The problem with Pornography

topic posted Tue, December 11, 2007 - 4:26 PM by 
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
In pornography, the woman’s whole existence is based on pleasing the male. Making him feel superior and “manly”.
Women however, are very diverse. Although some of us want to please our male counter parts sometimes, our existence is not dependant on it.
We are humans. We fight, we argue, we love we have emotions.
Above all, we are mothers sisters and daughters.
We deserve respect. We aren’t objects of pleasure. We are HUMAN BEINGS
Do you agree with me?
Is sacred sexuality the remedy?
posted by:
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, December 11, 2007 - 4:37 PM
    I agree with a lot of what you've said.
    I'm not really sure about "above all, we are mothers sisters and daughters" though, because that also relates our worth to our usefulness to other people. :P
    How could you use sex to remedy sexual addiction and sexual exploitation?? Please elaborate.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, December 11, 2007 - 4:40 PM
    (You said "diverse" - that's a great word here.)
    Pornography is a very diverse thing, and hard to define.
    What some people call pornography, some people call art. (Remember the 80's and 90's?)
    Everyone is familiar with the sexual temple carvings in India, etc.
    What some people call pornography, some people call religion.

    Pornography is very diverse - as diverse as human sexual interests and kinks.
    Some people like photos of people wearing shoes for example.
    And pornography is not just about women pleasing men.
    What about homosexual pornography - male AND female?

    So I have to disagree with your assessment that pornography is based on women pleasing men.
    That is a very narrow definition of pornography.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, December 11, 2007 - 5:18 PM
    We women are either or all: sisters mothers and daughters.
    Mainstream pornography in my mind is not sacred sexuality.
    I believe that healthy sex and sacred sexuality should have more exposure.
    Bang bang sex, with violence should not be tolerated.
    I like to watch sex. I like the fact that there are great diversity amongst people and sex. I think bondage is beautiful. If I had to define pornography, I would say it is disrespectful and violent. By violence, I don’t mean a man hitting a woman, but rather also the subtle violence of women having scars on them because they had too many plastic surgeries.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, December 11, 2007 - 5:27 PM
      Remember, that which we resist persists.

      What in you have you not embraced that has you attacking pornography?

      How about looking there and then see what inspires you as a creation in your own reality, such that pornography is no longer a threat to you.
      Blessed IS,
      Jeremiah
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, February 27, 2008 - 9:58 AM
        I just wanted to say that whenever I watch pornography for even a day, I start to have a different view of women. When I see women on the street, I picture them in the porn and I dont see them as full human beings who have love and compassion and joy and pain and sorrow. I see them as cliche but "sexual objects." And I think to myself, if I see them this way, then men MUST see them this way right becuase men watch porn a LOT more than I do. And I am just starting to get sick of men in this culture and how they view the body. Women need to be viewed as sacred, as well as men need to be viewed as sacred. We need to get past the patriarchal society and be equal.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, February 27, 2008 - 10:37 AM
          "And I think to myself, if I see them this way, then men MUST see them this way right becuase men watch porn a LOT more than I do."

          I don't know about that. I watch porn for the precise amount of time it takes me to bust a nut and not a minute more.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, February 27, 2008 - 10:54 AM
          I'd also like to add that men naturally look at women sexually. Men don't look at women this way because of pornography. Rather, pornography exists because men need a sexual outlet. I once went a month without masturbating, just to prove to myself that I could do it. The longer it went on, the more I started seeing women as sexual objects. It's because of the fact that I have an outlet for my lustful desires and needs that I'm able to go through my day relating to women on a completely human level.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Mon, February 9, 2009 - 8:13 PM
          I rarely watch women in porn. although I have nothing against it. Peoples preferences vary.
          Personally it makes me feel like I'm watching someone else enjoy a piece of cake while i'm on a diet....lol!!
          BUT
          it also make me want to take my attention off other things and put it onto myself and my own primal physical needs...
          that is the purpose it serves for me...
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, December 11, 2007 - 8:49 PM
      Not all women are a sister or a mother or even a daughter. Humans have worth just for being, beyond what kind of boxes (such as "mother" or "daughter" or "sex object") other people try to fit them into. And personally, please call me a chick or a dude or a girl! *smiles*

      Ok now on to the porn chat.

      There's a lot of talk among pro-sex feminists about how "empowering" sex work can be. I imagine those women who are actually empowered by selling their sexuality are in a tiny, tiny minority.

      I have been in the adult industry as a net model and/or stripper on and off for 10 years. I am 28 years old, so that is my entire adult life. It really can destroy a person's spirit.

      I too used to talk about how much I loved my job and how empowered I felt and how great it was to work for myself. I even said things like "it's the customers who are being used, the dancers/actresses are the ones in charge! They're paying for us!" But now, looking back, I can see that the damage was already being done, and I was hurting.

      The men who enjoy pornography might not be ALL bad ... but in my experience, most (but not all, let's say 90%) of the men who enjoy pornography and frequent strip clubs really do just want to objectify and humiliate women. It's not the arousal they crave, but the privilege of viewing a woman as an object. That's what they're paying money for.

      I have met some very nice customers at strip clubs, but only rarely, and most of them were sad and confused people. Even less often, I have been delighted to meet the occasional cool single or couple who was just there for a good time, and those people are refreshing. But for the most part I can say from personal experience that the sex industry is emotionally damaging to most (but not all, let's say 90%) of the women so employed.

      That's my $.02, and of course everyone's experience is different. Perhaps I'm just "burned out." But if you want a chill down your spine you should read some of the "fan mail" I have received from fans of my internet site. It will curl your hair to know what they're thinking about when they look at me... and I have a softcore lingerie website. The things a customer will say to a dancer's face are just as degrading.

      Mainstream pornography is certainly NOT sacred sexuality!
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, December 11, 2007 - 10:20 PM
      Well, maybe its because you are from Brazil and English is not your first language (clicked on your profile), but your arguments are not very good.

      According to you:
      "Bang bang sex" (whatever the hell that is) is bad.
      But "bondage is beautiful"?

      Wha...?
      And, um, you seem to have issues. Among them control - in that you want everyone to follow your definitions.
      Like I said, pornography is ALOT of things, to alot of different people.
      Get over it.
      • Re: WHAT problem with Pornography?

        Tue, December 11, 2007 - 10:27 PM
        Just think of those poor shoes that are objectified by foot fetishists!

        And gee - what about homosexual porn -- is a guy objectifying himself by watching other men?

        (Yes, I'm being sarcastic, in case you didn't get it.)

        Just get over it.


        • Unsu...
           

          Re: WHAT problem with Pornography?

          Wed, December 12, 2007 - 12:27 PM
          How can you say "just get over it" when we're talking about a system which is inherently harmful and degrading?
          • Re: WHAT problem with Pornography?

            Thu, December 13, 2007 - 10:33 PM
            Um, I can say "get over it" because porn is many things to many different people.
            Because its *not* inherently offensive - it is diverse and has been around forever.
            Just because you want to get all offended over it.... whatever.
            don't expect others to get all offended about it with you.
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: WHAT problem with Pornography?

              Fri, December 14, 2007 - 7:34 PM
              Did you read my post?
              I am not offended by the final product.
              What bothers me is the mental and emotional damage that pornography can create in the lives of the people who PERFORM in it.

              Please think about them.
              • Re: WHAT problem with Pornography?

                Tue, May 20, 2008 - 10:15 AM
                Just as there are many kinds of porn so there are many kinds of people who make and star in porn. Everything that I have done in front of a camera is something I wanted to do and would have been doing on my own at home. Nothing was faked. Yeah, I don't always dress up that much and I don't always wear make-up to bed, but sometimes I do. Why? Because it's fun! Don't go speaking for me, friend. I don't feel mentally or emotionally damaged. I feel like I'm having fun and recording it in a semi-permanent format!
                Now, granted, I don't do Hollywood style porn, in fact all the porn shoots I've done have been completely free of charge and usually with photographer friends of mine behind the camera, but it IS still porn. I also strip for fun and for charity, but never for personal profit. It's not that I think doing these things for money is bad, but if I take it on as a job then it would become work, and I enjoy it too much to take the fun out of it and make it my daily grind (if you'll pardon my pun).
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, December 11, 2007 - 7:39 PM
    This is an interesting observation that brings forth many different subjects. Can porn be seen by some as erotic? As a male, I feel if I were to pose in a sexual manner (ie. playgirl), that I would be there to please the female. would not do it, but would that sex be belitteling to a male as well?

    Now on to a sacred sexual content. Look at the Karma Sutra, it is shown in a way to help both man and woman, but not to just "get them off". I think that there is a difference, but it is mainly in the eye of the bholder. Does this mean that I agree that porn is bad or that all the magazines realted to the adult entertainment area are bad? No, each has it's own merrit. It is how we look at it that matters.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Wed, December 12, 2007 - 1:32 AM
    Is Sacred Sexuality the remedy? Depends upon your definition of Sacred Sexuality.

    I doubt it. In order for sacred sexuality to happen, the participants need to be in the "sacred" zone... at least I think so (It's late and my speculative imagination is tired).

    I myself enjoy looking at pictures of naked women, but mostly artistic nudes (e.g. Domai.com), not especially sexualized.

    If you tell someone they're broken -- either the man doing the spectating or the woman doing the posing -- they're either to a) believe you or b) shine you on.

    I think that resistance doesn't go very far; agree with Jeremiah on that. Encourage love and personal dignity, of both people and their sexual longings, and watch the magic happen.

    I think that might be part of it... mind the language. Begin introducing words like "Longing" and "Fulfillment" into sexual contexts and begin to move the energy up from groin to heart. I think that men, from the hungry-eyed drunk drooling over the weary stripper, to the "porn addict" who rents 10 porno DVDs every day, is unconsciously longing for contact with the divine feminine (both within his own soul and in his personal relationships). They are drunk, knocking at the door of the Temple of Dionysus clamoring to worship, but they do not realize that Dionysus wants them to enter sober.

    MM
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Wed, December 12, 2007 - 12:05 PM
      Domai.com is so beautiful! Thank you for introducing me to this website. I don't consider Domai pornography at all, this is art. Sacred Sexuality is very intimate it takes you through all the chakras. Pornography is fake sex, it's physical, that's it. We all know that sex is so much better when you have a special connection with your partner.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, December 12, 2007 - 11:07 PM
        "We all know that sex is so much better when you have a special connection with your partner."

        I wonder what you mean by 'special'? In the tradition that I work with (Taoist Sacred Sexuality) it's emphasized that _every_ partner is special. If a woman chooses to spend time with me practicing 'dual cultivation' she's a very special woman to me! Of course, it's my attitude and outlook that allows this to happen, and the fact that I'm taking full responsibility for my choices regarding my expression of sexual energy. There's nothing wrong with 'purely physical' if the physical energy generated is used consciously. Mixing in emotional stickiness can be a recipe for great confusion when it come to working with sexual energy. This is an area that is often overlooked by many 'Sacred Sex' practitioners.

        As for pornography, the ancient Chinese 'Pillow Books' are exceedingly explicit and would, no doubt, be considered pornography by many even today. They were used by both men and women to enhance their sexual practices since they recognised that humans (and particularly men) use visual stimulus as a way to get their 'Sexual Qi' flowing.

        I would agree that the vast bulk of modern day professionally produced pornography doesn't have a lot of energy. I suspect that this simply reflects the attitudes and environment that produce it. No Qi In = No Qi Out. What's fascinating to me is that some of the most popular material today appears to be 'amateur' footage of 'real people' simply enjoying themselves and enjoying being watched. If you want visual stimulus here's an idea: instead of buying a movie of silicon-enhanced droids why don't you go along to the Tantra Temple at one of The Netherlands best known clubs and enjoy the atmosphere?
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Fri, February 8, 2008 - 8:11 PM
      Let me throw this one out: If we accept (if nothing else than for discussion) that we were made by whatever vision one might have of a creator, are we not explicitly sacred? Now, what about when one moves to objectification and commercialism? Do we not then fall, in the scriptural sense? *

      Then there's one man's meat is another man's poison thing. There's a segment of our society which would, nay, does, find <pick any of several photographers on my bookshelf> to be porn?


      * No connection w/ A&E intended here
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Wed, December 12, 2007 - 10:31 PM
    Hi Aline,

    Pornography is tricky to discuss because there are so many different types of "erotica", from the beautiful to the obscene.

    I think most men are attracted to pornography and that attraction is somewhat "hardwired". While a lot of pornography is degrading to women, I don't think that graphic images of human sexuality are inherently demeaning to anyone. I find the graphic images arousing but the mistreatment of women repulsive.

    A lot of pornography ludicrous in the sense that no one that I know has sex like that. I think the main "danger" of pornography is that young men will mistake what is depicted for actual lovemaking. People in adolescence are very prone to sexual imprinting, and those are not imprints I would wish on young men. Or on their lovers!

