Advertisement
Hello,
I will appreciate helping me by interoperating the following reading form me. The question was about what will be the development of the relationship between me and the guy I know. We are actually not living in the same country now. Thanks. Jasmeen
The atmosphere surrounding the central issue: Page of Pentacles
The obstacle that stands in your way : Eight of Pentacles (Prudence)
Your goal, or the best you can achieve without a dramatic change of priorities. Two of Cups (Love)
The foundation on which the situation is based. Ace of Wands
The card at the left of the cross represents a passing influence or something to be released. Ace of Swords
The card at the right of the cross represents an approaching influence or something to be embraced. King of Cups
The card at the base of the staff represents your role or attitude. Seven of Swords (Futility)
The card second from the bottom of the staff represents your environment and the people you are interacting with. The Lovers
The card second from the top of the staff represents your hopes, fears, or an unexpected element that will come into play. The World
The card at the top of the staff represents the ultimate outcome should you continue on this course. Queen of Swords (I see this card a lot as an outcome).
P.S. I do not do reversals.
I will appreciate helping me by interoperating the following reading form me. The question was about what will be the development of the relationship between me and the guy I know. We are actually not living in the same country now. Thanks. Jasmeen
The atmosphere surrounding the central issue: Page of Pentacles
The obstacle that stands in your way : Eight of Pentacles (Prudence)
Your goal, or the best you can achieve without a dramatic change of priorities. Two of Cups (Love)
The foundation on which the situation is based. Ace of Wands
The card at the left of the cross represents a passing influence or something to be released. Ace of Swords
The card at the right of the cross represents an approaching influence or something to be embraced. King of Cups
The card at the base of the staff represents your role or attitude. Seven of Swords (Futility)
The card second from the bottom of the staff represents your environment and the people you are interacting with. The Lovers
The card second from the top of the staff represents your hopes, fears, or an unexpected element that will come into play. The World
The card at the top of the staff represents the ultimate outcome should you continue on this course. Queen of Swords (I see this card a lot as an outcome).
P.S. I do not do reversals.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:13 AMHello. Is there anyone to help me. Thank you -
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:51 AMI personally do not read cards without doing reversals, and I always wonder why readers choose not to use them... they can be very important in interpreting a spread. The cards here do show a lot of promise in regards to a romantic relationship, but, without the reversals, I would be afraid to read into things the wrong way.
We don't know the history surrounding this question, or if you are still in contact with this person? Are you expecting them to make contact with you when they live in another country? It just logically seems like it would be difficult to have a relationship with someone who lives far away.
If you get the Queen of Swords a lot, she may be a significator card for you, and she can sometimes warn of being too closed off in your emotional state when relating to another person. She is seen as a more cerebral, detached or pessimistic woman, sometimes due to past sorrows. It can be a warning that you need to show more interest in this person if you want him to be in a relationship with you. Men aren't likely to go for women who show guardedness or trust issues, etc. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:55 AMP.S., 7 of Swords as your attitude coincides with the Queen of Swords in that you may hold him at an arm's length when he tries to get close to you.
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:44 AMHi Jasmeen, I have only read this through once but it comes across as a very positive reading in this relationship. Positive in some way, could be that you keep/develop a very strong friendship with this guy, not necessarily lovers but a very deep and honest relationship whatever the outcome. There's a couple of aces in there which are very strong cards, the ace of swords is you coming from a very strong position, and I think that your greatest strength in all of this is your attitude. You are coming from a knowing mind, you are definitely not blindly dealing with your relationship and any problems that might arise, you have sound mental attitude and a good grip on the reality of it. Will it work? The cards won't tell you that, they will look at what is likely and where you are coming from on it. The fact that prudence is your only possible obstacle just reinforces to me that you are looking at this in a very level-headed way.
Your instinct and intuition in dealing with this distance relationship will ensure that you always see it for what it is. Keep positive and as always in life, constantly review the partnership as it is organic and moves along always with twist and turns in the road, as with all relationships.
Blessings
Lorraine
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:53 AMJasmeen
"P.S. I do not do reversals. "
I do, so would have been interesting to know which cards came up reversed if any!
Can you tell us more about this situation. Something just doesn't feel right with this, either that or our understanding of the cards are different and the cards you've pulled relate to your understanding and not to mine.
There's something not quite 'right' with this reading. There's somethign else going on or some other information not being relayed. You're not living in the same country now but is there a relatinoship there to begin with? There's some other stuff going on, even just with you. Are you bringing issues from a previous relationship into this one? There's some sense of dishonesty with this, either from you or from the other person, that's my feeling.
The suggestion is that you'd be good friends or business partners, or that you would work well together or get on in a work or monetary environment, but for me, romance doesn't look like a likely outcome.
