I am just curious to know if most of you who perform on a regular basis use choreography, or do you just "wing it" and do improv? An old teacher of mine said that everyone uses choreography, and she seemed kind of against the idea of doing improv. My personal belief is that it's good to be able to do both. I have always learned choreographies from the teachers I've danced with, and I like doing choreographed dances, but I wonder what does a dancer do if she's dancing to a live musician, for example, and the music is slightly different than what she's used to practicing to? It seems to me that she would have to do a little improvising. I have yet to dance to a live musician, and this thought always occurred to me. Have any of you ever gotten a little stuck in this way, and if so, what did you do?
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Sun, May 25, 2008 - 4:10 PM
    Improvisation is absolutely a necessary skill. One of my teachers likes to say that eventually you WILL forget a part of a choreo; if you don't know how to improvise, you're screwed. You can't just stand there and try to remember what happens next. Plus, being skilled at improv lets you change what you're doing to fit the audience's mood. Like, if they're a really awesome and interactive audience, you'll be able to "play" with them more, do some audience participation, etc.
    However, I do like to choreograph some. Nothing fancy, just a rough outline/ skeleton. What I usually do is improvise to a song many, many times (and film it if I can) to see what works and what doesn't. Then I have a basic idea of what to do, and if I get stuck while improvising, I'll have something to go back to. I think improv generally looks more natural, more like you're actually having fun dancing and not just trying to remember what you are supposed to do next. And it keeps you more in the moment; I've been guilty of going on auto-pilot and zoning out when doing a choreography.
    Oh! I just remembered this, and I think it's a good analogy. You know Coyote Ugly? The actual club, not the movie? A few years ago one opened in DC and a couple guys I knew went there. They said the dancing was super boring because they just kept doing the same choreographies over....and over....and over....and over.... So you don't want to rely on choreo so much that people get bored with your performances because you're doing the same dances over and over, especially if you have a lot of repeat customers wherever you're performing.
    Did that help at all?
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Sun, June 1, 2008 - 7:02 PM
      One of my teachers likes to say that eventually you WILL forget a part of a choreo;

      I've seen it happen while judging solo dancers. You can see them catching themselves to get their choreography right. If they had worked on their improv then no one would have been the wiser and the routine would have looked flawless.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Mon, May 26, 2008 - 7:27 AM
    I think dancers need both skills - being able to adjust choreography to fit the circumstances, and to do improv when it's appropriate (or necessary). You can learn improv by taking choreography & 'messing around' with it too - or by pracising performing to music you're not familiar with, or by working on dancing your favorite moves & combinations but changing them a bit to fit different music.

    I think some teachers might want newer dancers to stick with choreography until they get experienced, because improvising is a hard skill to do well if you're not experienced in performing. It could be that's what that teacher had in mind? I wrote on improvising last year for Zaghareet mag in the July - Sept. issues, which are online if you want to read them. www.kawakib.com/articles.html
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Mon, May 26, 2008 - 9:12 AM
      No, the teacher is a pretty well-known dancer now, and she always uses choreography when she dances. I remember she once told me that it's bullshit when people say they don't use choreography. Maybe she herself is just trained that way, and feels more comfortable? I don't really know. But I totally agree with you that it's good to be able to do a little of both. Sometimes it's more fun to just play around and just dance to a song without really thinking about it.
      • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

        Thu, June 5, 2008 - 11:32 AM
        When I am not performing with my troupe or in a group choreography I Only do improv for 2 reasons ...

        #1 I might be bi-polar or something but I feel so much different from day to day and I like to reflect my feelings , emotions while I am dancing as they strike or adjust my music to the audiance types that show up ( as opposed the the one I was expecting )

        #2 A dead dog has better memory then I do when it comes to choreography ...if I am in a group its ok ...my mind goes into robot mode and I anticipate REALLY well ... alone in a solo or leading a choreography .. my mind races the whole time I dance about anything and nothing and it becomes difficult for me

