I have found that I when I top another, while it can be sensual, it is rarely sexual. Its heaps of fun, make no mistake, but it doesn't have to be sexual for me to totally lenjoy doing it. Although, I really love the connection when I do play with someone I am sexually attracted to too.
On the other hand, I find that there has to be a sexual connection/attraction between my partner and I when I bottom to someone. I think it is because I put so much faith in the person I am playing with. After allowing myself to be that vulnerable, I find that I really NEED that closeness and intimacy to complete that connection. (The exception to this is demo-ing for a class or with someone with a particular skill)
That explains why I play more as a top than a bottom, because sexual connections are not required in that role for me for me to enjoy it.
Which role gets you going sexually?
On the other hand, I find that there has to be a sexual connection/attraction between my partner and I when I bottom to someone. I think it is because I put so much faith in the person I am playing with. After allowing myself to be that vulnerable, I find that I really NEED that closeness and intimacy to complete that connection. (The exception to this is demo-ing for a class or with someone with a particular skill)
That explains why I play more as a top than a bottom, because sexual connections are not required in that role for me for me to enjoy it.
Which role gets you going sexually?
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Fri, December 2, 2005 - 7:37 AMFor me it is the reverse...bottoming is the sensual role while my sexual side is released when I top.
The vulnerability of giving my self completely into the hands of someone I trust, have faith in, expands the sensuality I experience. While may I bottom for people without a close connection with them, having that brings what I experience to new levels.
When I top, a rare thing lately since I have been exploring my bottom half, I tend to top with people I am attracted to or have a relationship with and the energy between us builds and, well, feeds the sexual stimulation I experience.
I find that the whole process of guiding my partner through the scene, to help them find that space, that stimulation, that release they are seeking adds to my own experience, makes it all sweeter.
-
-
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Fri, December 2, 2005 - 11:44 AMIt must be the Libra in me, whether or not i respond sexually has a lot to do with the partner, not the role. Some people just give out that kind of energy. When i top i get more into a control/animal/predatory thing. i like stalking my victim..er..bottom and springing on them suddenly...
pandora
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Sat, December 3, 2005 - 3:27 PMI find that I'm stimulated in very different ways in either role
When I started in bdsm, I subbed and didn't think I had it in me to top/domme. I thought that if I wasn't as strong/creative/skilled as a pro, I couldn't hope to "qualify" and had better not even pretend to try
Then in my first bdsm relationship, we were both new and both wanted to try everything (well, pretty much everything, everyone has limits...) and I ended up topping more than bottoming
At first I was so intimidated, I didn't know what to do. So I sort of winged it, made it up as I went a long, ask for a lot of suggestions, and while I thought I was just topping for his sake, so he'd get to have the experience, I was surprised to find that I was incredibly physically excited by the process--undeniably tangibly so, so aroused that I physically ached--and so I have been following that feeling over time, learning from what my body gets excited by, rather than just following my head. What I am loving about topping is a kind of vicarious excitement that comes from leading someone through their bottoming, and from the feeling of power and control, especially when I can get someone to try something new (for them) that they are afraid of and have it turn into something that they really enjoy.
At the same time, I love being topped, and get a very different rush/thrill from surrendering, from not knowing what's next, from feeling desired, from abdicating resposibility for my actions/choices for a while (a mental vacation). But it takes a whole lot longer to build up enough trust with someone that I can get into the state of mind to bottom/sub any more.
I can't imagine I'd be happy unless I could have both of those experiences with someone. -
-
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Sat, December 3, 2005 - 4:08 PM"I can't imagine I'd be happy unless I could have both of those experiences with someone."
Interesting. For me, I havent come near to finding one person with whom I can switch roles. Perhaps it's because I come with a strong dominant energy, rather than just topping as an activity. But the people who submit to me have told me they couldnt even THINK of actually topping me.
It's been a real long time since I've bottomed to anyone. But that doesnt mean it's out of the question. I just havent found the right person in CA yet.