The indication here is that there's some work you need to do for yourself, maybe spending more time alone or working through issues from a previous relationship or expectations of relatinoship or something like that. There's a choice to be made here perhaps. Are you or the other person currently seeing someone else? It may well just be the fact that at the moment its long distance.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:56 AMOMG, Paul... you and I are on the same wavelength! -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:03 AM"OMG, Paul... you and I are on the same wavelength! "
lol
I dunno, you see romance in this equation? Cos I kinda don't. I think it would take a lot of work and personal development for this to work out in any kind of long term scenario!
I think there is a need to compromise and to deal with past issues and also the issues of living abroad seem to be on the same wavelength tho! I also agree with your input on the queen of swords. I'd just add that it can also show that you carry those dark clouds with you whilst TRYING to remain objective and cereberal cos there's a thinking pattern that dealing with emotions means repressing them and then projecting them onto new lovers. That would be my only input on that and thats a big MIGHT with that. Certainly the card demonstrates the warning that when you try to play it cool, you come across as just 'cold' instead. Sometimes being too aloof and above it can be unattractive for some people.
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 3:58 AMJasmeen
Out of interest where are you getting the words in brackets from such as Two of Cups (Love) and Seven of Swords (Futility) . Is that from a book or just your own understanding of the card?
Personally I see Two of Cups as Friendship and seven of swords as dishonesty for example, but I have my own spin on the cards so it might not be 'traditional'. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:07 AM"Out of interest where are you getting the words in brackets from such as Two of Cups (Love) and Seven of Swords (Futility) . Is that from a book or just your own understanding of the card? "
Those are Crowley deck descriptions... I personally never found them to be correct ways of defining those cards.
I don't know if there is romantic potential or not really, because the reversals are not here. The two of cups, king of cups and the Lovers do tend to be pretty strong indicators of something, but the placements are more likely what she is hoping to occur. Without the reversals, I'd really be careful in making an interp here. And I think it's difficult to do an objective spread for yourself on romantic issues... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:08 AMTwo of Cups can be romantic, but not neccesarily. If it is reversed it can even mean unrequited romance.
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:14 AM"I don't know if there is romantic potential or not really, because the reversals are not here. The two of cups, king of cups and the Lovers do tend to be pretty strong indicators of something, but the placements are more likely what she is hoping to occur. Without the reversals, I'd really be careful in making an interp here. And I think it's difficult to do an objective spread for yourself on romantic issues..."
Yeah without the reversals I personally think you're shooting yourself in the foot. Its like trying your hands behind your back. Personally, I see it as handicapping yourself unnecessarily!
"Those are Crowley deck descriptions... I personally never found them to be correct ways of defining those cards. "
Ah ok, that makes sense. I've experimented with Crowley and found using the cards, from a psyche-ic point of view, as using a sledgehammer to tap in a small nail. Too much 'push', too over-bearing for me. I like the more nebulous wispy feel I get from using my Rider Waite Tarot. Different strokes for different folks I guess. I would have 'creative differences' with Crowley's interpretations of the cards, but hey, he was the expert! I do think the feeling from the cards, for me, was 'overkill'. It was like reading a letter written in a large red bold font and in caps lock. Why all the overbearing energy? was my thoughts. I prefer rider-waite, but some people swear by the thoth deck. Each to their own!
"I'd really be careful in making an interp here. And I think it's difficult to do an objective spread for yourself on romantic issues..."
I totally agree! In fact, I might go one further and suggest its next to impossible to remain objective. Perhaps thats why the question found its way on here. Easier to be objective when others offer advice.
I think it has a good outcome if you're content with having a really good friend, just not if you're hoping to some day settle down with this person in a romantic sense. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:23 AMI use Rider Waite also, and agree about the Crowley. I found his deck useful in understanding some astrological and other symbolic meanings for some of the cards, but I can't take the dark energy in that deck. I am a dark person to an extent, but it's a bit much. I don't think the energy of the cards should interfer with your own energies if you want to tap into your skills. It seems like Thoth has a mind of its own. Rider Waite leaves you alone for the most part.
Sometimes even the cards that pop out when doing a romantic spread are just not objective - they are what you want to hear/see. That's another reason I'd question her not wanting to use reversals (out of fear?). -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:46 AM"That's another reason I'd question her not wanting to use reversals (out of fear?). "
Well some people don't use reversals as they believe that the meaning for the card, either reveresed or not, is all inherent in the card even when upright and it takes a psychic development and rapport with the cards to know which meaning it means.
However, whilst I agree that this might be true, the same could be applied to the entirety of the deck. You could just hold the cards and intuitively pick up the meaning without actually drawing any. After all they're only a tool. If you're happy to not go down the 'full psychic' route and are willing to actually draw the cards, then presumably the position of them mean something to you, why not whether its reversed or not, seems like an arbitrary rule to adhere to considering you're not being entirely intuitive to begin with. You could just try tuning into the meaning of the card, or you just observe that it IS reversed and intuit from that. That's how I work with them anyway. Reversed for me doesn't mean 'bad' and upright mean 'good' though, which I think you do see some people proclaiming and perhaps thats why some people are against it.