    Sacred sexuality can be a remedy but it needs to address the fiery nature of men's sexuality and create a vessel to contain it, rather than trying to "feminize" it, or to deny it.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Wed, December 12, 2007 - 11:33 PM
    I think that it is all very relative. I just go off of my gut instinct about intuitions I get. For me, the energy of porn isn't pleasant, I don't like it, and I don't enjoy sharing intimate energy with people who experience porn as a positive thing. But I don't judge other people who are involved with it, because I know that everyone is exactly where they need to be and doing what feels right to them. What feels right to one person may not feel right at all to another.

    Also, I find it really tiring to argue with other people who's morals are different than mine, because there never seems to be an agreement at the end. In my egotistical moments, if I could, I would wipe porn off the face of the planet...mainly because in those moments I feel like it causes a ton of disconnection inside of someone and also in our world. I don't have the energy to get into why I feel like it is disconnecting, and I'm giving you my truth, not saying it is anyone else's. I respect where everyone's coming from.

    Blessings!
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Wed, December 12, 2007 - 11:55 PM
      Chenae....I agree with you. I go by what I "feel" also. Maybe it's just been unpleasant experiences for me, but when my lovers in the past brought porno into things....their essence changed, they viewed me differently....I'm guessing because it stimulated different chakras then I was used to stimulating with my lover....always the heart first, then the lower. When the porno was brought into it....it was straight to the root chakra, and I wasn't comfortable with it.....I am a heart based goddess, and it seems so are you.

      I bellydance....I also find SOME exotic dancing very beautiful....but there comes a point...a man's or woman's essence may push the limit on respecting the Goddess being naughty, or sexy. I can see it in their eyes.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Thu, December 13, 2007 - 2:19 PM
        Oh yes and it TOTALLY makes sense to me what you said about stimulating the heart chakra first, and then the lower ones....to me, anything less than channeling my sexual connections through my heart feels completely wrong for me and my energy...very fake and disconnecting. Describing it this way puts it way more into perspective for me, thank you!
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Thu, December 13, 2007 - 3:14 AM
      The problem with wanting to "wipe porn off the face of the planet" is simple: who defines what is porn?

      Recently, the Attorney General of the U.S. covered a statue, The Spirit of Justice, because it had an exposed breast. Are the breasts of a statue standing by itself pornographic? I don't think so, but some people do. So who determines what should be wiped out?

      Michelangelo's classic statue The David shows the young man's penis (and he's clearly not Jewish!). Should that be destroyed and wiped off the earth?

      Every few years in India, politicians wanting to clean up tourist spots for visitors propose destroying the magnificent temples at Khajuraho. These temples show men and women in a wide variety of sexual activities and positions, including group sex and more. Should these temples be destroyed? How is that different than the acts of the Taliban who destroyed magnificent 1,000-year-old statues of the Buddha?

      And what about films? "Midnight Cowboy" is a powerful film with amazing performances by Dustin Hoffman and Jon Voight. It won the Academy Award for best film. It was rated X. Some people considered it porn. Should it have been wiped out? How about text? The book "Lady Chatterly's Lover" is a complex story of a sexual woman caught in a sexless marriage. When it first appeared it was banned in many places for being pornographic. Some of the writings of the Roman poet Catullus of the first century b.c.e. are outright lewd. Should he be banned, too?

      I would respectfully suggest that it is not the porn that causes the problems. Things many people in the U.S. would consider pornographic are considered normal and natural in Asia, Africa, and other locations. The problem, IMO, is that although many proclaim the value of women, the selfsame people want to denigrate women by putting them into second rate jobs, paying them second-rate salaries, and force them into a life of being nothing but possessions of men and used as breeders. Some women, given the opportunity to choose between working at McDonalds flipping burgers and working in what they think is a glamorous, movie-star like environment for a few hours and making more during that time than they could make in a month at Mickie D's choose the latter. In short, porn is not the problem, it is the lack of choice given to women in a culture that has inbred concepts of female inferiority. The problem is the repression caused by this attitude.

      I happen to know some women who are involved in porn. They have gone into porn as a practical choice. It allows them to make a lot of money. It allows them to not be the virtual concubine of some man who controls them in a variety of ways.

      I would say that trying to end the negative aspects of porn--and I'm not denying that there are many--is like feeling you are doing something good for the environment by bringing your own bags to the grocery store, and then driving your groceries home in a Hummer. The negative aspects of porn are not the problem, they are just the symptom. Get rid of the symptom and the problem remains, corrupting the body.

      Namaste!
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: The problem with Pornography

        Thu, December 13, 2007 - 6:43 AM
        Applause! Extraordinarliy well put, Sham. I agree with everything you've said. Thank you for saying it with such clarity.
        blessings,
        Dave
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Thu, December 13, 2007 - 1:16 PM
        I agree with you as well, I think everyone's definition of porn is different. Like I said, it is relative. For me, porn is anything besides a person that you are physically intimate with, that you direct your sexual energy towards. Usually in the form of videos or images. Directing my own sexual energy towards pictures or writing or videos feel unbalancing and disconnecting. And when others that I am *intimate* with direct theirs towards the same things, I can *feel* it, and don't want to mix my own energy with that kind of disconnection and unbalance. I agree that there are all kinds of takes on what porn is/could be, I am just giving my own definition, and it's effect on my own life.

        Blessings and Namaste you lovely people! :)
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Thu, December 13, 2007 - 3:59 PM
          Chenae wrote: " For me, porn is anything besides a person that you are physically intimate with, that you direct your sexual energy towards....Directing my own sexual energy towards pictures or writing or videos feel unbalancing and disconnecting."

          You are certainly entitled to your feelings, and blessings on you for following your path.

          For me, well, I think I may have a broader concept of "sexual energy" than you. That doesn't make your way wrong and mine right, or vice versa, it just makes it different. And using my concept, I couldn't live as you.

          For me, sexual energy is the energy that charges all of life. It drives us forward and help us commune with the divine. Without sexual energy moving me I wouldn't be able to write or create. Sexual energy is what links me to the universe and to every thing and everyone within it. I don't see sexual energy as something separate from me--it is part of everything I am and do.

          The real problem I have with wanting to get rid of all porn, as has been suggested, is who decides what is porn? You've decided what is porn for you, so you can excise it from your life--and I believe you should. Every person, IMO, should be free to decide what they do want in their lives and what they don't want in their lives.

          So what if we made you the anti-porn czar. You might be attacked in print and word for letting through things that others consider porn but you don't. If our former attorney general is this anti-porn czar, you might not be able to see The Birth of Venus by Botticelli or hear Cyndi Lauper sing "She Bop."

          That's the problem with denying freedom and censorship. Eventually it gets in the hands of people who would deny you freedom and censor what you believe.
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Thu, December 13, 2007 - 4:18 PM
            "For me, sexual energy is the energy that charges all of life. It drives us forward and help us commune with the divine. Without sexual energy moving me I wouldn't be able to write or create. Sexual energy is what links me to the universe and to every thing and everyone within it. I don't see sexual energy as something separate from me--it is part of everything I am and do."

            Sham,

            This is a beautiful way of putting it! And is also my experience as well...maybe I should have clarified that I meant *erotic* energy. I should have used that word instead, or described that to me there is a noticeable and tangible difference between the creative life force at work on a daily basis throughout my life and when I am sexually aroused...I am not sexually aroused by painting, but I enjoy it as an expression of my creativity. So what I meant by "sexual energy" is physical sexual arousal.

            Also, I didn't mean to *suggest* that we wipe porn off the face of the planet. I don't think it would be possible, considering everyone's varying definitions of what it is. I was just explaining my more subjective feelings on the matter, and how in some of my more egotistical moments where I am impassioned by the disconnection I see because of (what I consider to be) porn, I feel like I wish I could do that. I do not wish to censor anyone.

            Namaste



            • Re: The problem with Pornography

              Thu, December 13, 2007 - 11:46 PM
              Chenae, I really don't want to sound like I'm getting on your case. I have no doubt that you are a wonderful, caring person. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

              I don't quite understand, however, how you are now saying that you "didn't mean to 'suggest' that we wipe porn off the face of the planet. Earlier in this thread your exact quote was, "I would wipe porn off the face of the planet." Perhaps earlier you had a different meaning for those words?

              One of my favorite films is Antonioni's "Blow Up." In it, the main character, a photographer, quite literally gets so into taking photos of a model that the process becomes a virtual erotic, sexual experience. I would respectfully say that when I really get into any creative activity it is incredibly erotic. Athletes describe their creative experience as being in "the zone." If you've ever been there I find it identical to being in an erogenous zone. As a writer, when the words flow, I get the physical emotional and sensual feelings that can only be described as erotic. Certain forms of dancing, including contact improv and certain Brazilian and Spanish dances are filled with eroticism. Listening and/or performing certain music, from Belioz and Beethoven to Led Zep and Lords of Acid are highly sexually arousing. IMO creative is highly sexual and erotic, and in my experience, the more creative people are the more sexually active they are.

              Without sex, sexual arousal, and sexual energy, our world would be nothing but New Mexico whiptails and polyps.
              • Re: The problem with Pornography

                Fri, December 14, 2007 - 1:37 AM
                Hehe, I agree, sexual energy is what gives everything life and motion and creative ecstacy!

                Also, some pretty amazing feelings are aroused within me while doing certain activities or watching certain performances, as you say, but for me, it's a different than being in an erogenous zone. So that is where we differ! I think it's very awesome to be able to feel that way from activities other than what would normally be deemed "sexual". What I experience from "being in the zone" lifts me very high and brings me most definitely to a state of bliss, but not in an erogenous way. However, I do know that once there, that state of bliss that I feel can very easily manifest as or "morph" into an erogenous experience, because usually my heart is wide open and if my lover is nearby then I will naturally want to connect with them... ;)


                • Re: The problem with Pornography

                  Fri, December 14, 2007 - 1:47 AM
                  Oh yes and...

                  the actual quote was not "I would wipe porn off the face of the planet",

                  it was "In my egotistical moments, if I could, I would wipe porn off the face of the planet...mainly because in those moments I feel like it causes a ton of disconnection inside of someone and also in our world."

                  As I tried to explain before, I am not saying that I want to wipe porn off the face of the planet, nor am I suggesting it as a course of action. I was describing personal moments that I have in which I feel disconnection because of it. Kinda like saying, "Man, sometimes I have these moments where I get REALLY sad". This doesn't mean that I am sad constantly, and that it is set in stone forever that I am a chronically sad person. They are just moments in time, which occur and then pass...not a regular pattern of thought for me though.

                  Blessings Sham, I appreciate your postings and you've helped me to see your point of view and helped me clarify mine :)


                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: The problem with Pornography

                    Fri, December 14, 2007 - 8:16 AM
                    Chenae, I love that what we have posted has shown that it is possible to disagree without being disagreeable, something which is what sadly happens all too often on forums.

                    Communicating with someone we disagree with, and where all sides can share their views, does, as you write, allow us to see other sides of an issue and help us to crystalize our own positions.

                    As it happens, one of my interests in language and an area called "general semantics." When we speak in person, the words we use are actually only a small percentage of what is communicated. When we write, however, it is 100%, often making us wonder, "why doesn't that other person (or those other persons) understand?"

                    My guess is, were we talking in person, we would have far, far, more in common that differences. Perhaps some day I'll have the honor of doing that over a cup of tea or a nice glass of wine.
                    • Re: The problem with Pornography

                      Fri, December 14, 2007 - 12:41 PM
                      Yay!
                      "it is possible to disagree without being disagreeable,"
                      Like you say, all too often on forums and in life I encounter others who jump to defense as soon as it sounds likely that I disagree with them, haha. I love encountering others who recognize the unity in us and therefore feel that hey, it's ok that we are also different!

                      Blessings!
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: The problem with Pornography

        Fri, December 14, 2007 - 7:49 PM
        I also happen to know some women who are involved in porn.

        Your example of porn being a better choice than McDonalds is absurd. Yes she will make more money, but how will her soul feel? Getting involved in porn can follow you for the rest of your life, and it can utterly change the way a woman values herself. It's not just another job to choose because it's better than flipping burgers! The poor girl should choose McDonald's! "I'm down on my luck and want to feel glamorous for a little while" is just about the worst way to get into the industry and where a lot of the more exploitative videos are coming from.

        Even women who do approach the business with much thought and enthusiasm can become emotionally scarred. It usually comes quite suddenly - a lady will feel empowered for years, and then one day, or one minute, wake up realize how much of her self she has sold away to men who do not care about her and want only to control and demean her. I'm not sure how you can argue that a woman isn't controlled by pandering to the tastes of a very sick culture.

        I am speaking from personal experience and also from the experiences of several friends who have confided as much.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Sat, December 15, 2007 - 12:52 AM
          Respectfully, Creature, I did NOT say that being in porn was a better choice than working at McDonalds. You're really misrepresenting what I posted.

