Advertisement
Let me start out by saying I do not want to start up a thread that is a fiery debate between those who hold orthodox vedic views on meat and alcohol and those who have transcended orthodoxes and taboos.
I have heard it mentioned many times that if you are a devotee of Mother Kali or Mother Durga it is acceptable either on ritual occasion, through prasadam or at any time to eat meat and drink wine. Mother Kali and Mother Durga both have transcended this taboo and are often said to be fond of offerings of flesh, blood, wine and alcoholic spirits... There are also other Goddesses and deities who are fond of other taboo offerings. For example Mother Mathangi is known for favoring offerings of leftover food, menstrual blood, and other taboo substances from devotees in a state of pollution.
i'd like to discuss the transcendent nature of Mother Kali and other deities who are not bound by strict morally structured worship and how that relates to those of us who are devoted to them. It is well know that Maa Kali will start a funeral pyre for your karmas. Mother Kali also wears the belt of severed arms which indicates her ability to sever right handed AND left handed karmas. Whether your karmas are benign or not, she has the ability to sever you from your karmas and your ability to create more. I have heard it explained in many similar fashions that a devotee of Kali or other such Goddesses does not have the same karmic ties to the world if he or she is successful in their devotion. Non-attachment is one thing amongst many that Kali teaches as well, but also to embrace all levels of existence and the reality behind each level of existence. Such deities also encourages destructive behaviors and is known for living in the cremation grounds, battle grounds, desolate places, and other destructive places on the edge of society where the taboos of society do not exist. There is also a form of Kali who was worshipped by a band of thieves who lived in the forest and were said to offer humans to her. Stealing is also not morally correct, but that does not apply to a person who is without societal shame.
I'd also like to discuss that fact that it is said to be successful in many tantric sadhanas, one will absorb the shakti and essence of the targeted deity
There are also practices that offerings made mentally and physically to the power of the deity within you can sometimes take the form of feeding one's self physically to feed the deity inside so to speak through the fire of digestion and devotion both. It is well known in many cultures that a deity and/or spirit entity can consume energy through favored offerings through a favored devotee who has absorbed the energy of the deity or has become possessed by the entity or deity.
I am not here to discuss the phenomena of possession or the process of absorbing a deity, per se. What I would like to discuss in a suitable fashion is the consuming of taboo substances when one is a devotee of a deity who is fond of them. Of course when you offer a physical substance to a deity that is edible or drinkable then one will take a bit as prasadam. I feel that taking prasadam is also part of the offering in that not only are you absorbing the merciful shakti given by the deity but it also feeds and empowers that deity that is more powerfully present within our own selves.
In many true Kali temples there is blood, meat, wine, and cigarette smoke all in abundance to create the atmosphere fit for such a Mother who is fond of destructive behavior and breaking taboos.
Do you think that these taboos that she likes to break should be a model for her devotees who can often be stuck in such taboos? Do you ever get the desire to offer or consume taboo substances? Is it part of a regular sadhana for you to do so literally or metaphorically? Has any of the socially or morally destructive tendencies of your deity rubbed off on you?
A lot of people who practice benign methods of tantra shun such activity. They often share the view that such physical consuming of meat and wine is impure with their brothers and sisters who practice the orthodox Vedic Dharma. And while I see the wisdom in this, I also see the wisdom in PHYSICALLY facing taboos like wine and meat in order to break them away. If you are meant to do so. Mother Kali and other wild natures of similar tantric deities shows that she is one to experience all flavors of life, especially the dark and taboo flavors of flesh, blood, and wine. How does that apply to us as devotees who are following these deities as guides, or raising the power the represent within ourselves?
I see the metaphorical values, but since I have a body, a mind, and a spirit, I can see how this can translate to all three levels. A lot of times the physical side of nature is neglected. We are still embodied beings, and if we live life thinking "all is a metaphor" and that we should shun taboos, what benefit can be derived when facing one's fears and taboos on a physical level? I think that a true spiritual process can be found on all levels of the body. It is true that one passes physical limitations, but how can that be possible without working on a physical and literal level in the beginning stages? Just like any external worship and ritual that helps our body also be part of the process, as well as the mind and spirit and other subtle levels. There are many spiritual sciences that include physical practice, such as certain asanas and gestures, or the Aghor tradition of eating certain types of meat and foul substances to overcome disgust, etc. So why should certain practices that have a face value neglect that face value and physical aspect? I am one to believe that it applies to all levels. The face value, and the inner secret values on subtle levels.
I am not one to neglect my body in the transformation process. And as I include it along with my mind and spirit, I see the changes on all three levels.
There was a previous thread concerning meat and alcohol, but it turned into a big pissing match about the guru principle, and orthodox views vs. Unorthodox, how things like meat and alcohol are metaphors, etc. I am asking as the starter of this thread, let's not let this become a discussion of morals on the Aghora tribe... I don't personally care for much moral values, they are only limitations and rules to be broken, and I don't want to discuss them. I have already heard and read enough of orthodox morals to not only know them thoroughly but to be sick of them as well. After all has anyone ever met someone practicing Aghora who condones following moral and social structure?