In any case, to get back on topic... it's not the role that stimulates me sexually. It's the person. For instance, I could top a guy and have a really hot, intense scene... but it's not going to make me want to have sex with him. LOL
-D. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Sat, December 3, 2005 - 4:32 PM"In any case, to get back on topic... it's not the role that stimulates me sexually. It's the person. For instance, I could top a guy and have a really hot, intense scene... but it's not going to make me want to have sex with him."
I guess my limited (very) experience hasn't provided me with this perspective yet--I don't play with anyone with whom I don't also have sex, with whom I just "play". So being able to switch with one person is sort of a requirement for me.
And yes, there is the top vs. dom, bottom vs. sub factor. I think I have tended to "sub from the top", if that makes any sense--follow the bottom's directions, to learn, since I am still feeling very green. As I become more confident about my technical skills, I am less open to hearing from the bottom in the moment. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Thu, January 5, 2006 - 2:45 PMGeepers...you are quite lucky Darkly! I rarely have sex, so if I waited until I was sexually attracted to someone to play with them...I would never play. In the best of all worlds, I would like to have both as well.
Hugs,
Laura -
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Tue, January 10, 2006 - 9:28 AMI'm not sure I'd call it "luck"... more like intense stubborness? unwillingness to take risks? -
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Wed, January 11, 2006 - 11:41 PM"... more like intense stubborness?" I think that is one of your endearing qualities!!!
HUGS...I hear ya girlfriend
Laura
-
Unsu...
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Wed, January 11, 2006 - 11:43 PM"... more like intense stubborness?" I think that is one of your endearing qualities!!!
HUGS...I hear ya girlfriend
Laura
-
-
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Tue, January 24, 2006 - 5:47 AM>> I rarely have sex, so if I waited until I was sexually attracted to someone to play with them...I would never play. <<
I don't worry about whether I ever play or not. I'm very, very selective, and usually only really *want* to play when it's with the right person, and that usually means someone I am having sex with, or could at least envision myself having sex with. I *have* played with people I'm not sexually attracted to, but I mostly don't any more, because it just leaves me feeling icky a lot of the time. The idea of playing, just to play, just because I can, whether I'm sexually attracted to someone or not, leaves me quite cold. I could be playing every night of the week if I wanted to, either topping or bottoming, but frankly, I'd rather just be home alone most of the time rather than play with someone just to be playing.
That's mostly about bottoming/subbing, but it also includes topping, except that topping isn't at all sexual for me. It also doesn't fill the same need for me at all as bottoming, so for me, if I'm missing playing and/or sex, then topping will definitely not make me feel any better, since I am mostly a sub. To me, the idea of topping because I can't find people I want to bottom to has about as much logic as scratching my right arm when my left arm itches just because I can reach the right one better at that moment. To each his or her own, of course; I just can't quite grasp it.
Wendy
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Thu, January 5, 2006 - 2:15 PMLaura, thanks for letting me know about this site- awesome discussion.
Top-bottom...sensusual or sexual......
Bottom...
I have a lot of bottom/sub experience and just love the sensual space I get to when I am very attracted to the top...I would have liked the scene to go sexual far more than it did. Maybe that is part of the tease and deny thing. I do get very excited.
Top....
My ventures into topping happened infrequently in the past but the trend is thankfully accelerating. When the bottom is also one of my girlfriends...both of us just love the helpless bondagee, the teasing, the experimenting, the adventure, the sensual trip- taking her to the plateau of endorphine and sensual ecstacy over and over....I love the begging for a sexual ending.....and then OK - so I get weak kneed and give in!!
So I like it all.
-
Re: The more sexually stimulating role
Tue, January 17, 2006 - 11:16 AMTop or bottom, it is always sexual for me. It's why I'm so damn picky about who I play with and why I tend to go to events/parties to socialize and watch, but rarely play myself. It's a very interesting question, and one I will definitely think about some more!
