Advertisement
In the same town where no one stops to help a woman dying in a convenience store, Walmart decides to ban a women for trying to do the right thing.
To passer-by, crying child's ear-piercing rings of abuse
BY SUZANNE PEREZ TOBIAS
The Wichita Eagle
Could piercing a child's ears be child abuse?
Marilyn Johnson thought so when she heard a girl's screams in a Wichita Wal-Mart on Sunday -- and she reported it to police.
She said a child was having her ears pierced "against her will" at the store's jewelry counter, and the girl's cries were ignored by her mother and the store employee doing the piercing.
"This little girl was about 5 years old and was crying her eyes out," Johnson said. "Her face was beet red, and she was screaming and coughing and saying things like, 'I don't want this! It hurts! Please stop!' She was grabbing her ears so the adults couldn't touch them."
Johnson says she approached the girl's mother and the store employee and said, "Is this really necessary?"
Both women said nothing but continued trying to pierce the girl's ears, Johnson said.
So Johnson called 911 from her cell phone.
"We're forever being told we should report any suspected child abuse," said Johnson, 53, a Wichita landlord who founded Heart Bandits American Eskimo Dog Rescue.
"I saw a child crying and screaming and pleading for someone not to do something to her," she said. "And if that's not child abuse, I don't know what is."
When police arrived at the store at Pawnee and Broadway, they spoke with Johnson and the girl's mother, "then informed me that I was out of line," Johnson said. "The officers took my personal information and offered to walk with me to purchase my... items."
Johnson said she left the store without buying anything.
Wichita police spokesman Gordon Bassham said no law was being broken by the girl's mother or the employee doing the piercing.
At the request of a Wal-Mart official, the officers issued Johnson a warning for trespassing and escorted her from the store, Bassham said.
Store officials referred calls about the incident to corporate headquarters. Wal-Mart spokesman Dan Fogleman issued this written response:
"Ear piercing is a service that Wal-Mart offers to our customers of all ages. A parent or legal guardian's signature is required if the person having their ears pierced is under 18 years old, which was the case in this instance," Fogleman said.
"The child's mother indicated more than once through the ear-piercing process that she wanted her daughter's ears pierced."
Asked how the store handles incidents of children who oppose piercings, Fogleman said: "Local management has discretion based on the individual circumstance."
Ear piercing has long been the subject of controversy among parents. For some, piercing an infant or young child's ears has deep-rooted cultural or religious meaning. Others pierce babies' ears because of family traditions, or simply because they like the look or want to more easily identify the baby as a girl.
Several popular online parenting forums have featured lengthy discussions on the topic. A question posted to BabyCenter.com in October 2003 prompted more than 830 comments, ranging from outrage to agreement over piercing young children's ears.
"I had my daughter's ears done when she was 6 months old. She did cry, but just for about 10 seconds," said a mom named Jennie. "It was much easier than getting shots. Her ears have healed perfectly and she looks absolutely beautiful."
Other parents recalled children begging to have their ears pierced, then screaming or crying during the procedure.
Kansas law requires written and notarized consent from a parent or legal guardian before performing body piercing or tattooing on someone under 18. The law does not spell out whether piercings or tattoos can be forcibly administered.
"The parent was not, in the eyes of the officers, doing anything illegal," said Bassham, the police spokesman. "This could have been a cultural thing for the mother, or a religious thing. There are so many factors at work.
"For us as law enforcement to try and predict the reasons and the motivations behind this is not possible, and that's not our area."
The mother was not identified by police or store officials.
Johnson says she's glad she reported the incident to police, even though a Wal-Mart manager said she would no longer be allowed in the store.
She plans to talk to local legislators about the possibility of changing state law to spell out more clearly when piercings or tattoos become possible abuse.
"I can't understand doing that to a child who's screaming and crying and clearly didn't want this done," Johnson said.
"If I'm the crazy one for calling the police, then maybe I'm crazy. But I don't think so."
To passer-by, crying child's ear-piercing rings of abuse
BY SUZANNE PEREZ TOBIAS
The Wichita Eagle
Could piercing a child's ears be child abuse?
Marilyn Johnson thought so when she heard a girl's screams in a Wichita Wal-Mart on Sunday -- and she reported it to police.
She said a child was having her ears pierced "against her will" at the store's jewelry counter, and the girl's cries were ignored by her mother and the store employee doing the piercing.
"This little girl was about 5 years old and was crying her eyes out," Johnson said. "Her face was beet red, and she was screaming and coughing and saying things like, 'I don't want this! It hurts! Please stop!' She was grabbing her ears so the adults couldn't touch them."
Johnson says she approached the girl's mother and the store employee and said, "Is this really necessary?"
Both women said nothing but continued trying to pierce the girl's ears, Johnson said.
