Advertisement
Hi again everyone.. im posting this so i can get your views on intoxicants, im not sure how many of you are already on a left hand path.. i would say i am not, but i do have leanings... once after a very heavy salvia divinorum experience i could see prana everywhere, so since then i have been vegan, my question is .... i know the left hand path is fraught with danger, its too easy to fall into that comfort blanket of being intoxicated and thus thinking your on the path so to speak....does it take a certain amount of time or a certain experience till you can " take the plunge" so to speak and partake in intoxicants, do you wait for a guru to guide you? or dive in yourself? i have a hard time envisioning myself eating meat again, unless its human flesh . i have drank in the past though and for some reason that seems less of a "headfirst"...what are your experiences with left hand and intoxicants? do you wait for guidance or what do you wait for ????( if anything) once again all thoughts appreciated
jai shri shakti
jai shri shakti
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, December 15, 2006 - 2:58 PMwhat I find funny is that the more I become devoted to vamamarga the more things I drop from my daily life of the panchamakara. I don't eat beef, I don't drink, I used to use intoxicants heavily but I don't any more.
so things that are not "forbidden" in western life have become "forbidden" substances for me for "coincidental" reasons :) I developed alcoholism and it almost ruined my life. does that mean I would balk at using it in a 5 M's ceremony? absolutely not. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, December 15, 2006 - 3:14 PMthanks for the prompt reply saul , is that a concious choice? i know you have spent some time in india recently, so would the decision to indulge( thats such a lame word) in intoxicants , be a choice you made? or would you " build" upto it via a guru or what you felt was right? -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, December 15, 2006 - 3:33 PMit depends. if a proper Guru put me through the Panchamakara ceremony I would use alcohol. otherwise I wouldn't. other intoxicants I feel could be an adjunct to sadhana if they are respected and do not become a crutch. after all, a lot of Babas stay stoned all day long. I didn't smoke Ganja for many years after being a total stoner but I found that it was very conducive to Puja recently. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, December 15, 2006 - 8:25 PMi must admit i do drink alco, but occasionally and not too much
i do appreciate entheogens
trying to set up the limit of mary jane
the more i meditate i get more balanced
i do practice a mix of yoga, tai-ci, wu-shu and ci-gung
i do eat chicken n fish though
no beef, pork, lamb for about 6 years now
the most important part is that i know my goal - i am on my way
thank you
shanti om -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, December 15, 2006 - 8:52 PMI only refrain from the beef meatwise but I don't eat very much meat anyway. cohabitating with a vegetarian certainly helps. certainly my Goddess enjoys mutton though.
A Bengali Pujari said to my girlfriend in Tarapith, "some Devas, they are veggie... but Devi, She likes the MEAT! Hahahahaha!!!"
as for drugs, if all intoxicants were obstacles to practice, why was Soma used in the Vedas? ;) -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, December 16, 2006 - 9:23 AMThe 5 Ms are about transgression. They have no power on their own, but as devices of transgression, their tantric power lies in the fact they take the sadhaka beyond his/her normal self-definitions. In other words, eating meat or drinking alcohol is not transgressive for most of us, but for a brahmin they were practically deadly as they could cause one to lose caste. It was the intensity of this transgression that made them powerful as tools for sadhana, nothing in the substances themselves.
That said, many left-hand practitioners use psychotropic substances for various reasons, transgressive or otherwise. We are always the Self, whether straight or stoned out of our minds. For some folks, the shakeup caused by ingesting drugs can be transformative and beneficial. For others, they just lose it. It one of the dangers of the left-handed path. My rule: as long as nobody is getting hurt, do what thou will. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Thu, December 21, 2006 - 10:41 AMYou said, "The 5 Ms are about transgression."
That's rather simplifying the issue. Some people have said that. Others have said that the substances themselves are an optimal eucharist. I find the latter to be the case - they are effective at solidifying the exaltation of consciousness even though I myself do not consider them taboo or the act of taking them to be one of transgression. That "transgressive" tantra stuff is a bunch of poo-poo in my opinion.
Peace, Freedom & Happiness,
Adityanath -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Thu, December 21, 2006 - 12:45 PMwhere does Aghora fit into your view, in that case?
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Thu, December 21, 2006 - 5:55 PM> they are effective at solidifying the exaltation of consciousness
*****
That may be. Too bad the Self is hidden in the most mundane consciousness.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, December 17, 2006 - 6:35 AMSadhana without a GURU is sadhana without direction. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, December 17, 2006 - 6:54 AMMany times sadhana occurs irrespective of the direction of a guru. A good guru knows this and lets the sadhana take its course.
Ultimately, Ma is the only guru. Sometimes She supercedes the instruction of Her manifestations. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Tue, December 19, 2006 - 6:27 AMactually all of you agree that without guru guiding in your sadhana you are not supposed to eat meat as once vimalananda said in his first book about the reaction quality of each being.for example he said eating plants and vegetables are better because their reaction capacity is very low and cause very few karmas.but animals they react when they die like us so they might think about cursing us or the butcher who eats the animals.thus they cause karmas.so i conclude that everything is about karmas.even vimalananda used to say that many practioners would lose their wits thinking about their karmas and their current cause of karma at each step.he said one has to worry but one can also cleanse him/herself of it.offcourse actually he also mentioned the panchamkara sacrifice has nothing to do with meat or anything it has something to do with our own bodies the 5 m's even yogananda mentioned about it when he learnt aghora that beef is nothing but the upper lip or something like that intoxiant is the amrita the necter and such and such.but that does not mean that one should not do this sadhana without meat and liquor there are many ways in each sadhana itself. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Tue, December 19, 2006 - 10:17 AMMy experience agrees with what you say Jody. all of it in this discussion. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Tue, December 19, 2006 - 10:48 AM> My experience agrees with what you say Jody
*****
Yeah, I've found that experience will trump mythological conjecture every time.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Tue, December 26, 2006 - 3:24 AMBottomline of the panchamakara is to understand the tattwas associated with each of the ingredients used.Whether its meat or fish or alcohol there is a tattwa or an element associated with it. So if alcohol or sex is performed without the realisation of that tattwa then it becomes a mere mundane act which also has its share of karmas. Hence a qualified guru can only teach the right way of doing the pancha makara. For starters let me tell you that even in the simple act of drinking alcohol, some mantras need to be chanted to keep the karma of consuming it at bay. By merely drinking and doing japa or other sadhana cud help then half the drunkards or sex maniacs wud have been enlightened by now...:)
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 2, 2007 - 2:05 PMI still eat meat everyday but sometimes I get these weird psychometric responses.But I am very sensitive about the quality of the meat.As for Alcohol,I am almost immune to it but I dont like it anymore.I like to take about 16 OZ. of some fresh oysters,some Hamburger and lots of cherry coke with some excellent Ganja.I can just tune into things before I consume them.You have to use a great deal of mantra no matter what you do.at least an hour a day.of course,you should have great compassion for everyone which is a kind of yoga itself. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 3, 2007 - 11:34 AM<<<Sadhana without a GURU is sadhana without direction.>>>
I don't agree. When you say "Guru" do you mean a human?
Because my greatest gurus have been plants.
Humans, to me, stand in the way of Transmission of Truth.
I read that Adi Nath had over 24 gurus, and most of them
were "inanimate" objects lol
The whole world is my guru.
When everything around you is your guru, it's hard to
imagine thinking that you need a certain person with
a certain status to be your guide.
As for meat and alcohol, meat is forbidden to be consumed
by brahmins especially, but from a young age at school
if i didn't eat meat or drink milk I would go hungry.
So I went hungry lol
gave my chicken burger to the fat kid next to me,
and ate my kiwi with a smile :)
its not an ethical thing for me, i just don't like meat.
i like maintaining an etheric composition, so i eat
mostly raw fruits and drink lots of water.
Power plants are excellent on the path of self-realization.
herbs and other plants that put one in a higher state of consciousness
are considered sattvic, nectar, the purest foods, along with
water, air, and sunlight.
I'm drinking a beer right now lol :)
the way i see it is that everything comes from Shiva (for lack of a better word),
everything IS Shiva, so there's no need to accept something and reject
something else. Put whatever you want in your body as long as
it doesn't hurt you or others in the process.
peace
Om -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 3, 2007 - 1:52 PM> Put whatever you want in your body as long as it doesn't hurt you or others in the process.
*****
Amen!
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 1:21 PMThat's all fine and good, but Aghora and real Tantra especially Vamagara, and other paths that include wild rituals it's essential to have a Guru or else you will die or go mad, or worse. It's as simple as that. A real Guru, with a real lineage go all the way back to Shiva and Shakti. There are very few cases where one can succeed at very serious spiritual practice without the Guru, only some are born fully awakened and empowered. For the rest, there has to be an awakening and empowerment from a qualified Guru who can actually be called a hand of Maa and Shiva. Someone who causes the mind to quiet in their presence, whose every second of life can be seen as a miracle, and power and light radiates from them. This is exceedingly rare, especially in Kali Yuga. Sadhana during this time is very difficult so it's best to use a lightening path of awakening like Tantra, but you can't just jolt your Shakti into power and awareness without a Guru to protect you, otherwise your whole aura will be blown out, your nadis will be damaged, and even physical death and other problems can occur. The Tantras say that to practice Tantra Sadhana without the guidance of a qualified guru is a quick and sure way to meet death and a straight passage to hell (And I am sure since it's in twilight language that the word hell can mean all sorts of various sufferings of the Mind, Body, and Spirit). So people can say that they have a deity as a Guru, or they pray to dead Gurus, that they are guided by plants or what have your as most do here in America and other places neo-tantra and other such practices are prevelant, but nothing compares to a real Gurudev who can totally break your ego down, empower you, and show you to the water so you can drink which is also scriptural. But whatever Sadhana or Tantra, or Yoga you practice without a Guru, is simply NOT Sadhana, Tantra, or Yoga. In most cases it is just foolishness and dangerous behavior. Everything around you can also be a product of your own Maya and Self-Delusion, so let's hope that when you say everything around you is your Guru, that you are one of the rare few people who walk around fully awakened and need no mortal Guru. But even that is a far cry, even Gods, Rishis, and Munis have Gurus. And no offense, but I think it's silly to even compare yourself or most other human beings to a Nath. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 2:14 PM
Thank you for posting..