          What I did post was: "Some women, given the opportunity to choose between working at McDonalds flipping burgers and working in what they THINK is a glamorous, movie-star like environment for a few hours and making more during that time than they could make in a month at Mickie D's choose the latter. In short, porn is not the problem, it is the lack of choice given to women in a culture that has inbred concepts of female inferiority. The problem is the repression caused by this attitude." [emphasis added]

          The points I was making, and that you missed, is that
          1) women in a poor financial situation and who THINK porn is like being a movie star and get lots of money more easily may choose porn over flipping burgers, and
          2) The problem is NOT porn. The problem is a repressive society that does present women with a wide variety of choices, leaving women to think that burgers or porn are the only options.

          If you are attacking porn you are attacking the symptom, not the cause.

          You're absolutely correct, when you say that women who "approach the business with much thought and enthusiasm can become emotionally scarred." But having worked in counseling I can honestly tell you that women can be emotionally scarred working at burger joints, stock brokerages, or in just about any other business where they have to work twice as hard for half the money and get twice the results to get sexist bosses think they're half as good as men doing the same thing.

          I understand that you are bringing your own experience into this, and sometimes subjectivity gets in the way of being objective. I'm not denying any of your experience or downplaying it at all, I'm just saying that your individual experience does not necessarily match that of all others.
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Sat, December 15, 2007 - 2:34 PM
            My statement below had some typos for which I apologize. It should have read:

            "The problem is NOT porn. The problem is a repressive society that does not present women with a wide variety of choices, leaving some women to think that burgers or porn are the only options."

            Again, I apologize if this was confusing.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Fri, February 8, 2008 - 8:18 PM
        I'd agree that a lot of the anti-porn hoopla is promulgated by about people who have trouble dealing with their own bodies, their sexuality, and perhaps even their divine nature - or those who wish to mulct them - Asscroft.

        But back to the line between spritualtiy and porn ...
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Thu, April 2, 2009 - 10:50 AM
        >"Michelangelo's classic statue The David shows the young man's penis (and he's clearly not Jewish!)"

        lmao..... I never once considered the fact that Michelangelo's "David is not anatomically since he is uncircumcised.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Thu, December 13, 2007 - 3:31 PM
    Chenae and Einanna
    Beautiful, I couldn’t put it better.

    My definition of Pornography is simple; it’s destructive to men and women. Nudity, is beautiful, I met my ex-husband on the nude beach. Group-sex, as long it’s sacred with love, honor and respect is beautiful too. All I have to say about women flipping burgers or working in nude bars is: are they there by choice, or do they have to support themselves and others? They may have children, or disabled dependants. I don’t judge either way, but I do place some thought in that subject. Why don’t we have fair wages? I know for sure, that the resources for single mothers are scarce too, thus they choose to dance. I have no problem with that. I do have a problem with the mistreatment of women. That’s all. I think it’s very subtle, (sometimes not) but I see violence towards men and women when I walk into an adult video store. When I go to burning man gatherings, I see no violence. I have seen people having sex, even group sex; I thought it was beautiful too. I really don’t think a person chooses to be a criminal, circumstances placed that person in that role. I don’t think women choose to be in a degrading porno movie, I think circumstances if they like to admit to it or not, put them there. I know of people who did dance in go-go bars. Although a small sample, their personal stories matter. A few of them were immigrants who wanted to make money to better them selves in social status, others were raped or molested, and others were single moms. It’s sad, I am not saying all women involved in this business are victims, I just place some thought in this kind of vocation.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Mon, January 7, 2008 - 7:18 PM
      "My definition of Pornography is simple; it’s destructive to men and women."

      That's not a definition. It's an assertion. I've looked at your pics on your profile in which you seem to be objectifying yourself just as much as some woman who works at Hooters. Have you known any strippers? I have, and they enjoy what they do. I think you ought to let people decide for themselves when they are objectifying themselves and when they aren't.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Tue, January 8, 2008 - 7:13 AM
        What's this all about? I am simply trying to have a discouse here. Why do people have to attack me? This is how I live my life. I am not trying to please men by having the FREEDOM to wear what I want. Maybe you should consider reading my blogs too instead of just looking at the pictures. Maybe this will help you Jon see me as a human rather than just an object.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Tue, January 8, 2008 - 10:05 AM
          Hi, Aline.

          Unfortunately, the relative anonymity of the internet allows it to be easy to attack others. Do people "have" to attack you? No. Will people attack others on the internet? It happens every day in forums such as this. I moderate some forums in another area and one of the things I spend most time doing (other than deleting spam) is editing and deleting personal attacks. We simply don't allow them.

          It's the nature of the internet, I'm afraid, whether we like it or not. I also think it's one of the reasons that forums and tribes will have many hundreds of members but only a relative few will regularly post. I think many of the people who might post marvelous things won't do it because they don't want to be attacked.

          Me? I've just got a hard skin and remember that this is all just pixels on a screen. In another tribe, one person claimed to have incredible magic powers that ruined a person's life, that he can teach others these incredible powers but he thinks he will hold them back so when he dies, knowledge of these powers will vanish with him. I pointed out how incredibly egotistical this sounded and how he clearly had an agenda to try and become a teacher. Rather than being willing to respond and examine his words, he simply attacked me using the <irony> spiritually advanced <irony> "I know you are but what am I?" defense. It's sad, but I find him very funny.

          Now, in response to what Jon wrote, he quoted you as saying "My definition of Pornography is simple; it’s destructive to men and women." He wrote, "That's not a definition. It's an assertion." I wouldn't use that term, but I would suggest that the real problem is that the term "destructive" is not defined. I mean, just living results in the death of brain cells. Is living, therefore, destructive? It would seem to be so. And since it would be destructive to both men and women, is it pornography? By your definition is seems so, although I have no doubt that is not what you meant at all.

          Jon wrote, "I've looked at your pics on your profile in which you seem to be objectifying yourself ..." You objected to this as an attack on you, saying, you have "the FREEDOM to wear what I want." [Well, not if you lived in Iran, or Saudi Arabia, or a lot of other countries, but that's another issue!]

          I think you have hit the problems squarely in the center. What you consider "freedom," another person claims is "objectifying yourself." What one person considers "porn," another considers a viable way to provide financial freedom. Our former U.S. Attorney General covered up sculptures [SCULPTURES!] because they showed naked breasts. To him that was porn. I'd be willing to be you'd think of it as fine art.

          The problem with forums such as these is that we each make statements and people reading them will deconstruct it and interpret it as they will. Due to time lags and the nature of forums, there's nothing that can be done about it.

          So for a moment, if you will, let's go back to having a discourse, as you suggested. I repeat that I respectfully find your definition of porn to be so open to interpretation that just about anything--even breathing--could be considered porn. Can you explain your definition more?

          I hope you don't see this post as an attack as it was not intended to be one. Rather, it has been an explanation of 1) why people do get attacked on forums, 2) why people aren't understood on forums, and 3) a disagreement with your definition of porn, why I disagree, and a request for further elucidation of your opinion.

          Namaste!


          (BTW, you are the first person I've ever "met" who has the same name as my mother. When she met people, they would frequently mispronounce her name. Do you have that problem, too?)
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Tue, January 8, 2008 - 12:03 PM
          Attack you? I was simply showing the inconsistency of your argument. It's called debate.

          I do see you as human. I also see porn actresses, strippers, prostitutes, and other sex workers as human. I think it's ironic that when anti-porn feminists label pornography or other sex work as demeaning to women, in the same breath they demean the women who do such work. Like I said, I've personally known some strippers who love what they do. I've read the bios of porn stars who talk about how they love what they do. How is it demeaning to them to do what they love? I think it's a beautiful thing for women to love sex, and if they like to have it on camera, or with paying customers, more power to them. I don't think they're all as "trapped" as you make them out to be.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Fri, April 10, 2009 - 9:40 PM
      Dreamer sid "I think circumstances if they like to admit to it or not, put them there. I know of people who did dance in go-go bars. Although a small sample, their personal stories matter. A few of them were immigrants who wanted to make money to better them selves in social status, others were raped or molested, and others were single moms. It’s sad, I am not saying all women involved in this business are victims, I just place some thought in this kind of vocation."

      I danced as a go-go dancer and this in no way had anthing including a history of being raped or molested or ill treatment of any kind. it had nothing to do with anything other than opportunity and personal enjoyment...
      it was a second job/past time offered (not needed/hardship) and the other dancers there with me were there for the fun of dancing and socializing (male and female) they also all had day jobs as well...no hardship stories and no personal degrading... a few drug users, but not the whole bunch....
      go-go dancing is no more that club dancing in general except perhaps you are in the spot light...
      I found dancing expressive and freeing, not degrading or victimizing. not even close.


  • Unsu...
     

    Re: The problem with Pornography

    Fri, December 14, 2007 - 7:40 PM
    Having been a porn performer I can say, when I think porn I don't think "is the final product offensive?"
    I don't ponder over the "difference between porn and art."

    I don't even think about "does this turn me on?" or "does this portray healthy sexuality or positive gender roles?"

    I think, "How did making this movie, or posing for these pictures, FEEL? How will these women and men feel about themselves and this choice five years from now? Ten years from now? Is there a chance that the process by which this piece was created has caused pain for another human being?"

    The answer is usually that, yes, there is a good chance that creating the porn was a hurtful or shameful experience for someone involved and that's enough reason for me to be unable to defend it.

    I'm saddened that few people are looking at it through the eyes of the actual performers.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Fri, December 14, 2007 - 11:03 PM
      Knowing now that your perspective on porn is personal, I thank you for sharing your experience with us.

      I own a couple of porn DVDs that were given to me by a friend in the biz; she's a real fan of them and reviews them online. But when I watch them, nothing at all in me moves. It's hard for me to ascertain exactly the reason for this... although it's probably what I perceive as a lack of connection to "real life." I've seen a few things that turn me on a little, but not enough to pursue with my dollars or even much of my time. Real human connections are what it's all about.

      Sex on screen can be really hot though. "Short Bus," a movie that came out last year, has a lot of sex in it, and part of the reason it is hot is that it feels real. The actors, as it turns out, actually played a significant role in developing the characters.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Fri, December 14, 2007 - 11:06 PM
      For some reason....I remembered.....my first love, he was an artist, he did alot of aribrush work, with all kinds of photos....to "perfect" the photo. Lots of modeling pics, ya know, a little celulite, swwwoooossshh, gone...a little bit of white swooshed here, her skin looks flawless and healthy.

      I remember one time, he had some porno model pics he had to "perfect". One girl had HUGE scars under her breasts...uuukkkk. Another actress/model had fresh slash marks on her wrists......I was saddened to the point of nausea for this girl.
      Not a pretty memory.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Mon, January 7, 2008 - 7:08 PM
    I don't know that pornography in general is necessarily demeaning to women, although there is certainly a lot of that out there. However, what I do find lacking in pornography is tenderness. It seems that pornography has explored every aspect of human sexuality except for tenderness.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Mon, January 7, 2008 - 7:21 PM
      That's brilliant.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: The problem with Pornography

        Mon, January 7, 2008 - 11:55 PM
        I wonder what tender pornography would look like - or if it's even possible. How would one create pornography designed to encourage tender feelings in the viewer? And would tenderness be satisfying to watch, in the way that lust and dirtiness is satisfying?

        A friend of mine and I were discussing doing a porn site devoted to "hardcore hugging." It would of course be partly a parody, but perhaps some folks would enjoy just watching hugging videos. I'm not sure if it's much of a fetish...
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Tue, January 8, 2008 - 1:47 PM
          As an erotic artist I've spent a lot of time considering this topic. Feeling deeply moved in a beautiful way by explicit depictions of sexuality and wanting to share that beatuy with others.
          The responsibility I feel is to not create something that will be destructive. We live in a world so beaten up sexually that I really feel that pornographers or erotic artists (whatever label you want to use) need to be conscious of this.
          With this said, why can't films, writing, whatever depict the most explicit, hard-core sex that you want and still share the idea of respect, love and beauty? With this element of the soul added to what some may call pornography, the arousal potention shoots up through the roof for me.
          The experience of the people being depicted in the act is the basis for the energy that is relayed to the viewer. If the people aren't having fun, the energy projected is likely not very creative.
          An example of positive, creative explicit sex would be Tallulah Sulis's brilliant film about female ejaculation - "Divine Nectar".
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Tue, January 8, 2008 - 10:57 PM
            shpriken I like your statement.

            I agree with you.

            As someone who worked in the editorial department of a few magazines while in College. I can tell you this much, porn is very much like art. Some artist are well recieved and others are completely misunderstood, yet everyone is simply attempting to communicate through their own media.

            Sex can be many things for some folks and for some its just a means to an end. At the end who's right?
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, January 8, 2008 - 3:13 AM
    Aline there is a wide range of porngraphy...some only for women and by women. Annie Sprinkle is well known for her female oriented porngraphy

    Many of us when we think porn we think stuff like playboy or screw magazine. The pages of playboy or screw depicts only a limited example of porn. Playboy was designed to please men, while screw was designed to be a parody not to be taken seriously.