        I really blossom as a dancer when I just flow with the beats and let my mind go blank theres nothing like forgetting anyone else is in the room and dissapering in the music :) ... no BS in that
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Mon, May 26, 2008 - 8:19 AM
    i haven't performed much, but Shira.net's articles about common styles in the USA has a section of which styles tend to use improv. vrs choreography. She talks about why and how one or the other fits the circumstances that style usually appears in. ^_^
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Mon, May 26, 2008 - 2:22 PM
    I am afraid to say that I totally disagree with your teacher!!! I think improvisation is an essential skill for dancers of ALL LEVELS and the sooner a student starts the better! I see choreography as a necessary evil...its inevitable that if performing as a group it will be needed but other than that don't do it!!! I always improvise to a greater or lesser degree when I am performing. You have to really know your music (if working from cd). As mentioned above I too have a 'map' in my head of the music. I know what looks good with what part of the music and I have an image of what I want the dance to look like planned out in my head but after that its all down to the night. I'll have put in plenty of practice runs beforehand mind you!! This gives you the ability to interact and engage with the audience rather than just go through your moves like a robot! And the audience will love you for it!

    As you quite rightly point out..improvisation is essential if you are working with musicians...as they may play a version you are not familiar with or improvise themselves...in Egyptian (my style) its the tradition to have improvised interaction between the musicians and dancer... and there is no greater thril than having a band follow you!

    My advice is to get practicing at home if you don't get to improvise in class! A great way is to get your friends over..put a cd on shuffle and then take turns..practice at improvising and performing..all in one evening :-)
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Mon, June 2, 2008 - 12:21 PM
      I agree with Ellie - belly dance is about improv, and improv can be hard. When I first started I found it easy to improv on my own at home alone, but really difficult to solo improv in class with the other students watching!! So it's important to start practicing that skill right away, before choreography becomes a permanent crutch.
      Improv gives you the ability to adapt your performance to your surroundings. It also gives you a tool for quick recovering if something goes awry with the performance. When things are under control, just return to that "map" in your head.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Mon, May 26, 2008 - 7:04 PM
    When I'm watching an event like a recital or "stage" show, I honestly prefer to see choreography. I notice that audiences tend to be more attentive to that sort of thing, too. Improv just doesn't quite keep my attention the same way in that environment. Now I _enjoy_ the personal feel of dancing improv in festivals or spontaneous situations like a music circle & wish to grow in that area.
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Mon, June 2, 2008 - 12:27 PM
      Choreography can coordinate dramatically with the music. It can look a lot better on stage, but things don't always go as planned, and a good performer needs to be able to keep going, and that's where the improv element comes in.
      Also, a routine that's only part choreo can include dramatic choreo sections to highlight parts, and other sections that are organic improv growing out of the moment, the music, the dancer, the audience, and the surroundings.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Tue, May 27, 2008 - 2:07 AM
    I will perform on friday and I'm sure that I will get totally mixed up. That means, as long as I don't find my way back into my original plans I will have to improvise. But nobody really can tell unless you stop dancing or start making worried faces. It is only my best pal from dancing who usually notices. I only find it is a pity, because some choreographical ideas that answer the music so well to me are the highlights of the dance and I feel sorry if I skipped them.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Tue, May 27, 2008 - 8:03 AM
    From a training perspective, I'd suggest learning both skills. They each have their own strengths and limitations, and are appropriate for different situations. When you're performing, you can choose the method that's most appropriate for the show and your mood.

    As lots of people have pointed out, being able to improv will let you turn lemons into lemonade when things don't go according to plan, but it's not just important for disaster recovery. Sometimes those unexpected moments turn out to be the most fun and memorable parts of your show.


    I improvise almost exclusively when performing, for a few reasons:

    - I'm usually dancing to live music, and even when the band is playing something we've used a dozen times, it's never the same. So relying on choreography wouldn't work. Plus, when you have a good band, they'll watch you and adjust what they're playing accordingly: if you do a really cool accent, they'll bring that accent back in the music, or if you're clearly having a great time with a song, they may play another verse, etc.

    - When I am using taped music, it's usually for a bellygram, where I rarely have much information about the space (or whether everybody is going to jump up to dance and fill up what space there is).