I couldn't agree with you more Rasa. It is an extremely dangerous path even with a real Guru..
and searching for information on Kundalini derangement which is very common when not taking the proper precautions that you mentioned, will bring up almost no results ... many western Tantriks think K awakening is all fun and pleasure and much information out there pimps it as such.. some even play it up as a buzz word for kinky sexual practices... all BS of course... but when or if Kundalini derangement takes place, I have been told that there could be untold years or even lifetimes of madness...
free will allows us to make such decisions, I'm all for free will, when we have free will that is... mad people, unfortunately are slaves to their derangement...
Om Shanti !
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 4:18 PM> Aghora and real Tantra especially Vamagara, and other paths that include wild rituals it's essential to have a Guru or else you will die or go mad, or worse. It's as simple as that.
*****
That's the standard boilerplate flimflamming gurus use to collect your money and devotion. The fact is that as long as you are sincere and surrendered, Ma (or your personal Ishta Devata) can function as your guru completely apart from the existence of any physical teachers. If you don't feel you need your hand held, don't go to a professional hand-holder.
> A real Guru, with a real lineage go all the way back to Shiva and Shakti
*****
I think it's just as mad to believe there was an actual Shiva and Shakti to start anything. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 1:48 PMIt's mad to think there was a Shiva or Shakti to start anything? Then what is this you talking of Ishta Devas and Maa!? How dare you question their existance, and question the usage of a Gurudev which is thousands of years old! You are just like all the other Americans that cannot understand our ways and slander Gurus because Americans are all out for money and that's where fake gurus come is here to America where people are greedy so they can make money, so you slander the entire thing. Shakti is Maa, and every other Ishta Devata. You clearly have no clue what you are talking about. Why even post here on Aghora which is a tradition that STRICTLY requires a Guru. Do you think real Aghoris and mystics in India go around babbling all this New Age foolishness about not needing a Gurudev? How silly to talk about having an Ishta Devata and say that Shiva and Shakti never existed. Just another pompous American who thinks they can understand ancient Indian mystical practice and question a culture and spiritual REALITY that has been present for untold eons. Please, if you want to discuss spirituality you are best discussing it at some vegetarian pot luck at some New Age event... This kind of talk and foolishness is an anathema to the very foundation and golden spiritual lineages that have been present for thousands and thousands of years, and it is also very egotistical and self-deluded. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 2:07 PMheh! Jody at a new age potluck... now there's an image that makes the mind reel...
might be entertaining tho!
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 2:20 PM> Then what is this you talking of Ishta Devas and Maa!?
*****
It is one thing to observe and come into relationship with the universe, coming up with names like Shiva, Kali, Atman, Brahman, etc. to help us understand, but it is entirely another thing to believe that these depictions of reality were actually flesh and blood humans.
> How dare you question their existance, and question the usage of a Gurudev which is thousands of years old!
*****
The story of Genesis is thousands of years old. Do you believe all human beings are descended from Adam and Eve?
> fake gurus come is here to America where people are greedy so they can make money, so you slander the entire thing.
*****
So, because we are greedy Americans, we're to blame for greedy Indian gurus who come to take our money? It's more a function of our lack of critical thinking, if you asked me.
> Shakti is Maa, and every other Ishta Devata.
*****
I'm in full agreement. But again, Shakti as the motive principle of Reality and Shakti as a figment of myth (as a human incarnation) are two different things.
> Why even post here on Aghora which is a tradition that STRICTLY requires a Guru.
*****
That is only your opinion.
> Do you think real Aghoris and mystics in India go around babbling all this New Age foolishness about not needing a Gurudev?
*****
That depends on whether they had a guru themselves. Just because a tradition holds certain ideas doesn't mean that tradition can't work outside those ideas. In my opinion, what makes Aghora a powerful transformational practice is the transgressing of one's identifications, those fetters which tie us to our idea of ourselves outside a recognition of our truth as the Atman. I agree that you can mess yourself up real good, but I also maintain that if one throws the whole thing into Ma's hands, things will work out as She wills. We just can't count on that conforming to any expectations we might have.
> How silly to talk about having an Ishta Devata and say that Shiva and Shakti never existed.
*****
I find it much sillier to accept ancient myth as historical fact.
> This kind of talk and foolishness is an anathema to the very foundation and golden spiritual lineages that have been present for thousands and thousands of years, and it is also very egotistical and self-deluded.
*****
Being old is not a credential for anything other than being old. To believe in fairy tales as if literally true is also quite self-deluded, in my book. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:12 AM*It is one thing to observe and come into relationship with the universe, coming up with names like Shiva, Kali, Atman, Brahman, etc. to help us understand, but it is entirely another thing to believe that these depictions of reality were actually flesh and blood humans. *
I agree. That is what I am talking about. And when I say Shiva and Shakti were the original gurus I am not necessarily saying it was in flesh and blood to a certain degree. But when you consider all sentient beings are emanations of Shakti, they very well could have been manifesting themselves in certain people or creatures or forms or whatever and passed down knowledge that way of how humans can attain higher levels.
*The story of Genesis is thousands of years old. Do you believe all human beings are descended from Adam and Eve? *
I can't deny it's existence, I wasn't there.
*So, because we are greedy Americans, we're to blame for greedy Indian gurus who come to take our money? It's more a function of our lack of critical thinking, if you asked me. *
People attract those in common. Peopleoften go to India to find God, people often come to America to make money.
**I'm in full agreement. But again, Shakti as the motive principle of Reality and Shakti as a figment of myth (as a human incarnation) are two different things. **
Again... Shakti is the eternal cause, everything that moves and is unmoving. She is every sentient being. We are all physical manifestations by her power. I do not doubt the power of the Cosmic Mother to incarnate in any form or live for even a few moments in any form she pleases. Don't let practical and logical thinking overrun the possibilities of the spiritual awareness. All things are possible in the Universe. and when it comes to stories of Gods, I believe many serve as an example and have different meanings, but I also can say that I was not there, so I can't say for sure whether Jesus, or Krishna, or Shiva, or Buddha or any of the supposed incarnations actually happened or not. But I will say that from the miracles I have seen in my own life through the power and will of God, that I really don't doubt anything anymore. I have seen Maa do so many things that blow my mind each and every minute of every day. She upholds and maintains every force in the universe, it's much more likely to comprehend rhe ability of a person becoming or incarnating as divine than to even comprehend all the cosmic functions of Maa.
*That is only your opinion. *
To say it's my opinion is a bit of a stretch. I can gurantee that 90% of mystics, sadhus, tantrikas, and Aghoris will tell you that they had a guru. And their Guru will tell you they had a guru, and so forth. Just going to my Guruji who is a Samrat of Tantra, answers that for me... Not to mention the scriptures, and writings of those who genuinely delve into that sort of esoteric practice.
I don't think it is necessary to live to have a Gurudev, but in my culture... It is thought of like this. Your mother and father teach you your first steps and how to walk and talk, etc. in the world when you are born because it's a new world to you. To think you can just march into the spiritual world and already know how to walk and talk with deities and spirits and be able to de-condition your mind of social constructs without someone to help you build it back is just mad. A person raised in the forest by animals cannot just come into society and expect to get around. Likewise a person with social condtioning and no idea of spiritual things, can't just march into the spiritual real and expect to find liberation. Do you know how many power thirsty spirits and deities that are out there that will take you for all you got? Just ask any aghori who has sat in the Smashan over night for just one night. Have you ever spent the night in the Smashan? Because let me tell you what, you don't just go into the Smashan without guidance and expect to get something easy.
**That depends on whether they had a guru themselves. Just because a tradition holds certain ideas doesn't mean that tradition can't work outside those ideas. In my opinion, what makes Aghora a powerful transformational practice is the transgressing of one's identifications, those fetters which tie us to our idea of ourselves outside a recognition of our truth as the Atman. I agree that you can mess yourself up real good, but I also maintain that if one throws the whole thing into Ma's hands, things will work out as She wills. We just can't count on that conforming to any expectations we might have.*
I agree about transgressing, very much so. And I agree that you can think outside the tradition sometimes. But it is very few and far between that you find a person who is of Vira or Divya nature naturally without a Guru and plenty of Sadhana. Most in this Yuga are Pashu. The Pashu cannot understand and have the strength to transgress the herd without having a mental break down. That is why they are Pashu. Most people in this Yuga are Pashu, and they follow the herd. They have no strength or independence, and the damn for sure do not have the power to transgress the herd and become awakened by Maa's Grace alone. In order for Maa to guide you in that way you have to turn your divine spark into a blazing fire with bhakti and sadhana so much so that Maa or whatever your Ishtadevata is can actually physically manifest through your Kundalini Shakti, to the point where you practically, if not ARE that deitty on Earth. That is a very important part of Tantra. And that is how Ishtadevatas come to Earth is through the kundalini identifying with the devata through intense and since devotion. To find that kind of devotion is rare, that is why everyone is not Jesus or Shiva, or Maa walking around. Only very few reach this state of becoming Sambhava.