    The field of pornography is too wide to sterotype it as only designed to please men. Though its initial conception might have been aimed at doing that, its whole existence these days is too wide and too diverse to limit it to men only. Granted there are some degrees of porn that are behind the degrees of pleasure and enter the realm of bizarrio and twisted, but that is no longer porn as it was intended.

    As for pleasure...it too can be sacred...and if I am an object of that pleasure why not? I rather be an object of pleasure for my mate then a source of pain or anger.

    Porn can be viewed in a number of ways...depending what type it is.

    It can be a enticing and inviting the imagination into another person's fantasy world....it can be used to create fantasies for couples who need some spice to their regular routine.

    As for people who work in porn. Not all women are exploited -innocent- virgins- picked- up- by- hollywood -sleezy -producers. Women who work in the field of porn do have a lot of say as to what they will or will not do.

    Also many people who enter the field do so not just for the money but because they are exhibitist who like being seen by others.

    And though many of us might not relate or understand why some folks get off on being seen by others while having sex, the fact remains that some people do. Some folks love their bodies and have no problems carrying on in public.

    Is it sleazy? Honestly some folks think anything that is not vanilla is sleazy, which includes Tantric sex, mostly because they don't understand it.

    Sacred sexuality has many levels...you have your partnerships with your mate which is your personal sacred union...and then you have sacred sex rites to raise energy in rituals.

    An rough example of a scenario of sacred sex rite...would be doing a ritual in honor of isis. The person who takes on the spiritual persona of Isis is worshiped sexually by the members. Now some of you will say...wow that's kinky and an excuse to have sex. While others will say..hmm that is true spiritual way to raise the highest vibrations.

    Its all relative.

    anyway my 2 cents
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, January 8, 2008 - 7:57 AM
      "In pornography, the woman’s whole existence is based on pleasing the male."

      Obviously, you may have watched one too many pornography films. I thought it was about Men PLEASING the women. There always seems to be two girls and one guy scenes all the time, so there! :D Actually, I didn't think that... but, what you said is totally ridiculous... no offense.

      "Making him feel superior and “manly”."

      One doesn't have to feel manly by the sake of just being with a woman. If I was single for the rest of my life, I would still be manly, passionate, extremely romantic, a great lover as I am and I would be content, humble, and know that I'm all man. Of course, the only thing that is changing about that is that I'm getting married very soon.

      "Women however, are very diverse."

      What? And, men aren't? That's actually a very wrong statement to make. How about rephrasing that as "some women are very diverse"... as one can't say "most women are very diverse" or "women are very diverse" (as it speaks for all). It's like my photo- "Rap is Crap"... which I intend to get a big-ass black t-shirt with white letters printed on it and the shirt will be down to my ankles and I will walk the streets of the gang areas in downtown Seattle. I have that right because I'm not saying "All rap is crap" or even saying "Some rap is crap", but there is that black subliminal message that the word "some" is there, it's just others read it as if I'm stating "all", but I can't because I have not heard it ALL. So, the statement you made about women are very diverse... that's a load of crap! That's because you're speaking of "all"... unless you have some subliminal message that you meant "some" in front of that.

      "Above all, we are mothers sisters and daughters."

      You're also aunts, cousins, nieces, sister-in-laws, and grandmas.

      "We deserve respect. We aren’t objects of pleasure."

      Neither or men. I won't boast, brag or anything, but I will say the truth. I've been with over 220 women (about 165 of them full-on sex, and another 50 or so other sexual things). I'm not proud of that and it hurts me when I talk about it. I feel dirty at times and I wish that I could forget about all the women that have hurt me, as I think that they only used me for sex. I know I'm like the "porn star that never made it to film" so to speak. Now, don't get me wrong... that's not me being a "player" or me having MY way with them. That's 220 women who all wanted me too- if one looks at the other side of the coin. So, please do just that- look at the other side of the coin. If it's one compared to 220... one can easily see that women are much more sexual, more hornier and more deceitful than men. It's just a fact as I have proven that. I'm just not saying "all" women are that way, and I can't say "most" women are that way. But, I can say as a fact that "SOME" women are that way.

      "We are HUMAN BEINGS. Do you agree with me?"

      Last time I checked in the mirror I was a human being.

      "Is sacred sexuality the remedy?"

      It depends on what definition one has for it. Sharing each others bodies fully engaged in love-making is more powerful I have found that just f--king someone's brains out. Although that can be fun at times... AFTER you are already in love with your partner, immediate partners just don't have the "staying" power.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Tue, January 8, 2008 - 12:12 PM
        I'd like to add that every pornographic film I've seen has shown a considerable amount of time of the man giving oral sex to the woman, so obviously the stereotype that it's all about the woman pleasing the man is unfair.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: The problem with Pornography

          Tue, January 8, 2008 - 2:51 PM
          I second that Jon, and third it, etc. It's "better to give than to receive" anyways... and I've lived that. Giving is even more fun because of the reactions you're causing them to have. :D (Don't you just love making them squirm?) lol
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: The problem with Pornography

          Sun, January 13, 2008 - 11:00 AM
          Funny, every pornographic film I've seen shows a man *pretending* to give oral sex to a woman - but holding his head, lips, hands and tongue in a position designed to maximize a good view from the camera, NOT to maximize the woman's enjoyment. The orgasms are scripted. Really good oral sex doesn't usually allow for much of a view!
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Sun, January 13, 2008 - 8:58 PM
            Everyone's a critic.

            Obviously when it comes to pornography, the person who's really supposed to be pleased is not the man or the woman, but the customer. Perhaps it takes a different technique to make it look good for the cameras just like how real martial artists don't fight the way you see in martial arts films. Or perhaps not every woman likes it the way you like it. In any case, I fail to see any misogyny in the way they film such scenes.
            • Re: The problem with Pornography

              Sun, January 13, 2008 - 11:08 PM
              "Really good oral sex doesn't usually allow for much of a view!" ...........Amen Creature!!!! Amen tah that!!!!!
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: The problem with Pornography

                Mon, January 14, 2008 - 7:47 AM
                "Funny, every pornographic film I've seen shows a man *pretending* to give oral sex to a woman - but holding his head, lips, hands and tongue in a position designed to maximize a good view from the camera"

                Perhaps you're watching soft-porn then. The one's I've seen CLEARLY show tongue in vagina... clit-sucking, finger-poking, etc.

                ... "NOT to maximize the woman's enjoyment."

                Perhaps it's for the man's enjoyment too... that the woman is enjoying it (in real life anyways- not in film).

                "The orgasms are scripted."

                True- on film... but not in real life... unless a partner (man or woman) fakes it.

                "Really good oral sex doesn't usually allow for much of a view!"

                Wanna bet? The man LOVES to watch the inside of a woman. :D

                Plus, he also loves to watch the abs rock like waves... so... yes... THAT view is HUGE turn-on... and also seeing beautiful mounds and the look on her face.
                • Re: The problem with Pornography

                  Mon, January 14, 2008 - 11:07 AM
                  Respectfully, I don't think anyone can speak for "women" or for "men"

                  SOME men love "to watch the inside of a woman." Others don't.
                  SOME men love "to watch the abs rock like waves." Others don't
                  SOME men find this a "huge turn-on." Others don't.
                  For SOME women "Really good oral sex doesn't usually allow for much of a view." For others the opposite is true.
                  Different women find different approaches to receiving oral sex to be the most exciting for them.

                  Every person is an individual with different interests, turn-ons, fetishes, etc.

                  Namaste!
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: The problem with Pornography

                    Mon, January 14, 2008 - 11:14 AM
                    "Every person is an individual with different interests, turn-ons, fetishes, etc. "

                    I can totally agree with that too. :D Everyone is different.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: The problem with Pornography

                    Mon, January 14, 2008 - 10:06 PM
                    I think the problem with porngraphy..is not porn, but the people who are worried that they are not sexy enough, so they assume their problems stem from porn rather then look at their own self-image and hang ups.

                    Porn is not the only thing that influences sexual desires...kids growing up are influenced by the toys they play...barbies are suppost to be the role model of beauty for girls and Ken for boys...then we have our parents who pass on their hang-ups...then we have MTV, other music videos showing our kids sexual messages on what is "sexy", commericals sending messages if you want to be popular by this item since the popular kid gets the girl/boy.

                    Then rated "r" movies showing our kids what sex is about....then you have cosmopolitan claiming that it can make you a "sex machine": if you follow the recipe inside, then you have more magazines telling you that being a size 6 is fat...and so on and so forth.

                    By the time a person gets to porn they can't enjoy anyway it..cause their mind is so screwed up with images of what beauty is...which more then not the average female since the average female size is "12" not 6.

                    Let's be real porn does not create our problems..our problems are created cause we are trying to compete with Debbie who does dallas...or Deep Throat ...or any number of porn actresses, instead of being ourselves.

                    SO what do we do as people to erect our flaccid spirits...we criticise and tear apart that which we fear most so we can feel better about our own saggy butts... If we can blame porn on poor self image, we can feel better.

                    Give it up....even if one kills porn you still got the magazines, the movies, videos, ads, commericals...even wrestling/boxing matches showing off women with bodies many of us will never ever have naturally even if we starve...now if we had $85,000 maybe some of us will look better if our bodies will agree with surgery

                    We need to learn to like our bodies...We are delicious as we are...we don't need to compare or compete wiht porn. Porn does not make us less sexy...what makes us less sexy is our attitude..our fear destorys the mood and desires.
                    • Re: The problem with Pornography

                      Mon, January 14, 2008 - 11:42 PM
                      Well you know what I tell my clients who come to see me for internet porn sexual addictions, or pornography in general, have fun don't stop just start opening your heart and stay present and conscious with the process and see how long your in the game. Most people use pornography to check out, not everyone but most people. The problem with pornography is the chemicals that love making produces between two people live don't happen except between you and the screen so after time you become unable to truly bond with another human being. I have research on this that I can send anyone who wants it just send me a personal note and I will send it to your personal email address. It is very interesting...
                      • Re: The problem with Pornography

                        Tue, January 15, 2008 - 4:53 AM
                        I have read through all these posts and I am saddened by the fact that so many men who claimed to understand sacred sexuality are defending the perverted use of sexuality in all pornographic media that exists. Pornography has one purpose to gain money from the base animal desire of lust are to promote this anti-sacred desire. Lust can not honor the sacred in sexuality, as the sacred comes from surrender, and lust is about taking wanting, it degrades everyone who becomes addicted to its power. Where it exists in the East you find the grosses forms of humanity, poverty, predation, slavery and cruelty as lust always takes you to the dark side of the human experience. How can one honor a woman they do not know by being sexually turned on from a photo, film etc, this is so far removed from sacred sexuality, that I am ashamed at how many of my brothers have chosen this path. Sacred sexuality is about connecting at the highest levels of transcendent experience through the somatic, energetic, emotional astral, causal, spiritual connection that surrenderd beings can experience. A Michelangelo statue does not have a errct penis, trying to butt fuck another statue the distinction between art and Pornography is so blatantly clear to any soul who has a sense of spirituality a sense of dignity.

                        I apologize beloved sisters for this thread as a man who so seeks to promote genuine sacred sexuality I am ashamed at the brotherhood, and saddened that so many would promote pornography as something valid or useful in any way. I have lost my respect for many writers here because I realize they are just lust driven males that are using sacred sexuality as a cover up for their perversion,

                        Deeply sorrowful that the sacred has been lost in sexuality once again
                        • Re: The problem with Pornography

                          Tue, January 15, 2008 - 9:24 AM
                          Well excuse me, Mr. Self-righteous, but apparently sacred sexuality has not done much to tame your ego. It's a fact that guys are visually stimulated, and sometimes we can't always have sex to satisy our lust(which is perfectly natural emotion). Personally, I'd rather masturbate to other people having sex than go to a bar and try and hook up with a random girl to satisfy my needs, because frankly I have too much respect for women to use them like that. Nothing would make me happier than to find the right girl for me and treat her like a goddess. But it's kind of hard to do while I'm single. So while you're out there bragging about what a superior specimen of masculinity you are, how about you meditate a little bit on softening your ego, and maybe try and be a little less judgmental, k?
                          • Re: The problem with Pornography

                            Tue, January 15, 2008 - 10:59 PM
                            Holy brother,
                            There are various techniques of learning how to take your breath and awareness into your sex center and feeling wonderful orgasmic sensation, without the need of lust based visual stimulus. This process is far more beneficial for your body's health and spiritual well-being, and does not create the reoccurring need for more sensation but insteed builds up the psychospiritual vehicle.

                            I honoring your desire not to devalue a woman through shallow sex, honor them further by having eyes compassion and kindness, once women see a man's eyes that is filled with honor and not lust and they are attracted to such a man, and you will find many wonderful sisters to share deep rich companionship with.
                        • Re: The problem with Pornography

                          Tue, January 15, 2008 - 1:02 PM
                          Friend Yosef, I have started this post numerous times only to find that I was getting sidetracked to other issues such as what is "perverted" and what isn't, why lust and sacred sexuality are not opposites, why your opinion of what is pornographic seems so different than that of the former AG of the U.S. But I think it might fall on deaf ears and blind eyes.