"but I can't take the dark energy in that deck. I am a dark person to an extent, but it's a bit much. I don't think the energy of the cards should interfer with your own energies if you want to tap into your skills."
That really sums it up! I don't want to imply that the cards are inherently 'dark' as that connotates a negative feeling, but if I'm honest that IS the feeling I got from using the cards. I would actually feel a little nauseous after using them. I used them a for a bit about two years ago having, in my mind, already gotten to grips with rider-waite and foolishly felt that somehow the toth deck was a 'step up' from rider waite, a natural progression. However, I have to say that's not I experienced although there does seem to be some pervading myth that this is so.
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 9:38 AMThank you very muchTeresa. My inner feelings match with what you said. I have a stronge feeling that I should not move now. I guess he is not ready for going for something serious at the moment. It could be an affair that it just ended or in trouble.
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 4:09 AMjasmeen
one other thing, is some issue relating to being underqualified in some work scenario figuring in this equation at all? Are you living abroad from one another for work reasons? -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 8:28 AMThank you very much all for your replies. I can feel that you are really experts. Your questions are right.
- I do not do reversals out of fear and I do not know why.
- Yes Paul we live abroad for work but let me add that this guy holds a much higher position than me . This could be one of the reasons for your conclusion that there is something related to work.
- We are friends and I see potential in this relationship. I have an offer to go and work where he lives but to be honest I’m afraid to take a big move and be disappointed. This is the reason for this reading. I want to know if there is really a hope that I can put an effort to realize.
- I can be the queen of sword because I’m alone for quite sometimes now. The last serious affair I had was 7 years ago. As well I lost my dad when I was very young. Therefore, I calculate every step I take to avoid being hurt.
- I’m not sure if he has somebody else behind the scene. I’m not there. But for sure he is not in serious relationship.
- He is actually a matured man, in his forties, and 10 years older than me.
Maybe that will help you to understand the situation better. I’m open for a new reading if you kindly do one for me. I guess that the reading is more accurate when they are done by the person who will interpret them because the intuition part will be involved as well. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 8:38 AM"Yes Paul we live abroad for work but let me add that this guy holds a much higher position than me . This could be one of the reasons for your conclusion that there is something related to work. We are friends and I see potential in this relationship. I have an offer to go and work where he lives but to be honest I’m afraid to take a big move and be disappointed. This is the reason for this reading. I want to know if there is really a hope that I can put an effort to realize."
Ah so that might explain my suggestion about training or being under qualified. Is there some kind of learning curve required for you to move?
"He is actually a matured man, in his forties, and 10 years older than me. "
I don't want to be insensitive, but I wonder if this is the source of my feelings of projection from previous relationship. Perhaps you project onto this man your desires and expectations of a Father figure.
Sometimes you have to do the wrong thing in order for it to be the right thing. You say that you calculate each step to avoid being hurt, the problem can be that sometimes you calculate every step to avoid feeling. Better to re-adjust your paradim with regards relationships. Relationship are not all serious affairs, they can be lighthearted and just a bit of fun and should make you happy. If you don't go for things in case you get hurt you'll find that you won't have ever done anything, cos after all there's always hte possibility of being hurt.
I really would urge that you consider this from the angle of your father. You, perhaps, are afraid of feeling the fear that you once felt stemming from your father's untimely death. You were left somewhat abandoned and obviously and understandably hurt and lonely from this experience. Perhaps your fear in regards relationship are actually stemming from this incident. You say that he is forty and that you are a decade younger. Are you 29 or thereabouts then? Because if so, you are likely experiencing what astrologers would call a Saturn Return. I mention it because the Saturn Return has implication on both career and perhaps father/relationship issues too.
I have felt from the onset that there was some 'projection' from past relationships going on with this but perhaps the past relationship is the relationship with your father, although it would be 'interesting' to see if your previous relatinoship, which ended 7 years ago now (last saturn square for astrologer enthusiasts) also involved these father/authority patterns. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 9:16 AMYou are right. I should complete my master degree to be like him. Throught my life I had an affair with matured men, at least 8 years older than me.Speaking of Astrology, I have Uranus and Pluto in the seventh house (Libra). I'm an Aries. At birth Saturn was in the third house and will be soon visiting my seventh house.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 9:24 AMI agree with what Paul about your needing to work on yourself first. I would add that I don't get the impression that this man knows how you feel about him.
i33.tinypic.com/16jld9t.gif
I tried a horary chart for the time that I understood your question, and the chart had the ascendant in the via combusta (the burning way) with Scorpio rising. This is usually a sign of heartbreak in the end and warns against obsessing over this person (not that you are, but I hope that you don't). He was Venus in Virgo, you Mars in Cancer. He was residing in the house of friendship and in your term, which shows he has fond feelings for you, but not likely romantic ones. The Moon being the most important body in horary is peregrine (lost, without any dignity) and does not aspect either of your planets, which doesn't bode well. Your two planets will aspect each other soon, but your planets are both in the sign of their fall and not in mutual reception to help give a real future here. Your planets will also both aspect Saturn around this time, and Saturn is a planet of restriction and also rules his house of work/career. You may see each other again only for something work-related, perhaps. This can also be a warning that he may reject any potential advances because he would have an issue with you being associated with his work somehow. I have seen the same planet involved in a romance question and it ended in rejection in the querent's advances.
