The First Four Circuits as Narrative Archetype

topic posted Mon, February 6, 2006 - 6:42 PM by  Heresiarch
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
RAW used the crew of the original Star Trek series to illustrate the four terrestrial circuits:
Scotty is in charge of bio-survival
McCoy (Bones) always has his emotional undies in a bundle
Spock is the logical computer brain
Kirk uses his socialized adult personality to impress the chicks.

But there's another pop culture model for the first four circuits: the movie, The Wizard of OZ
The Cowardly Lion senses danger everywhere
The heartless Tin Man has no feeling
The Scarecrow is a mental doofus
Dorothy is the socialized adult

Unlike in the Star Trek analogy, the first three circuits are represented here by their deficiency. Once they are activated (when the Wizard dispenses his recognitions to the subhuman characters), they become, in a sense, placated, or satisfied. At that point Dorothy looks to the Wizard for help in returning home. The Wizard's technology, the airborne balloon, points to an extraterrestrial abode. But Dorothy misses the ride on the ET technology, and so reverts to mysticism (the "good" fairy) for solace and ends up back where she started--on Earth among the larvae.
posted by:
Heresiarch
Minneapolis
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: The First Four Circuits as Narrative Archetype

    Mon, February 6, 2006 - 7:21 PM
    Heresiarch - Thanks for posting this OZ analogy which goes beyond the Star Trek model in terms of recognizing deficiencies and then, activating their fulfilmment. Quite brilliant, actually (I am also heavily biased towards the Oz meta-structure which was used in one of my feature films, "Under a Shipwrecked Moon").

    The only part I disagree with or rather, feel compelled to provide an alt-ending for would be the interpretation of the Good Witch. I find the "reversion to mysticism" defintion a bit too simplistic and suggest another more harrowing fate for our beloved, socially-challenged Dorothy.

    The Good Witch seems too good to be true and more likely to represent a warm, shiny usher into Chapel Perilous, than a one-way ticket back to larvaeland which would end our story with a thud. And I want more for our Dorothy.

    Though it certainly appears as if Dorothy has been returned to her earthbound family and cozy mundane life, I think it would be more fun to see this time and place as an illusion of reality, rather than as any "real" reality. A shift that opens the towering arched doors to Chapel Perilous.

    In my book, ANGEL TECH, the chapter on Chapel Perilous finds itself wedged between 4th and 5th circuits as a kind of virtual interpol zone of hungry ghosts and disembodied souls wandering that bardo in a search for re-entry and re-embodiment. And often, without knowing it. As I re-imagine Dorothy returning to her old familiar life as a virtual hologram model, the Chapel Perilous alt-ending makes startling sense.

    As a result, this story is not over. Will our Dorothy awaken to this illusion of reality, a time and place she assumed was real and which continues to appear so very real ? Or will she wander endlessly in her bardo of blind faith and unchecked assumptions ?
    • Re: The First Four Circuits as Narrative Archetype

      Tue, February 7, 2006 - 5:08 PM
      Right. Dorothy is the dreaming naif. Baum wrote many books in the OZ series (and ghostwriters continued after him), but I'm not familiar with Dorothy's ongoing adventures. I must imagine she alternately dreams and wakes, though which world has deeper ontological roots remains unclear. I imagine Dorothy in olde age, vexed by her own imagination. She contemplates what she has been through and decides that she would rather enterain the demons than quell them with Xanax. She drifts off, to sleep among the stars, to wake to another time. Her experiences preserved as data in God's memory. Her soul reports back to Galaxy Central. And gets reassigned. Again. And again. And again.
  • Interestingly, I've seen this in some recent popular TV shows and can't help but wonder if I'm just fitting my map to the territory of if "hollywood" had adapted it as a forumla for success...

    Witness:
    Sex & the City
    Carrie - obsessive neurotic
    Charlotte - emotional romantic
    Miranda - intelligent lawyer
    Samantha - liberated sex-pot

    Desperate Housewives:
    Susan - obsessive neurotic
    Bree - heavily emotionally repressed, has to deal with emotinal issues of loss of husband, homosexual son.
    Lynette - intelligent business woman
    Gabrielle & Edie - sex pistols

    I've never seen an episode of the Sopranos, but I can't help but wonder if they fit a 4 circuit map, too.
    • Good Lord, I think we've stumbled upon a new school of literary analysis.
      • That's right and it's all your fault!
        • I, too, tend to "see" Circuits portrayed as characters in a variety of stories. Stephen Spielberg movies, in my opinion, tend to stick to this formula.

          Jaws
          1) Brody - He just wanted to kill the shark, and had an unspecified anxiety about the ocean throughout the movie.
          2) Quint - He had a macho, bravado about proving himself in being able to kill the shark.
          3) Hooper - He had a scientific curiosity at such a unique specimen.
          4) Mayor - He was more concerned about....well, I guess he was mostly concerned about his own bank roll, but at first I wanted to say he was concerned about public image and the happiness the activities on the island brings to the community.

          Similar breakdown can be seen in Jurrassic Park and his other action oriented films that are not based on historical events. It seems that having a variety of characters, one that is scared, one that is emotional, one that is intellectually curious, and one that is socially engaged, is a great formula that provides the broadest spectrum of viewers an opportunity to identify with someone.
  • Unsu...
     
    How about The Simpsons:

    Homer: first circuit bio-survival, obsessed with food, etc.
    Bart: second circuit territorial brat
    Lisa: third circuit brainiac
    Marge: fourth circuit social caretaker/nag

    Notice the feminist subtext.

    I'd thought about the Wizard of Oz thing before. Other observations: We are introduced to each circuit in descending order: Dorothy (4th) (who is deficient socially, btw, because she's displaced from her home), Scarecrow (3rd), and so on. You have to be broken down before transformation can take place.

    Other symbols: Toto = Sirius (black/dog/guide of sorts). Notice the Wizard's idealized image of himself is virtually identical to Aleister Crowley's "idealized self-portrait" (here: www.hermetic.com/crowley/c...ning.jpg). The yellow brick road is the "golden spiral", the tornado is a black hole, etc. Basically I think the whole film is an allegory of the technological nervous system becoming self-aware. That or the filmmakers (or Baum) were were initiates, having fun at the expense of ignorants. Oh and the munchkins are DMT elves... I could go on, lol.

Recent topics in "The 8-Circuit Brain"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
autism and 8-circuit brain Mushroom Spore 6 January 31, 2010
Sex and the 8-Circuit Brain offlinekatrina 9 December 20, 2009
my new book on the 8-Circuit Brain sherpa 4 October 17, 2009
2nd Circuit and Reichean Therapy offlineBulgakov 26 August 8, 2009