-
Unsu...
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 12:59 PMPossibly yes, because of orgasms.
For many if not most humans, orgasm is the only state where one loses the sense of "self" as separate; in spite of orgasm being an exceptionally physical/body experience, it is an out-of-body experience as well.
And humans would want to know "whaaaaaa was that? -- gotta be something greater than me that I just tapped into." And in attempting to answer that question, there would be different theories, hence religions. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 1:02 PMThat's spirituality, not religion. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 1:03 PMPS, I just came up with this this week.
Imagine a color wheel.
Math, Spirituality and Art are primary colors.
Math+Spirituality = Magic
Math + Art = Science
Art+Spirituality=Religion
-
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 7:59 PM"Math+Spirituality = Magic
Math + Art = Science
Art+Spirituality=Religion"
Huh? This makes no sense whatsoever, I'm afraid. I'd think that math and magic would be diamterically opposed to one another, beyond which, what does art have to do with science or religion? -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Thu, November 9, 2006 - 6:52 AMIs an egg a cake? Are eggs used to make cakes?
Math is the formulaic approach to the universe. Art is a perspective based expression of the universe. Magic uses formulas to attempt to influence the universe from a personal perspective.
-
-
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 7:59 PMReligion is sprituality codifed.
-
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 8:00 PMMegan, you never went to a Dead show if you think orgasm is the only state where one loses the sense of "self"... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 8:45 PMThat's why I qualified with "For many if not most humans" ....
...at least I don't think most humans went to Dead shows...but then again..it was like everyone and everything was there...or was it that everything was there and I was one...or was it everything is one and I was there...or was it I was everything and there was One...
...think I should start a religion?
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Thu, January 25, 2007 - 10:51 PMmmm... Dead Shows
-
-
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 7:04 PM"Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?"
Yes, you left out ignorance and superstition. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 7:49 PMIsn't superstition the result of suffering and great quantities of ignorance the result of poverty?
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 8:40 PMHey, I'm ignorant AND superstitous and even I know organized religon is a crock a shit...
-
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Thu, November 9, 2006 - 10:23 AMI dunno, but since suffering and poverty were most likely around before religion and have survived through hundreds if not thousands of different religions, exists where religion is banned, and generally has foundations based in the nature of life and mankind, I don't think there is necessarily a direct connection between religion and poverty/suffering.
Or are you saying that if there was no suffering and poverty, religion would have nothing to offer? Don't have a solid answer for that either, but I'd venture a guess that yeah, it probably would exist if for no other reason than people still need a strong reason to be better than you and me. The need to be *right* is pretty powerful in a lot of folks. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Thu, November 9, 2006 - 10:29 AM"I don't think there is necessarily a direct connection between religion and poverty/suffering. "
Neither do I. However, I do, apparently, believe there is a correllation between religion depending on suffering and poverty.
That suffering and poverty existed long before religion came around to exploit or feed off it doesn't mean anything. Sex existed long before MTV too, but MTV couldn't survive without sex.
"Or are you saying that if there was no suffering and poverty, religion would have nothing to offer?"
That too. People do look for things to make them feel superior, but the vast majority of people in a religion depend on it for solace. Without those numbers, religion wouldn't be seen as a route to influence and power. Secular power and wealth would be more than happy to fill the void for the greedy.
Without the backing of numbers, religion's ability to provide a pulpit and power would be pretty dim.
-
Unsu...
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Thu, November 9, 2006 - 10:41 AMI dunno, but since suffering and poverty were most likely around before religion and have survived through hundreds if not thousands of different religions, exists where religion is banned,>>
just because religions are banned, doesnt mean that it is still not practiced -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Thu, November 9, 2006 - 10:45 AMIn fact, it probably makes it more likely. Why ban something that doesn't exist? -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, November 10, 2006 - 12:22 PMYeah, that could be. My first thought was that where it's banned it's much harder to come by, but after I thought about it, religion thrives in that kind of environment. So forget that part. Of course that whole paragraph was a result in me misreading the original post to read "can religion exist without "creating" suffering and poverty" so nevermind that first part of my post.
Now that I know what you're talking about, I think it would and could, but on a much smaller scale. Even without the lure of solace in the present life, there's more than likely lots of people who would want that same sense of security in the hereafter. Or who simply need something to believe in for direction and guidance. How much would that be reduced by a life devoid of suffering or poverty? Probably lots. Interesting question, that... -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, November 10, 2006 - 12:26 PMI think, much like an unemployment office, without a need to support it, most people wouldn't choose to keep it around.
Given enough time, most people would start to wonder who are these folks who claim that god is speaking through THEM if everyone is supposed to be equal in the eyes of god.
And in a society where things would theoretically be equal in terms of access to necessities, the focus on remaining inequalities would get pretty sharp.
Of course, that's already happened in one way, the rise of megachurches came after "televangelists" realized "Hey, I could do that too and no one could say anything about it!"