In regards to a new job near him, it is represented by the Sun, and the Sun is the weakest body in the whole chart and in the house of isolation and sorrows. It is also square your planet and in your planet's detriment, which means it would probably be something that you would regret doing.
His planet is in mutual reception with another (Mercury) by strong dignity (domicile), and Mercury rules his house of romance. I would wonder if he is in love with someone else currently, though not necessarily dating right now. It may be someone he separated from (their planets were conjunct recently and are separated by about 6 degrees, which means 6 something - 6 months, etc.).
I think most relationships can be built on a solid foundation of friendship, and perhaps you should just stick with being friends for now. However it plays out, I wish you luck. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 9:39 AMThank you very muchTeresa. My inner feelings match with what you said. I have a stronge feeling that I should not move now. I guess he is not ready for going for something serious at the moment. It could be an affair that it just ended or in trouble.
-
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 7:40 PMFor what it may be worth, I would interpret the Ace of Swords in the "former influence" or "passing away" position to refer to a past promise or commitment that still exerts some influence on the current state, though whether it is a promise or commitment once made by you or by your friend is not apparent to me. The root meaning of Ace Swords is an oath or promise, one's word given or pledged, something to which one is committed. As the Swords are the suit of Air, the idea is of a word (air) standing as the beginning of some state of affairs. The Root of the Powers of Air, as the card is known by its occult title. Since the foundation card is the Ace of Pentacles, the whole spread is based on a decision drawn from somone's True Will and confirmed by the promise shown by the Ace of Swords.
Unlike some of the other posters here, I do not find the Thoth deck dark or menacing. It may appear that way for those who fear to face their own inner darkness or pretend they have none (which means they must not be human to begin with), but that darkness is a source of strength for those who do not fear themselves. Before we can seek the light, we must recognize our own darkness and accept it as simply the result of our humanity. Even Gandhi and Mother Teresa had their dark side, but they didn't let it overpower them or get in their way.
As for the occult titles of the cards, those are used in the Thoth (or Crowley) Deck, but they originated with the Golden Dawn, if not earlier. Crowley did make some adjustments to the titles in terms of his own philosophy, but they are still very much in line with the titles assigned by the Golden Dawn. Those who find Crowley frightening also seem to me to be afraid of what they find within themselves and are too hesitant to look at what the Beast is pointing out.
If the Lord of Prudence represents what stands in your way, then I'd say you are too hesitant and should be more bold in pursuing the kind of relationship you want. Don't let your anxiety trip you up.
These are just some random thoughts on the cards that stand out in my mind from your reading. I hope this is somewhat helpful.
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 11:04 PMThank you Bob for your contribution. Eight out of ten I were having the Ace of Sword turning up in the reading. The card gave me a drop of hope that the relationship might develop in the future but not now. I felt that there is an obstacle that should be overcome first for the river to flow and that I will be the one who will work hard to make it happen. As if the situation is very much up to me. Leave it or take it sort of a thing. I read somewhere that the tarot normally predicts the near future, let’s say up to 3 or 4 months, is it true? So if the situation changes, the card will come up with different outcome based on the new development.
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 2:12 AM"Unlike some of the other posters here, I do not find the Thoth deck dark or menacing. It may appear that way for those who fear to face their own inner darkness or pretend they have none (which means they must not be human to begin with), but that darkness is a source of strength for those who do not fear themselves. Before we can seek the light, we must recognize our own darkness and accept it as simply the result of our humanity. Even Gandhi and Mother Teresa had their dark side, but they didn't let it overpower them or get in their way."
Bob
I don't for a moment believe that my dislike for Thoth has anything to do with not being willing to face my own inner fears nor about accepting my dark side. In fact it seems completely arbitrary to randomly choose one quality (in this case darkness) and assume that it is because of a dissociation from that aspect of the psyche. Should we suggest that those who dislike Rider-Waite are afraid of facing up to their sensitive emotions? Of course not, it would be entirely arbitrary to assign one feeling and juxtapose it against a set of tarot cards. However, if this has been your experience, then undoubtedly you have to go with it, I would just urge a reconsideration of this in case ungrounded assumptions have been made instead.
Whilst I agree that often before we reach the light we must pass through darkness I disagree that you must dwell in darkness and if you are assigning Thoth to a 'facing up' of darkness, then surely thoth are a 'transitory' deck, you face up to the darkness (thoth) and move on to the light (another deck), but as I say, we cannot simply suggest one tarot deck is to be assigned to darkness.