*I find it much sillier to accept ancient myth as historical fact. *
And I find it silly that you speak of transgression and you do not have the frame of mind that accepts all possibilities ;-)
*Being old is not a credential for anything other than being old. To believe in fairy tales as if literally true is also quite self-deluded, in my book.*
An old person has an advantage in society over a baby. An old tradition has more chances of survival than a new one. An old practice has more chance of perfection because of the time factor. People will never wake up until they tap their ancient roots. I respect very much my elders, which is not something common in your culture. In my culture, the elderly to be upmost respected not just because they are OLD, but because they are wise, and some are likely to be powerful in some way or another. They are consulted for all the things our generation has forgotten and do not understand. Elders guide and tend to the young so that they can take part in the cycle and do it with skill.
I don't want to argue with you. I am not an argumentative person. I am just very taken aback by Americans who claim to understand my cultures they have never really been exposed to except through books and magazines, and internet and then piece together their own lack of culture with snippets of other cultures, and then refute ancient traditions, cultures, and spiritualities as if they really know what they are talking about. It's very pompous. All of this Neo-tantra is all well and good for new age floozies and couples who want to reclaim their sex lfe, but when it comes to real Tantra, new age needs to stay out of it. They all proudly proclaim they dont need gurus, and that life or drugs or whatever will show them the truth, and then they come to our Gurudevs when their Kundalinis have ruptured a whole in their aura and they feel as though they are going mad and dying. Trust me I have seen it.
Maa does work through them for sure, because she teaches them a very important spiritual lesson that Americans tend to leave out of everything in life which is respect for that which you do not understand and humility towards everything from a dog to a deity.
May Maa always keep you in her blessed lap, sweet child. And it has been nice to speak with you. I have learned from you and I hope you have maybe learned something from me. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 8:31 AM> when I say Shiva and Shakti were the original gurus I am not necessarily saying it was in flesh and blood to a certain degree.
*****
Thank goodness for that.
> But when you consider all sentient beings are emanations of Shakti, they very well could have been manifesting themselves in certain people or creatures or forms or whatever and passed down knowledge that way of how humans can attain higher levels.
*****
That's a quaint belief. I believe that Shakti is equally manifested, at all times, in all people, places and things. If we believe there is more Shakti here or there, that's because we are projecting Her to be more here or there.
I'd also recommend throwing the "higher levels" thing clear out of the windows. This is it, Rasa. It's right here, right now, closer than your own breath, as if it were on the tip of your nose.
> I can't deny [the fact of the story of Genesis'] existence, I wasn't there.
*****
So, because you weren't there, you don't deny dragons ravaging the English countryside during the Dark Ages, either?
> Peopleoften go to India to find God, people often come to America to make money.
*****
You didn't answer the question. Are you blaming Americans for greedy gurus? That's like blaming the Iraqis for George Bush.
> Again... Shakti is the eternal cause, everything that moves and is unmoving. She is every sentient being. We are all physical manifestations by her power. I do not doubt the power of the Cosmic Mother to incarnate in any form or live for even a few moments in any form she pleases.
*****
It's one thing to say Shakti is the eternal cause, it's quite another, indeed, WAY another, to anthropomorphize her outside your own personal conception of her. Just because She's in all doesn't mean She's going to come out in some like some Cosmic Lady hippie.
> Don't let practical and logical thinking overrun the possibilities of the spiritual awareness.
*****
Don't mistake the ephemera of spiritual experience to mean anything at all in terms of real spiritual awareness.
> I will say that from the miracles I have seen in my own life through the power and will of God, that I really don't doubt anything anymore.
*****
Do you doubt that your miracles are anything other than constructions of your own ideology, belief and favorable interpretation of your subjective experience?
> it's much more likely to comprehend rhe ability of a person becoming or incarnating as divine than to even comprehend all the cosmic functions of Maa.
*****
To someone who claims to become divine, perhaps.
> I can gurantee that 90% of mystics, sadhus, tantrikas, and Aghoris will tell you that they had a guru.
*****
And the 10% who didn't, are they false in some way?
> And their Guru will tell you they had a guru, and so forth.
*****
And that means that there's a magic string of magic power stretching all the way to Shiva? That sounds hooky and cartoony to me.
> Not to mention the scriptures, and writings of those who genuinely delve into that sort of esoteric practice.
*****
Often in esoteric religion, what they write has absolutely nothing to do with what they are doing.
> Do you know how many power thirsty spirits and deities that are out there that will take you for all you got?
*****
They can have whatever they want of me. All is Ma.
> you don't just go into the Smashan without guidance and expect to get something easy.
*****
I want nothing from nobody, so there's no need to go there.
> I agree about transgressing, very much so. And I agree that you can think outside the tradition sometimes. But it is very few and far between that you find a person who is of Vira or Divya nature naturally without a Guru and plenty of Sadhana.
*****
Technical terms are meaningless to me, Rasa. If one is truly sincere, from the bottom to the top of their heart, they can do whatever they want in the spiritual realm. It is that sincerity that carries the power, not austerities, magic rituals or potions, or sitting on dead people's ashes while playing with imaginal reality.
> In order for Maa to guide you in that way you have to turn your divine spark into a blazing fire with bhakti and sadhana so much so that Maa or whatever your Ishtadevata is can actually physically manifest through your Kundalini Shakti
****
You mean "Ma has to turn your spark into a fire." She does everything. I do nothing (except question folks' beliefs online.)
> Only very few reach this state of becoming Sambhava.
*****
More quaint belief.
> I find it silly that you speak of transgression and you do not have the frame of mind that accepts all possibilities ;-)
*****
I accept all possibilities for everyone *in their own subjective envelope.* However, these ideas and beliefs do not qualify as cosmologies that explain everything to all. In other words, it's your boat, float in it. Just don't think your boat carries everyone to the other shore. There are literally millions of boats, and they all work equally well when you're equipped with paddles made of sincerity.
> An old practice has more chance of perfection because of the time factor.
*****
Or, it institutionalizes ignorance into cement overshoes, weighing down millions with ludicrous notions of spiritual magic and powers.
> some are likely to be powerful in some way or another.
*****
Power and poop. It's all the same to me.
> I hope you have maybe learned something from me.
*****
Not really, but that's no commentary on what you believe you know. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:36 PMI don't wish to further this conversation. I am no longer going to discuss my culture and beliefs so openly with an American who highly misunderstands, and is disrespectful of my culture. It is clear you are not initiated into Tantra, and that you want to discuss what it means is fine, but you will never fully understand it until you go there. It's just not worth it. You have your opinions, that is fine. It is also constructions of your own inhibited beliefs just as much you think the same of me. So it's been a pleasure again, and many blessings of Maa to you. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 2:39 PM> It is clear you are not initiated into Tantra
*****
You mean: "you don't appear to be initiated into *my idea* of what Tantra is, and since I live in the East, I know more than you."
Which is perfectly fine for you to think. However, I will say that I have been initiated into tantric shaktism by a more-than-qualified guru. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 3:04 PMWhy would you need to be initiated more than once or have more than one Guru? -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 3:10 PM> Why would you need to be initiated more than once or have more than one Guru?
*****
There's my initiation guru and my inquiry guru. I don't why. It was never my intention.
I took initiation at some point, and then ended up in therapy with a Sufi. In my time with him, he clearly functioned as a guru, especially in the end, even though I didn't have a thing to do with his lineage and those teachings. That said, the conclusions of this particular Sufi ideology are very similar to the conclusions reached by the progenitors of my lineage.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 3:16 PMNo that's not what I mean at all. I never said where I was from or live. You are just assuming to know where I am from or live. And it's not that really, it's just that you are not the only American male with a logical awareness and disregard for people's simple beliefs as old fashioned and irrelevant. AS a woman, above all, regardless of where I am from, or what I believe, it's easier for me to tap into absolute illogical thinking (illogical by society's standards) and live a magical life. Whether or not it's my construction or not, or whether these tales are allegorical or not, I don't think that they are without good reason, and I respect them. I totally believe in questioning things and pursuit of knowledge but on another hand I believe in blind and total absorbed devotion, and disregard for scientific and logical thinking because it taints the mind. I believe in being a child of Maa, and taking a child like approach to life. I believe in living un-tainted by what society thinks I should think or do with my life, and what I should believe. I believe in all kinds of possibilities, and that makes everything possible. To a child all things are possible when they have not been tainted by society and logical thinking. To assume you know anything and to explain everything logically, and deny things that seem miraculous and assume they are wives tales, and the constructions of people's imagination would mean that no miracles are possible, there is no God, and we are all here by accident. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 3:29 PM> you are not the only American male with a logical awareness and disregard for people's simple beliefs as old fashioned and irrelevant.