I have heard it mentioned many times that if you are a devotee of Mother Kali or Mother Durga it is acceptable either on ritual occasion, through prasadam or at any time to eat meat and drink wine. Mother Kali and Mother Durga both have transcended this taboo and are often said to be fond of offerings of flesh, blood, wine and alcoholic spirits... There are also other Goddesses and deities who are fond of other taboo offerings. For example Mother Mathangi is known for favoring offerings of leftover food, menstrual blood, and other taboo substances from devotees in a state of pollution.
i'd like to discuss the transcendent nature of Mother Kali and other deities who are not bound by strict morally structured worship and how that relates to those of us who are devoted to them. It is well know that Maa Kali will start a funeral pyre for your karmas. Mother Kali also wears the belt of severed arms which indicates her ability to sever right handed AND left handed karmas. Whether your karmas are benign or not, she has the ability to sever you from your karmas and your ability to create more. I have heard it explained in many similar fashions that a devotee of Kali or other such Goddesses does not have the same karmic ties to the world if he or she is successful in their devotion. Non-attachment is one thing amongst many that Kali teaches as well, but also to embrace all levels of existence and the reality behind each level of existence. Such deities also encourages destructive behaviors and is known for living in the cremation grounds, battle grounds, desolate places, and other destructive places on the edge of society where the taboos of society do not exist. There is also a form of Kali who was worshipped by a band of thieves who lived in the forest and were said to offer humans to her. Stealing is also not morally correct, but that does not apply to a person who is without societal shame.
I'd also like to discuss that fact that it is said to be successful in many tantric sadhanas, one will absorb the shakti and essence of the targeted deity
There are also practices that offerings made mentally and physically to the power of the deity within you can sometimes take the form of feeding one's self physically to feed the deity inside so to speak through the fire of digestion and devotion both. It is well known in many cultures that a deity and/or spirit entity can consume energy through favored offerings through a favored devotee who has absorbed the energy of the deity or has become possessed by the entity or deity.
I am not here to discuss the phenomena of possession or the process of absorbing a deity, per se. What I would like to discuss in a suitable fashion is the consuming of taboo substances when one is a devotee of a deity who is fond of them. Of course when you offer a physical substance to a deity that is edible or drinkable then one will take a bit as prasadam. I feel that taking prasadam is also part of the offering in that not only are you absorbing the merciful shakti given by the deity but it also feeds and empowers that deity that is more powerfully present within our own selves.
In many true Kali temples there is blood, meat, wine, and cigarette smoke all in abundance to create the atmosphere fit for such a Mother who is fond of destructive behavior and breaking taboos.
Do you think that these taboos that she likes to break should be a model for her devotees who can often be stuck in such taboos? Do you ever get the desire to offer or consume taboo substances? Is it part of a regular sadhana for you to do so literally or metaphorically? Has any of the socially or morally destructive tendencies of your deity rubbed off on you?
A lot of people who practice benign methods of tantra shun such activity. They often share the view that such physical consuming of meat and wine is impure with their brothers and sisters who practice the orthodox Vedic Dharma. And while I see the wisdom in this, I also see the wisdom in PHYSICALLY facing taboos like wine and meat in order to break them away. If you are meant to do so. Mother Kali and other wild natures of similar tantric deities shows that she is one to experience all flavors of life, especially the dark and taboo flavors of flesh, blood, and wine. How does that apply to us as devotees who are following these deities as guides, or raising the power the represent within ourselves?
I see the metaphorical values, but since I have a body, a mind, and a spirit, I can see how this can translate to all three levels. A lot of times the physical side of nature is neglected. We are still embodied beings, and if we live life thinking "all is a metaphor" and that we should shun taboos, what benefit can be derived when facing one's fears and taboos on a physical level? I think that a true spiritual process can be found on all levels of the body. It is true that one passes physical limitations, but how can that be possible without working on a physical and literal level in the beginning stages? Just like any external worship and ritual that helps our body also be part of the process, as well as the mind and spirit and other subtle levels. There are many spiritual sciences that include physical practice, such as certain asanas and gestures, or the Aghor tradition of eating certain types of meat and foul substances to overcome disgust, etc. So why should certain practices that have a face value neglect that face value and physical aspect? I am one to believe that it applies to all levels. The face value, and the inner secret values on subtle levels.
I am not one to neglect my body in the transformation process. And as I include it along with my mind and spirit, I see the changes on all three levels.
There was a previous thread concerning meat and alcohol, but it turned into a big pissing match about the guru principle, and orthodox views vs. Unorthodox, how things like meat and alcohol are metaphors, etc. I am asking as the starter of this thread, let's not let this become a discussion of morals on the Aghora tribe... I don't personally care for much moral values, they are only limitations and rules to be broken, and I don't want to discuss them. I have already heard and read enough of orthodox morals to not only know them thoroughly but to be sick of them as well. After all has anyone ever met someone practicing Aghora who condones following moral and social structure?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Sun, April 27, 2008 - 8:17 AMWhere I say "I think that a true spiritual process can be found on all levels of the body." I meant to say "On all levels of the Self. external and internal".
