WTC Seven Au Go Go

topic posted Fri, November 13, 2009 - 4:34 PM by 
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Here are links to some of the most persuasive video footage and writing demonstrating that the WTC 7 collapse was so anomalous as to warrant a new investigation. The WTC7 collapse is itself just a small part of the overall 911 “coincidence” string that has now swelled so hugely and includes so many coincidences and anomalies that I am sure any new investigation will be provided with a mountain of new data and witnesses.

May I suggest copying and pasting these into a saved word document and then perusing them when you have the leisure and inclination to do so.

www.youtube.com/watch (Overview)

www.serendipity.li/wot/last...nding.pdf (“Was WTC 7 A Dud?” This is an update of the original “dud” article. A theory of why things happened -and also didn’t happen - with WTC7. A crucial theory)

www.youtube.com/watch (Office of Emergency Management employee Barry Jennings interview and subsequent death threats. He said that explosions took out most of the WTC 7 lobby before the two big towers fell and also as they fell. This jives with idea that WTC 7 had been “softened up” for collapse which was to have occurred under cover of the big tower collapses, but that the collapse failed thus leaving the perps with the biggest white elephant of 911.)

www.youtube.com/watch (First responder Kevin McPadden’s account of the WTC7 demolition countdown sequence)

www.youtube.com/watch (First responder Bartmer’s report of explosions at WTC 7.)

www.youtube.com/watch (Closer footage of the infamous “Get back – the building is about to explode”)

www.youtube.com/watch (The Italian mini doc called “Seven Is Exploding”)

www.youtube.com/watch (Demolition expert Danny Jowenko on the WTC 7 collapse)

www.youtube.com/watch (The most well known video of 911 sound and video secondary bomb evidence for the entire Trade Center Complex. – 13.5 million hits on Youtube!)

www.youtube.com/watch (Disposal and destruction of forensic evidence -steel beams etc.- in violation of law. Overseen by Giuliani)

www.youtube.com/watch (The infamous “Pull It” uttered by WTC complex owner Larry Silverstein.)

www.youtube.com/watch (Silverstein refusing to answer direct questions concerning “Pull It” and the “chain of command.”)

www.youtube.com/watch (Explosions throughout the day)


www.youtube.com/watch (Professor Steven Jone’s visual analysis of WTC 7 collapse)

www.youtube.com/watch (Firefighter and civilian reports of explosions)

docs.google.com/gview (Freefall physics and WTC 7)

www.911speakout.org/ (A very good general site)

911exposed.org/ (The most intelligent 911 site)












posted by:
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: WTC Seven Au Go Go

    Sun, November 22, 2009 - 12:03 AM
    "He said that explosions took out most of the WTC 7 lobby"

    Giant pieces of shit falling from high speeds from the collapsing towers taking out big chunks of WTC7 could easily be mistaken for explosions.

    "First responder Kevin McPadden’s account of the WTC7 demolition countdown sequence)"

    McPadden has been conclusively demonstrated to be a liar on this matter. In one speech to truthers, he expressly said that he couldn't hear a count down. In another interview, he expressly said that he could hear a countdown. One of those times was obviously a lie.

    "First responder Bartmer’s report of explosions at WTC 7"

    Explosions heard in a building housing 36,000 gallons of diesel fuel that's been on fire for seven hours is not at all unusual. Does anyone really believe that the only thing that could possibly explode in a burning office building housing tens of thousands of gallons of diesel fuel is cutter explosives?

    "Closer footage of the infamous “Get back – the building is about to explode”"

    Not an unusual declaration when one considers the building has been burning for seven hours and housed 36,000 gallons of diesel fuel. If you knew that a building was on fire for seven hours and it housed 36,000 gallons of diesel fuel, would you seriously not worry about it exploding? And the idea that firefighters and reporters would be given a heads up as to an alleged conspiracy is ridiculous. ("Be sure not to tell anyone about our elaborate criminal conspiracy, except reporters and fire fighters")

    "The Italian mini doc called “Seven Is Exploding”"

    See above

    "Demolition expert Danny Jowenko on the WTC 7 collapse"

    Contradicted by other demolition experts, and based solely on his visual impressions. Truthers also conveniently ignore Jowenko's opinion that the Twin Towers were definitely not controlled demolitions. If you accept him as an authority on 7, why not on the other towers?

    "The most well known video of 911 sound and video secondary bomb evidence for the entire Trade Center Complex. "

    Again, occasional explosions in a building on fire for hours housing tens of thousands of gallon of diesel fuel is not surprising. However, if it was a controlled demolition with explosives, you'd clearly be able to hear the explosives going off in rapid systematic fashion right before and during the collapse. No audio video footage of the collapse, even from a few blocks away when the explosions would have been audible for miles, has ever been shown to show that. It was not a controlled demolition since there was no systematic series of audible explosions at the time of collapse.

    "Disposal and destruction of forensic evidence -steel beams etc.- in violation of law. Overseen by Giuliani) "

    A million tons of debris is not going to be left on the ground indefinitely if you want the city to get back to work. We're not talking a couple bullet casings disposed of.

    "The infamous “Pull It” uttered by WTC complex owner Larry Silverstein."

    Probably the most blatant case of outright lying by truthers, who falsely claimed that "pull it" was controlled demolition jargon meaning to demolish a building with explosives, a claim they completely made up out of whole cloth. They have been asked repeatedly to cite a single professional controlled demo source to back up that claim and they have never been able to, and the claim has been soundly denied by at least ten professional demo companies.

    "Silverstein refusing to answer direct questions concerning “Pull It” and the “chain of command.”)"

    Eventually he did, and said that "pull it" meant what firefighters mean by it, to pull back operations. See above as to the relevance of the expression

    "Explosions throughout the day"

    Explosions in a burning building filled with diesel fuel? Whoda thunk it?

    "Professor Steven Jone’s visual analysis of WTC 7 collapse"

    That's not evidence. Jones has repeatedly been demonstrated to be a hack, a fraud and a liar

    "Firefighter and civilian reports of explosions"

    See above about explosions

    "Freefall physics and WTC 7"

    Probably the second biggest lie by truthers. Not a single one of the collapsed buildings free fell. Even Architects and Engineers for Truth acknowledges that.

    If that's the "most persuasive" video footage you have, then your case is frankly crap.

Recent topics in "CONSPIRACY"