    - I give a much more lively and "connected" performance when I improvise, since more of the dance is coming out of the spirit of the moment: how I feel, what the band is playing, and what the audience is responding to. When I use choreography, I'm breaking that audience-band-dancer connection, and my dance ends up more cerebral, less spontaneous, and less emotionally honest. That said, this is NOT true for everybody. I have seen some dancers who can bring lots of warmth and emotion through a choreography. But that is also a skill that takes a lot of practice.


    That said, choreography is still useful to me:

    - In my first few years, I'd use choreography as a gateway to improv. At each student recital, I'd choreograph a different section of a routine (intro, veil, drum solo, karsilama, etc.). Once I had performed one choreography for a particular section, I found it much easier to improv it because it would get the pacing of the piece and a lot of different combinations and accents into muscle memory. And having already performed it made it less intimidating. :)

    - at any level, learning choreography ***and spending some time analyzing it*** (i.e., thinking about why the choreographer made the choices she did) is a good way to learn composition skills. And whether you choreograph in advance or on the fly, the same compositional principals still apply.

    - learning choreography during practice time is a good way to get new ideas and stylings. You can mooch anything from a full combination to a cute accent or a useful transition. Plus, cross-training in someone else's style is good for getting your own creative juices flowing and for stretching beyond your usual material.

    $0.02,
    Nadira


    p.s. If I may do a little shameless self-promotion: I have a free video podcast on dance composition at:
    www.taktaba.com
    The podcast takes a very analytical, focused look at individual choreographic elements that you can play with (timing, repetition, etc.), but I'm also working on a more ground-up series on how to improvise and how to choreograph.
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Tue, May 27, 2008 - 2:38 PM
      Yeah, I agree with you. I think dancing mostly the improv way also takes a very long time to be able to do, at least exclusively. Malia DeFelice once said that she does improv at times because she's been dancing so long (over 30 years!) that she knows almost every belly dance song really well. She doesn't really have to improv now because of this reason. But we still did nothing but choreography during class and when we performed.
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Fri, May 30, 2008 - 12:59 PM
      funny you should mention your taktaba podcasts, Nadira -- I just ran into those a few weeks ago on itunes and downloaded episodes 1-3. I've watched all of #1 & part of #2 and am enjoying them so far. It's interesting how the principles of musical composition and dance composition seem so closely related. I have this sudden urge to analyze my choreographies to see if they follow any of those patterns you mentioned -- a lot of dancers probably do these things intuitively but it's helpful to actually become conscious of what you're doing, why and what effect it has on the audience.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Tue, May 27, 2008 - 9:35 AM
    Wow, what a great response! Thank you, ladies! I definitely agree that being able to improvise a little is important. I do it at home, and actually, that's how I am coming up with some choreographies. It is difficult to improvise on your own at first when all you have ever really done is choreography. With my teachers, we always just worked on the choreography that we were performing. At least I am working more on improvising now.
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Tue, May 27, 2008 - 11:49 AM
      As long as nobody is watching improvising is cool. For myself i can dwell upon one or two figures for a long time, just to enjoy the move. Or in between two classes my teacher has a break and sticks on music and all try out their stuff without any pressure or criticism.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Tue, May 27, 2008 - 7:47 PM
    I"m very, very lucky in that Tribal Spirits of the Sun, my troupe, has many live drummers. We play with all the basic Middle Eastern rhythms as well as African ones, and most of the dancers are fair to good drummers as well. The beautiful relationship between dancers and drummers that know each other over a long period of time is something I would NOT trade - and it's great for learning improv. But even with that blessing, which most dancers don't get, I would have to say that improv comes usually to me with a 'canned''piece that I really like and have heard before.

    And, as before stated, choreographies come like wildfire when you're improving and enjoying yourself while listening to music - just be sure that you have pen and paper handy, or your MS Word or Google Documents ready to go! I have spent many happy hours choreographing fun pieces by improving over and over to a song.

    Gypsy Wishes,

    Raven
    www.thegypsykiss.com
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Fri, May 30, 2008 - 2:19 PM
    I think it's really important to know how to improv... I don't mean ATS style, I mean flat out dancing to music without a pre-planned sequence of moves. I've been working on my improv skills because there's always times when I would love to get up and dance to live music or during open floor. I've also been sneaking in improv on myself more and more lately - I'll choreograph parts of a song and intentionally leave others open for improvisation, both to build my skill and to change things up when I perform the same number again later on. It has made me a lot more comfortable with improvisation overall.

