ubuntu

topic posted Fri, September 7, 2007 - 4:59 PM by  kage
1 - how awesome is this? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubun...losophy%29

2 - how destructive do you think this could be to american society as we now know it?
posted by:
kage
San Diego
  • Re: ubuntu

    Fri, September 7, 2007 - 7:26 PM
    Okay, I'm totally humiliated. When I saw the title of this thread, my first thought was that you needed some kind of Linux help.

    I'm going to go hide now. ;)
    • Re: ubuntu

      Fri, September 7, 2007 - 8:06 PM
      Well, it is a perfectly good Linux distribution.

      And frankly, the original posting, in itself, does little to disabuse us of that interpretation. Even looking at the link, as it appeared in the posting, I thought sure this was about the Linux distribution, because there, too, there is something called a Ubuntu Philosophy.

      So, um, thanks for the warning?
      • Re: ubuntu

        Sun, September 9, 2007 - 9:36 AM
        for the love of god - does 'ajax' also now mean 'asynchronous javascript and xml' rather than 'cousin of achilles'?
        • Re: ubuntu

          Mon, September 10, 2007 - 9:48 AM
          I dont know - but this collection of postings is hilarious. I dont feel nearly as nerdy as I usually do.
        • Re: ubuntu

          Thu, September 13, 2007 - 5:45 PM
          >for the love of god - does 'ajax' also now mean 'asynchronous javascript and xml' rather than 'cousin of achilles'?

          I'll admit, when I hear "ajax", I think of two things -- coding, and the stuff we use to clean kitchen sinks. I almost never think of ajax in the achilles context, although I know that reference too. ;)

          But back to ubuntu.......

          When I read the description, I didn't think of it as destructive, I thought of it as a very powerful tool in community building. i don't think we need to destroy our current community in order to incorporate the notion of ubuntu. The changes in society, as we incorporate them, would likely be gradual and over a period of decades. I love the idea of it.
          • Re: ubuntu

            Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:34 AM
            :: i don't think we need to destroy our current community in order to incorporate the notion of ubuntu.

            it's important to distinguish destroying the institutions of our society - for example, conspicuous consumerism, corporatism, the democratic party, the humiliation industries - from destroying our community. ubuntu simply threatens the prestige of affluence, because people who have actual love and respect because of who they are and what they have done for people will have radically less incentive to pursue fantasies of being envied because of what materials they possess on credit.

            :: The changes in society, as we incorporate them, would likely be gradual and over a period of decades.

            not necessarily for us! but perhaps for nebraskans - love and peace and freedom for us in our lifetimes are not pipe dreams; it is dangerous to position them as such.
            • Re: ubuntu

              Fri, September 14, 2007 - 11:24 AM

              :: The changes in society, as we incorporate them, would likely be gradual and over a period of decades.

              not necessarily for us! but perhaps for nebraskans - love and peace and freedom for us in our lifetimes are not pipe dreams; it is dangerous to position them as such.

              It's possible, I agree. I just don't think it's *likely* to happen in my lifetime because "our way of life" is so entrenched, and people (generally) hate change. Even looking to Burning Man (which encompasses some aspects of ubuntu), most of the US still doesn't know about Burning Man, and its been around for twenty years. I think the ubuntu aspects of Burning Man will spread more quickly if people take those ubuntu aspects off the playa and incorporate them into their day to day lives. Other festivals that have similar philosophies will also help spread the word. All of this takes time though.

              Is Nebraska an evil place? ;) I've never been there and don't know much about it.
              • Re: ubuntu

                Fri, September 14, 2007 - 1:06 PM
                :: I just don't think it's *likely* to happen in my lifetime because "our way of life" is so entrenched - I think the ubuntu aspects of Burning Man will spread more quickly if people take those ubuntu aspects off the playa and incorporate them into their day to day lives.

                i notice here you seem to be identifying with, or resigning yourself to being a part of, conventional america, and you seem to be shifting the responsibility for change in your own life to 'people' - i am not trying to ride your jock, i am just trying to point out an undercurrent of attitude of futility that i feel is very common. we don't need to wait for social revolutionary heroes to make some big awesome movement that we can join onto, and we don't need to be awesome revolutionary heroes - we can do things differently for ourselves with those around us, and if other people are inspired to do the same, then awesome - we have an accidental revolution on our hands.

                the sorts of things i'm talking about take effort but are fairly straight-forward and attainable - i'm talking about cohousing (even if not cohabitating - though i am shocked by people's reaction to the prospect of sharing living space with friends), food coops or even farming coops, local news papers, community education initiatives - but the crux here is that rather than people simply espousing an arbitrary do-gooder philosophy, they are trying to work together to become more self-sustaining, more self-reliant, more educated, more loved, more free of financial risk, more free to basically do whatever they want rather than worrying about paying bills and acquiring more prestige all the time. am i being clear? i am not talking about some abstract leftist dream of improving society - i am talking about a here and now effort to make our own personal lives better through cooperating with and intertwining the essential features of our lives with the people around us.