*****
You are not the only female (or male) that isn't quite getting the gist of what I'm saying.
> AS a woman, above all, regardless of where I am from, or what I believe, it's easier for me to tap into absolute illogical thinking (illogical by society's standards) and live a magical life.
*****
I'd disagree that your being a woman has much to do with that. Yes, female brains are more emotionally wired, but that doesn't mean you don't have the capacity for discrimination. Look at all the female scientists. Are they aberrations of womanhood?
> I don't think that they are without good reason, and I respect them.
*****
I respect the fact that myths carry a strong attraction for some. I also respect that they can be perfectly adequate vessels to assist as maps on one's path. However, they are just the mapped paths. There are a practically infinite number of unmapped paths, depending on how Ma chooses for you to walk them, imo.
> I believe in blind and total absorbed devotion, and disregard for scientific and logical thinking because it taints the mind.
*****
That's too bad. I've found you can have blind and total absorbed devotion *and* a critical perspective on one's experiences.
> I believe in being a child of Maa, and taking a child like approach to life.
*****
What you are calling innocent, I would label infantile. Not that I'm a Christian, but Jesus said, "There's a time to put away childish things."
> I believe in living un-tainted by what society thinks I should think or do with my life, and what I should believe.
*****
Were you to actually critically appraise your own worldview, you'd see there is no escape from the influence society has had on our development. Not to mention the even more powerful effects of biology. Even if you are rejecting society's ideas, you are still being defined by them in what and how you choose to reject.
> there is no God, and we are all here by accident.
*****
There is a God, and accidents are the way She gets things done. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 5:10 PM*You are not the only female (or male) that isn't quite getting the gist of what I'm saying*
I get what you are saying, I am just politely disagreeing. I am not saying it's not the truth.
*'id disagree that your being a woman has much to do with that. Yes, female brains are more emotionally wired, but that doesn't mean you don't have the capacity for discrimination. Look at all the female scientists. Are they aberrations of womanhood? *
I never said anything about all women. Some females transform into men, and vice versa.
*That's too bad. I've found you can have blind and total absorbed devotion *and* a critical perspective on one's experiences.*
I agree.
*What you are calling innocent, I would label infantile. Not that I'm a Christian, but Jesus said, "There's a time to put away childish things." *
I never claimed to be innocent. I am far from innocence. Do you believe that Jesus was a historical person or another allegory, just out of curiosity. It's very common for Shakti Bhaktas to take a very childish approach and act childish and infantile, many mad saints throw temper tantrums, and break things. Right and wrong, good and bad is all relative. Approaching Maa as an ignorant child approaching her mother for food and sustenance just works for me. I find whenever I claim to think I know something she humbles me.
*Were you to actually critically appraise your own worldview, you'd see there is no escape from the influence society has had on our development. Not to mention the even more powerful effects of biology. Even if you are rejecting society's ideas, you are still being defined by them in what and how you choose to reject. *
Ok Maybe so, I am not perfect. And like I said, I really don't know anything.
*> there is no God, and we are all here by accident.
*****
There is a God, and accidents are the way She gets things done.*
It's fine to make little metaphors about nature and God, and what have you. But I am sorry but as someone who avoids trying to know how god functions and maintains the Universe. So that's nice you think that, it's a nice opinion and a good perspective. But really I have no idea in the end what God is doing, or how or why. To claim to know that would be ridiculous. There are only rare few people who I would even consider trusting their understandng of God, and even the greatest saint and mystic only has a small piece of the puzzle. Most people are not on any kind of cosmic level to understand all the workings of God, and how they work.
Which is the entire point of my opinion in this debate, to not think of anything as impossible. Once you start saying Shiva did this, or god did that or Maa can't do that, or this is a fairy tale and that's not a fairy tale it puts a limitation on God, which really actually puts a limit on yourself. By dropping all assumptions that you can understand and rationalize the Universe, God might just let you in on a glimpse. I may know things about cultures and beliefs here on Earth, but as far as I am concerned with God, I wont and don't claim to really know anything. To me EVERYTHING is possible. Everything. And in that way my entire life and the lives of those around me have been drastically changed.
It is very often to find men like you who are better on the path of Jnana, and women who can work better with Bhakti. Not to say that there's no exceptions of course because all is possible. But you very much seem like a person who wants Jnana and practical knowledge, where as someone like me, I really just don't care to know. I just want Maa to be pleased with me and always be my friend and Mother. I love her so very much, whatever she does to maintain the universe that is her job. I really don't care to know or understand it. Maybe one day if it is her will, I will understand. But until then I will remain her infantile, childish devotee who believes her power is endless and incomprehensible and that every second is a miracle.
I also want to say that I hope that we can remain peaceful towards each other throughout our interaction online, because we are parts of each other as embodiments of the divine soul. You are an emanation of Maa, so I love you.
Jay Ambae Bhavani -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 5:42 PM> Do you believe that Jesus was a historical person
*****
It seems likely, although what we think we know about Jesus and what Jesus was actually like may not have much to do with one another.
> I find whenever I claim to think I know something she humbles me.
*****
I find myself inspired to keep bringing up these same points many times over.
> I have no idea in the end what God is doing, or how or why.
*****
Me neither. But that's no excuse to not try and understand the world. We wouldn't be communicating online were it not for folks who figured it all out in some ways.
> even the greatest saint and mystic only has a small piece of the puzzle.
*****
I'd paraphrase: even the greatest saint is still plain old ordinary human folk. But I disagree that it's a puzzle. It's a whole that turns itself inside-out into a multiplicity.
> God might just let you in on a glimpse.
*****
Who's to say She hasn't already?
> you very much seem like a person who wants Jnana and practical knowledge
*****
It's just fun to learn things, although Jnana has nothing to do with learning in the conventional sense of the word.
> I also want to say that I hope that we can remain peaceful towards each other throughout our interaction online.
*****
I'm hoping you'll agree that's been the case all along. :) -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 5:49 PMBlah blah blah, whatever Jody. Just admit I know everything and you don't. You just don't even know because your just plain foolish! :-D
Haha. So yeah, I win and you don't. I am the girl, so let me have my cake and eat it too. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 5:55 PM> I am the girl, so let me have my cake and eat it too.
*****
Consider it laid out at your lotus feet.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 11:57 AMShiva is the father of Tantra, as you know he accepted all as his devotees. He divided his disciples into two main categories, to one type of person he would teach the five M’s with a subtle interpretation, so that each “M” was symbolic of a subtle spiritual practice, for example Mamsa = meat (beef or cows Tongue) was symbolic of the Kechari Mudra in the subtle interpretation, Matsya (fish) was symbolic of the fish swimming up the Yaumuna or Ganga River meaning that the Shakti flows up the Shushumna Nadi, Wine was symbolic of the Amrit or Soma, the subtle blissful secretion of the Pineal gland. Etc..
The crude interpretation of the five M’s would be taught to devotees with a more Tamasik nature. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 12:25 PM> The crude interpretation of the five M’s would be taught to devotees with a more Tamasik nature.
*****
Dude, do you actually believe these kinds of explanations? It's ridiculous hagiographic nonsense. We don't know what Shiva actually did anymore than we know what Santa Claus actually does. Hell, we have absolutely no idea that anyone named Shiva fathered anything. It's all straight-up myth, not historical fact.
I am amazed day after day at how seemingly rational individuals can throw their minds in the mud in deference to such clearly mythological nonsense. Just because it's a part of some tradition doesn't mean it's true, regardless of what any pandit or guru says about it.
The world needs to fucking grow up. I have my doubts that it ever will as long as adults continue to grasp fairy tales as the highest wisdom. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 12:36 PMhere is what irks me:
why is everyone always so reductionistic? "THIS is the proper interpretation of something"...
can there not be MULTIPLE right answers?? we live in an infinite universe!
balance of the Gunas is the object, not running away from Tamas! -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 12:40 PMFirst of all this is obviously just one interpretation and explanation, of course its not “the way” and second of all, I’ve heard a lot more rationality and intelligent answers coming from certain Gurus (not all) than you Jody. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 12:58 PMyes but you are setting up a hierarchy here by saying "crude"...
I gather you are not a fan of physical panchamakara from the statement? -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 1:10 PMSaul, there is a common idea in Tantra, that is Satva, Raja, & Tama, I’m not saying one is better or worse, that is left up to interpretation.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 1:41 PMyes, the three Gunas borrowed from the philosophy of Samkhya, which I mentioned before.
I don't need a lesson on what Gunas are, thanks.
especially since we seem to differ on the definition of an Avadhuta...
www.geocities.com/advaitave...tagita.htm
that is not a term to be thrown around lightly.
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 12:58 PM> I’ve heard a lot more rationality and intelligent answers coming from certain Gurus (not all) than you Jody.
*****
I'm certainly not the end-all-be-all of rationality, but I still know the difference between an abject fairy tale (Shiva is the father of Tantra) and a more hermeneutic approach to interpretation.
Bottom line: the five M's came well, well after Shiva was allegedly alive. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 1:08 PMHow on earth do you know? You just said that my statements were from fairy tales and mythology, how do you know, you have no idea. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 1:15 PM> How on earth do you know?
*****
I don't have to know. The statement itself: "Shiva is the father of Tantra", is ridiculous at face value. The idea of there being a historical Shiva who did stuff like put the Ganga in his hair or cut his kid to pieces, to be reconstructed from elephant parts, is beyond the pale.