                          You see, your post is not about others, it is about you. It is about your fear of porn, perversion, desire, and lust. It is about your inability to deal with those issues. It is about your fear that if anyone else dares to present a different opinion on this than you that (gasp!) you might be wrong and might have to re-think so many things you are sure of. It is about attacking others rather than challenging your own dogmas.

                          Well, I imagine that you won't understand this post and will probably attack me for it. So be it. But the fact is, respect and honor of partners and sacred sexuality has nothing to do with whether a person watches porn, it has to do with how a person relates to others and his/her partner(s). By the time someone sees much porn they have already been heavily influenced and indoctrinated by their parents.

                          If you're having trouble with sexuality, don't blame it on a so-called "addiction" to porn. Take personal responsibility for your actions, behaviors, and beliefs. There are many therapists who would be more than happy to accept you as a patient or client and help you deal with your rigid dogmatism and fears.

                          Good luck!
                          • Re: The problem with Pornography

                            Tue, January 15, 2008 - 9:40 PM
                            And speaking as a therapist of 25 years I happen to agree with Shambhalanth's comment.

                            Frankly perversions are often a result of repressed desires that become imbalanced. Basically too much fighting with our shadow make our shadow gain more power.

                            The bottome line, attitudes and beliefs create hang-ups...there are many who never ever watch a speck of porn who are completely infused in a web of self-destructive behaviors...porn is not the core of a person's problem, but the vechicle in which they choose to express their core issue

                            Now you can degrade a person by being critical and judgemental...afterall one does not need porn to have a sacrastic, judgmental-condescending-self-righteous-holier then though attitude....

                            Sacred sexuality does not mean prudeness...virginal...saintly behavior...its about divine respect and honor, which one can do with or without having an appetite for porn

                            Also last time I did check porn was a business and like most business they are in it for the money...pretty much like folks who make commericals make music, Rated "R" movies , magazines, etc..few forms of media are doing it for free.

                            Hey if you hate porn...that's cool. I don't care to watch that much either (I say much cause I will watch it occasionaly with my partner, if it pleases them). Now thought I don;t care much for porn, I still defend people's rights to enjoy it. I personally don't find it that much of a turn on...but then again I don't care for the movies that also have a lot of sexual undertones as a whole.

                            The way I look at it, just because I don't enjoy something or it doesn't suit me, I'm not going to make someone feel uncomfortable about their preference...afterall who am I to judge???

                            I think it takes a very ego-centric person to assume they know what's sacred and right for everyone...whatever happened to freedom of love and self-expression?

                            How could something be sacred with its defined by someone's idea of sacreness? What does one concern sacred? (hmm a new thread idea)
                          • Re: The problem with Pornography

                            Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:11 PM
                            Clearly we share different veiws, but assuredly mine view is born out of deepest love for the sacredness of sexuality, for the sacredness of my sisters, for truly honoring the somatic spiritual connection. I understand the futility of discussion with you, and therefore I would respectfully bow out of endless dialogue. This is an open forum we can continue to express our different viewpoints and I'm sure there will be readers that will find resonance in one or the other.

                            I wish you the best in your journey may find the path of least resistance that best serves your highest self,

                            Deep peace
                            Yosef
                      • Re: The problem with Pornography

                        Tue, January 15, 2008 - 5:58 AM
                        Shaman...most people use Tv period to check out...I prefer one on one than a tv any time. But that's me
                        • Re: The problem with Pornography

                          Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:18 PM
                          And so what is your point? People use many things to check out, my point is porn often times is a powerful and uncontrolled addiction for many people and it is one modality people use to check out rather than being present of in their heart for love making. Just plain raw goal oriented sex...sacred sexuality is just the opposite. I have no judgements around porn just stating facts around my experience with issues around porn and my clients...
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, January 16, 2008 - 6:40 AM

        You can take apart my post; I won't go down to your level.
        By dehumanizing and objectifying women, I mean that they become a source of labor and pleasure; emotional health and well being is not taken into account.
        I hold the firm stance that people should have the freedom of speech. However, we all know that the industry has many problems with regulation. Women are treated poorly and not cared for properly, because it’s a profession that is frowned at and not tolerated well. Otherwise there would be a union formed by now, since it’s an old profession. It’s a business; a humanitarian approach does certainly not exist.
        I am deeply grateful for all the opinions and the time you all took to write here.
        I see a great disparity between the men and the women in this post. Of course there are exceptions, and the men who are more compassionate, in my opinion, (and I know it’s a bias one) probably have experienced real sacred sexuality. Others are just trying to speak for something they have never known. I am sorry for the people who never experienced the ecstasy of sacred sexuality.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, January 16, 2008 - 10:51 AM
          "By dehumanizing and objectifying women, I mean that they become a source of labor and pleasure; emotional health and well being is not taken into account."

          By that standard, it's not just pornography that's to blame, but any and every form of entertainment. If you've ever watched any movie or TV program, shame on you.

          "Women are treated poorly and not cared for properly, because it’s a profession that is frowned at and not tolerated well."

          So then, the solution is to stop frowning on the profession.

          "Otherwise there would be a union formed by now, since it’s an old profession."

          Ah, so lack of a union equals oppression. You wouldn't happen to be a communist, would you?
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, January 16, 2008 - 5:06 PM
          Wonderful point sister these poor brothers have never experienced sacred sexuality, never experience that deep honoring and connection, that creates a union that brings one to the highest states of consciousness.

          So in their manish attemps they have try to call their behavior sacred in hopes to remove the deep underbelly of guilt that knaws on there subconscious.

          All lust bound men also suffer from anger which is always a byproduct of lust, indeed this is why you find them on these forums so they can vent their anger by projecting their incompleteness on others. I feel their pain, their anger, there hopes to mentally convinced themselves that there is no bad thus they are not bad. My compassion compels me to endure their insults to speak the simple wisdom of the heart that exposes such mental foolishness . And a one-man is liberated, if one sister is empowered then it was worth it.
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Wed, January 16, 2008 - 5:11 PM
            So compassion drives your condescension and arrogance? Funny concept of compassion you have there. I think the compassionate thing would be to understand another's point of view rather than stereotype and make assumptions about their experience. If people here did not have some understanding of sacred sexuality, we would not be here. Don't assume that you know me just because I disagree with you. That is your ego speaking, and there is nothing holy or sacred in arrogance.
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Wed, January 16, 2008 - 9:06 PM
            You're really full of yourself.
            • Re: The problem with Pornography

              Wed, January 16, 2008 - 9:08 PM
              Indeed. I wonder how someone so full of himself can claim to be able to have an honest connection with others, sexually or otherwise.
              • Re: The problem with Pornography

                Wed, January 16, 2008 - 11:24 PM
                lots of wounded souls here lots of blame and shame

                Sad so sad I leave to your "shit and piss" as some brother put it, your lust and pain dwell in it all you wish.
                • Re: The problem with Pornography

                  Wed, January 16, 2008 - 11:46 PM
                  If sacred sexuality means being arrogant and full of yourself, count me out. If some supposedly spiritual path doesn't teach you humility, it's not worth a thing, IMO.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: The problem with Pornography

                    Thu, January 17, 2008 - 1:39 AM
                    Jon, many years ago I met a man who ran a metaphysical supply shop. He self-published lots of books before self-publishing was considered cool. One of his books was "Spiritual Intimidation."

                    The idea is that someone claims to have superior knowledge and power and the only way you can get it is by following him and obeying what he says. If you don't, then you are inferior--suffering from bondages, anger, lust, etc.--while the intimidator can lord his supposed superiority over you.

                    The book was intended to help people see that they don't have to suffer the attacks of intimidators. What it didn't do was go into WHY some people do this. It usually because of a deep inferiority complex and feelings of insufficiency. Sometimes it may be as a result of impotence. Freudians call it a "Napoleonic Complex," the little man who is so insecure he has to rule all.

                    What our friend is trying to do is say that you can only have Sacred Sex his way, and if you don't then he'll go home and take his sacred sex ball with him! The truth is, there are lots of ways to play.

                    If you note, the tenor of our friend's posts is one of extreme unhappiness and anger. In my experience neither has anything to do with Sacred Sexuality. There are lots of great teachers of Sacred Sexuality who describe it as fun and exciting, lusty and spiritual, juicy and nasty, and amazingly transcendent. In fact, just the opposite of what our friend thinks it is.

                    Now, he is welcome to have his serious, angry, dogmatic views. In a post elsewhere I claimed he didn't understand karma and he somehow managed to interpret that as saying I didn't believe in karma. His anger (which he claims to be free of--I guess he's no longer human) got him all twisted. But it's okay. Someday he'll learn that everything is sacred, including all forms of sex. He might just learn to enjoy it some day!
                    • Re: The problem with Pornography

                      Thu, January 17, 2008 - 11:25 AM
                      My apologies to anyone who felt belittled by my comments

                      We are all humans trying to find both our humanity and our divinity
                      • Re: The problem with Pornography

                        Thu, January 17, 2008 - 12:55 PM
                        Apology accepted, Yosef. And please graciously accept my comment that you belittle yourself with these comments as well. Any constructive commentary by me should be accepted in the light that I offer it for your higher self. Doesn't mean you have to integrate it, as we're all different and there's no one "right" way to do it. Blessings on your journey -- Al
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: The problem with Pornography

          Fri, May 16, 2008 - 3:05 PM
          "Women are treated poorly and not cared for properly, because it’s a profession that is frowned at and not tolerated well. Otherwise there would be a union formed by now, since it’s an old profession. It’s a business"
          Katie Gold is trying to form an adult actors union;
          'A former gymnast turned porn star, is trying to organize an adult actors' union ' is on her biofile.
          The also can join the "Screen Actor's Guild" and aren't required to do anything they don't want to do. They may not move far in the field if they don't, but that is personal choice.

          An acceptable interview for either male or female to get into porn would be for the producer or director to ask the potential porn actor to remove their clothes and perform fellatio.
          Why is that acceptable?
          It's the same as asking one to read a script for a regular movie. Either a person has 'talent' or they don't.
          It's a different kind of field and can't have the same standards apply for it.
          I don't think anyone should be 'abused', but the line is a bit different in that area of business than other businesses.
          If you*generally speaking* were in the business office of a Fortune 500 company and someone asked you to have sex with another to get ahead, that would be considered sexual harassment.
          In the porn world, that is another day of doing business.
          Is that a bad thing?
          I don't think so, as long as it isn't physically forced.
          If a person chooses not to do something that is a requirement of their job in the non-adult oriented world, they lose their job.
          The same is true there, but by personal choice is why it isn't sex harassment and why the only thing a union would be good for would be to:
          Set a standard wage for performing certain acts*This would lead to a ton of gang bang movies and not much else, as people like to, excuse the pun, get the most bang for the buck*.
          Guarantee breaks after a certain amount of hours*Imagine only getting 15 minutes of break time after 4 hours of work there*.
          Have a degrading pay scale for the older one becomes*Star or not*.
          and
          It would drive out all the amateur movie makers just starting up their business, as they couldn't afford the preset wages for jobs, unless......
          they used non-union workers.
          Betcha
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Wed, March 5, 2008 - 5:04 PM
    Perhaps the category is too judgemental. Open sites like youporn seem to indicate that both er, many sexes seem to be enjoying themselves...immensely.

    Interestingly, some Scandinavian countries rate their movies in terms of violence, not sexual imagery. For example, "Dirty Harry" is X rated, but "Emmanuelle" is not. I dont hear about too many college shootings or other wanton mayem from that part of the world. Perhaps they are on to something ?

    I think treating someone as an object of pleasure, and being treated is part of the human experience. I see that you are from Latin America, and from that cultural perspective, it is possible that the woman is not worshipped as she should be ?
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Thu, April 3, 2008 - 2:17 PM
    <<the woman’s whole existence is based on pleasing the male. Making him feel superior and “manly”. >> this very much depends on the type of pornography surely ? what about S&M porn were the man is submissive, hardly conforms to your statement.

    And when you say – <<Women however, are very diverse..>> what makes you think men are not diverse also ? this in iteself seems quite a sexist statement, in fact there is a tone in the whole post that seems hostile to men.

    Admitdely quite a few men in Latin America are macho types but it is not like this in all parts of the world. You should re- think your gender stero types.

    I think the only problem that can come with porn is people doing things they dont want, everyone is different sexualy, everyone has different tastes, and im a strong beliver in liberty.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Fri, May 16, 2008 - 8:42 PM
    Perhaps it's not necessary to make it into a problem, but I can see how pornography could set up expectations in either the male or the female psyche which could set one up for disappointment in any real world relationship.

    Isn't one of the points of sacred sexuality experiencing and honoring what is happening in the moment with no expectations that things happen in a certain manner or that a certain goal be reached?

    And while there is no harm in enjoying beauty, if we are not careful, we can narrow our image of what is beautiful to a point that we miss out on relationships that could bring us tremendous joy. I have observed this happening in both men and women.