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Sun, April 27, 2008 - 9:52 AM>> Do you ever get the desire to offer or consume taboo substances?
I'm not sure if, for those of us raised in the west, meat and alcohol are really taboo or if their consumption can truly be antinomian (or vamacara etc). My root Guru made this observation and stressed that we should keep in mind the original context (ie that it was originally transgressive)
>>Has any of the socially or morally destructive tendencies of your deity rubbed off on you?
I can't speak about myself because I am too obscured to see myself accurately.
However, I know many people who practice a form of gana-chakra-puja (a type of chakra-puja) at least twice a month consuming meat and alchohol on each occation. Many of these folks have very fierce ista-devatas such as "adamantine Bhairava", Mahakala, "adamantine Varahi" etc.
These folks are often vegetarians and teetotalers outside ritual practice. I don't remember who said it but somebody observed that most people have excellent ethics when they attend worship (ie Sunday), but very questionable ethics in daily life, were as tantrics usually have good ethics in daily life but engage in some very questionable activities while ”worshiping”.
My own observations would be that these practices and the attributes of their ista-devatas have definitely not resulted in any "socially or morally destructive tendencies"…
Got to run, maybe more later.
Ryan
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 10:20 PM
There was a time that I would see Kali every day. She would show me things, teach me things, and also provide whatever I needed.
Though, always I saw her in bright almost neon blue body, big hair that was almost like an aura, the size of her body... her tung was hanging and blood was dripping, but all I saw and felt was deep love...
she took me places and showed me how she was worshiped by secrets sects of people, some were tibetans, or looked like tibetan monks who were under ground. To them she was screaming loudly. I really didn't understand why they saw her this way.
Those days were such that even when it would rain, when I would step out of my apartment, the rain would stop until I reached my car and sat inside, that moment the rain would continue. There were continuous blessings like this to my heart whims for 3 years during that sadhana.
Though, all along I was celibate... that is about the only thing I offered to her... I offer her that I would see everything and everyone as her. Everyone was my mother... as such brahmacharya was easy too.
all of this eventually in 2004 november lead to nirvi kalpa samadhi... since then I have seen Kali a few times... not many... I see her as an aspect of myself...
recently I was at a tantric puja (months ago) and they began singing at the end to Kali and Durga... I sang along... though it was so obvious these were just aspects within me.
Even more recently, after all my arms had been severed by Kali... I got them all back... except now I also know better to not repeat the same. It is dangerous to have your arms when you do not know better... but terrible to not have them once you know.... that's why she has so many arms.
It is strange... what once was so close, closer than anything, is now such a remote memory, almost a dream.
I see photos people have posted on tribe profiles on abhisheka puja's where the fire takes the form of kali... I recall seeing all these forms... seeing my candle flames rise to 1 feet in hight and take different deity forms including shiva... often I didn't believe what I saw myself with my own eyes
it's amazing how through these mediums like tribe I see everyone sharing some of their experiences... when I got into meditation, I didn't think there was anyone in america that even did such things... now who doesn't know about it? -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 7:09 AMJai Guru!
"After all has anyone ever met someone practicing Aghora who condones following moral and social structure? "
YES! YES! Triple YES!
Sorry I didn't read everything but this caught my eye.
Aghoris are not anti-moral rather a-moral. This doesn't mean they don't have and follow morals with such a high standard that would put the rest of us to shame. Furthermore - structure of all happenings is Nature. Aghoris are not anti-nature, therfore I wouldn't consider them anti-social structure either.
-
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 11:32 AM>>After all has anyone ever met someone practicing Aghora who condones following moral
>>and social structure? "
>YES! YES! Triple YES! ...Aghoris are not anti-moral rather a-moral.
If Aghoris are "a-moral" then the answer is: NO! NO! Triple NO!
If you read what you quoted from Rasa's post a little more carefully you will see she is merely asserting that Aghoris are not *pro-moral*. Amoral is by -definition- something other than pro-moral.
She never asserted they are anti-moral or anti-social. That is something you projected onto her post. She merely asserted that they are not pro-moral and pro-social structure. This is precisely what you claimed when you asserted that they are amoral.
The quote above from Rasa was a non-affirming negative.
Best regards,
Ryan -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 11:34 PMJai Guru!
In answering the question have I ever met them, the answer is still yes. In existential amorality one can still condone morality, teach it even. Amorality itself should be a right reserved for those deserving of it. Funny conundrum eh? Even one IN and OF amoral fiber can observe alignment with morality but sorry not dogmatic virtue, rather the righteous laws of Nature. -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 12:58 AMThere is nothing in particular I disagree with here. What I was pointing out earlier is that you implied that Rasa was claiming that aghoris are anti-moral and anti-social. She did not make such a claim. That is all I was trying to say.