My main concern with using the thoth deck is that it is too forceful. It is like a megaphone roaring out a message and then standing right beside it. It is uncomfortably loud. The same for the thoth deck. It is quite probable that the thoth deck is better suited to 'thicker skinned' or less psyche-ically sensitive individuals. Dion Fortune once suggested that there are often two 'types' of people those best suited to wielding 'forces' which she terms as Occultists and those more sensitive best suited to tuning into energies which she terms Mystics.
It could well be that those more used to handling more forceful energies are best suited to one deck (thoth) whilst those not so accustomed to this and more used to simply tuning into other energies are best suited to another deck (rider-waite). So as I say, each to their own, different strokes for different folks. I would not say one is better than the other, or suggest that people who dislike Thoth are afraid of their own darkness any more than I would say that those who do not use rider-waite are afraid of their own light. It seems absurd to suggest this.
I can only assume, as it makes the most sense to me, that those who use Thoth regularly and are comfortable with it are less sensitive. I just think for my personal use, Thoth is too 'much', its too overkill. It screams the message and belts it out, whereas rider-waite is more subtle and perhaps nebulous, it is not as direct perhaps but this suits me better as after using it I feel 'lighter' whereas after using Thoth I feel like my senses have been assaulted.
One final thought on this, it is worth remembering that the Tarot are a subjective connection to a (presumably) universal set of archetypes. My connection to those archetypes is undoubtedly going to be different to someone elses. With that in mind, is it really appropriate or wise to go by the suggestions of others? I think were I to advise a Tarot reader on ANYTHING it would be to understand the philosophy behind the card but to make your OWN connection to that card. With that in mind it is immaterial to me what aleister crowley says of hte cards. I don't doubt they work exceptionally well for him and for others who follow his mind-set or train of thought, but its entirely possible that those who don't would find those titles and meanings entirely uselss as they have differing sets of thought patterns and differing mindsets that do not gel with the philosophy that crowley was operating from. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 4:19 AMI just want to let you know that out of curiosity I repeated the reading using the reversals. I were persuaded of your point of views and this what I got. Theresa I feel is this very much matches your reading.
The atmosphere surrounding the central issue. Queen of Pentacles
The obstacle that stands in your way - Ten of Swords
your goal, or the best you can achieve without a dramatic change of priorities. The Empress
The foundation on which the situation is based. The World, reversed:
A passing influence or something to be released. Temperance, reversed:
An approaching influence or something to be embraced. Ace of Wands
Your role or attitude. The High Priestess, reversed:
Your environment and the people you are interacting with. The Fool, reversed
Your hopes, fears, or an unexpected element that will come into play. Four of Wands
the ultimate outcome should you continue on this course. Two of Cups -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 4:27 AMThe two of cups as the end result is no bad card.
NOrmally I associate it more with good friendship rather than indicative of a relationship.
But if thats the end result, it might well be a very good thing. It just might be a disappointment if you expect more than that.
But don't let your fears or anxiety hold you back. You need to make the decision you think is best. tarot obviously isn't a replacement for making choices in life, but it can offer you more foresight on some issues.
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 4:58 AMactually just re-reading Adastra's post after the new reading returned two of cups as the final card.
Isn't the two of cups the epitome of love under will? Someone better versed in Thoth/Corwley-ism would know better, but I think so. Adasta just signed off his post with Love under Will which is what drew my attention to it, but didn't connect it to the two of cups til just now.
I would be interested in anyones interpretation of the Two and indeed the Three of cups.
For me the Two represents harmony, a coming together of the masculine and feminine princple, like a lesser 'lovers' card in that I feel that both relate in some way to Gemini. I just see this coming together as being almost more platonic and only seldom represents a love affair. I think it can show a love affair that starts out as friendship first and develops more, but it is, for me more indicative of a friendship/business partnership etc. I would connect the notion of reconciliation, compromise, partnership and contacts as being related.
Also would like to hear people's opinion on the three of cups. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 10:43 AM>>>I would be interested in anyones interpretation of the Two and indeed the Three of cups.<<<
Okay, I'll give it a shot. The deuce of cups is called "The Lord of Love." And, yes, Crowley stated that he considered that the more accurate name should be "The Lord of Love Under Will." Good call, there. The trey of cups is called "The Lord of Abundance." it is unique as being the only card in the suit of Cups that acts as if it were in the suit of Pentacles. This card offers material abundance, prosperity in other words.
These cards are assigned to the 1st and 2nd decans of Cancer respectively. Sorry, but they have no immediate connection to Gemini, although the deuce would be governed by the King (or Knight in the Thoth) of Swords, which corresponds to the second and third decans of Gemini as well as the first decan of Cancer.
As a personal note, my own birth date falls in the third decan of Cancer, the card being "The Lord of Luxury."
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 1:33 PM"The deuce of cups is called "The Lord of Love." And, yes, Crowley stated that he considered that the more accurate name should be "The Lord of Love Under Will." Good call, there."