    I know, for instance, that there is magic in my touch, but if a man couldn't see past my excess weight to the precious gifts I have to share, he would terribly sorry if he knew what he were missing. And that's not bragging. It's just truthfulness.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: The problem with Pornography

      Fri, May 16, 2008 - 10:06 PM
      'Isn't one of the points of sacred sexuality experiencing and honoring what is happening in the moment with no expectations that things happen in a certain manner or that a certain goal be reached? '
      Yes and porn doesn't change that. People make choices whether they want a set pattern or go with what feels good in the moment.

      'And while there is no harm in enjoying beauty, if we are not careful, we can narrow our image of what is beautiful to a point that we miss out on relationships that could bring us tremendous joy'
      The same is true here. It isn't about porn, it is about what is inside of a person.

      'I know, for instance, that there is magic in my touch, but if a man couldn't see past my excess weight to the precious gifts I have to share, he would terribly sorry if he knew what he were missing. And that's not bragging. It's just truthfulness.'

      If they aren't willing to, then aren't you the one settling for less than you are worth if you accept them?
      They are being shallow. There is no point of being with them, as that amplifies with them, as time passes.
      I like someone who likes themself. If they are overweight, that doesn't mean that they don't. One of my funnest friends ever has quite a bit of weight, is a wonderful person and happily married. When she wasn't married and I wasn't we were drawn together because of our friendship, which brought sexual attraction too. We knew we weren't 'made for each other', but it was nice to share that with my friend.
      What I ask of a woman on weight is to keep themself healthy *Too much weight can cause a stroke of which I don't desire in my partner, but cushion is good too*.
      Porn doesn't screw up the world any more than guns.
      Just like with a gun; there are certain people who can't handle having it around them.
      The rest of the world need not be punished for that small percentage.
      The train filled with removal of 'questionable' items takes a path to something you like in the future if brakes aren't applied.
      There's proof in history on that one.
      Betcha
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Fri, May 16, 2008 - 10:57 PM
        "If they aren't willing to, then aren't you the one settling for less than you are worth if you accept them?
        They are being shallow. There is no point of being with them, as that amplifies with them, as time passes."

        Exactly my point. You're saying the same thing I am saying, only wording it differently.

        As far as porn being good or bad, I am not passing judgment, only mentioning potential effects as I see them. "There is nothing good or bad, but thinking makes it so." - William Shakespeare

        I don't need to be right or make others wrong. That's just more judgment. Even making that statement is quite possibly judgmental. The ego is a sneaky little bastard. And that's a judgment, too. Okay, let me quit while I'm behind. :-)
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Fri, May 16, 2008 - 10:21 PM
      The idea of pornography creating unrealistic expectations doesn't really hold true for me. The sex I see in most pornography doesn't look nearly as nice as my real-life intimate experiences. And I don't think it's changed my standards, because I've seen as many women in porn who don't meet my standards as I have in real life. To me, the real life touch of a woman is better than any sexual acrobatics I might see in porn.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, May 20, 2008 - 9:11 PM
    Aline, I know some who is in the Strip club industry and I hear that it is not uncommon for the people working there to have been sexually abused when young.

    If porn and the sex industry is often born out of pain and feeling a degradation that cannot be overcome, then there is something very wrong with that culture. I believe that very rarely is the pain conscious.

    Men will always try to argue that a few woman out there enjoy it. Often that "enjoyment" is just an internal perversion for the woman, born out of a feeling of degradation. It is really sad to think that so very often men care more about their personal pleasure than how their actions many be degrading and really wounding to a woman who is seen as a powerless, intelligent-less object. This is the result of egoism.

    I think that most of the sex industry is just a manifestation of a huge wound.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, May 20, 2008 - 10:42 PM
      "It is really sad to think that so very often men care more about their personal pleasure than how their actions many be degrading and really wounding to a woman who is seen as a powerless, intelligent-less object. This is the result of egoism."

      If a woman feels degraded, she can speak up. You realize in order to get a job at a strip club, the woman has to actually apply for the job? Yeah, that right: They work there VOLUNTARILY! Imagine that! The whole sexual abuse argument is an ugly generalization, and demeans those sex workers who really enjoy their work(and they're definitely out there).

      But just for the sake of argument, let's just suppose a stripper was sexually abused when they were young. How is that the fault of the men she entertains? It's not their fault she volunteered for the job, nor does it necessarily mean she doen't enjoy the job either. Frankly, I don't think either of us is in a position to judge whether or not someone truly enjoys what they do, and I find it more than a bit pretentious that you do make that judgment for other people. That is truly egoism.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: The problem with Pornography

        Tue, May 20, 2008 - 11:59 PM
        "Frankly, I don't think either of us is in a position to judge whether or not someone truly enjoys what they do, and I find it more than a bit pretentious that you do make that judgment for other people."
        I totally agree!
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, May 21, 2008 - 12:23 AM
        Jon, I agree with you that the "whole sexual abuse argument is an ugly generalization, and demeans those sex workers who really enjoy their work." I've known some he consider their sexwork to be a spiritual honor and even a duty to help bring balance to the world.

        However, I would respectfully disagree with your implication that because to get a job at a strip club a woman has to volunteer and is therefore something she necessarily wants to do. The fact is, if a woman is a single mother without job skills, flipping burgers at Mickey D's ain't gonna pay the rent, pay for milk or pay for diapers. Some women, due to economic situations, increasing lack of educational opportunities and financial support find the only way to get ahead is through sexwork. Then, when they start making large money, do you really think they're going to abandon it to become a secretary at 9 bucks an hour? By the time they're 30-35 and not making the tips they once made, and have no job skills and no place they know of to turn to they--and society--are in trouble.

        No, I don't think all women in sexwork start for that reason. But even one starting because they have no opportunities and can see no other choice is one too many. And even though such a person applies and works their voluntarily, with no options, there's no freedom to choose at all.

        Honor and respect should go to those who freely choose to be sex workers. Education and assistance should help those who look for other ways to be productive members of society.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, May 21, 2008 - 1:10 AM
          Another reason for being part of the sex industry is that it is high dollar for short work.
          Some want the money and some are just to lazy to do all the work required in flipping burgers and dealing with the power junkie managers that run many of those places.
          Betcha
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, May 21, 2008 - 10:18 AM
          "The fact is, if a woman is a single mother without job skills, flipping burgers at Mickey D's ain't gonna pay the rent, pay for milk or pay for diapers."

          Right, but if we're using that as a standard, then most of us are being exploited. How many people can honestly say they have a job they truly love? Stripping may not be what a girl would truly like to be doing, but she obviously considers it a better job than flipping burgers or being a secretary.


          "By the time they're 30-35 and not making the tips they once made, and have no job skills and no place they know of to turn to they--and society--are in trouble."

          Unless, like many strippers, they're doing it to fund their college education. Many professional athletes don't have plans for after they're too old to play the sport anymore, and many end up doing things like becoming used car salesmen. But we don't consider that exploitation.

          The point is that I don't see why we need to single out sex work as exploitative and demeaning when most people's jobs are exploitative and demeaning.
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Wed, May 21, 2008 - 10:34 AM
            Jon, you're right. Most of us ARE exploited.

            But you missed the point if you think the woman described "obviously considers" stripping or other forms of sexwork "a better job." What I'm saying is that it is not a question of choice, but of necessity. If you loved your child but couldn't afford its needs, wouldn't you do what was necessary to support it? When you can see no options, there are no choices.

            And if you think that "many strippers" are trying to fund a college education, you're sorely mistaken.

            I agree that sex work should not be singled out as exploitative any more than many other forms of work. The idea, IMO, is to provide people the education and opportunity to do the work where they will be the most happy and productive. If it's sexwork, fine. If it's flipping burgers, fine.

            I'm supporting the cessation of all exploitation. But what might exploit one person is freedom to another. The focus shouldn't be on the work, but on the worker.
            • Re: The problem with Pornography

              Wed, May 21, 2008 - 10:39 AM
              Personally, I wish stripping was an option for me(there are more strict standards for male strippers, and they make less money). When I can't find any better job options, I'm just shit out of luck. The fact that women have this option open to them is an advantage, in my mind.
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Wed, May 21, 2008 - 2:15 AM
    There are all of you folks going on and on about how horrible the sex industry is and how it demeans women and how it degrades us and demoralizes us, etc. Now, I just have to ask: have ANY of you ever worked in the sex industry?!? I have, I sometimes do, and it's fun. Sure, there are asshats out there who make their employees feel like shit, but I never ran into ANY situation in the sex industry that made me feel dirtier than I did when I was doing work for Disney. You know another reason women choose stripping over fast food? It's less degrading. At least when you're stripping people are paying attention to you and find you beautiful. You get no respect in either job, but you get ego stroking when you strip. Sex work is a job. That's it. It's no more wretched than sitting at a phone for hours calling people who don't want to hear from you and trying to sell them things they don't need. For me it's VASTLY preferable. Is that how I make my money? No. Like I said: I don't want it to become a boring routine just like any other repetitive job. Does getting up on stage and taking off my clothes to earn money for charity bother me? Does it make me feel dirty? Does it shame me? No! So far it doesn't even seem to have made others think less of me!

    If there's anybody else who actually has any first-hand experience with the sex industry then speak up, 'cause gods know there are some horror stories out there (especially in Hollywood porn) but I'll thank all you arm-chair psychologists to refrain from trying to "save" us "poor objectified women" who are up on stage having a blast! And no, I have never been sexually or physically abused in my life. I'm even still on good terms with all but two of my exes. Yes, I have education and job training and certainly don't HAVE to strip or do porn. It's FUN when you take it on your terms!
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Wed, May 21, 2008 - 10:16 AM
      Yes, I worked in the six industry for several years. (I also worked for Disney in Glendale.) And yes, some women do choose sexwork over fast food as a free choice.

      What I was saying is that you have to be aware that you have a choice. Some of the women who get involved in sexwork do so because they don't think they have a choice.

      If you have a variety of choices in front of you and select sexwork by choice rather than necessity, goddess bless you! More power to ya! Those who feel they had no choice need information, support, and educational opportunities. Everyone should have the opportunity to do the work they want to do and become qualified to do, not be forced into what they think they must do because they see no possibility of other alternatives.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Thu, May 22, 2008 - 6:57 AM
        "Those who feel they had no choice need information, support, and educational opportunities. Everyone should have the opportunity to do the work they want to do and become qualified to do, not be forced into what they think they must do because they see no possibility of other alternatives."

        I wholeheartedly agree! What I am very strongly objecting to is the notion that the sex industry by it's very nature exploits and degrades women and that pornography is some sinister patriarchal plot. I would love to see the working conditions in the sex industry improve and maybe get the women unionized (although that admittedly has it's own mess of problems) but just because some of the more visible icons of porn are less than reputable characters with a plastic male-centric product does not make "porn" in its entirety something dirty or disgraceful. Stripping in Rapid City is a very different experience from stripping here in Portland where stripping is a fairly respectable and very common profession. Change our culture's attitude about women and I guarantee that our porn will reflect that. Porn gives the clients what they want and what we find sexy is what flourishes.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: The problem with Pornography

      Wed, May 21, 2008 - 10:36 AM
      Myriad.....
      BINGO!
      It's judging without experience or judging by how one may have felt why they went in and stating that others must feel their guilt.
      I managed an adult motel for 3 years.
      I worked for an adult shop for 6 months.
      I have stripped for money, though found that I didn't care for that the way you do, as I did it for necessity, not joy which tainted it for me. I wasn't forced by any means.
      I lost my job at the adult shop because I didn't "put out" to the lady v.p. of operations for the chain of those stores by not taking her up on going back to her hotel*she was in town on company business* after I got off work. this after a promotion to Assistant Manager 2 days prior.
      I made my choice.
      I was working in construction and lost my job for sleeping with my female boss when we broke up.
      Fucked if you do; fucked if you don't: the field matters not.
      I have had many friends who stripped over the years.
      Some had issues prior, some loved sex to the ultimate extreme, some like what they were able to buy with the money, some were to lazy to get another job, some had reasons like Myriad, some liked to get dressed up and feel sexy, with the kicker of getting cash for it.
      There are many reasons and each person in the adult industry has their own.
      Was I sexually abused as a child?
      Not to my recollection and I don't make up things, just to have drama or be a victim in my life.
      I can compare the guys in porn movies and say that I could do porn, which is true.
      I thought about doing porn, but I don't like feeling on the spot to have to be hard on cue, as that just seems like a lot of pressure, rather than the reasons why I would do it. There also seems to be more money, for guys, in the gay or bi movies, of which I haven't an interest.
      Now, I am married and older, so it is less appealing than even 6 years ago*The last time I considered it seriously.
      I have had a couple of friends who did it to score other things back in that time, but it was their addiction that led them there; sex for drugs.
      They didn't care as they liked both sex and drugs and the combination of both at the same time.
      To take the industry based on a few people is to call all snowflakes the same: it just isn't true.
      Betcha
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, May 21, 2008 - 2:05 PM
        "If there's anybody else who actually has any first-hand experience with the sex industry then speak up"


        Interesting topic. Great insights so far from everyone.
        Maybe I can contribute a bit as well, as I have some experience with the adult industry, not professionally, but a friend of mine is a pretty successful porn director for Wicked Prodcutions (next to Vivid, both are the leading (high end) porn production companies).
        I got to meet him over myspace, as he contacted me in regards to my shamanic experiences which he wanted to find out more about.
        He was just interested in psychotropic plants and their healing effects, since mushrooms and DMT have helped him in his life and his life-long struggle with depression. I met him and we got along right away, He invited me to some of his film shoots, which was very educational and interesting.