-
-
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 12:48 PMI do not mean moral to mean purity or abiding by the laws of the Universe. I mean moral as in socially imposed rules and ideas of what morality and normality is. Do you think that anyone of almost any orthodox religion and/or anyone who follows societal rules like a herding animal would spend their time in the land of death, burial and cremation? How about testing your limits by eating human flesh, taking drugs, transmuted poisons, handling deadly serpents, worshipping wrathful frightening dieties, sharing food with jackals and dogs, and eating from a human skull? By most people's standards whether they are socially conditioned or not, do not go and involving themselves in the cremation ground and keeping company with spirits of all kinds from angels to demons, from hungry ghosts to miserable spirits, treating every person, beast, spirit and deity as an aspect of their self. I am not saying this is nor moral as in it's bad, I am saying it's bad by society standards. I think morality is a lot of times confused with purity. Purity is a state of being, where as morality is just a state of mind, which is often socially imposed.
I.E. A person who does good deeds, goes to their church and temple, has a job, contributes to society because they think they are obliged to, and because they care what others think... As opposed to someone who is constantly performing good deeds and helping others but with no expectations of return, and by their own natures, not by the nature of society. The kind of person who views all places holy whether it's a cremation ground or church, spends every moment with god to the point they can't even keep a job because they spend all day and night chanting the name of god, who sometimes engages in rituals or activities that are not easily understood or called evil because of lack of understanding. A person who does what they need to find and worship their deity, and transcend their mortal condition regardless of what others think about them or what they do.
These are the same kind of people who have been accused of witchcraft, sorcery, etc. Look at anyone who shakes up society... Jesus was crucified because the people who followed external religion for the sake of following it because others do thought him to be blasphemous and immoral.
People who follow morality for the sake of following will always have a negative reaction towards people who have real inner purity and do not concern themselves with silly external rules of society.
There is a big difference between the order of the Universe and the rules that society and organized religions pose on people. And it gives the herd cud to chew. But those who walk away from the herd, they are called crazy, immoral, witches, sorcerers, evil, etc. by the majority of people who have a prejudiced view, the type who is filled with pre-conceived notions of how people should act, and the way society should be, people who follow the pack and do what they are told without questioning.
To an Aghori, the entire manifested Universe and all it contains on every level is the manifestation of Shakti, who is divine, and is looked upon as all pure. Everything from a flower to a piece of dog shit, to a temple, to a burning ground. It's all Shakti. they see all as pure because they are pure, by the power of the inner fire which purifies them and burns away all lies and preconceived notions.
The person who is impure, sees the manifest Universe, and things that happen within in it as only partly pure, because they have not transmuted their inner-selves and been put through the fire.
My question to you is, what do you think Morality is? What do you think it's uses are? What do you think the purpose of Society and it's organized religions and institutions that impose rules of conduct on it's people? Do you think any of this has to do with inner purity or the will of the Divine?
I think real transcendence occurs in the outcaste, in the person who has reached a mentality of unity, who cares not for the imposed laws of man, but for the laws of the Divine. I also realize that if there wasn't a reason, society and imposed morals and rules would not exist. I realize it's value to those who need society and need to be told what to do. But that does not apply to a mystic who gets their orders from their deity.
Jai Ambae Maa!
-Rasa Mohini-
~*~
-
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 6:24 PMthese are all very complex questions, perhaps better to be asked of the Aghori Guru.
my feeling is that the taboo items and left handed rituals are often consumed and done as a fast and furious way to shock the bodily system, and there are many reasons for this.
I'm not sure if one can really separate the body-mind from the spirit or soul, or choose to work with say the body only; for even with the process of internalization and inward meditative processes (as are taught in most Tantrik schools), changes to the bodily form will become evident, and as one reaches higher states of consciousness, the physical body will become transubstantiated. If the physical body is seen as the alchemical experiment, and the vehicle for realizing the Absolute, and seen as part of the dynamic process called Self-realization, then the body must be cleansed, readied and purified before consumption of taboo items, such as bhûta-shuddhi or the “purification of the elements” within the body. consumption of taboo items will undoubtably lead to some sort of transfiguration, but without certain abilities of the adept, or a highly purified mind and body, those changes may not be what one desires.
as far as I know, the term "amoral" is used as a way to express that the practitioner has gained realization and can sustain advanced states of Samadhi indefinitely, therefore anything that they may do cannot be considered moral or immoral, so the term *amoral* applies to them in a very particular way... again, I would only apply it to the adept.
~Om Shanti -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 7:26 PMThese are complex answers as well, and very interesting and valid indeed. I think that just on a basic level, one could see the benefit of breaking away from social conditioning and strict moral codes, just on the surface value, for the spiritual aspirant. In that the aspirant has less ties and constraints inhibiting free flowing transformation, inner inspection, pondering, and spiritual ideation that is free from social strictures.