                :: Is Nebraska an evil place?

                this is an openly absurd and ignorant statement, but my prejudice is that any place without a coast line or a significant homosexual population is rife with illiteracy. by which i mean a sort of cultural or philosophical illiteracy -
                • Re: ubuntu

                  Fri, September 14, 2007 - 1:59 PM
                  There is something that is very important about the psychology of politics. Largely I would agree with you Deborah, but one thing which I share in acquiring a psych degree is that depressed people often have a more realistic view of the world, but are lest apt to make accomplishments, while people who are less depressed, are less realistic, but also are more likely to make accomplishments in their lives. Now I am not saying anybody in this tribe is depressed, but our culture behaves exactly in that way. There is a cycle of the human condition which things don't happen if we don't think it happens; so we have to act like things we want to happen will happen, or nothing gets done.
                • Re: ubuntu

                  Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:05 PM
                  >i notice here you seem to be identifying with, or resigning yourself to being a part of, conventional america, and you seem to be shifting the responsibility for change in your own life to 'people' - i am not trying to ride your jock, i am just trying to point out an undercurrent of attitude of futility that i feel is very common. we don't need to wait for social revolutionary heroes to make some big awesome movement that we can join onto, and we don't need to be awesome revolutionary heroes - we can do things differently for ourselves with those around us, and if other people are inspired to do the same, then awesome - we have an accidental revolution on our hands.

                  Maybe I didn't do it very well, but what you say is exactly the point I'm trying to make. The responsibility for effecting change lies with each and every one of us. I just think you're kidding yourself if you think change will happen overnight.

                  >i notice here you seem to be identifying with, or resigning yourself to being a part of, conventional america

                  If you knew me in real life, you'd realize how hilarious this statement is. :) I have no desire to lead a conventional life, and I don't think I ever have.....

                  I rarely lapse into a feeling of futility (unless it's been a particularly bad day), and continue to work on the values that I think are important.

                  >the sorts of things i'm talking about take effort but are fairly straight-forward and attainable - i'm talking about cohousing (even if not cohabitating - though i am shocked by people's reaction to the prospect of sharing living space with friends), food coops or even farming coops, local news papers, community education initiatives - but the crux here is that rather than people simply espousing an arbitrary do-gooder philosophy, they are trying to work together to become more self-sustaining, more self-reliant, more educated, more loved, more free of financial risk, more free to basically do whatever they want rather than worrying about paying bills and acquiring more prestige all the time. am i being clear?

                  These are all important things, but again, they take time to take root. For example, farmers markets are enjoying a resurgence now, and will only get more important as time goes on, but it's taken quite a while for people to realize their importance.

                  Do people have issues with sharing living spaces with friends? Maybe it's because my living situation has always been somewhat fluid, but I've never seen the shocked reaction that you describe.

                  > i am not talking about some abstract leftist dream of improving society - i am talking about a here and now effort to make our own personal lives better through cooperating with and intertwining the essential features of our lives with the people around us.

                  Some ideas are abstract and there is just no getting around that. Whether or not they end up being mere dreams depends on whether or not you're willing to do the work to ensure that they don't remain dreams. For me, I spend most of my work days on abstract issues (privacy) that some number of us believe improve our society. As for my current project -- I'm convinced that we'll kill Real ID, and if we do, it will have been because of a large group effort.

                  ====

                  :: Is Nebraska an evil place?

                  this is an openly absurd and ignorant statement, but my prejudice is that any place without a coast line or a significant homosexual population is rife with illiteracy. by which i mean a sort of cultural or philosophical illiteracy -

                  I was completely joking with you -- I never thought you'd take it seriously.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: ubuntu

                    Fri, September 14, 2007 - 3:48 PM
                    :: If you knew me in real life, you'd realize how hilarious this statement is.

                    whatever - because of the patriot act i was able to find out that your legal name is june cleaver -

                    :: These are all important things, but again, they take time to take root. ... Do people have issues with sharing living spaces with friends?