        I've never been at a porn film set before, and it was not what I imagined at all. Everything went down highly professional. No drugs backstage (except for some pot smoking), no random "fucking". It was just like on a real film set, except that the actors and actresses are naked and having sex. Not much of a turn-on because of constant changes and brakes between action and cut. I actually have to give the male actors some "kudos" for keeping it "up"...lol!
        I went to a couple of shootings, got to know the crew and some porn stars I never though to meet ever in real life. I met veteran male porn star Randy Spears, one of the most humble and down-to-earth people I've ever met. He was very interested in my journeys to Peru and wanted to know more about ayahuasca. As I was talking to him, more people came up and listened, including the director and some female porn stars ( Justine Joli, Eva Angelina). It was a bit bizzare and I felt like in a twilight zone. Here I am talking about Shamanism to porn stars I only know from the tv/computer screen and some of them I have "enjoyed myself" to in the past.

        I'm also a bodyworker/massage therapist and David, the director, asked me to bring my massage chair to the shoot. So here I am giving back rubs to porn stars, male and female, and they loved it. There was nothing sexual about it, just some good ol' bodywork to release some tension. Film shoots are always stressfulI, even if it is porn. I guess the only difference was that the girls are very comfortable being naked so they didn't bother putting a shirt on. I didn't mind eiher...lol!
        They tipped me well and I even got some private clients out of it.
        As I was driving home later that night I was just laughing at it all. Life is unpredictable and funny at times.

        However, it didn't stop there. David, the porn director, asked me if I'd be up for a Shamanistic ceremony. He needed someone to sit in with, to hold space.
        I've done many ceremonies in the past and my place in Topanga is well suited for such inner journeys. He was in particular interested in the "Spirit Molecule", the essence of ayahuasca.
        So we started having ceremonies every new moon for about 6 months. He brought some friends, his girl friend, porn stars, penthouse models (penthouse pet of the year 2007 Heather Vandeven took part in one ceremony and had an amazing breakthrough in regards to her relationship issue with her boyfriend). David made peace with some of his demons he had been struggling since child hood.
        Others had great spiritual insights as well. There was never anything sexual our orgy like things happening at any of those ceremonies.
        As a matter of fact, you wouldn't be able to tell that the participants were actually working in the adult industry. One of my friends took part at one of the ceremonies during this time. Later when I told her who she just met, she couldn't believe it. She thought they were just "regular" folks looking for some spiritual insight......well, in the end, that is what they are : regular people.

        During this time I became close with Justine Joli , a porn actress, who "works" only with girls in front of camera, but is bi-sexual in real life We dated for half a year, and even went to Peru together, did some healing journeys with San Pedro and ayahuasca. Btw, having sex with a porn star is no better or worse than having sex with a "normal" person. It's all comes down if two people mix well together in real life, no matter what fantasy these girls sell through porn. The interesting thing with Justine was that she's a complete different person in real life as opposed to the way she sells herself. I was not together with her because she's a porn gal, but because I like her as a human being, her character and how we vibed together, not just sexually. Sure she had her problems and I'm not saying that there is not a negative aspect to the porn industry. But fact is that the issues "these people" have are no worse than any issues "regular" people, you or me have.
        She loves her job. She likes sex and likes to perform and model. She knows she doesn't have to do it, but she chooses so, because she likes to.

        The way I got to know some people form the porn industry was because they were looking for meaning and healing, essentially looking for themselves, like we all do. They actually came to me for help and insight, not for partying and random sex. I never asked for it, nor was it ever my male ego-aspiration to date a porn star or hang out with a penthouse pet of the year. These are just images/appearances/fantasies and illusions that have nothing to do with the "real" person. In the end I have to laugh about it all, because I'm not the most social person, more like a hermit, living in the woods in Topanga. The irony of it all is amusing, but at the same time there is tremendous insight.

        The biggest lesson in this for me was to never judge any human by their profession, especially if it is a profession that is judged as "bad, wrong, tabboo or evil" by mainstream society. Many people I met personally in the porn industry are in may ways more open minded and more down to earth than many self-proclaimed "aware, conscious or enlightened" individuals I've come across, especially in LA.
        Interesting to note, is that some of my female friends reacted in disgust and offense when they found out I dated a "porn star", some of them who consider themselves "spiritual". Well, isn't it spiritual to never judge but show compassion and see others as Self?
        The people working in the adult industry are human beings like you and me. They have issues, they have love, they have fear, hopes, dreams and everything in between. The fact that they work in this "lower" manifestation of sexual energy doesn't make them any less human. The contrary, I find people who deny the the lower aspects of sexuality or see porn as "bad" to be more dysfunctional and pretentious in many ways. It shows more about their own sexual issues and lack of true spiriutality than anything else.

        I like sex. I'm comfortable with my sexuality. I don't confuse sex with love. I like to explore sex, but I don't have randome sex with any girl I can get may hand on. I'm very discerning and there have been periods in my life where I went without sex for about two years. There are not many women I can fully connect with and let go. And if I'm with one person, I'm with that person and don't have multiple partneres on the side. But that's just me and what works for me. There are no "rules" other then the ones we make up based on our conditioning.
        Sex is the most denied and most underrated experience on this planet. I've gone into the depths of animalistic/lust up to practicing Tantra and Taoist Sexual Techniques to transform my "highly" sexual energy into finer energies rather than "shooting it out". It's ALL valid. Trouble only comes in if we deny any one of these aspects.
        As someone else said on here, Porn is not the cause it's the symptom of a spiritual and sexual suppressed society.

        All that happened a year and a half ago. In retrospect I can say that it all makes sense now. For anyone who's into astrology, my venus is in pisces in the 8th house, so there is Karma aspect for me in regards to Sex and also as a way to "relate" in relationships, sex had always been a transformative experience for me. I mean Sexual energy in general, not just the "act". So I find it rather interesting, because all my explorations with psychotropics have always been highly sexual and here I am doing shamanic ceremonies with people who work in the "Sex Industry".
        The universe knows what it is doing. It provides lessons and it is up to learn from them.
        I found it to be healing not only for them but also for me, as if the lower and higher sexual aspect of myself were fused and transformed.

        And David, the porn director is shooting a new film. It revolves around an ayahuasca experience. It's still hard core porn, but his films are not the typical stuff you see on the internet. There is a plot and insight. He likes to make art and he's a big fan of Lynch and other great non-porn directors. He also likes to show the act of sex in various forms and fetishes without any censorship. And the only way to do this in this day and age is in the porn industry. The film, by the way is based on the ayahuasca experience I had in Peru. I even get a credit in it, as "advisor"....LOL!....I still have to make up a porn name, though. No one is using their real names in that industry, by the way.
        Sure most people will push fast forward to get to "it", but still David himself is trying to change the adult industry through his own isnights and search for meaning. For him porn is art. What others think of it, doesn't matter to him at all.

        What I can say from my own experience is that most people judge way too soon about what they think they know about porn and the people working in the adult industry. There is dark and light in everything and creator experiences him/her/itself though it all. It's just us silly humans who divide it all into good and bad according to our conditioned subjective judgments based on taste or projection.

        Hope that gave a little insight into "the problem with Pornography".
        As I see it, there is no problem with it whatsoever. The problem is with people who see it as a problem. For those who have issues with Porn, I humbly suggest to look inside and explore your own sexuality and see where it is blocked, because it has to be blocked on some level if one is offended by porn.
        All chakras need to work in balance, from the most root/animalistic red ray, to the most spiritual indigo ray, never choosing one over the other, or giving one more importance than the other. It's about bringing them into balance and let the energy flow freely without obstruction.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, May 21, 2008 - 5:02 PM
          "I met veteran male porn star Randy Spears, one of the most humble and down-to-earth people I've ever met."
          Isn't he though? I met him and his wife(Not sure if they are married anymore) at adult motel I was manging. Both of them were super cool and sorry fans hoping to fulfill their fantasy...they stuck to their Deluxe Suite, rather than participating in the community hot tub/pool area.
          "they have love"That was evident between the two of them.
          "No one is using their real names in that industry, by the way. " True, Randy is not really a Randy. His name remains anonymous from me.

          "What I can say from my own experience is that most people judge way too soon about what they think they know about porn and the people working in the adult industry."
          I agree. People who I hung out with regularly either jumped on talking to me about adult stuff or acted differently to me like because I am comfortable in the sex arena, that mans that I must be all about being a playa.
          Those were my jobs. I wasn't any different because of my job, except I had to explain to various people why I worked there and then I would be asked questions that weren't others normal business to ask if I worked in an office. I don't know about everyone else, but I don't like talking work, after work, other than my initial 15-20 minutes of wind down and bitching time; if I had a bad day.
          Just because a person takes a job, whatever job, in the porn industry doesn't mean that we are open to being the Dr. Ruth of your life or have nothing else to talk about. I don't mind talking about sex and porn, but I don't feel the need to explain it to everyone who I encounter in my life. Right now, I am just choosing to. That's how it should be, by choice.
          Betcha
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, May 21, 2008 - 6:50 PM
          You met Eva Angelina? Dude, I am so jealous.
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: The problem with Pornography

            Wed, May 21, 2008 - 10:10 PM
            "You met Eva Angelina? Dude, I am so jealous."

            LOL! Yeah, she's really down to earth as well and very funny. She just "came" to the shoot for the scene and then left to another film shoot. Busy girl. She plays the drums, so we had a drummer geek moment since I play drumset as well.....it was a typical talk between drummers. For a moment I forgot that she's a porn star and just enjoyed the moment, not seeing her as a sex object but someone who just has the same interest musical outlet like I do. She was dressed when I talked to her, so there was no distraction....lol!
  • Re: The problem with Pornography

    Sun, May 25, 2008 - 3:24 PM
    The problem with porno is that it just sucks. Its not art, or worthy of anything. Its not even just a film of two people who love fucking each other going at it. Its garbage. Where is the good erotica.?
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, May 27, 2008 - 4:22 PM
      "The problem with porno is that it just sucks. Its not art, or worthy of anything. Its not even just a film of two people who love fucking each other going at it. Its garbage. Where is the good erotica.?"

      That's my problem, too. So much porn I've seen just doesn't look like the kind of sex I've had. It looks all dolled up and raunchy. A lot of amateur porn doesn't cut it either, because it's filmed by horny frat boys and slutty sorority sisters whom I don't really relate to. I understand that the "loving couples" porn is out there, but it's hard for me to find(partly because I only look at free internet porn).
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, May 28, 2008 - 4:22 PM
        OK, I will admit that good porn is hard to find. There is a certain look and quality of porn that floods the market, and the odd thing is that very few of the folks I know actually LIKE Hollywood style pornography, but it's ubiquitous! So I do my homework and when I find something I like I usually buy the video instead of renting so that I have it on hand and can introduce new folks. There's something out there for every taste, but just like everything else it takes some work to find the stuff you like.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, May 28, 2008 - 4:31 PM
          "There's something out there for every taste, but just like everything else it takes some work to find the stuff you like."
          Yeah, it isn't as if it is advertised on regular tv as the multi-million dollar blockbuster up for 10 Oscars or anything.
          One must do their own research.
          There are a few female directors that do some decent porn, some funny porn movie takeoffs of well known movies and then there are the 4-8 hour DVDS's of pure sex; in whatever category you prefer. You're bound to find one good scene in 4 hours and they are, usually, $5-10 to add to one's collection. If a person is looking for "purity" in porn, then they need to hit the soft porn on HBO or Showtime for the erotic story shows.
          Betcha
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: The problem with Pornography

    Mon, December 1, 2008 - 11:29 PM
    On this controversial topic, I will speak on behalf of all of those who used pornography to connect with their sexuality as a last resort. Those who could not get off in the presence of another because of desensitization due to trauma. Hell, I'll speak for every man and woman who is incapable of getting off without external stimuli of a remotely degrading sort, even if it is imagined. It is a HUGE problem, which is not nearly addressed enough.

    This type of disconnection is a serious lack of presence. Not only that, but when they find a lover, they are so far gone as to make the other feel inadequate or objectified. At times they can't even get off with another person around. Their behavior is dehumanizing, to themselves and those unfortunate enough to be their lovers.