So Johnson called 911 from her cell phone.
"We're forever being told we should report any suspected child abuse," said Johnson, 53, a Wichita landlord who founded Heart Bandits American Eskimo Dog Rescue.
"I saw a child crying and screaming and pleading for someone not to do something to her," she said. "And if that's not child abuse, I don't know what is."
When police arrived at the store at Pawnee and Broadway, they spoke with Johnson and the girl's mother, "then informed me that I was out of line," Johnson said. "The officers took my personal information and offered to walk with me to purchase my... items."
Johnson said she left the store without buying anything.
Wichita police spokesman Gordon Bassham said no law was being broken by the girl's mother or the employee doing the piercing.
At the request of a Wal-Mart official, the officers issued Johnson a warning for trespassing and escorted her from the store, Bassham said.
Store officials referred calls about the incident to corporate headquarters. Wal-Mart spokesman Dan Fogleman issued this written response:
"Ear piercing is a service that Wal-Mart offers to our customers of all ages. A parent or legal guardian's signature is required if the person having their ears pierced is under 18 years old, which was the case in this instance," Fogleman said.
"The child's mother indicated more than once through the ear-piercing process that she wanted her daughter's ears pierced."
Asked how the store handles incidents of children who oppose piercings, Fogleman said: "Local management has discretion based on the individual circumstance."
Ear piercing has long been the subject of controversy among parents. For some, piercing an infant or young child's ears has deep-rooted cultural or religious meaning. Others pierce babies' ears because of family traditions, or simply because they like the look or want to more easily identify the baby as a girl.
Several popular online parenting forums have featured lengthy discussions on the topic. A question posted to BabyCenter.com in October 2003 prompted more than 830 comments, ranging from outrage to agreement over piercing young children's ears.
"I had my daughter's ears done when she was 6 months old. She did cry, but just for about 10 seconds," said a mom named Jennie. "It was much easier than getting shots. Her ears have healed perfectly and she looks absolutely beautiful."
Other parents recalled children begging to have their ears pierced, then screaming or crying during the procedure.
Kansas law requires written and notarized consent from a parent or legal guardian before performing body piercing or tattooing on someone under 18. The law does not spell out whether piercings or tattoos can be forcibly administered.
"The parent was not, in the eyes of the officers, doing anything illegal," said Bassham, the police spokesman. "This could have been a cultural thing for the mother, or a religious thing. There are so many factors at work.
"For us as law enforcement to try and predict the reasons and the motivations behind this is not possible, and that's not our area."
The mother was not identified by police or store officials.
Johnson says she's glad she reported the incident to police, even though a Wal-Mart manager said she would no longer be allowed in the store.
She plans to talk to local legislators about the possibility of changing state law to spell out more clearly when piercings or tattoos become possible abuse.
"I can't understand doing that to a child who's screaming and crying and clearly didn't want this done," Johnson said.
"If I'm the crazy one for calling the police, then maybe I'm crazy. But I don't think so."
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Walmart Bans Woman for Reporting Possible Child Abuse
Thu, July 12, 2007 - 9:47 PMWow, so Walmart is the LAW in their jurisdiction it would seem. or at least Judge & Jury. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Walmart Bans Woman for Reporting Possible Child Abuse
Fri, July 13, 2007 - 4:40 AMThe mother's an imbecile.
I'd never subject my girls to anything they weren't mentally ready
for just so they will look "cute" later.
What a twit.
-
-
Re: Walmart Bans Woman for Reporting Possible Child Abuse
Mon, August 6, 2007 - 6:17 PMGod, this is a tough one to side with...I am glad that the lady felt the need to do something, but whether it was the right thing to do...I don't know. All I can say is that there are plenty of things that kids scream/cry over such as getting a shot, wanting a toy that they can't have, etc, etc...a little piercing never really hurt anyone too bad, but I only wish that people would call the cops when they see actual crimes happening...there are so many times people see things and do nothing about it...Walmart threatening that lady with tresspassing - that's a little harsh. Again, it's hard to totally take sides. -
-
Re: Walmart Bans Woman for Reporting Possible Child Abuse
Tue, October 2, 2007 - 4:56 PMbut the point is - rather than thanking the woman for her concern and going on with business, Walmart had the gall to ban her from their store. Of course it is the right thing to do if you think a child is being harmed. It is better to have it checked out and turn out to be nothing than find out later that something terrible has happened and you did nothing because you figured a parent had it under control. We have become such a "me" society, looking the other way. What if the child had been screaming in obvious pain in a car in the parking lot? Would you assume it was ok still? As was mentioned - in this same city only days before, people stepped over a woman who lay bleeding to death in a conveience store because they didn't want to get involved. I suppose Walmart would give them gift cards for their excellence.
-