Looks like NASA is reviving the basic battlestar design that didn't work 18 years ago:
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/scien...7116834.stm
But it looks like they will be using some Mars Direct ideas, but no mention of producing return fuel on the surface.
So, Galactica Lite.
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/scien...7116834.stm
But it looks like they will be using some Mars Direct ideas, but no mention of producing return fuel on the surface.
So, Galactica Lite.
-
Re: Son of Battlestar Galactica
Sun, January 13, 2008 - 10:30 PMWhat is the Battlestar design? I didn't see anything about that in the article.
While I think the closed loop idea is interesting, I fail to see why they can't send advance supplies. NASA could put half a dozen resupply ships enroute before and after the Mars explorer leaves. Soft landing supplies is relatively easy compared to a ship full of sensitive instruments and telemetry. Once the crew is ready to leave they could intercept their fuel in orbit. It doesn;t take a huge amount of fuel to get into Mars orbit (compared to earth.)
-
-
Re: Son of Battlestar Galactica
Fri, July 11, 2008 - 1:14 AMWhat is the Battlestar design? I didn't see anything about that in the article.
----------------
its a term used by space geeks to describe ships so large that they are perhaps a bit silly.
---------
better yet, just do a serious reprioritization and go for cruithne first, all the NEOs next, and slowly expand out rock by rock until mars
is next and thus theres a much more local supply line.
mytalktoday.com/forum/forum.php
mytalktoday.com/forum/index.php
-