I only remembered that in particular because from my (very limited) understanding of his work, the issues of love and will were of 'interest' to crowley, love under will being another term I have heard of before, love is the law, love under will (93, agape etc etc etc) and i remember researching the Thoth deck prior to using them and just remembered that random piece of trivia.
"These cards are assigned to the 1st and 2nd decans of Cancer respectively. Sorry, but they have no immediate connection to Gemini, although the deuce would be governed by the King (or Knight in the Thoth) of Swords, which corresponds to the second and third decans of Gemini as well as the first decan of Cancer."
Sorry I didn't mean to imply that it was in any way 'officially' linked up, just that to ME the two seem rather similar. Perhaps its arrogant of me, but I only take on board those meanings or understandings that I consider and find agreeable or that 'feel right' with me. The Three of Cups feels much more Cancerian to me than the Two, and the twos generally I would associate with Gemini, gemini being the first and perhaps primary sign relating to duality.
I've mentioned before in the past that I am not 'formally' trained in tarot, nor have I read in any detail any tarot book. I have only ever skimmed the basic meanings from the leaflets you get with the cards and then threw them away. This has always worked very well for me in all matters except one, namely, timing. I am able to time to the month that something will happen but after that I'm lost. I can't do better. Occassionally I can time it to a lunar phase but thats it. However you (bob) have given me in the past a list of more accurate methods for timing and I have not had an opportunity to test them yet. One thing I still find is that I get the right month, perhaps even the right decan but in the wrong year. Terribly frustrating. it's happend to me roughly 8-12 times now. I will say "oh actually I DO see a child, it'll be toward the last decan of Libra" etc. only for the start of November to come and nothing happens. one year later on the 19th Oct she gave birth to a child. Very irritating. ANyone else have this problem?
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Fri, October 16, 2009 - 11:08 AM>>>Perhaps its arrogant of me, but I only take on board those meanings or understandings that I consider and find agreeable or that 'feel right' with me. The Three of Cups feels much more Cancerian to me than the Two, and the twos generally I would associate with Gemini,<<<
Hey, a card means to you what it means to you; there's no law to follow here. Personally, I work from a system of relating the cards to QBL, astrology, tantra, alchemy, numerology and a number of other studies that give me an organized approach to the deck. But I still tend to read the eight of cups, the Lord of Indolence, as referring to an illness, although I never found that in any book. It tends to work for me by suggesting Forced Indolence, or being bedridden due to illness. And it doesn't appear that way all the time, only when my gut feeling tells me it does. So far, my gut has known more than my head has in most readings. You go with what works for you, regardless of what some text says. But in determining the timing of events, I would still use the deuce, trey and four of cups to indicate the sign of the Crab.
As to duality, there are other Trumps that depict two or more people, The Sun comes to mind or the traditional design for the Devil. The Wheel of Fortune also shows three figures, representing the three Hindu gunas or the triplicities of the zodiac. The Universe (or World) shows a woman dancing with a serpent in the Thoth, and the Strength (or Lust) shows a woman riding a seven-headed beast. The pair in The Lovers suggests choice to me rather than love per se. To each his own.
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 5:14 AM"Those who find Crowley frightening also seem to me to be afraid of what they find within themselves and are too hesitant to look at what the Beast is pointing out."
Not to get in a tyrant over divination, but I find it a bit small-minded to attack readers for their own preferences. I am not "afraid" of anything divination-wise (I've covered just about every mode you can think of), and first learned tarot via Crowley. I have used it off and on for many years, as has an elder sister of mine who is more gifted at tarot than I am. But Paul and I (and my sister) are certainly not the first readers who have experienced the negative energy associated with those cards. If you search different websites about tarot, this is a prevailing thought, so obviously no coincidence. I am not a conventional reader, and I tend to follow my own feelings and perceptions of things, which I think are quite heightened. I personally have had many experiences with negative entities throughout my life, and I would associate the sort of energy that comes off of that deck something akin to that type of energy. If you feel that you can harness such energy and not let it read for you, go for it. But I would much rather rely on the source of energy that is within myself, and not be emotionally assaulted by outside forces every time I pick up my cards. I do not fear the cards, but I do not trust them either, nor the negative energy that is innate in every edition I have come across. If you find yourself to be a superior reader because you "accept" that sort of energy, so be it. I would rather be inferior, if that is the case! -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 10:20 AM>>>I find it a bit small-minded to attack readers for their own preferences.<<<
Dear Teresa,
I would like to apologize to you and to Paul. I apologize also to anyone else who read my comments as an attack. I may have been a bit too forceful in my encouragement to the querent. If you will look at the statement you object to more carefully, I was responding to those who find the "Thoth Deck" frightening. It is always best for a reader to use the deck he/she feels most comfortable with. There was no criticism intended toward those who find the deck unsuited for themselves. Only toward those who find it frightening. And there are many who do. It always amuses/irritates me to run into the prejudice against Crowley and his cards based on phony articles in the yellow journalism tabloids of Crowley's day, which are of the same type as our modern "National Inquirer" rags with their invented scandals and phony "news."