I agree that the Guru should be consulted when these matters go to the ritual level, but on a basic level to even a free thinking person, let alone the heroic Aghora devotee, the benefits of questioning social structure and moral codes and seeing past them is remarkable.
I am no realized sage, nor do I really know anything at all, but the day that I started questioning society and it's moral rules and regulations is the day I started thinking differently and more freely.
Even the common person, who wants to think more freely and live more freely can do so by merely questing the rules and expectations their societies have put on them, let alone transgressing those rules. Even that can be considered a bit of transformation, and most likely does not need a guru, unless the person is absolutely incapable of thinking outside the box without losing it, which in the case of that extreme the person would most likely not be questioning social strictures in the first place, would they?
Jai Ambae Maa!
-Rasa-
~*~
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 10:16 PMHi Adya,
I hope you and others read this in the lighthearted spirit it is meant.
>>as far as I know, the term "amoral" is used as a way to express that the practitioner
>>has gained realization and can sustain advanced states of Samadhi indefinitely,
>>therefore anything that they may do cannot be considered moral or immoral, so
>>the term *amoral* applies to them in a very particular way... again, I would only
>>apply it to the adept.
The word amoral has a long history of usage and that usage has generally never referred to a "realized adept". Arbitrarily making up a *new* definition for a long established word is a little silly. It is even sillier to expect anyone else to begin using the "new and improved" definition.
The word amoral has *never* had anything to do with the ability to "sustain advanced states of Samadhi indefinitely". For instance, science is the most often cited example of something that is completely amoral. Yet, there isn’t a bunch of spiritually realized scientists running around all jacked-up on samadhi-steroids. :-) :-)
If you want an English term that describes this sort of adept, you probably shouldn’t attempt to redefine an existing word. Rather create a descriptive that doesn’t already have a well defined meaning… maybe “trans-moral realization” or something like that.
I find it interesting that many adopt the position that transgressive behavior is a "sign" of realization. However, when one looks at most of the Indian tantric materials that could be called the "primary literature" one finds something quite different. In fact, the tantras and commentarial literature essentially appear to assert the exact opposite. For instance according to the _Kalachakratantra_ and Pundarika’s commentary the _Vimalaprabha_ one is to transcend cultural convention (loka-vyavahara) in order to move towards supra-mundane gnosis (lokottara-jnana). The tantras advocate “transgression in service of transcendence” rather than the counterintuitive idea of “transcendence resulting in moral transgression”.
Warm regards,
Ryan -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 10:45 PMin a lot of Indology and Religious Studies works, the word "antinomian" is often used for transgressive spiritual practices. -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 1:21 AM>>in a lot of Indology and Religious Studies works, the word "antinomian" is often
>> used for transgressive spiritual practices.
Antinomian is closer to what Adya had in mind. It is a term borrowed from medieval Christian theological traditions and refers to the idea that one can transcend moral law via spiritual methods or beliefs.
David B. Gray translates the term vamacara (as it is used in Vajrayana at least) as "heteropraxy" and "vamacaras tu sadhakah" as "heteropraxic adept". I like those.
Antinomian, amoral, transgressive, and heteropraxic are all perfectly useable terms when discussing tantra. However, none of them refers to special ability in samadhi or even “spiritual realization” per se.
However, antinomian/transgressive/heteropraxic conduct was/is often used in service of realization… -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 4:16 PM>>"Antinomian is closer to what Adya had in mind."
How do you know that?
I can assure you Ryan, that if I wanted to use the word *antinomian* I would have used it.
I am not using *amoral* in the way that the word is typically used or the way you would find it in the dictionary, obviously, and this may require getting away from its typical or socially cultural use to understand the way I used it and peer more deeply into the context of the overall discussion and the sentence in which I used it. this does require thinking outside the box. perhaps I wrongly made the assumption that it would not be taken to mean its plain old usage, but I just took a guess that people who are drawn to a tribe like Aghora aren't interested in moral or societal rules or typical anything.
when plain everyday words are used in Siddha or Tantrik traditions, and they are frequently, they never equate to their typical usages... one must have the key to their deeper meaning... some call this twilight language ... the Bards and Druids also have a similar way of speaking, and it is very much on purpose I can assure you. the average joe will never know what they are not meant to know, and quite frankly I like it that way!
~Om Shanti -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 4:28 PMRyan wrote: "The word amoral has *never* had anything to do with the ability to "sustain advanced states of Samadhi indefinitely".
Clearly you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. right off the top of my head, I can think of the Yoga Sutras... -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 6:36 PMwhat I find interesting about the word antinomian is that it had a fairly restricted use in religious studies when things were christian-centric, and then began to be used in a broader sense - so even scholars will modify the usage of a word that already has a common currency.
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:23 PM>Clearly you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
>right off the top of my head, I can think of the Yoga Sutras...
Patanjali wrote in Sanskrit so I highly doubt he included an English word in his yoga-sutras. If you think that the word "amoral" ever left the lips or pen of Patanjali it would appear to be you who are mistaken.