But don't worry, you aren't alone. The world is chock full of folks willing to believe anything to escape the humdrum of their lives. It's just too bad that self-realization hides right in the middle of that humdrum. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 1:28 PMSelf realization hides in the middle of every humdrum, and everything for that matter my friend, you are right, there are countless mythological misinterpretations in every religion and spiritual path, but to say that Shiva never existed as a real person (without all the pomp and show of course), may not be true. There is no end to this argument, so people must decide for themselves. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Meat and alcohol
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 5:22 PM> to say that Shiva never existed as a real person (without all the pomp and show of course), may not be true.
*****
I find no mention of any actual historical Shiva here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva
I find it more likely that the mythological Shiva became associated with tantra because the first tantrikas were Shaivaites. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 4:14 AMwhatever the interpretation let's just put it behind us,one can either accept things the way they are,but nothing should be forced upon someone.
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 7:29 AMSo we are to assume Shiva never existed because of Wiki says? -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 8:46 AM> So we are to assume Shiva never existed because of Wiki says?
*****
No, we are to assume Shiva never existed as posited in the puranas because it's more sensible. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 12:07 PM> we are to assume Shiva never existed as posited in the puranas because it's more sensible.
*****
But that doesn't mean there was not a certain historical figure who later became known as the mighty God Shiva. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:38 PMOk well whether or not you know for certain, trust me I wont be counting on your answer. You weren't there, and you by no means seem like the person to rely on for that kind of information.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:21 AMI will tell you one thing sweet child, Shiva is the Father of All... OM Namah Shivaya, infact. I will also say you ought to quit comparing to Shiva to Santa Clause, because that's offensive to those who are devotees of Shiva. In India he is very loved, very respected. Though I do not take offense to most things people say, it's offensive in nature to compare a cosmic deity to a man who passes out candies and toys to children. And yes, St. Nicholas ACTUALLY existed, It's a historical fact, go look it up. His spirit lives on through a holiday symbol just like Shiva lives through every realized saint and mystic! -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 8:36 AM> Shiva is the Father of All
*****
In terms of being the source of all awareness. However, he's only the "father" of those who accept Shaivaite ideas.
> that's offensive to those who are devotees of Shiva.
*****
Then Shiva still has a lot of work to do in those devotees.
> it's offensive in nature to compare a cosmic deity to a man who passes out candies and toys to children.
*****
Not when both are constructions of myth.
> St. Nicholas ACTUALLY existed
*****
That doesn't mean a flying jolly dude distributing toys is anything other than myth.
> Shiva lives through every realized saint and mystic!
*****
Shiva lives in every person in every time on every planet in every universe. Saints and mystics have nothing on us common Joes in this regard.
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 9:41 AMAs above, so below.
Yes, several things can be true at once.
And as you said (basically) but now in my own words: We could be living in a multiverse.
As we think in terms of macrocosm, the microcosms begin to become illogical.
As we think in terms of splitting a microcosm, the macrocosm no longer makes sense.
Modern physics now uses String Theory to bridge and unite the opposite natures of all things great and small.
I think this is the scientific community's equivalent to Gunas & Tamas, as you call them.
There is also supply-side thinking, and demand side thinking...
People who understand both supply & demand equivocaly are called Economists.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 1:57 PMShiva and everything else in the Tantric scriptures are spoken of in twilight language. Many of what is told there is written in code so that herd following fools cannot understand it. This has nothing to do with fairy tales, and if you can't even believe in the existence of Shiva or the fact that he inspired the Tantras, then why are you discussing ANYTHING on a forum like Aghora!? Aghoris not only communicate with deities but they also communicate with spirits in the cremation grounds. Don't compare your foolish Santa Clause Western beliefs to beliefs that can be traced back for thousands of years. That is very egotistical. And the only childish thing, is some self deluded American fool coming to preach about ancient practices when it's clear that the person does not only not know what they are talking about, but are using curse words to speak about spiritual matters! Who is throwing their mind in the mud? The American who is ignorant and is chastising thousands of year old beliefs that still flourish? Or the beliefs themselves!? Are you seriously asking people to change what has been there for thousands of years because your logical western mind cannot comprehend it!? That is SO egotistical and so ridiculous. Let's just Americanize EVERYTHING and do away with all gods and all stories of gods and spirits that have deep meanings outside of their face value and throw THOSE in the mud so that we can have a more logical belief system. Hell let's all just become atheist because some pompous American says so! Get a life and quit chastising my culture which you know nothing about. You wanna talk about throwing minds in the mud, look at your fellow country men who watch television for hours and have chemicals for breakfast lunch and dinner. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 2:28 PM>if you can't even believe in the existence of Shiva or the fact that he inspired the Tantras, then why are you discussing ANYTHING on a forum like Aghora!?
*****
Because I can accept that Shiva represents a transcendent reality, and also understand that the characters of the puranas are nothing more than allegorical representations of certain truths that have been uncovered by the Sages.
> Aghoris not only communicate with deities but they also communicate with spirits in the cremation grounds.
*****
Sure. All entirely within their own subjective envelope. This points to an important truth of spiritual reality. What we believe determines what we experience in the imaginal realm.
> Are you seriously asking people to change what has been there for thousands of years because your logical western mind cannot comprehend it!?
*****
No. I'm asking people to keep their thinking caps on, rather than jumping into an alien culture's mythologies and superstitions just because they seem romantic. I'm also saying grow up and think for yourself, rather than succumbing to the standard Hindu boilerplate which exalts its myths as history rather than the quaint stories they are. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:26 AM*No. I'm asking people to keep their thinking caps on, rather than jumping into an alien culture's mythologies and superstitions just because they seem romantic. I'm also saying grow up and think for yourself, rather than succumbing to the standard Hindu boilerplate which exalts its myths as history rather than the quaint stories they are.*
Well it seems to me that you as an American are jumping to conclusions about mythologies and superstitions that really have nothing to do with your culture, it is you that has decided to come and discuss these things. Also you really wouldn't know the standard hindu "boilerplate" would you? Were you born in India? Were you raised by Hindus? Have you lived their for decades upon decades that you can claim to know it's culture? Maybe you should also take your own advice of growing up and stop trying to tell another culture how to believe in their spiritual tradition. If you ever want any kind of spiritual progress you must stop that. It is very egotistical and very pompous. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 8:39 AM> If you ever want any kind of spiritual progress you must stop that.
*****
Spiritual progress, the most occluding concept of spiritual truth that has ever existed.
> It is very egotistical and very pompous.
*****
I'm not one to parading my "qualifications" around. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:44 PMMake no assumptions about me, I have no qualifications. If you do not believe you can spiritually progress, and that it's an occluding concept, fine. You are welcome to that. I am the type of person who believes all things are possible. I am always a student, I am never a teacher. In fact I don't know anything at all, so I am just going to stop talking to you from here on out. I am sure you wont be missing out on anything since I am probably some crack pot to you anyway because I believe in the possibility of supernatural happenings and possibility of all kind. Neither you or I, can completely comprehend the manifested Universe, and if you think you do, you are mistaken. I don't doubt or question anything. Just look at nature and you will see a miracle. Look at how the Universe maintains itself through whatever you believe maintains it, and see how miraculously it flows in perfection. How everything is mathematically perfect. Everything here existing for a reason, and all other things that it connects to. The perfect orbit. The perfect destruction and creation of new bodies. That's proof enough for me to believe in anything, dragons, manifested deities, whatever. Call me simple minded, but I like to keep it simple. I am happy and every day Mother Sarveshi astounds me and fills me with incomprehensible joy, and I hope that she does the same to you! And that's very important, is to just be happy and keep it simple. By pretending that either of us know answers to anything, we are fooling ourselves. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 3:07 PM> If you do not believe you can spiritually progress, and that it's an occluding concept, fine.
*****
I believe that one can walk a path which engenders much psychological transformation, and that this transformation manifests itself as spiritual experiences. But I also believe that spiritual experiences are no more closer to nondual truth than bathroom experiences. They may be a lot more fun, or a lot scarier; they may allow one to feel mighty and high, or they may break you down to practically nothing. But any way you look at it, spiritual experiences have as much to do with nondual truth as my dog's ass, imo.
> I am never a teacher.
*****
And I'm just some jerk who thinks he knows. Don't ever forget that. Please.
> I am probably some crack pot to you anyway because I believe in the possibility of supernatural happenings and possibility of all kind.
*****
Absolutely not, Rasa. Really. I don't think that at all. And I'm not saying anything you say isn't true. What I am trying to say is that if you go meta on spiritual practices, including those of tantra, you begin to see that the content is not nearly as important as the application.
Supernatural happenings are called "weird shit" in my meta-picture. It happens to all of us. Some more than others, perhaps. But there are other explanations for it. Coincidence comes to mind for much of it. However, I can't say that weird shit hasn't happened to me that was startling and not quite explained from a skeptical point of view.
But the bottom line, imo, is that weird shit just happens, and that it has nothing more to do with nondual truth than a turnip. Additionally, the pursuit of weird shit is a complete detour with regards to a deeper understanding of our actual nature. It's just a whole other world of Maya to get stuck in. That world is no more closer to our spiritual truth than this world, imo.
> Neither you or I, can completely comprehend the manifested Universe, and if you think you do, you are mistaken.