I was responding to the common prejudices directed against Crowly, not responding directly to any specific comments made by anyone here. Apparently I went a bit overboard, judging from the protests. I am sorry. Please believe that I did not intend to accuse anyone posting here of anything. I meant only a word or two of encouragement to the querent and to clear up a bit of confusion over what I find to be a somewhat dogmatic approach to Tarot in terms of "good and bad" interpretations. A "good" card is simply one that gives the querent useful information. A "bad" card is simply one that is confusing (probably because not clearly understood). And any deck that speaks to the reader is a "good deck", regardless of which deck it may be. That was the point I was trying (apparently in a rather clumsy way) to make.
And I don't understand the idea of "negative energy". All energy is simply energy. When applied to Tarot, I suspect "energy" simply refers to the thoughts and insights a reader experiences. If nothing comes to the readers mind, then that would be a negative result and probably means that particular deck is not suitable for that particular reader. "Energy", either as a force in motion or as a mental impression has no moral value, in the same sense that an electrical current can be used to furnish light or to execute a murderer. It is not the nature of energy to be good or bad; the difference lies in the purpose for which it is used.
Nor did I claim any "superiority" or label anyone as "inferior." If I gave that impression, I am sorry, but I suspect that people are drawing conclusions based on things I did not post.
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 1:19 PMBob Adastra
Apology accepted. I do understand the preconception of ignorance with regards Crowley and people (mis?)comprehension of him. From my point of view I have experimented with Thoth and just found it an assault on my psyche. Undoubtedly it works better with people who are of a different disposition to me, or perhaps I would grow accustomed to it. I didn't use it long enough as I found using it like being run over by a train, too 'forceful'. That's not to suggest that it is unaccurate, however it is, for me, like reading an email written in all caps. Why the need? Why shout what you can say. I am under no doubts that it is different for everyone.
I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark that someone such as yourself is familiar with Dion Fortune and her work. What do you think of my theory that certain cards are more 'attuned' or useful for differing people. Dion fortune uses the terms Occultist and Mystic, by which she suggests the former are more practiced with wielding 'occult' forces (I'm oversimplifying these terms just to elaborate the point) and are often trained (in this or in previous lives) to some degree or other in any of several occult schools, possibly being more practiced or more naturally inclined to 'bring down' the energies into the realm of matter or, for the qbl-ists through Malkuth. Mystics on the other hand are more used to perceiving energies from one of several other 'dimensions' or perhaps sephiroth if you're so inclined and not so used to actually wielding these forces. The advantage of the former is the ability to wield the energy to some level or another (a prequisite of many occult schools) and a disadvantage is an inability or a struggle to perceive subtler energies. The advantage of the more mystically inclined is an ability to perceive subtler energies and perhaps their meaning/message if one is to be found there, a disadvantage being normally a more sensitive constitution resulting in an inability or struggle to actually wield those forces.
For me, this would explain to at least some degree the differences of opinion in regards the Thoth deck. My feeling is that the Thoth deck was devised by, and for, someone with some degree of occult training, or to put it another way, someone more used to wield or 'manifesting' occult forces. Having not received training of this sort, and being perhaps more mystically inclined, the use of the Thoth is like an assault on my more sensitive disposition. My guess would be that those more naturally suited to wielding occult forces, and therefore more drawn to Thoth, would find Rider-Waite or similar decks to be too 'weak' or too 'light' for their liking. As I say, neither one is better, both are simply different.
What do you (or anyone else) think?
(my disclaimer is that I know that calling these things 'occult' is sort of a misnomer, I use the term in part because dion fortune used it and I'm referencing her work and in part because I think everyone understand what I mean when I use these over-simplifications, but mostly because I lack any better word to use in its place without resorting to pedantic tedium). -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 1:36 PMI will use different decks based on the sort of information I want. Sometimes I like it fluffy, other times I like it straight with no chaser - that's when I turn to the Thoth.
I'll admit the deck can be intense, but I've never found it difficult or disturbing to look at. But then, much of the art, music and entertainment I like can be considered intense or disturbing to some.
When reading, you're only wielding the perceptions the images spark in you. If there's anything frightening or disturbing in that, that should be examined. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 1:38 PMYes, Paul, I do see your point about the deck reading in all caps and preferring more subtlety.
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 8:49 PM>>>Dion fortune uses the terms Occultist and Mystic,<<<
Dear Paul,
Yes, I have read some of Wirth's works and admire her clear grasp of the subject matter. I personally consider myself an occultist. I notice that in earlier times most ceremonial magicians worked with a scryer to help them "see" and "track" the forces they were working with. I tend to focus on directing the occult energies (or thoughts), but I do most of my own scrying; it is difficult to do both, though not impossible, but it is just about impossible to do both at the same time. The thought patterns seem to be very different and mutually exclusive to a degree.