    The fact that pornography is so prevalent, so largely used across the world is a serious problem. It is a problem because of its addictive nature, some move towards more aggressive porn, some towards degrading, some towards the nasty, etc. It is somewhat Frueudian if you think about it, all of these abused children grow up into adults and seek sexual gratification from simulated traumatic experiences of power and submission, dominance and subservience. Watching their mothers abused by their fathers. It is archetypal, it does ripple down into the generations and it perpetuates the male/female imbalance. These may be extreme cases, but I guarantee you have a neighbor who has thoroughly screwed up their perceptions towards women because of pornography.

    It is sensory, it is physical, it is mental. The images stick in the mind like a bad dream. They enter the unconscious and distort reality. They perpetuate whatever the initial problem was which caused the need to seek it out. They are disorienting and create a lack of presence because the image on the screen is in the lover's eyes, not the actual person they are with. Just as a rape victim often simulates the rape in sexual situations, so the pornography addict simulates the scenarios and if remotely unhealthy, they are present with that thought process.

    It is insidious, viral, toxic, poisonous. This is not remotely to say that the people in this tribe are perpetuators or the extreme, only to state how extreme it can get in the worst case scenarios.

    Look at how many sexual predators are out there, how many of your female friends have been molested or raped. I don't deal in numbers, but I guarantee they are high. What was the mentality like of the aggressor? Desperate? Mimicking a previous observation? Mimicking a previous fantasy? A person unable to get off without extremes? It is the extremes that pornography generates that is where the problem lies. It pushes the mind to the limits, making lesser fantasies seem uninteresting in comparison. It lacks the aspect of intimacy and connectivity, which far too many relationships are missing as it is. In that respect it is devolution.

    What do you think the victims life is like? Is it any wonder so many women have difficulty being present with men? There are countless women who have been the victims of sexual abuse across nations. How many of them have the tools to overcome the trauma? How many are silent, subservient or end up becoming porn stars to relive the trauma? How many experience unfulfilling marriages where their partners are envisioning someone else? How is that woman expected to be present in the presence of one who causes such disrespect, the same disrespect and far gone state of mind as their aggressor. How many men cheat because their wife isn't present, yet they themselves aren't present?

    Does the porn addict see a woman he is with as the beautiful Goddess she is? Does he seek intimacy? Is he present with her?

    I am simply attempting to demonstrate the rippling effects porn has on societies across nations. It is saddening to see. From this perspective, which is often unspoken, pornography is most definitely NOT sacred sexuality. This isn't to say all pornography is bad, just that there are voices out there who don't get to speak up or speak out and those are the ones I feel need to have a voice, because this problem won't go away unless people wake up to it.
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Tue, December 2, 2008 - 12:01 AM
      The universe of sexuality in the world is so huge, that in order to get a sense of the real Tao of it, I use behavior modification principles as a lens to get a grip on the subject. Males are intermittently reinforced, females receive constant reinforcement. The first promotes toxic , angry 'hoarding behavior'. The second, non toxic normal behaviors. This difference occurring at the same time can (does) create aggressive, deceptive, and toxic outcomes in relationships between the two. With the latter often being the prey of the former. Intermittent reinforcement does this to rats, dogs, and men. it's our universe, forgive the men because they know what they do or why they do it.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, December 2, 2008 - 11:48 PM
    Sacred Sex heal all aspects all aspect of self within Both partners hit helps. It is about healing & restoring self for both people in the long run. so it has got to be healing, mutual both need to be on the same levels on every aspect of Nature A True Duality Otherwise the Union is not sacred. A union of uneven balance of any proportion is not a Sacred Sex. I think that is why often one person may have gained SOMETHING the other Felt NOTHING AT ALL.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: The problem with Pornography

    Tue, December 2, 2008 - 11:50 PM
    another thing is porn just desensitizes the Man Period him constantly mangling his penis is not really what some good loving feels like. Pron Teach a Man How TO FUCK LET'S BE HONEST. It teaches nothing about love & sensuality!!! That you ONLY GAIN THROUGH EXPERIENCE!!!
    • Re: The problem with Pornography

      Wed, December 3, 2008 - 1:18 AM
      A Northwestern University Law Professor, Anthony D'Amato, published a paper tin 2006 titled "Porn Up, Rape Down." In this paper he points to official statistics showing that the incidence of rape has declined by 85 percent in the last 25 years.

      But then D'Amato analyzed individual states. In 2001, the states with the lowest per capita access to the Internet were: Arkansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, and West Virginia. The states with the highest per capita access to the Internet were: Alaska, Colorado, New Jersey, and Washington.

      He then looked at the police reports for forcible rape for the years 1980 and 2000. While the nationwide incidence of rape was showing a drastic decline, the four states with the least access to the Internet showed an INCREASE in rape during the same time period.

      D'Amato then compiled the statistics for the four states with the most access to the Internet. Three of the four states showed a decline. New Jersey showed an almost 50% drop. Alaska was the exception, and D'Amato noted that it had the lowest population (about one-tenth of the other states). So, D'Amato combined the populations of the four states with the highest Internet access and the four with the lowest Internet access. He found the high Internet access states had a decrease in rape of 27%. And, the low access states had an increase of 53% in rape.

      So what is it that is on the internet that seems to have such an amazing effect? Sexually explicit images. Porn.

      There are two possible reasons why porn has such a positive role in decreasing the instances of rape. First, it lets people see what naked bodies, and bodies involved in sex actually look like. The mystery is gone and there is no need to abuse someone to solve the mystery. Second, porn provides an easy avenue for men to "get it out of their system."

      Certainly, it is pointed out that some rapists have porn. Some even try to reproduce activities they've seen in porn. But the hundreds of terabytes and millions of pages of porn are primarily viewed by people--both men and women--who would never consider rape. Why? Because rape isn't about sex. It is pure violence where sex is the weapon.

      The inference is quite clear: if you don't like porn, don't watch it. If you don't like country-western music, don't listen to it. However, if you're denouncing porn in a way that would limit the access to porn by others, you are essentially saying that you want to increase the number of women who are raped, perhaps resulting in the rape of millions of women who would not have been attacked.

      Do I think porn is "good?" Not really. It's mostly awful and sometimes awfully funny (unintentionally) when it isn't boring. However, access to porn, as indicated by the prof.'s research, saves womens' lives. So what should be done about this "problem?"

      Perhaps Ayanna has the answer. As she points out, porn teaches nothing about love & sensuality. I couldn't agree more! Of course, neither do the sex ed classes in school. So perhaps the focus of sex ed should be more about the heart and spirit rather than tab A going into slot B. And perhaps someone--maybe you, Ayanna--should start making "adult movies" that do teach love & sensuality.
      • Re: The problem with Pornography

        Wed, December 3, 2008 - 2:10 AM
        It's all about the heart and spirit. And and attempting to achieve a transcendent understanding to escape the toxicity.
        The problem with associative studies is that events which seem to occur congruently may not have anything to do with one another. This is called superstition.
        • Re: The problem with Pornography

          Wed, March 25, 2009 - 12:11 PM
          Well said Jack....


          Granted I'm jumping on this post rather late, but it seems to me, the original posters intent was to say / express disgust with

          women being seen as sexual objects and a means for them to satisfy their own sexual desires
          vs
          human beings who like their male counterparts have sexual desires

          Rather a fine line but one with possible distinct negative or positive ramifications on the human spirit
          • Re: The problem with Pornography

            Wed, March 25, 2009 - 4:09 PM
            Can't we be all?
            • Re: The problem with Pornography

              Thu, March 26, 2009 - 10:58 AM
              cant we be all what ?
              • Re: The problem with Pornography

                Fri, March 27, 2009 - 12:42 PM
                Can't we be sexual objects and human beings and spiritual beings and evolving entities?
                • Re: The problem with Pornography

                  Fri, March 27, 2009 - 9:14 PM
                  Maybe,

                  Maybe not

                  we all evolve at different rates, emotionally, physically, spiritually, sexually, intellectually,
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: The problem with Pornography

                    Fri, March 27, 2009 - 11:37 PM
                    That's very true, coco. I just think a life without limits is better than a life limited by definitions such as "You can only be this or that." As Heinlein wrote, "Specialization is for insects."
                    • Re: The problem with Pornography

                      Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:47 AM
                      For you , that would work . But seems that in the " you can only be this.... " notation limitations are thus being considered only in its negative sense.

                      Limitations can be both good and bad. They can work to "limit" behaviours that have or would produce undesireable results. Note, I'm being very general in what these behaviours and results would be.

                      Limitations can also be good in the sense that yes we can all desire and work to achieve the ends we want, but the truth being we all wont. Specialization is not a bad thing either. I akin it to these 2 sets of images: the person who is rather sociable at a gathering floating around and with a myriad of personalities and intelligences because they have something and can speak intelligently on any topic with anyone..... to the person who is at the party who is surrounded and perhaps approached by a select few, becuase that person can only speak 1 or 2 "languages" ( again languages in the broader sense, not specifically the spoken type, ie, a specific science field, a new though young technology with an impact that is forecasted to be extensive, etc ). So while this 2nd person is not a generalist but rather a specificialist they impact the room and their surroundings different from person 1.

                      Neither is wrong. It's the method of its use that can either bring about good or bad results, and have either positive or negative impact on a person, and thus the other people that interact with said person.
                      • Re: The problem with Pornography

                        Tue, March 31, 2009 - 8:17 AM
                        Well, coco, bringing this back to the point of my posts, rather than the generalizations taking the discussion away from the point, which would you rather be, e sexual object or a human being; a spiritual being or an evolving entity? I believe we don't have to be limited in those ways. If you insist on limiting yourself and putting yourself in a tiny box of who you are and what you can be, that's up to you. It's also up to everyone reading this. Small, limited boxes or a limit-free life. For most people, I imagine, it's somewhere between the two. I prefer the latter...or at least moving toward it.
                        • Re: The problem with Pornography

                          Mon, April 6, 2009 - 4:07 PM
                          no one is all the same time as most everyone else, and it doesnt really matter

                          you asked if we can be sexual human beings that are spiritual and evolving, sure, but you if you look at all that from basic objectivity you cant be all that at the same time . of course then we're going to get into semantics etc : define human beings. define a sexual being. etc. then after that, we can all discuss how we disagree/agree on the definitions themselves....

                          so in that sense, we are all in various stages of limitations, whether you actually believe it or not. limitations on our physical beings, our spiritualism etc. could be just the hour, the day, the week. irrelevat. limitations exist everywhere in everything . again, limitation in the manner you describe, is IN ITSELF a THOUGHT of limits on limitations.

                          I'm not sure what I'm saying is being clear. Limitations exist, period. It's HOW you view limitations that defines WHAT you consider to be a limitation on your life.




                          • Re: The problem with Pornography

                            Mon, April 6, 2009 - 6:43 PM
                            Coco, I agree that there are limitations in life. I can't jump to the moon. I can't walk on the sun. I can't run a mile in three minutes. I can't read a million words in one minute.

                            But there are other things that are only limitations because we see them as such. For example, for some reason you have determined that you cannot be a sexual, spiritual, and evolving being. I would respectfully suggest that thousands of people around the world right now, and throughout written history (at least), do not have that limitation. There are Tantrics in India, Tibet, and around the world who are all three and more. There are Taoist alchemists who are all three and more. There are traditional Western sex magicians who are all three and more.

                            Coco, everyone has their own personal limitations. Some people can't leave their houses without double checking to see that every door is locked. Some managers at work can't trust their employees and have to check every bit of work the employees do. Some people feel they're not good enough for love. Those are all personal limiting beliefs, and as long as they want to have them, it's up to them.

                            I would suggest, however, that it would be a mistake to assume that everyone has to double check their locks, micromanage employees, of not be worthy of love. Personal limiting beliefs are not general beliefs.

                            And therefore, I would suggest that it is not universal that people can't be sexual, spiritual, and evolving simultaneously. History and evidence shows that's not true for everyone.

                            I would further suggest that, in fact, it is simply your limiting belief. I also have to acknowledge that it is a limiting belief that some other people have, too.

                            If you want to keep that belief, that's up to you. I'm not criticizing you for having that belief any more than I could criticize someone for not being able to jump to the moon. You're free to keep your limiting beliefs just as everyone, including me, can keep their own limiting beliefs.

                            I have a limiting belief that if I stand in a pool of water and hold the bare ends of an electric cord plugged into a wall socket things will not turn out well for me. Therefore, that limiting belief is actually beneficial for me. There are some limiting beliefs, therefore, that are beneficial and worth keeping.

                            My question to you, then, is how is your belief that you cannot be sexual, spiritual, and evolving simultaneously beneficial to you? I've given three examples of groups of people throughout time who do not have this limiting belief, so it's not generally true. So how is it beneficial to you or to anyone? I'm not mocking, I'm just trying to understand why anyone would want to keep that particular limiting belief. Also, perhaps you could help by pointing out the source of this belief. Thank you in advance.

Recent topics in "Sacred Sexuality"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Holiday sex offlineNicole 1 Yesterday, 7:52 PM
Is sex a need or a want ? Robert 15 December 21, 2009
why men cheat? david 68 December 17, 2009
The Path *B* 1 December 16, 2009