*****
Of course not. But we can look at the huge variety of spiritual practices, observe that they appear to work for all those who follow them sincerely, and then surmise that there is something common to all of them. If you asked me, I say it's the fact that the imaginal world, those experiences that seem to occur in our heads and hearts, is formed into certain manifestations by our beliefs. You accept a certain set to tantric practices. That creates a projection from your mind that manifests as an imaginal world which reflects the expectations set forward by your beliefs. And presto! You find yourself having experiences which confirm those beliefs and the teachings of your guru.
But lets take another case. A sundancer in South Dakota. He's been initiated into an entirely different set of practices, with an entirely different cosmology and an entirely different set of supernatural characters. His beliefs are confirmed by his experience, out of an ideology that is very different in details small and large than yours. But they BOTH work.
That's a question worth exploring. I've tried, and came up with this rap you've been getting. I don't know everything, but I feel there is something to holding a meta-perspective on spiritual practices.
> Just look at nature and you will see a miracle.
*****
Absolutely. However, many of those miracles have recognizable cause/effect paths that have been mapped.
> Look at how the Universe maintains itself through whatever you believe maintains it, and see how miraculously it flows in perfection.
*****
That's your gloss on it, girl. If you were brutally murdered, would that be perfection? It's certainly Ma's will, but it's you who would be ascribing the quality of perfection to that. By the way, I never in a zillion years would want anything for you but your own happiness.
> How everything is mathematically perfect.
*****
Actually, the math isn't working. That why we believe in dark matter we can't see and have built the Large Hadron Collider.
> Call me simple minded, but I like to keep it simple.
*****
You mean, keep it non-critical. That's ok. Not everyone has the mind or stomach for it, and that does not degrade them in any way, although I'd maintain they could still probably use a bit of it in their lives.
> I hope that she does the same to you!
*****
I am blessed to never be a nanometer apart from Her in the heart.
> By pretending that either of us know answers to anything, we are fooling ourselves.
*****
I can't argue with that, but that's not going to stop me from not trying to understand – where led by Ma to do so.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 12:21 PMThank you! How where we having this conversation without remembering this! Everything is many things.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 1:15 PMChit...
If you are going to practice tantra sadhana
you need a guru to guide you
the alcohol and meat
is the least important part of the practice
find a real teacher
the spychic powers are to be developed without intoxicants
othervise
they are not realy powers are they
some teachers want a student to learn both , right and left hand tantra
do you have a guru
one cannot jsut read books and make up practices
its very dangerious
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 1:30 PM> one cannot just read books and make up practices
>
> its very dangerous
*****
Nothing worth having comes without some hazard.
It is the very essence of tantra to transgress. This includes engaging in what some would find to be dangerous behaviors.
If you asked me, if it's not dangerous, it's not tantra. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 2:10 PM*twitch twitch*
ya know I was meditating on a Yantra when I had my little strokelet. I consider it a coincidence but you always gotta wonder. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 10:47 PMI am not tallkign abotu yantras saul
if you are just practicing simpel yantra meditation with comonly used mantras
thats fine
I am tallking abotu more serious rituals where people can start to make things up
as they go
anyhow
I am just speakign from experience thats all
although a guidance of a guru is best
obviously it will be a choice of the individual
what paht they will choose
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 9:48 AMExperience: The body-mind link.
You take what is in your mind and put it into practice.
You look at the results.
You take those results and adjust what is in your mind accordingly, or not.
The Experience of Land-Surveying:
You look up records of how things are "supposed" to be.
You go out and you measure how things actually are.
You then compare reality to the book.
You try to make it all fit the best you can.
Sometimes you go back and forth between the field and the books indefinately until you get it...
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 9:54 AMAnd sometimes when you talk to the old farmers whose families owned that land for generations, they know things that all the experts don't know.
They are the Gurus.
And they have a way of finding you when you're in the woods scratching your head when the books just don't fit what you want to see.
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 8:45 AM> Well if you have figure out what the secret it, you wouldn't be here on the internet ;-)
*****
Actually, I'm here to share the secret with all.
> I don't claim to know any secrets. I don't think you should either, because god will not give any secrets to anyone that thinks they know it all.
*****
Well, you are wrong, about me thinking I know it all and about the secret I bear.
Here is the secret: "As many faiths, so many paths." Any belief will bear fruit, provided the aspirant is truly sincere in their application of their belief to their practice. There are millions of paths. They all work when the person who walks them is pure in their intention. What you believe determines what you experience. The imaginal realm is like mind putty. If you believe a demon is pursuing you, you create your own tormenter. If you believe you are possessed by a divine spirit, you manifest one to do the job. Go for word-to-word accuracy or make up your own. What matters is you and your pure intentions, not what you believe. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 3:08 PMAt least we can agree on some things. And that you believe you have the secret, well then god bless, there's no more to discuss.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 10:44 PMwell
I would only aks a tantric teacher, lama or so on -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, February 9, 2007 - 10:59 PMI agree from my own experience that my practice is benefited from having a real Guru. Although not everyone meets one right away on their journey. Sometimes the gurus message is still felt from previous lives and he/she may not appear in this one. A real guru will tell you that your mind is Guru.
On the meat subject.. since this discussion is not only about ritual eating... What I have been taught is that since we are made of polarities like magnets.. we contain nectar and poison in our constitution. When we die most of the nectar if not all leaves the body. That is why blood changes after death and breath is gone from us among other signs. One who eats flesh is eating alot of poisonous material, hence we burn or bury the dead deep in the Earth.. I don't like to tell peple about m eating ahbits anymore, but since this was discussion I thought Id mention, please dont take offense if you eat meat, I am not attempting to convert you. Peace
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 10:13 AMA student doesn't choose his Guru.
A Guru doesn't choose his student.
The relationship is confirmed before either one knows it.
They are chosen for each other to walk awhile together, to learn about the "student-teacher relationship" in general...and the pratical knowledge which is exchanged in that relationship is really just the medium which makes it possible for those two souls to form a bond. The medium could be baking, boxing or brain-surgery...its doesn't matter. What most "Western" people don't realize is that the medium is not as relevant as the bond. You can't go choosing a Guru because you like the medium he teaches. It really can't work that way. A Guru who is meant for you unknowingly brings inadvertant gifts into your life which are unexpected, and you must accept him before you can accept the gifts. A Guru is someone who has mastered a way of thinking in which you are in your infancy. By learning to think more like him you can attract whatever success you want, pertinent to your own life ; Duplicating the success of your "Guru" is not truly respecting them as a Guru.
A Guru is not there to teach you to be a better baker, he is there teach you wisdom.
True wisdom is applicable ANYWHERE.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 1:29 PMIt is true Tantra is the heroic path, but it can be dangerous even with a Guru. Without a Guru, the dangers are so much more, it's foolish to even think you can handle dabbling in that kind of power without proper guidance. If even true Tantra, through initiation of a Guru is called Heroic, then you better believe that tantra without a Guru is bold, prideful and foolish to assume you can master that kind of esoteric knowledge and power. Any person with a strong enough ego will think they can accomplish anything and best others at things they know little to nothing about. The Dangers that come with dabbling in any form of occult or powerful practice such as Tantra, are so much so that you can be certain that 95% of people that try that kind of foolishness will end up sick, mad, dead, ravaged by spirits, and with an awakening Kundalini that identifies with no form and has no control that will wreak havoc on all layers, and aspects of embodied life. The Guru has reached a state of power by his or her own practice and through his or her Guru that if you make a mistake he or she can protect you! With what will you protect yourself if some spirit or demon decides to tear you apart? Who will you turn to if you make one mistake in a Sadhana that is either performed flawlessly or you die right there on the spot? No one will be there to help you, even God can't help you in that situation, only the Guru. The Guru can protect their devotee from even the danger of the wrath of Shiva. This is just not one of those things that one can master through intuition. You either master it or you don't. This is not the guided meditation at your local new age shop or some drum circle a the beach, this is marching into the spiritual realms and invoking real volatile power, through often volatile and wrathful deities.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 10:19 AMNever trust a Guru who still has all his fingers and toes.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 9:07 AMTo avoid becoming a hypocrit, I will state for the record that I DO consume alcohol often.
However, I think that part of the human coporeal experience is to experience the presence of intoxicants as a natural part of creation and physical existence. As we are exposed so do we develop immunity, or at least allergy, as we recognize what is intoxicating. So intoxicants have things to teach us. Used in moderation they can help us expand ourselves and our knowledge of Creation as a whole. It is playing with fire...
If you want to cook your food and stay warm, then you'd better know how to use fire without burning down your house. The risk is always there. You are making a deal. Striking a balance, as you let this "substance" into your home. It has it's place - the FIREPLACE.
How you keep from burning down your "house" depends on what you perceive to be the symbolic boundaries of your house, and where the walls are. Know your house.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 9:24 AMMeat:
I am by no means a vegetarian, either. However, about 6 years ago I began to develop a dislike and repulsion for beef. There is something about it which seems dirty, impure...
Beef is the main source of Prionic disease.
These are fatal brain-diseases cause by proteinacious particles which destroy brain-tissue, called Prions. One other source of Prionic infection is through cannibalism, specifically the ritualistic eating of the brains of ancestors or enemies.
There are several types of Prionic disease.
Kreutzfeld-Jakobs disease which comes from Beef.