Amoral is an English word and its meaning is determined by English usage and can be found in things like English dictionaries. If you will show me the Englih dictionary that includes the word samadhi in its definition of "amoral" I will repent and be converted
I hope this doesn't degenerate into something unfriendly; I have enough of those types of discussions for a while.
Best wishes,
Ryan
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:37 PMDo any of us really know what we are talking about?
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 8:04 PMAdya,
I could have sworn you were in the "my friends" thingy on my profile. Maybe I pissed you off to the point that I got cyber-dumped. Or maybe I was thinking of someone else, I dunno.
The dry semi-sarcastic sense of humor I enjoy doesn't seem to translate well into text form
.
In any event, I wasn't trying to pick a fight. But I can see that’s where its heading so let me save us both a little trouble and declare you the winner of said fight. There are no hard feelings on my part and I hope same is true for you.
Sarva mangalam
Ryan -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Fri, May 2, 2008 - 5:54 PMhey Ryan,
no harm done.... chill dude...
Im not interested in fighting with anyone, nor was I fighting with you.
but don't be surprised when you tell people that what they're saying has *never* ever in the history of time ever been used in such a way, if they respond to said absolutist statement with alternative possibilities.
your insistence on telling people what is right or wrong is your problem, i am not bothered in the least by it.
but the simple truth is I don't care for history or historical usages of any words or being the one who is right or wrong.
let's just pretend that we're all hanging at the Smashan.
would we be having these discussions there?
and would you really care?
~Om Shanti~
-
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:35 PM>How do you know that?
>I can assure you Ryan, that if I wanted to use the word *antinomian* I would have used it.
You eem to be getting a bit hostile. As I aid in thebeging of my post I was being lighthearted and (with the exption of my comments on the Kalachakratantra) was try to be a little humorous. Clearly I failed.
>I am not using *amoral* in the way that the word is typically used
>>or the way you would find it in the dictionary, obviously,
Yes, that would be my point.
>when plain everyday words are used in Siddha or Tantrik traditions,
>and they are frequently, they never equate to their typical usages
Three people in an internet forum were talking about the word amoral when you jumped in. If you think we are siddhas I guess I'm flattered. The context was not some esoteric circle of siddhas wispering their arcane secrets.
The context was three fairly normal people using the word "amoral" in the normal way.
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 4:52 AMMoral Transgression is the two words that pop up in my mind when I read this post. They stay there and beg me to define them. What is true Moral Transgression? Does it differ from society to society? Does morality change from society to society. Of course it does. In America, a good Christian is capable of eating meat. In a society like India, the meat eating is considered immoral. Especially if it's beef, which is a staple of diet here in America.
Really and truly moral codes differ on the society and the religions that exist within them. Almost every society has some religion tied to it, and there sets of rules as what is acceptable.
What difference does it make whether these rules are followed or not, especially if they only apply to people based on differing religion or differing nationality or both. In reality they are all just man made rules. They are all man made organized religions to feed the masses and keep society in line. I see the benefit for the animals of the herd to have a shepherd to follow. But my question is, what benefit are these rules to the mystic? You can follow them and respect them outwardly as to not be arrested or to not cause trouble... But inwardly what use do any socially imposed morals have?
There are basic human laws of respect like not killing, stealing, lying etc. But those to me are a level of respect for another human being, not morals.
I see every reason in questioning everything. I can question why I shouldn't kill and get the clear answer that it's not in my nature to harm another living being, or deprive them of their life. However when I question things in the example of the Christian morals that say sex before marriage and people of the same sex loving one another is blasphemy I get the clear answer that these are rules instituted by people with a false sense of purity, and by people who are uncomfortable with their own sexualities, let alone the sexualities of others.
There are those who shun beggers, prostitutes, addicts of every kind, out casted homosexuals, gender variants, the mentally ill, the terminally poor, etc. Because they do not fit in their pictures of social perfection and their ideals for purity. But to these kinds of people I say come, and I will feed you. These are my "children" because they are the ones in most dire need of love and care.
This is another reason why I say to question what makes a person moral or pure based on social standards. The out casted person still needs love and food and shelter, but it some societies they are thrown out on the streets because they do not fit in line with social standards. I lived on the street for a couple years because I did not fit in to the mold that my family had for me. And now that things have been righted, I see the kids thrown out, at the age I was thrown out... And I see them forced into begging and prostitution. And I welcome them with open arms to my house, they can even steal everything that I own of value if they need it more than I do.
This is why I feel strongly about questioning social strictures. I also think this plays a role in people's development however, and there is a reason for it all. I would never be the person I am today if it wasn't for me having to live as an out cast amongst other out casts. -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 11:47 AMagreed on all points.
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Mon, June 9, 2008 - 1:07 AM"I see every reason in questioning everything. I can question why I shouldn't kill and get the clear answer that it's not in my nature to harm another living being, or deprive them of their life. However when I question things in the example of the Christian morals that say sex before marriage and people of the same sex loving one another is blasphemy I get the clear answer that these are rules instituted by people with a false sense of purity, and by people who are uncomfortable with their own sexualities, let alone the sexualities of others."