    I also think that improv is a good skill to have because it makes you listen to the music you're dancing to. I've seen many choreographies that simply happened at the same time as the music, instead of being a response and addition to the music. Improv is a direct reaction to whatever is happening musically... so it can make you realize things about a piece of music you hadn't necessarily noticed.

    A poster above said they find improv less interesting... I actually wonder how many of us see improvisational dancing and don't even realize it's improv. Elizabeth Strong, for example, frequently dances improv, but you'd never know it by watching her. She knows her music inside and out, and it looks like she always knows what's next.
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Fri, May 30, 2008 - 9:16 PM
      I'm not a professional by any means and I will always consider myself a student, but I have been performing a bit here and there. I debuted earlier this year at an Improv event (Cues and Tattoos) and I wasn't too happy with my performance...more nerves and other stuff...but we all see those things when we watch ourselves....anyway...sorry...off track sort of.

      I have been dancing at a nursing home for a few months now and each time I put together a CD of music that I know pretty well. I haven't choreographed anything because of a number of reasons. I don't have a lot of time to put together that amount of choreography (20min or so) since I am a full time student. I also, just don't like the idea of choreographing every move. I like to have the ability to go from one move to another by feel and not by programming.

      On the flip side, I am working on a choreography for Med Fest. Though, it's not a completely choreographed number, there are parts that I have moves I want to put in a certain spot. Why?...because when I watch myself in my head there are just certain moves that I want to put there. I also see it in another way. By choreographing these moves, I am training my body to do certain combinations that I otherwise would probably not do. In addition to that, I am doing moves that are a little more complex and/or involved.

      I agree with what seems to be the consensus here. Both is best. Why limit yourself?

      btw...I am performing tomorrow (the MedFest one) at a Hafla and I am quite nervous. Wish me luck all. I haven't finished the choreography so I'm going to be winging a lot of it. Damn finals and all those papers and exams just take time away from belly dancing. You think the professors would be a little more understanding. :)
      • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

        Sat, May 31, 2008 - 6:18 AM
        I love to do choreographed dances...but I believe being able to do improv is essential, as well...

        My very first independent solo, I ended up having to do total improv...I'd had a pretty well choreographed routine to a certain song...had been practicing the night before...and went to take my CD out of my stereo the next morn...and it was stuck!!! It would not come out of the player!!! Sooooo, I just grabbed a CD with one of my favourite songs that I loved to dance to at home and off I went...

        I actually think I did better than if I'd done my choreo routine...I had fun and really 'felt' the music...and I got a very good response...
        • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

          Mon, June 2, 2008 - 1:36 AM
          you have to love the music you dance too. One of my teachers does choreos I never like. If I find the perfect choreo to a song I love, then I love to dance it. If you don't like the music or don't feel like it's "yours" then I'd say neither choreo nor impro will work well.
          I was right about the need to improvise in my recent performance. Although my planned thing went just fine, apart from costume and prop malfunctions, the following two pieces I picked just in case kept playing so I just danced to them. I thought about other things so I couldn't remember the choreos I had done to them so I kinda just moved around somehow. It was ok.
          The best thing now is when I listen to my player to a beautiful song and clear moves pop up in my head like I can dance it with full conviction!
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Sat, May 31, 2008 - 3:14 PM
      " I've seen many choreographies that simply happened at the same time as the music, instead of being a response and addition to the music."
      amen!
      • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

        Sun, June 1, 2008 - 9:40 PM
        Well, and I think some people dance *over* the music, and not *to* the music. I remember Malia once made a comment about that. She believes in dancing *to* the music.
        • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

          Fri, June 6, 2008 - 5:13 AM
          I've noticed this as well. It seems that people aren't really hearing the rhythms.

          Choreographies are great for stage and I perform alot of choreographies in shows in India, but usually I need to modify on the spot because the stage is carpet or slippery or they blow out dry ice right when I'm about to spin and suddenly I'm blind! So being able to improv is a necessity!