Mad Cow disease, which cows get from eating sheep-protein fortified grain
Kuru (human cannibalism)
As you can see, cannibalism seems to be a factor, but also when mammals consume the meat of other mammals which are genetically similar to themselves. (Indirect cannibalism, perhaps.) The blood plasma which is most compatible with humans is actually beef blood, not the blood of other primates as you might expect! I believe that the basis for this is that the body is tricked into accepting proteins into the bloodstream becaus tehy seem so familar. Then these proteins make it to the brain and begin the destructive sequence. They have literally gained access through your security gates because the gaurd thought they were somebody else who had clearance!
Anyway, I never conciously took this into account when I started to cut beef out of my diet. It was just my intuition, and there is no religious reason for me to do so. I wonder if the original bannings of certain meats in various religions was REALLY due to ancient medical knowledge - but the enlightened ones used the idea of "sacred animals" rather than explain the truth to the lower un-educated classes. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 12:14 PMVariant CJD is why I gave up beef initially but I feel a lot better for it physically. psychically, I couldn't say - too many factors involved. but just from the amount that I have to plunge the toilet (not a single time since I quit beef) and those that eat it almost every day (once every other week or so for the family I was living with for 2 years, about once a month for my old roommate) I am of the opinion that cows are not good for humans to eat, holes in the brain or not.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 10:30 AMMaybe it could be said that I have things to learn from the experience of alcohol.
I have always leaned to Karmic explanations of such things, and the shallow answers of Western thinking just provoke more questions. Western thinking puts the cart before the horse. It says that the goal should be to quit using intoxicants, period.
John Lennon said that using intoxicants is more of a symptom than a cause of misery, or as much. So if it is a symptom of some dis-ease in the body or mind, then how can we diagnose the dis-ease without the presence of a symptom? Western thinking often starts with the symptoms and works backwards, thus cutting off our ability to understand the dis-ease at the source...and the result is the perpetuation of the dis-ease.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 2:02 PMsheeeeeeeeeeeet....lol
i had to throw my spare change in here
NO ONE
i repeat
NO ONE
**NEEDS** a guru
that's absurd
the highest guru possible
is within
Also
it was said that
the real deal so to speak
does not come from consuming "intoxicants"
First of All
what's an "intoxicant " in your view?
in my view an intoxicant is something that
poisons you and alters the mind/body
alcohol could be considered an intoxicant
so could cobra venom
but many a siddhas
can transmute cobra venom
into nectar
so
it's different for everyone
to make general statements like
"you can't use intoxicants" or "you need a guru"
is ridiculous
i mean shit!!
this is the Freakin' AGHORA TRIBE lol!!!!
vimalananda was a good example
of a Master of Transmutation
so
shit...
there's millions in India
watch out for gurus
watch out for anybody who thinks they can teach you
I'm my own best teacher!!!
yay!!!!!!! wooo hoooo for mee!! three cheers for Om!!!
woop woop!!!
lol
Om -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, February 17, 2007 - 2:59 PMactually what was funny in Tarapith was that some Sadhus asked me, "what does Guru mean?"
so of course I gave them the stock answer, "Guru is God"
and they schooled me! they insisted that Ma was the REAL Guru... "yes, Guru is God - God is your Guru!! Tara Ma is your Guru! Kali Ma, this is the true meaning of Guru, look to God!"
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 1:37 PMYou need a Guru if you are going to practice Sadhana, Tantra, Aghora or take Sanyas. Plain and simple or you will die and or go mad. No diety and no power within yourself can protect you from the dangers that come with making a mistake in Sadhana. A guru can save you from even Shiva's rath. A normal person like everything has a divine SPARK in them but that does not mean their inner power has becoming a raging fire or has become a manifested diety. The Guru already has a Kundalini Shakti that has manifested itself into a deity, so the Guru becomes the hand of God. Only people like Avataras and Buddhas are born fully realized, and unless you are a direct avatar of God/dess or a Buddha, then highly doubt you can go on practicing intense spiritual practices without a Guru. But you have you own free will to do as you please. If you wish to go mad, die, or feel the wrath of a an angry diety that you have mistakenly offended, that's fine but your inner whatever is not going to save you from that. Kundalini Shakti, Tantra, Sadana, and Aghora is nothing to play or dabble with. To do so, you are gambling with your life... Plain and simple. None of that New Age self deluding garbage is going to help you in that. You dont just feel your way with intuition in these kind of practices or you will feel wrath and pain! Awakening of the Kundalini is so powerful and dangerous it can actually de-materialize the body in some circumstances. No book, no plant (because plants dont have that kind of awareness), and no internet info can guide you through this, sorry. This kind of foolishness is a blatant mockery of Indian spiritual sciences and goes against everything they prescribe. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 2:26 PMwere you responding to me?
the incident I refer to took place in the smashan at Tarapith in West Bengal - left handed Sadhus were the ones who insisted that Ma was the true guru, and the only one that was REALLY needed.
to be honest, I put more stock in what those dudes have to say on the matter than almost anyone. they have given up everything and are practicing Tantra and living in a Shakta cremation ground next to a holy site in India. it doesn't get much more legit than that. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 9:19 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>
I put more stock in what those dudes have to say on the matter than almost anyone. they have given up everything and are practicing Tantra and living in a Shakta cremation ground next to a holy site in India. it doesn't get much more legit than that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
Here here! They truly "walk the walk" as they say... Everybody has an opinion, but some folks (like the sadhus you mentioned) are more entitled to them than others.
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 9:29 PMThe Tarapith "sadhu" said this or that, may be a trump card to some, but I have spent much time there, and many of those sadhus are just blow hards. Because they have no lineage, that claim that none is needed. These "mahatmas" have to shut their mouths when real Tantrics come there. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 10:29 PMheh. somehow I find that hard to believe, but okay.
I met enough sadhus in India to be able to tell the ones who are full of shit from those that aren't. if you've been there so many times, I'm sure you realize I ain't talking about the dudes who hang near the garbage.
in any case, your attitude isn't doing anything for making me want to hear what those "real tantrics" have to say... as it stands, I can go with what sadhus said... or some dude on the internet.
my choice of potential spirtual guidance is pretty clear. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 10:56 PMFor those too whom you were offering wisdom based on the words of Tarapith "sadhus", you are some dude on the internet. To them I would ask, as a choice of potential spiritual guidance, who would they go with...a qualified guru or some dude on the internet? I said nothing about you, just about the quality of the sadhus that frequent Tarapith. This sentiment has been echoed by other Tantrics. This is because these fellows run off, show off, and create obstacles for other sadhaks. So the source of "my attitude" is not against you, but rather for the sadhaks who go to that place. Do not insinuate that I am untruthful. You can say that I am mistaken or misguided, but to say I am untruthful is insulting and untrue. I am a Kapalika and a child of the Kaulas, so to call me untruthful is a mistake on your part. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 11:24 PM>>For those too whom you were offering wisdom based on the words of Tarapith "sadhus", you are some dude on the internet.
we both are. I don't expect anyone to ask me for spiritual guidance. go find out for yourself is what I suggest. you have, right? cool.
>>To them I would ask, as a choice of potential spiritual guidance, who would they go with...a qualified guru or some dude on the internet?
I say go to Bengal and talk to real Tantrikas. don't take my word for it. but when you go, use your own judgement on who to believe.
>>I said nothing about you, just about the quality of the sadhus that frequent Tarapith. This sentiment has been echoed by other Tantrics. This is because these fellows run off, show off, and create obstacles for other sadhaks.
I know the type of people you are talking about, and I don't have time for them. I don't listen to anyone who shows off, sweats me for money, etc. it's easy to tell the difference! really, you should know. the genuine guys get a wide berth from the fakers. when I was there, they were scared to go near the real sadhus. the people who I really listened to were generous, never asked for a thing, never showed off, and never made any effort to impress me. they were doing their thing and didn't really care if I noticed or not, but were some of the wisest people I've ever met. but YMMV of course.
>>So the source of "my attitude" is not against you, but rather for the sadhaks who go to that place.
you have pictures of Bamaji and Ma Tara in your profile... obviously not everyone who goes there is full of it, right? give me some credit for critical faculties, yeah? my personal opinion is that a living Guru is highly beneficial to a person. my point is that I have heard a dissenting view from people that I have used my own judgement on whether to believe or not. like many things that occured in India for me, it was a smack upside the head to abandon all that I thought I knew and just be open to learning. if I'm not getting that... well, I don't think I'm getting much of anywhere.
>>Do not insinuate that I am untruthful. You can say that I am mistaken or misguided, but to say I am untruthful is insulting and untrue.
my first response to this is to tell you I can say whatever I want, cuz I never like it when people take that tack. but I find it hard to see where I ever called you a liar, so IMO you are misreading me anyway.
what I find hard to believe is that the sadhus that _I_ interfaced with would run and hide or "shut their mouths" for anyone. and as you don't know who I spoke with or what I thought of any particular person, it's just as ignorant to make assumptions as I would be about yourself, your experiences, or your guru. I don't make those assumptions.
>>I am a Kapalika and a child of the Kaulas, so to call me untruthful is a mistake on your
part
good for you. if I call you a liar, repeat that. but since I didn't, please read more thoroughly before assuming I am talking shit about you. you say you are not saying anything about me, but your tone sounds rude and more than a bit like many internet threats I have heard in the past. perhaps I am misreading you as well though. I am open to that possibility. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 8:55 AM>> my personal opinion is that a living Guru is highly beneficial to a person.
