Blauer

topic posted Tue, December 4, 2007 - 9:37 AM by  Marty
What do ya'l think?
posted by:
Marty
SF Bay Area
  • Re: Blauer

    Mon, March 3, 2008 - 8:04 PM
    What I like

    - The primary tactic (the "SPEAR Move"). Combined offense and defense, which most people try to do at the same time when faced with a sudden threat anyway, and requires less accurate timing than any unarmed combative movement I've seen, which means once it's picked up as a skill it'll take forever to rust and is very likely to be accessible in a crisis.

    - Excellent use of psychology-under-stress, some of the drills I've been exposed to are extremely sophisticated.

    - High Gear is @!#$in' awesome.

    What I Don't Like

    - Not as fun as "martial arts."

    - Hard to find people to study it under/with. I've met, like, two. Ever.

    - High Gear is @#$in' expensive.
    • Re: Blauer

      Tue, March 4, 2008 - 12:18 PM
      One important thing Blauer leaves out in his seminar is economy of motion and centerline leverage. Economy of motion actually helps out your response time and centerline leverage/control/aim reduces variables, targets and stimuli in accordance with hicks law. Centerline control also increases power and speed.
      • Re: Blauer

        Wed, March 5, 2008 - 11:39 AM
        I must say that it was the first time that I heard of hicks law, but you got me when you used terms like targets and stimuli so I ran a search on it and in a nut shell I almost passed out trying to figure out what the hell they were talking about, but I think I got the idea of it, but I needed to know in which way it fits into self defence
        • Re: Blauer

          Wed, March 5, 2008 - 2:02 PM
          Heya Kester,

          How Hick's law fits into training and self defense is a matter of some debate. See this link for details: www.hockscqc.com/articles/hickslaw.htm

          He sums up his impressions pretty well, though I would look for other pro and con reviews. The basic idea is that the more choices you have available to execute, the slower you are going to react. The problem is that this model was initially created as a study in computer responsiveness back in the 50's and from there migrated to being used for measuring human response times.

          While the black and white perspective of Hick's Law is initially appealing in its simplicity, more research into the matter regarding human response times is required. Much more research and many more tests have since been performed since Hick's Law was first stated. A quick read has supports a comment made in another forum where the poster stated regarding combat:
          "You do not rise to the occasion. You sink to your training." Or as my Coach always said, "God damn it Al, you do what you train to do!"
      • Re: Blauer

        Wed, March 19, 2008 - 8:45 AM
        I think the bottom line in any uncontrolled, unexpected aggression is that in the first 2 seconds of an engagement, if you have to think cognitively and illicit fine motor coordination patterns, your chances for survival fall off dramatically.
    • Re: Blauer

      Wed, March 5, 2008 - 12:49 PM
      <<- Not as fun as "martial arts." >>

      So do you think this is similar to the difference between jujitsu (jujutsu/jiu-jitsu can also be correct spellings btw) & judo - i.e. jujtisu being considered more of a martial art than it's "counterpart" judo - which is considered more of a sport?
      • Re: Blauer

        Wed, March 5, 2008 - 2:09 PM
        lol. This comparison always kills me. Professor Kano created Judo in 1882. It was developed from 10 different schools of jujitsu. For that matter, the founder of the much renown and rightfully respected Gracie Jujitsu was initially trained as a Judoka. The idea of classing all schools of Jujitsu as a more martial art and classing all aspects of Judo as more of a sport is less a fact and more a matter of common misunderstanding.
        • Re: Blauer

          Wed, March 5, 2008 - 3:06 PM
          I never said I agreed to the comparison/ differences.

          I simply asked what you thought of it (which you most succinctly answered).

          Thanks.

          Not everyone knows everything everyone else knows.

          Not always at the same time anyway.

          *bowing with respect*
          • Re: Blauer

            Wed, March 5, 2008 - 3:21 PM
            <<*bowing with respect* >>


            especially since I've read how you like to hit things & people sometimes! hahahaha!

            (btw we're on the same page on that one dude!)


            *respectbowing continues & stuff*
            • Re: Blauer

              Wed, March 5, 2008 - 4:18 PM
              *laughs* I re-read my post and realized I'd come across a bit high-handed - which really wasn't my intent. I just wanted to clarify a common misconception. I've done Judo for a while now and I've had the great privilege and fortune to meet and grapple with some skilled fighters from different schools of Jujitsu, such as Brazilian Jujitsu and Danzan Ryu Jujitsu. They share a lot of common ground. Some practitioners are strictly recreational and do it to stay fit, some are tournament minded and others practice because for whatever reason, personal or professional, they are in an environment where a knowledge of hand to hand combat is necessary. In all cases, how the martial discipline was practiced and pursued was determined by the individual.
              • Re: Blauer

                Thu, March 6, 2008 - 9:13 AM
                well lemmie tell ya:

                To me what comes across pretty strongly reading your posts:


                you're a pretty good writer 2. If you fight as good as you write .....


                Woe to any of your opponents! LOL

Recent topics in "Martial Arts"