Yes Rasamohini, you are right about the amorality of Aghora. The term Aghora means 'beyond illusion'. Morality from the western viewpoint is also an illusion, a mystic illusion to dream of the other world, a Judge-God in His/Her doctrine courtroom. But according to the principle of Aghora neither homosapien perceptual desire-oriented judgements are away from the same illusion. Natural law selected sex for procreation in all sentient beings except human beings made it into recreation by their cultivation of self-imposed free choice. Sex is not accepted as a way of recreation, be it before or after marriage, in Aghora tradition; it is either a way for procreation or meditation to transmute the losing energy into gaining it back. In this sense the natural law is to be discovered in one's own self guided by the Guru. To go beyond illusion is to go beyond all desires. Even the generally hateful rituals of practicing in opposites (for example staying in cremation grounds, eating leftovers, giving up puritanism...) is basically to have a check on your preferences and not to grow superiority complex or self-hypnosis thereof. Real Aghoris are Enlightened Beings who don't care for man-made rules but follows the ways of natural conscience. Aghora believes in all-acceptance but not perversion. Remember the word 'perversion' has been used to denote the homosapien ways that contradict natural laws. One who has not transcended sexuality, has not freed himself/ herself from gender-centricness, cannot call himself/ herself an Aghora practitioner. In India 'moral' is recognized as conscience. In that sense Aghoris also follow Aghora morals -
1. Transcend sex and see yourself formless.
2. Love all but don't interpret love as either possession or sex.
3. All acceptance without any compromise.
4. To pass through the razor's edge Wisdom between Samsara and Nirvana.
5. Transcend all rules to the end you can order the Cosmic Nature to act according to you.
Adesh! -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Sun, February 1, 2009 - 11:44 PMAdesh Kula!
You seem an accomplished Aghori!
Here are my questions:
1. Transcend sex and see yourself formless.
-What form is that close to? Somehow while thinking of transcending sex, I should still know what form am
I moving towards. You know have a vague picture because form-full is still easier to focus on than
formless. And once the form-full is reached then formless is simpler and then finally transcendence can begin...
2. Love all but don't interpret love as either possession or sex.
-Then what to interpret? Again nothing....is it?
3. All acceptance without any compromise.
-So I should accept but never compromise? I mean be haughty and mighty to the point of arrogance but still accept?
4. To pass through the razor's edge Wisdom between Samsara and Nirvana.
- But then Samsara is Nirvana! Isn't that what George Fuerstien wrote in his book on Tantra?I mean
you have most of your points borrowed from some book. All these one-liners! So where is the razor's edge
and how can I pass through it?
5. Transcend all rules to the end you can order the Cosmic Nature to act according to you.
- Who is making these rules that are to be transcended? And then can you really order
Cosmic Nature or Prakriti to listen to you? Nature or Prakriti is Ma and will you order Ma?
I guess yes, but for that one has to be as accomplished an Aghori as you.
Sorry for my limited understanding on such intricate philosophical subjects...do shed some light my way...
Adesh!!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Sun, February 1, 2009 - 11:11 PMOnlyNow,
My god you accomplished being! You achieved Nirvikalpa Samadhi (did I spell it right?).
My lord come and bless me and show me Kali and carry me across this Samsara! Can you adjust weather patterns
such that we don't have this thing global warming? After all siddhis should be scalable too! Why
stop at the rain?
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Tue, May 6, 2008 - 11:30 PMAghoris don't give a fig about taboos or transgressing norms, one way or the other. This total apathy is called transcending taboos. I have never heard of the taking of alcohol and meat within the context of taboo(from Gurus or other sadhaks), so I lean heavily toward the perspective of subtle offering and inner alchemy. The energy and mandala should be firmly established in the subtle body, the mula mantra should be done a certain amount and the parushcharana completed, it should be fuzzy were "you" start and stop and where the Ishta does.....ie non-duality. Now lets talk about the panchatattva.
One should let Kali inform who Kali is. Experience inform context. Skillful means inform concepts. Morality is right action, which may or may not conform to conventions. Power informs this, as does loss of power. Power means Shakti. Subtlety of mind provides insight into when there is power or its loss. Nothing is ever lost. I am drunk and need some meat. Thats what she said. Which leads to the topic of maithuna.
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Thu, May 15, 2008 - 8:44 AM
Perhaps, this is a matter of identifying the difference between
A: participating in (what some call astrally) any herd of any kind,
be it any relationship, family, race, religion sexual inclination
B: taking part in something of a higher order, something which
transcends all those things, like a cosmic force or a Deity or even beyond.
