Protestant---

topic posted Wed, April 30, 2008 - 9:09 AM by  Josh
what does the word mean to you?
posted by:
Josh
Boca Raton
  • Re: Protestant---

    Wed, April 30, 2008 - 9:53 AM
    There are two meanings to me:

    A) As a student of the Reformation it means protesters

    B) As a person in todays day and age it means anything but Catholic or Eastern Orthodox....meaning it has no meaning in todays day and age.
    • Re: Protestant---

      Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:54 AM
      I'm a student of the Reformation too. Right now I'm reading Alister McGrath's "Christianity's Dangerous Idea." (The subtitle is something like 'the Protestant Revolution from the sixteenth to the twenty-first century.) That book is what prompted my question.

      I grew up Southern Baptist, which is certainly Protestant, though it is not representative of mainline Protestantism down through the centuries.

      When I was a kid, the Catholic Church was definitely The Other, but things have changed a lot since then. I don't know any Southern Baptists who want a pope, of course, but I know several who feel closer to the Catholic Church on the question of homosexuality than they do to the Episcopal Church, which is Protestant!
      • Re: Protestant---

        Thu, May 1, 2008 - 8:00 AM
        I was raised southern baptist, but later was attracted to catholicism because i like the message of the catholic church more than that offered by protestants. while i don't want to paint with too broad a brush, i view the catholics as much more focused on the essential message of jesus, while the protestant churches seem to emphasize sin, god's wrath, hell fire and damnation.

        i think the protestant reformation was a valuable agent of change in history, but I think that it is time for another major change among the protestant sects. . .
        • Re: Protestant---

          Thu, May 1, 2008 - 9:22 AM
          I love Alister, seem him on a few occasions and even got to have lunch with him once.

          I have delved into the study of Catholic theology quite a bit and I am wondering soemthing Lorenzo. You say the catholics are much more focused on the essential message of Jesus (and I am assuming you mean redemption) but is it not true that their theology teaches more a matriarcle line of redemption rather then a partiarcle one? What I mean to say is that without Mary (and Christ and God) there is no redemtion?

          As for the protosents preaching a hellfire theology, I tend to agree with you. It is hard to find a church today (in any sect) that teaches a balanced view of damnation and redemption. I love a sermon that starts out beating me up and then takes it all away wiht the work of Christ. One tiem I saw John Mac Arthur preach on predestination (I know, a whole other subject and controversy we can talk about) and THAT one sermon was probably the best sermon I had ever experienced when it came to a full view of God, creation, the fall and redemption.
          • Re: Protestant---

            Thu, May 1, 2008 - 9:23 AM
            "i think the protestant reformation was a valuable agent of change in history, but I think that it is time for another major change among the protestant sects. . . "

            What would that be? (mind you, I also do).
          • Re: Protestant---

            Fri, May 2, 2008 - 12:40 PM
            >>>>>>>I love Alister, seem him on a few occasions and even got to have lunch with him once. <<<<<<<

            I wish I could say the same! I'm enjoying his book "Christianity's Dangerous Idea," and I've also read his "The Twilight of Atheism," "In the Beginning" (-on the KJV of the Bible), "The Dawkins Delusion?" and I' ve dabbled in his Christian Theology. I want to read his work on science and religion---I guess I'll have read 8 or 9 of his books by summer's end.

            >>>>>>What I mean to say is that without Mary (and Christ and God) there is no redemtion?<<<<<<
            You addressed that to Lorenzo but I can speak to the matter. The short (but incomplete) answer is: No. The reason being is that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are at the banquet of the Lord, which means they were saved or redeemed before Mary was conceived, and since there is no "pre-existence" of Mary, she cannot necessary for salvation.

            But as I said, that is incomplete. Many Catholics love to call Mary "the mediatrix of all graces." This doesn't make her "the fourth person of the Trinity" but it *suggests* something of a divinity about her which troubles not only Protestants but many Catholics. It's important to keep in mind that the *devotion* to Mary many Catholics have is not required of Catholics. If you would like to discuss this further, I could refresh my memory on the details.
          • Re: Protestant---

            Fri, May 2, 2008 - 12:47 PM

            >>>>>>>As for the protosents preaching a hellfire theology, I tend to agree with you.<<<<<<<

            It's funny but every time I mention something like this to a member of the clergy---regardless of denomination---I get the same thing: Where *is* that guy who is giving all the hell-fire sermons? I haven't heard one in decades!

            That's anecdotal, of course, but I think there's much less hellfire preaching than there used to be because the younger generation of Protestants don't believe in hell and thus don't fear it! I think the younger generation is more open to be *drawn* to heaven and that this is why the environment is such a powerful image for them. Seeing how they fit into creation, how one might glimpse God in creation, that seems much more appealing to them, and speaking of "God the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth" is certainly in tune with the Gospel...

Recent topics in "Bible Talk"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
How do you mean “biblical”? Josh 3 April 29, 2008
Biblical Interpretation In Crisis Josh 16 April 20, 2008
Paul and Jesus Josh 5 April 17, 2008
Who wrote the book of James? Josh 7 April 17, 2008
Heaven Is Not Our Home Josh 3 April 2, 2008