound effects, surround music beds, EXS24 samples, and impulse response files
      * • Demo content DVD
      * • Printed and electronic documentation


      comes with about 46gigs of content & is only $160 more than FL XXL Edition ($110 if you are a student)

      & unlike FL, but like most other DAW programs(excluding Reason), it has very easy, click & drag universal plugin automation capabilities


      pound for pound, dollar for dollar, capability for capability, FL doesn't quite match up...which, was, originally my point. some of my subpoints were admittedly off the mark, but I taught myself 99% of FL without any reference material of any kind, I even composed & produced an entire album in FL. your point about the interface codes for vst's is well taken, but it could be that much easier if FL, like Logic or Cubase, simply automapped it.

      & the one other thing I have personally found, right out of the gate using any DAW, is that with out quite a bit of processing, FL just sounds flat by comparison, & many people I know have also noticed that difference. ultimately, for sound & production quality purposes, it left me wanting for more that I easily found elsewhere. I highly recommend, as I have said countless times before, that anyone interested in learning MIDI & Sequencing start with FL. Logic was until this release one of the more complex interfaces to be found & one of the more expensive, & didn't come with much in the way of plug ins...now it comes with 3 proprietary programs, a whole suite of virtual instruments & processing plugins, & over 32 gigs of samples. while it seems apparent to me that this was influenced in some way by the host of goodies that FL XXL Edition boasts, it also makes it for me a clear, obviously better choice for the money. another big factor is the new price/feature ratio of the new Intel Duo Core iMacs. all-in-one housing for the monitor, hard drive, cpu & superdrive. 5 USB & 2 Firewire ports, 320gb hard drive starting at $1199, with total virus invulnerability. to me, it's simply a better route if you can afford to make that choice.
      • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

        Fri, December 21, 2007 - 2:43 PM
        About the "out of the box" production quality FL offers, this is true and probably the only real difference worth talking about. Though in later versions like FL7 the clarity and output detail has been greatly improved - out of the box its true that you will have a little bit more difficulty getting a clean fat sound

        But this I'd attribute to experience with production and that FL's presets are not as polished or detailed as Logic or Reasons. The only one with a genuine advantage in quality is cubase which lets you be much more precise and somehow its audio engine just sounds better [we're talking out of the box here] - but for any serious production you will have to do your own work to get the quality and vibrancy you want and in the end it again boils down to the artist and their experience working with sound.

        I guess I'll explain my stance, which is that I agree all these softwares are great and each has its own perk, I'll come out to defend FL when there are misconceptions about it... Like it does actually automap midi that supports smart learn... you do the link to controller thing and just turn the knob or move the slider on your controller and its mapped - you can even do this via hotkey so you never even have to click anything...

        Anyhow there are tons of features and productivity features in the program that aren't on the immediate interface - much of it becomes hotkey work and just using them enough until its second nature - thats what wins for me.

        Whats the best DAW? The one YOU like the most, and you won't know until you try them out solidly. Whatever you can do in other software I bet you anything theres a way to do it in FL to say the least - and really this is true comming from logic, cubase, ableton, anything - the software is so advanced now that they can all do it - my arguement is the one thats the best is the one you are most comfortable working with, aside from interface and so long as you've spent 2 years or so doing this, they really are all interchangable in their functionality. Its only the workflow that is different from program to program.

        I don't know if ill forever use FL, I initially got it because I also heard its the easiest to learn the basics on, but the software has grown with my production knowledge and every time I try to get into cubase or reason I find myself going back to FL if I really want to work on music for musics sake rather than exploring sound engineering.. It just starts to feel like I'm working with my left hand, though I'm sure if i spend the time getting used to it i'd find things to love in that software as well, for the time being I've not ran into a wall with what I can do with FL yet, and its been 5 years so far.

        @Rick: Thanks :)
        You'll find you'll keep encountering surprises like that when talking to people if you let age be any kind of a biasing factor for a persons intellect or motivation... the two just aren't related in my life experience so far
        • Re: logic's 'ultrabeat' vs fruity loops

          Fri, December 21, 2007 - 5:59 PM
          no, don't get me wrong, I'm not an aegist at all...................as a matter of fact, I completely eschew the generally aegist
          paradigm that prevails in many, many people in our culture, particularly as it revolves around the entertainment business.

          However, having produced and let bands, composed, arranged, recorded, toured, published and taught professionally
          for 30 years and having experienced people of different ages as a keen student of human behaviour for all of that time,
          one CAN generalize about behaviour in people. Young artists will, frequently, have a tendency to be more narcissistic
          in their views and likes and dislikes than more experienced artists in my experience.......................that is only natural................
          one does grow in one's life if one is sentient, intelligent and interested in constantly evolving as an artist.

          That doesn't mean, however, that all young people act this way (or that not all older artists are stuck in their ways, inflexible
          and intolerant when it comes to growth, which is a stereotype that is largely born out from my experience).

          The thing about stereotyping or drawing generalizations is that we are making what I would call a 'fuzzy' map of reality.
          You can still get the lay of the land from a 'fuzzy map' and, certainly, a more accurate map is the best map to have.

          So I honestly wasn't trying to make trying to make my generalization a prison that one can't escape from...........but in my experience, you seem wise for your years..............so I hope you can accept the compliment as it was intended.

          and, once dispensed with all that....................what's your music like?

          yours, too , Sean?

          above all things, that is really the coolest thing to talk about in the end, isn't it?

          you can check out my new abstract electronica with the lo fi videos I made using toy video cameras and toy webcams in a
          sort of really lo tech 'animating' way at

          www.youtube.com/looppool

          I do much music besides that style of music, however and some of it is up at my website:

          www.looppool.info

          and here's my bio (which desperately needs updating)
          www.looppool.info/bio.html

          Happy Holidays all!

Recent topics in "Digital Audio Arts"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
DVDs to Quicktime Bobby 1 May 1, 2008
Updating my old Pro Tools Jose 1 April 16, 2008
Tenori-on US Launch Events offlineAlia 0 April 3, 2008
Trade Fire Spinning skills for DJ Skillz (-_-)Jason(-_-) 0 March 26, 2008