I sometimes still give a thought to making my own church and finding me a flock. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, November 10, 2006 - 3:05 PM"Given enough time, most people would start to wonder who are these folks who claim that god is speaking through THEM if everyone is supposed to be equal in the eyes of god. "
I can't figure out why more people don't see that NOW. Of course, depending on who you talk to, we may not all be equal in the eyes of God. Ya know, favored tribes if Isreal, chosen people, true descendents and all that...
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, March 16, 2007 - 12:23 AMOf course it could...people from time in memorial (sp??) have been expecting/looking or an explaination for the thing that hapen in their lives form day to day...it could be God(ess) but it could also be pure coincidence....Fate or any of the multiple myriad of gods (roman, greek, celtic...u decide) that we pledge alliegience to. Religion comes down to faith - either you have it or you don"t. You can say you have it until your blue in the face but (especially if you're catholic) at the tim of reckoning the truth will be found..,...not that I agree iwth all of that but apparently that the way of things :) -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, March 16, 2007 - 3:20 AMOK, that's interesting, now could you make a coherent argument for why religion would exist without suffering and poverty? Maybe a few salient points would help me grasp what you're trying to say. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, March 16, 2007 - 10:10 AM"Of course it could...people from time in memorial (sp??) have been expecting/looking or an explaination for the thing that hapen in their lives form day to day"
what? you dont think there was suffering and poverty when humans first appeared?
-
Unsu...
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Sun, March 18, 2007 - 4:38 PMalrighty - I guess attention deficite breeds inarticulation with me.....
I guess what I was trying to say was that the question assumes that religion is a product of poverty and suffering when I don't believe that it is as simple as all that...it could be a factor but not the underlying origin. To my way of thinking, human's have had that place inside them that is fulfilled by believing in something greater than themselves - this could come from a number of reasons....the loss of security when you take responsibility for yourself in the world and have no one to look out for you, the all important 'why are we here, where did we come from, where are we going' questions, a reaction to the inexplicable occurances of the day-to-day, a inner connection to the rhythms of the vibrations of the world around us, the terror of having children.......I could go on and on. I think that suffering and poverty are a part of all of that but aren't the fundamental reasons for religion, I guess I would like to think that something that is meant to be a gift would be founded from such a place.....doesn't seem to balance up in my mind or my gut I suppose. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Tue, March 20, 2007 - 12:50 PM
I don't get your point. are you suggesting that religion preys on the poor? well then what about the scientologists? they seem to have a fairly affluent following. and of course, there are some very wealthy mormons and jews. I think people instinctively need to affiliate themselves with something larger than themselves. it is part of the socialization process that facilitates working towards a common goal. it makes sense that a common set of rules is a good first step in this process and what better than religion?
anyway, it seems that some of us see ending religion as a magic bullet against ignorance, intolerance and suffering. my hunch is that even if you succeed, you'll just end up replacing one dogmatic, intrusive institution with another. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Tue, March 20, 2007 - 3:37 PMWe can actually agree. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, March 30, 2007 - 8:28 PMThe most dangerous people are more times then not the ones who think they walk the earth with gods warrant.
Can religion survive without suffering and poverty? Ofcourse it can. Just drive by any Mega church and count the escalades in the parking lot.
I think you can make a pretty solid argument that the people in those places have lost the meaning of the faith. Just add up the amount of money spent on the extravagance in the parking lot and ask yourself how muc h of it could have been spent on practicing what jesus said about helping the poor but as far as the institution of religionitself? It does better than anyone in good times -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, March 30, 2007 - 8:50 PMWhat value those Escalades if not to firmly assert that the owners are above the poverty and pain around them? Status symbols lose their meaning if they have no corresponding lack to contrast their excess. -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Fri, March 30, 2007 - 11:25 PMAnd that is the hypocrisy which infuriates me about churches. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Sat, March 31, 2007 - 12:44 PMIm not sure if they are hypocrits or if they are ignorant. Just an example the christian right demands public prayer in school. If they had actually ever read the gospels they would know that God said "do not pray in public like the Pharites rather withdraw alone into your darkest chambers" I shouldnt have put tha in quotes because Im paraphrasing from memory.
I like to tell christians who want to display the ten comandments that the reason they cant do it in the commons is for the same reason I cant go down to their church and glue the constitution to the chest of their wooden jesus.
How come noone ever wants to display the sermon on the mount particularly things like oh you know bleesed are the peacemakers, the merciful shall receive mercy? -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Sat, March 31, 2007 - 4:56 PMWhat I want to know is why they never want to post the Song of Solomon...... THAT'S scripture I can get behind! -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Sun, October 14, 2007 - 4:14 AMamen, sista... -
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Sun, October 14, 2007 - 4:18 AMthat being said...ahem. I think the question is somewhat simplistic. I think religions, Catholicism comes to mind, have taken advantage of suffering and poverty, but I think that these are an intrinsic part of the human condition. I also think that faith and the religious impulse are part of the human animal. It's interwoven with the whole of human history. And I am unaware of a single culture that did not embrace some type of religion, and give it's priests power.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Could religion exist without suffering and poverty?
Wed, April 16, 2008 - 4:08 PMErrrm. The older I get, the less use I have for religion (we're in negative terrotory now). Suffering and poverty seem to be holding their own. Methinks there is no connection....