          As a general rule,
          Choreography= Stage
          Impov= Social Dance

          I've been away from the North American belly dance scene for 7 years or so. I'm back in New Brunswick Canada and I've been noticing since I've been back that students seem REALLY shy about improvisation. They just want to be told what to do, but won't dance on their own. This wasn't the case when I started and I think a big part it is related to the fact that zills aren't taught as much and as a result students aren't embodying the rhythms.

          I'd love to help make belly dance more accessible as a social dance as well as choreographed. So I'm developing a 3 step program!
          1. Rhythms and Moves
          2. Improvisational tips and framework
          3. Zills

          I'm teaching a rhythms and moves workshop this weekend in Moncton. In this workshop, I try to get people to really feel the rhythms and hear/embody the 2, 4, 8, 16 and base Duns of an 8 count rhythm. You know when you hear a rhythm, ie baladi, you'll usually instinctively fall on the 4 counts when you clap it. But inside baladi are all the other counts as well, when you speed up your count or slow it down or match the duns. Each of those ways of hearing the beat will permit certain moves to come out, but not others. ie basic egyptian fits on 2 (2 basic egyptians fit into one 8 count baladi beat) and a choo choo shimmy fits on 16. The response from the workshops has been great, some students are saying its like a light got turned on because no one has explained rhythms to them in this way.

          For the Improvisational part. I'm researching the patterns in space (like spirals for an entrance and exit, or box pattern or fan patterns for the body of the dance) as well as patterns of combos that work within an 8 count beat with a "flair" move added to the 4th count of 8. Kind of hard to describe in words. I hope to film it soon and put it up on youtube!

          For the zills part, I think I'm going to travel with a big bag of those baby tins zills, just to get people introduced to them and to the concept of becoming the music.

          Doing this work on teaching improvisation is becoming a big project and a big passion. I think that choreography is great for stage and necessary for it not to get boring for the dancer and the audience, but it is essential to be able to improvise. Choreography isn't cool as a social dance or when we are hanging at a hafla. (Unless you get hauled up and showcased!) So for us to claim belly dance as part of an exciting emerging women's culture we need to call it our own through improvising.

          Tara
          www.tarastardancer.com
          • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

            Fri, June 6, 2008 - 6:36 PM
            <...but usually I need to modify on the spot because the stage is carpet or slippery or they blow out dry ice right when I'm about to spin and suddenly I'm blind!>

            I performed last weekend and I think I did fairly well. Definitely better than my first time. Anyway, like I said, part of it was choreographed and the rest ended up being improvised. Well...the part that was choreographed ended up being mostly improvised too because of the layout.
    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Fri, June 6, 2008 - 8:01 PM
      "A poster above said they find improv less interesting... I actually wonder how many of us see improvisational dancing and don't even realize it's improv."

      I was so sure Asharah must choreograph everything because it seemed so intricate but it turns out she doesn't at all! She says she uses "anchors" where she knows what she'll do to a particular musical accent but the rest is improv. I think a lot of improv DOES look kind of boring, at least to me, but she is an example that it can be completely fascinating to watch when done well. Myself, I'm a very, very bad improviser but I'm working on it. Like Bo, I've been putting increasingly longer improv parts into my choreographies & I'm planning to dance to a totally arhythmic piece in a few months so I can't really choreograph that because how would I notate it! *brain fries at the thought*

      I really think you get a better show when I choreograph because I think I'm pretty okay at it and like I said, my improv skills suck, but I'd like to be able to do it.
      • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

        Sun, June 8, 2008 - 4:56 AM
        I think there is a distinction between improvising based on the rhythms and improvisation that is more freeform. It's best to have both. When I first started 11 years ago I was happily noodling away, improvising in restaurant gigs. I thought I was the Queen of Sheba, until I got a gig on stage with an Arabic band and then realized (VERY QUICKLY lol) that I needed to learn more about a framework or skeleton for the dance. Like entrance, body, taxim, drum, and exit. Then inside that framework I needed to learn what rhythms were likely to come up and to let both a freeform and a body of practiced moves for the rhythms come out.

        I like the description of "anchors". I do that too.