It all depends on one's intention and state of being while engaging the performance of taboo practises:
The urge to go it alone and transcend the Guna's suggests a certain stage of unfoldment in a 'person',
where there is no (or almost no) connection with his or her 'background', ceasing the unconscious (astral)
adherance to moral rules applying to that specific ghotra (or distortion thereof). Astrally this person has
allready advanced beyond the dualistic games Maya plays with time and space and circumstance as far as
his or her collective samskaras are concerned.
This is one of the reasons why there are so much conflicts nowadays, as many traditions
and ancient ways of life, fear the advent of being 'tainted' by that which is impure,
whether it is the 'honour of the family', interracial marriages or the prevalence of
'Western Materialism'. That is what the moral code is for, preventing that something foreign
will infuse their astral bubble and break it, thereby destroying their 'self-image'.
However, there are many motivations to engage in taboo activity,
some of them conscious, other unconscious.
Those attracted mainly to transgressing the rules, because it makes
them feel a certain way, are strictly speaking suffused in an atmosphere
which is limited to this alone.
This is the main difference between being a conscious (kevala)
outcast and an unconscious (karmic) outcast. The former can
perform in any tradition without betraying him or herself as they
are all manifestations of Sanatan Dharma.
The potency of the Vamacara Marga lies mainly in the realization
that in transcending that which binds us most to the samsara:
(tamasic and rajasic substances and practises, some herd instincts, some herd taboos)
the Shakti generated and the Grace bestowed are the quickest and most effective way to reach Liberation.
Performing in these transgressive acts frees this person this person from society's fetters,
while allowing him or her ultimately to engage in any practise.
From another perspective: Karma is born of ignorance, while real Dharma
(not in the societal sense) is free-willed, conscious and allways action-transcendant.
It may seem it morally transgressive, but purity lies not in the act, but in the intention
of the actor.
Ultimatly, all moral code is used for and dependent on keeping people together,
by manipulating their sense of fear and desire. By transcending fear and desire,
you are no longer bound by any moral code as your astral body will cease to hold sway over you. -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Mon, June 9, 2008 - 1:24 AMGreat understanding Petros! Congratulations!
-
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Sun, February 1, 2009 - 11:27 PMI think these are the questions from your thread, but if so then let my humble intelligence try:
Do you think that these taboos that she likes to break should be a model for her devotees who can often be stuck in such taboos?
No. It' akin to saying that if Buddha quit his life of luxury to find Boddhi-dharma then we should do so too! Yet in Tantra we have
something called 'Avishkara' and 'Nyasa'. Now Avishkara is literally recreating and if one recreates even remotely what Kali did
or does then one feels closer to her. So the meat and alcohol and the over-board stuff. Have you heard of Ramakrishna Paramhansa?
He didn't do any of the meat, alcohol etc but he did do Avishkara by dressing up as a woman and he is greatest Kali worshipper that we know of (at least me). Now Nyasa is something that you are doing in your picture on profile! Do you feel a bit more like Kali holding
your hand in that mudra and with your tongue out? I guess so...
Do you ever get the desire to offer or consume taboo substances?
Yes I do them to see a different perspective. I offer them because I have them on me. I really like Kali-Shiva on them! Not to say
I wouldn't like them on candy and I would still offer candy as I have it on me.
Is it part of a regular sadhana for you to do so literally or metaphorically?
Literally.
Has any of the socially or morally destructive tendencies of your deity rubbed off on you?
None of this is either socially or morally destructive! So how can it rub of on me? You know what
is socially or morally destructive? Brain-washing people and conforming to misplaced society.
Jai ma! -
-
Re: Meat and Alcohol in relation to devotees of deities with a tamas nature.
Sun, February 1, 2009 - 11:48 PMRasa,
Sorry for posting again bu then I didn't address this to you before...
I think these are the questions from your thread, but if so then let my humble intelligence try:
Do you think that these taboos that she likes to break should be a model for her devotees who can often be stuck in such taboos?
No. It' akin to saying that if Buddha quit his life of luxury to find Boddhi-dharma then we should do so too! Yet in Tantra we have
something called 'Avishkara' and 'Nyasa'. Now Avishkara is literally recreating and if one recreates even remotely what Kali did
or does then one feels closer to her. So the meat and alcohol and the over-board stuff. Have you heard of Ramakrishna Paramhansa?
He didn't do any of the meat, alcohol etc but he did do Avishkara by dressing up as a woman and he is greatest Kali worshipper that we know of (at least me). Now Nyasa is something that you are doing in your picture on profile! Do you feel a bit more like Kali holding
your hand in that mudra and with your tongue out? I guess so...
Do you ever get the desire to offer or consume taboo substances?
Yes I do them to see a different perspective. I offer them because I have them on me. I really like Kali-Shiva on them! Not to say
I wouldn't like them on candy and I would still offer candy as I have it on me.
Is it part of a regular sadhana for you to do so literally or metaphorically?
Literally.
Has any of the socially or morally destructive tendencies of your deity rubbed off on you?
None of this is either socially or morally destructive! So how can it rub of on me? You know what
is socially or morally destructive? Brain-washing people and conforming to misplaced society.
Jai ma!
-