>>my point is that I have heard a dissenting view
If I may interject a note here, it seems to me that those masters (in any domain) that make such assertions are usually people who have spent years following the advice of a tradition/master themselves. After a certain point, one transcends the need for formalism in practice and often when this happens one forgets how important the formal structure initially was.
One may well need a teacher and highly formal practice to get to the place in which a teacher and highly formal practice are seen as unnecessary.
Think of the way a teacher may have one practice scales in music, after a while the whole thing seems quite silly, but it served an important function
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 11:02 AMOkay...Sorry, I thought you were publicly calling me a liar. Give me a hug. If you have an Aghora tribe, then you can't expect all of us to be charm school grads. I have a way about me that does translate well to the written word. We will have more cordial future conversation.
Back to the original points. I have also heard Shaktas say that Ma is the Guru, but had you followed those statements by the Sadhus with "so I can just do the pachatattva as I please and take whatever mantra I want from a book", they may not have gone along with that. Leaving aside the points that may not be accepted like....a transmition takes place, some items have curses, some mantras should be know, the Guru can save you if you step in it etc. Just practically speaking, one should proceed with confidence, and if you got the teaching from a Guru and tradition, then one can move in confidence. Particularly in veera sadhana, one should be confident and strong.
I will also part with a secret. While some things are gotten from a Guru via formal initiations, the clever sadhak can snatch certain things that come up, even if it is casual. If the Guru is drawn out and talks about some practice or mantra, then jump on it like a tiger and make it yours. Then ask for permission to do the practice/mantra, if you jump on it good, then the Guru has no choice but to give permission.
All the Best
Kaal -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 12:46 PM>>Okay...Sorry, I thought you were publicly calling me a liar. Give me a hug. If you have an Aghora tribe, then you can't expect all of us to be charm school grads.
hehe. certainly not charm school, but I find no matter what the subject, certain forms of discourse are more suited to internet discussion forums than others. crazy wisdom doesn't translate well onto the screen... :)
>>Back to the original points. I have also heard Shaktas say that Ma is the Guru, but had you followed those statements by the Sadhus with "so I can just do the pachatattva as I please and take whatever mantra I want from a book", they may not have gone along with that.
yes, I agree with that.
>>Just practically speaking, one should proceed with confidence, and if you got the teaching from a Guru and tradition, then one can move in confidence.
certainly, I think that is of great benefit. I think that this is a much more sound argument than the standard "you will go crazy and DIE!" one. to be honest, those who I have actually seen lose it in whatever spiritual tradition have had teachers. now, perhaps the reasoning behind this is that they were able to make more progress because of their spiritual guide, but the guide in question was incapable or unwilling to put the cat back in the bag when it got out of control, so to speak. I think that without a proper guide, little or no results are much more likely than horrificly bad ones. I think that in truth, a lousy guru is worse than no guru at all. the danger IMHO, of the guru-centered outlook is that many folks, once they have someone in their life who tells them they will be their guru, figure it's all gravy and a lot of the time they are being led astray, fleeced for their money, taken advantage of, left to fend without proper tools or submitting to another's ego. the same ullasa of the Kularnava Tantra that stresses the importance of initiation for the shishya also describes tests of the guru.
-
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 8:53 AM> I am a Kapalika and a child of the Kaulas, so to call me untruthful is a mistake on your part.
*****
Maybe not untruthful, but certainly full of yourself like some schoolyard braggart. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 11:44 AMI am sure that some in the plumbers Tribe some claim to be plumbers, and Doctors in the Doctor Tribe. There are probably some Vedantics there as well. If you practice your "Tantric" trangression by pooping in a sink, then you will really have something for the plumber Tribe. If you are still seeing ego everywhere, as people with big egos do, then just ask yourself "Who is the one that sees this?" The problem with non-dual semantic warriors is that their language can be turned against them. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 1:16 PM> If you are still seeing ego everywhere, as people with big egos do, then just ask yourself "Who is the one that sees this?"
*****
This jerk right here (meaning me) is seeing that you presented yourself as somehow dangerous to offend. Because you appeared to use your initiation as proof of your "power," this big ego (meaning me again) called you out on it.
Unlike other "non-dual semantic warriors" you've encountered, I am always perfectly willing to admit that I'm just some dumb jerk. I go so far as to say that all of us are just dumb jerks, to varying degrees of jerkiness, regardless of the state of their so-called realization.
If in fact you weren't trying to threaten Saulji with these words: "I am a Kapalika and a child of the Kaulas, so to call me untruthful is a mistake on your part," then sorry for the gross misinterpretation. At that point I will admit to being an even bigger dumb jerk than I was before. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 10:04 PMJust to be clear, I was not trying to threatening Saul. I thought his "that is hard to believe" comment referred to my having experience at Tarapith and being a Tantric . As he clarified, he had a different intent. To say what I am, and that someone is mistaken are not threats, but as I read the post again I can see how it could be read that way. It is always dangerous to offend a Kapalika/Aghori/Kaula, and not because that person will take any direct action. But this gets into realms of Deities and lineage and Tantras that you may be cynical about, so we will leave it.
Although I tease you a bit, people who have a firm grasp of non-duality make for good Tantrics. They are able to see the energies and deities generated in the proper context and not only gain power but deepen the realization. Many who are interested in Tantra and especially the Vama/Kaula marga are not fit for it. While many people who would have no interest would make good Tantrics. It is the paradox of this work. People with your interests are generally more sincere and qualified for the Tantric work. Come over to the dark side.:)
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 8:03 AM> Just to be clear, I was not trying to threatening Saul.
*****
That's good to know. Now you know I'm an even bigger jerk than I was before.
> It is always dangerous to offend a Kapalika/Aghori/Kaula, and not because that person will take any direct action. But this gets into realms of Deities and lineage and Tantras that you may be cynical about, so we will leave it.
*****
So, there WAS a subtle threat offered. I knew it. You can take your deities, lineage and tantras and shove them where the sun don't shine. And I take that amount of jerkiness I added to myself back.
> They are able to see the energies and deities generated in the proper context and not only gain power but deepen the realization.
*****
Any "power" that accumulates here I shit right out of my ass like poop. Do you want some?
> People with your interests are generally more sincere and qualified for the Tantric work. Come over to the dark side.:)
*****
I'm not surprised you haven't already seen me over here, being so full of your ideas of your tantricness.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sat, April 12, 2008 - 1:58 PMNo I am talking to the silly person who claims that by smoking pot and salvia all day long that they are at the level of someone who has had a guru or higher.
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 7:31 PM> This kind of foolishness is a blatant mockery of Indian spiritual sciences and goes against everything they prescribe.
*****
Obviously, you aren't in on the secret. -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Sun, April 13, 2008 - 1:31 AM*Obviously, you aren't in on the secret.*
Well if you have figure out what the secret it, you wouldn't be here on the internet ;-) I don't claim to know any secrets. I don't think you should either, because god will not give any secrets to anyone that thinks they know it all.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Mon, February 19, 2007 - 3:45 AMThe leftist practices start after the righist practices are completed if one follows a proper Tantrik order. Otherwise an authentic reincurnation of a past accomplished one recognised by an authentic guru of the order can start with the righist-leftist equal order known as the Kaula order.
The usage of meat and fish in the matured state (purnavisheka) is to support the nervous system in its maximum usage. The practice of alchohol is alchemical and not for intoxication. In Tantric alchemy our whole body chemistry can be transformed into 3 basic ingredients : 5 basic salts, 5 basic oils and 5 basic alchohols. The salts are responsible for our 'body', the oils for our 'mind' and the alchohol for our 'spirits'. Those who reach the state of the 'spirits' in yogic technical ways can join the outer alchohol with the inner one to get more energy to apply ecstacy in every aspect of life. One who eats meat and drinks alchohol without proper initiation and practice is like an illiterate collecting pen and ink! -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Mon, March 12, 2007 - 3:22 AMI think one should have meat and alcohol if one desires them until the desire fades away...and it does....I dont drink alcohol...I still like some meat...but just a thin slice once in a few days...but that too shall pass :)
-
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Mon, March 12, 2007 - 5:38 AMI think indulgence is generally a good thing. When we dove into these waters, we knew there would be sharks. It's a part of the game. I have no qualms against eating meat, or even butchering animals. I occasionally consume alchohol. I even drink coke. I avoid drugs though, because I believe consumption (of whatever) should be done in relative moderation, and as a choice. Drugs take away your freedom of choice. I have no desire to use drugs, so there is also no taboo there for me to break. These are just my set of choices for myself, I think everyone must make their own. =) -
-
Re: Meat and alcohol
Mon, March 12, 2007 - 10:02 AMhello. My name is ja-kel. and i've been on cherry coke for about 9 months now. it started out as a thrill-y'know, a treat every now and again. now i have to have one every time i see them. they don't even taste as sweet anymore, but i keep tossing them. i'm gonna go cold turkey soon..............after the next two liter.............six pack....................case............................ :)
I've come to see indulgence as neccessary. Just not all indulgences or excesses of your indulgences. I'm realizing that everyone can define excess for themselves, and some of us aren't good with definitions. I draw the line with the loss of freedom of choice too. Why do it if you're not really the one making the decision? You're the one whose dealing with the consequences.........................
-