Advertisement
www.nasa.gov/mission_pag...h/index.html
www.nasa.gov/multimedia/...d_video.html
Houston Chronicle
www.chron.com/disp/story....6530036.html
www.nasa.gov/multimedia/...d_video.html
Houston Chronicle
www.chron.com/disp/story....6530036.html
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Endeavor Launch
Thu, July 16, 2009 - 12:00 PMvery cool to see such a good shot of it breaking the speed of sound. -
-
Re: Endeavor Launch
Thu, July 16, 2009 - 4:23 PMYeah, quite a powerful view, in general.
-
-
Re: Endeavor Launch
Fri, July 17, 2009 - 5:04 AMIt always gives me goose bumps.
I assume the shock wave at 1:30 was the shuttle breaking the sound barrier? And also the reason for the short down-throttle?
Visually impressive, but I'm sorry to say it is a very dangerous, outdated piece of junk.
I just can't get into this international space station thing. I know we have mundane work in long-term spoace living to do before we can consider leaving for Mars, ect., but this is just boring. We might get some more public support with more interesting stuff, but i doubt even that.
Back in the day of the moon landings, millions of people around the world were glued to the radio and TV. I was, a little boy with wide eyes and big dreams. Now, I don't think a Mars landing would guarantee bigger ratings than that of one of the braindead reality shows.
It's sad. If we ever go to Mars, we'll probably have to buy a ride from somebody else, because nobody here will be able to graduate high school, let alone pass enough engineering courses to build an interstellar rocket, lol ( sob).
-
-
Re: High school
Sun, July 19, 2009 - 5:48 AMAs one of my freshman physics professors said once - "Foreigners will do it for us" .... (me looking at him in a slight shock) ... Bwah-hah-hah-hah-hah-hah!!! ...(him sinisterily laughing, as if saying, "Well, have you got it now, stupid? It's about damn time already.")
This system has been built to leech the brains, ideas, people and resources from the rest of the world, hence, (some of), the consequences of it are what you are discribing,Thanos. And it indeed does hurt, deep inside, those who sincerely love their country and want it to succeed on its own. Yet, they are overwhelmed by the vast majority of those who think, (and want), otherwise.
-
-
Re: High school
Sun, July 19, 2009 - 2:41 PMAlso, the crash program of the 60's was as much about geopolitical machinations as a science. It was an "us against them thing", and nearly everybody was behind it.
Now, there is nowhere near that level of competition, There's no real sense of national pride. Nobody gives a damn about space, except for the military, who must dominate it, and the scientists, who want to understand and explore it. Your average person and the politicians who get their votes just don't care, because it has no percieved value. Who's gonna vote for a politician "squandering" billions ( remember when that was big number? lol?) on "worthless" projects such as Orion and the dozens of lesser known probes when they can't afford to see a doctor. You wait and see Nasa's budget after national healthcare gets passed. I mean, it'll be nice for me to finally be able to see a Doctor, but it'll basically be a budget so low nothing at all will get done. I bet it would cost a quarter billion dollars to do absolutely nothing except keep the lights on.
There's no way we'll explore the solar system without a multinational effort. It's just too expensive. With all the countries with the highest level of technology suspicious and all but looking down the barrel of a rifle at each other, it makes it that much harder. I don't know if it's ever going to be done. I'll be lucky to see a human boot on Mars before my time on Earth comes to an end.
It's just sad for a kid who grew up with the Apollo program and raised on Star Trek ( sniffle). -
-
-
Re:
Fri, August 21, 2009 - 4:12 PMNasa's bugdet is actually very small compared to other goverment (..& definetly private) agencies. It's just that their spending is so "visual" that most people beleive they are taking a huge chunk out of spending. But, yeah. To the general public (and I do mean general) space travel is, and for the forseable future, will be boring. It's just that everyone has been raised on Star Wars & Star Trek and not many people watch 2001 A space odessy any more. -
-
Re:
Sat, August 22, 2009 - 4:43 AMYep, it's only a small percentage of a decimal of a fraction of the budget.
I hate to say it, but robot probes are probably the way to go for your forseeable future. Not nearly as romantic as skimming over an alien landscape in a landspeeder, but it's something. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re:
Sat, August 22, 2009 - 3:50 PMNot MY future. I love real space travel. Always have. The more probes the merrier. But how much you want to bet the ratings for the mars landing will plummet in about 3 weeks after touchdown? -
-
Re:
Sat, August 22, 2009 - 6:11 PMEasy solution. Just have the next celebrity that goes to trial tried on Mars. (Defense would have argued it was the only place with an unbiased jury.)
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re:
Sat, August 22, 2009 - 11:59 PMI just saw on TV that the whole Moon mission is in jeopardy because of the lack of funds. I.E., it's not gonna happen by 2020.
...
(Read: Those who are really in power, in this country, have diverted the money stream towards the preparation for the WWIII, after Barak will have served his two terms, and they fix the 2016 elections to put their own president, (jebby-boy?). THAT is when we will ALL be fucked... The extent of preparations for that, (war), is indescribable; to those who know what is going on.)
-
-
Re:
Sun, August 23, 2009 - 4:55 AMFortunately, control of space will be neccessary to win WW3. And by win, I mean survive with more than a 15th century style of living. -
-
Re:
Sun, August 23, 2009 - 11:58 AMSo, in order to control/have-access-to space is directly related to the technology that would have been developed during the "Return to the Moon" program.
-
-
-
Re:
Thu, September 3, 2009 - 6:10 AMI saw the shuttle fly over yesterday. I went outside to let the dog pee real early in the morning. There's my nieghbor and his wife sitting in chairs in the driveway. Since it was about 430 AM, I said what are you crackheads doing? He says, we're watching the shuttle. I said yeah, right. He says, no, really- look! So I look up, and sure enough, there's something very bright, like venus, way brighter than a normal sattelite you can barely see against the infinite background of stars, hauling ass across the sky, from north to south, ( give or take). He said he has a schedule for when you can come out and see it. Tomorrow, ( Friday) it can be seen at 4:54 am coming out of the west northwest for a few minutes.
I dunno why it's so bright, I guess the sunlight reflecting off is pretty bright up there. Either that or it just burned up again. Piece of junk, lol.
I used to say when i was a kid, man I wish I could ride on that. Now, haha, NO WAY. -
-
Re:
Thu, September 3, 2009 - 6:19 AMOf course, if you live somewhere away from me ( laughlin, NV) it will probably be different for you.
-
Re:
Thu, September 3, 2009 - 5:14 PMI'm sure they'll come up with a,(much), better means of getting up there within a decade or less - Russians, Americans, Europeans... So, you won't have to say "NO WAY" anymore. :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-