                    it's come to my mind is that they take time to root precisely *because* people are socially isolated from one another - in other words, we are culturally experiencing a serious lack of what robert putnam calls "social capital", the stuff of community, the quality that turns a number of individual people into a group of people, the fuel that gets movements moving. how do we develop social capital? a brief anecdote - i had some folks over at my house last night who used to be in the military, and they were reminiscing about how during that time, they had no money, but because they were living together, they were having a great time and didn't seem to need any; i've had experiences like this as well - i've felt richest and most free when i was poorest, and not in some enlightened philosophical sense, i'm talking about the materials and luxuries i literally had at hand. the difference is that i was living in a cooperative. we took care of one another out of necessity, and a lot of great social epiphenomena emerged from that - community education, food not bombs, orgies. i think there is a deep relationship between human social behavior and *capability* and this manner of living together. what do you think?

                    :: Some ideas are abstract and there is just no getting around that.

                    i don't mean so much that the ideas are abstract as that the effects are abstract - there is a big difference between 'helping the community' in the way that newspapers talk about it, and your making your life better and the lives of those you actually interact with better. i don't believe that progress needs to be primarily glacial and conceptual in one's own life, even if sweeping national or international changes may often be this way out of necessity. as an example, before i entered my coop, i didn't know how i was going to eat - the next day i did. one day i was alone in a strange city, and the next day i wasn't. with the right ideas and some motivation, we could make our lives significantly better - measurably better, simply judging by our facial expressions - within 6 months. agree or disagree?

                    :: I was completely joking with you

                    i was fucking around, but i think it drastically backfired! i was calling myself absurdly ignorant, if that clarifies... here's a funny cat picture to make everything chill again! gallery.ksilebo.com/randimg/....jpg.html
                    • Re: ubuntu

                      Fri, September 14, 2007 - 4:28 PM

                      >whatever - because of the patriot act i was able to find out that your legal name is june cleaver

                      Drat! Then you must know all about The Beaver too...... Drat!

                      >it's come to my mind is that they take time to root precisely *because* people are socially isolated from one another

                      I can easily believe this.


                      >i've felt richest and most free when i was poorest, and not in some enlightened philosophical sense, i'm talking about the materials and luxuries i literally had at hand. the difference is that i was living in a cooperative. we took care of one another out of necessity, and a lot of great social epiphenomena emerged from that - community education, food not bombs, orgies. i think there is a deep relationship between human social behavior and *capability* and this manner of living together. what do you think?

                      It's very true, I've had very similar experiences.

                      :: Some ideas are abstract and there is just no getting around that.

                      >i don't mean so much that the ideas are abstract as that the effects are abstract - there is a big difference between 'helping the community' in the way that newspapers talk about it, and your making your life better and the lives of those you actually interact with better. i don't believe that progress needs to be primarily glacial and conceptual in one's own life, even if sweeping national or international changes may often be this way out of necessity. as an example, before i entered my coop, i didn't know how i was going to eat - the next day i did. one day i was alone in a strange city, and the next day i wasn't. with the right ideas and some motivation, we could make our lives significantly better - measurably better, simply judging by our facial expressions - within 6 months. agree or disagree?

                      Generally, I agree.

                      Maybe we should separate the issues. The two issues I think we're discussing are 1) making your own life better, as well as making the lives of those around you better (using the notions of ubuntu), and 2) making society better, on a state or national scale.

                      For the first issue, I agree; and the effects are very tangible and real; not abstract at all. In some cases I don't even think six months is necessary. For the second issue, that's where I think things take time. Doesn't mean I think things are futile and that we might as well give up now; I just don't have the expectation that we will see vast changes after years of apathy. It is also here that some of the benefits of helping the community *are* abstract. Privacy (and why it is good for society) is very much an abstract concept...

                      :: I was completely joking with you

                      >i was fucking around, but i think it drastically backfired! i was calling myself absurdly ignorant, if that clarifies... here's a funny cat picture to make everything chill again! gallery.ksilebo.com/randimg/....jpg.html

                      It was always chill. :)
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: ubuntu

                    Fri, September 14, 2007 - 4:44 PM
                    Deborah asks, "Do people have issues with sharing living spaces with friends?"

                    I think different people have different needs for privacy and "space." I've lived alone most of my life (more, in fact, than I would prefer), but sharing space is only for significant others. Roommates have never worked out for me; I find myself confined to my own bedroom, not feeling like common space is mine.

Recent topics in "attrition"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
why do homeless people not count? kage 6 July 17, 2008
Talk about attrition!!! Deborah 3 February 28, 2008
abandon : privatized healthcare kage 5 February 16, 2008
capitalism and its relation to wage labor kage 6 February 14, 2008