It's not the end of the world - C'mon help me out~!!

topic posted Wed, November 5, 2008 - 6:48 AM by  Schrödinger'...
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
In fact I can think of some up-sides to a Democratic sweep of Congress and a Democratic president.

1.) A more liberal supreme court - I liked the court of the late 1960's and early 1970's. It was more Civil rights oriented. I want a slightly liberal supreme court because the lower courts across the land tend to be overly invested in serving local governments and less about the people and especially less about the rights of the accused.

2.) The potential for de-criminalizing Marijuana becomes more plausible both at the state and federal levels.

3.) there exists a chance that we could be building better roads, schools, and publicly funded hospitals.
Advertisement
Advertisement

  • the composition of the court prevents it from swinging to far to the left. and the fact that the economy is in the crapper means that the Dems can't go apeshit with new spending programs.
    • **********the fact that the economy is in the crapper means that the Dems can't go apeshit with new spending programs. *********

      I think you are giving them too much credit.

      As I recall during the recessions of the Carter years the left went ape shit with spending programs. Many of which were supposedly targeted at creating jobs. Typical of such endeavors, they all failed. I remember the local Woburn Mass CETA office had an occasional opening they recycled every few months driving meals to shut ins. That was about the best the government was able to do. Woburn was in the heart of the famous Route 128 Loop (www.naihunneman.com/Portals/...&DQ2.pdf) which was the Massachusetts answer to CA's silicon Valley.

      The left is able to rationalize damn near any social engineering project you can imagine and plenty more no matter how bad times are.

      In fact they use the fact of bad times as justification.


      • sadly, I think you're right. the fact that they are lobbying the Bush administration to bail out the big three is proof of that.

        oh well. let's hope for the best.
        • unfortunately, the republicans have left the economy in a mess and the democrats blindly followed messiah paulson's miracle cure. . .

          do you think there is any way out of this mess without government spending? I don't. But the spending has to be well thought out and have concrete goals that conform with the way economics can work best in this country.

          so i favor legalization of hemp, establishment of relations with cuba, freeing those incarcerated for victimless crimes, consolidation of the space program, the curtailment of extravagant military expenditures and the launching of the green economy to provide home grown energy sources and thereby cut our bleeding out of dollars in imports, etc etc. .

          we need to take radical measures but again, they need to conform to sound economic practice.

          voodoo economics! HW didn't know the half of it. .
  • Well the great depression was distinct from what is possible today in that the US's adherence to the gold standard crippled government's ability to cope. The supply of money was entirely inflexible. The collapse of the banking institutions also was different then. Today the banks are underpinned and there is the FDIC. So the banks which facilitate the flow of money have remained viable and the fed is able to issue more money.

    Unfortunately the banks are not loaning money yet. That was right at the heart of the bailout. The fed wanted liquidity and the way to that is VIA lending. Instead the banks took the money and are hoarding it.

    The Car makers can not make the same claims about facilitating the flow of money as can the banks. If they go into bankruptcy they can re-org and keep going too. Federal money is just stupid in the automakers cases 'cause the law already has provisions for what ails them.

Recent topics in "AMERICA: The United States Network"