        I prefer orientale stage shows that are mostly choreographed, but they don't LOOK choreographed, which is really hard to accomplish. But for more alternative-goddess style performances I have really enjoyed spontaneous improvisations. Like Delilah in Fire at the Iao. I was there in Maui for that show and it was amazing! Delilah and Uncle Mafufo and Coyote have all worked together so much that they were like one creature. Wow



        • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

          Sun, June 8, 2008 - 4:44 PM
          I prefer to call it imporiography

          framework for key points to work around and I fill in the rest. same concept. most of the time it works out OK. I need to be a better dancer in general for it to really come together, but I mean its a journey... its like anything else, more of it will probably make it better eventually. *-*
          • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

            Sun, June 8, 2008 - 4:58 PM
            Oh yeah, I definitely believe it's a journey, too! That's a good way of looking at it. There is always room to learn more and to grow. When I was competing heavily in horse shows, my mom used to say that no one knows everything. Even the best riders and trainers out there have someone that they ride with and continue to learn from. I think it's that way with belly dance or anything else.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Wed, June 11, 2008 - 7:57 AM
    I start out choreographing things to fit the song that I want to dance to. I guess what evolves is more like the anchor idea. The chorepgraphy gives me a way to focus my energy. By the time it gets to stage its prolly been choreographed at least 75%. By the time its performed, what comes out is about 15% choreographed anchors and the rest is improv cause my stage-frightend mind has totally gone on vacation. That is the biggest gift my teacher has given me, being able to improvise and not depend on chorpgrapy that I'll just forget. the mind might forget but the body, if you have practiced over and over to a song, just free dancing, will just pick right up.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Wed, June 11, 2008 - 9:03 AM
    I'm one of those people for whom improv does not come naturally. I can remember choreography really easily...but when my instructor would put music on at the end of class and tell us to "feel the music," I would stand and stare at her like she'd lost her mind.

    So, I worked on ways and methods to improv. And now I teach them to my students. I teach my intermediates what I can...and I make them dance to music they've never heard before. I want them to develop the skills to anticipate the music...and make improv look just as smooth at choreography.

    I've found that a lot of the things that can be done to improve improvisational skills will also help with creating choreography. And because these are my biggest trouble spots (and usually fairly intimidating for most of my students), I put a lot of emphasis on it. By contrast, I put little emphasis on zils...not because I think they need to be ignored...but because they come so easily for me (I have a lot of musical background...much of it in percussive instruments) that it's hard for me to teach.

    My instructor, on the other hand, has trouble with zils, so she really works people on them.

    One thing I've noticed about improv, though, that I think that people need to really be aware of: you're more likely to showcase your bad habits in improv than in choreography.

    So, I've started taping my personal practices. I try to video my students once per month so that they can see both what they're doing well (harder for them to see than for me to see) and what they need to work on.

    Incidently, my biggest bad habit is what my instructor calls "stupid hand." It's always my left hand that will flip around as I dance...not in a pretty way...but in a dead fish flopping around kind of way. It's obvious when I watch my videos that I flip it whenever I'm thinking about what move to do next...that's why it doesn't happen when I perform choreography.
  • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

    Sun, July 6, 2008 - 5:03 AM
    Choreographies are essential when you're dancing with a group, but from the viewpoint of solo work, I personally function best when I incorporate the two. In general my pieces are about 1/2 & 1/2. If they're all choreography I get bored and it shows! If they're all improv, I kick myself afterwards for all the cool things I missed.

    I'd much rather watch someone dance from the heart, than demonstrate a carefully fine-tuned choreography. I wish we'd have worked much more on improv when I was taking group classes. (I only do privates and select workshops now).

    Irregardless, the answer lies in what you - yourself are most comfortable. For your teacher to say it's "bullsh#t" is unprofessional and untrue.

    • Re: Choreography vs. Improvising

      Tue, July 8, 2008 - 8:37 AM
      AAAhhhhhhh!!!!!! Oh My GOODNESS!! The Adishakti from youtube? I have several of your vids on favorite, I'm such a fan! I can't beleive I never though to look for you here. Thank you for dancing so beautifully. I'll stop gushing now.

Recent topics in "Bellydance Drills and Choreography"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
how much strenght to use in actual dancing? Nadya L 11 Yesterday, 10:00 PM