I am certain that no single Tarot deck is right for every reader. I have a number of decks, not a huge collection, but there are easily ten decks on my bookshelf as well as two or three other divination decks other than the Tarot. But I find the Thoth deck the best for me and the easiest to tune into. I am a bit puzzled by the complaints that it is too highly energized, since I have always found the deck to be very good for teasing out very subtle intuitions on each situation. The results often surprise me in particular, but other people who have sat in on my readings seem to expect considerable accuracy. It may well be that I am a bit "hard of hearing" on the "psychic" wavelengths, but I use the Thoth exclusively. Even when I am away from home and without my deck, I find I can use a borrowed Tarot of any kind and simply imagine the Thoth cards in place of the deck in hand. I get perfectly good readings that way. It's a bit easier with the Thoth at hand, but it still works my way. So, the final conclusion for me is that it's best to use the deck that "speaks" to the individual reader. I only object to the often-repeated prejudice in some quarters that my favorite deck is somehow "evil" or "cursed" or highly "negative". As with any other deck, one gets what one can from a deck of cards and so long as the readings are accurate enough to satisfy the querent and help him/her with his/her problems and questions, that is really all that matters.
And when I can tell a querent that the event she hopes for will be coming in a month and a half and I get an entirely unexpected phone call a month and a half later to tell me that it happened precisely on schedule, I am satisfied--and I believe the querent is too. I wasn't expecting the phone call that time, since I still have no idea how she tracked me down and got my work number. The only time I have any difficulty is when I don't trust what the cards are telling me, since I have found out in such cases that what I'm getting is precisely true, but simply seemed unlikely or possibly unwelcome news and have tried to skirt the issue. In all these cases, I find that for the querent this has been news they've been hoping for--even when it seems to me that the message is likely to be unpleasant.
>>>I know that calling these things 'occult' is sort of a misnomer,<<<
Actually, the term "occult" is quite accurate. It simply means "hidden", and (let's face it) most occult knowledge is hidden from most people because they don't "believe" in it and so don't bother to learn anything about it. Most people get their understanding of occult matters from cheap Hollywood horror movies, which have about as much to do with the occult as fundamentalist creationism has to do with science. The term is often taken to refer to evil practices and has acquired a sinister reputation, but simply because something is hidden from the masses does not make it evil or suspicious. Doctors refer to internal bleeding within a patient's body as "occult blood" since it is not visible on the outside. And when the moon or a planet covers up another object in space, such as a star, astronomers refer to this as an occultation of the star. Nothing the least bit evil or scary about the moon passing in front of a star and hiding it for a time--unless that star is the sun and those who view it see it as an evil spirit trying to blot out the sun. Hopefully most humans have finally outgrown ghost stories and being frightened by what they don't (yet) understand.
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville -
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 11:43 PM"So, the final conclusion for me is that it's best to use the deck that "speaks" to the individual reader."
Right. I just personally know that I don't use the Thoth anymore for the same reason I wouldn't use one of those girly, fluffy rainbow-esq decks. I just want the truth of the matter, not doom and gloom or fairy princess readings.
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 12:20 AMBob ~
<Yes, I have read some of Wirth's works and admire her clear grasp of the subject matter.>
You mean Firth. Her given name was Violet Firth. She was a contemporary of Crowley's and knew him as an acquaintance. They both had basically the same training through the Golden Dawn.
It is hard for me to imagine that Crowley did not endow his deck with certain potent forces that permeate the images. It is likely that a lot of people who use these cards tap into those forces s a result, and it sounds to me as though that may well be what some people here are picking up on and reacting to. I know a lot of people who are into Crowley, but personally, I wouldn't touch his stuff since I always felt a sort of revulsion toward him for reasons of my own. Dion Fortune is a totally different matter, but I don't think she ever created a Tarot of her own. If she made one for her own use, it has never surfaced publicly.
I'll just stick with the historical decks I use, which, for me, are rich enough graphically just as they are. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 12:57 AM"I'll just stick with the historical decks I use, which, for me, are rich enough graphically just as they are. "
Amiable
Do you use the Marseille Deck? The imagery always captivated me, but I don't have a deck of my own. If I ever buy a new deck, I'll buy that one I think, or one similar to it. Right now I have the traditional Rider-Waite deck, a Rider-Waite style deck by Juliet Sharman Burke, the Thoth Deck which is now pretty much unused and the very first deck I bought when I had no money and cost m £3 which is REALLY basic.
Interestingly, for whatever reason, I get a different 'timbre' or personality to each deck. My first really cheap deck had a deep-voiced male feeling to it. I'm not crazy and have not heard any mad voices or anything like that, but you get a sense of 'something' when using the cards and for me I got that from those cards. The ones I use now don't have a personification like that, but when I first started using them and using them properly I had a dream of the cards in the air, huge and splendid and in their box which I keep them in. There was an owl flying in the night on a rocky landscape and I was dressed as a hunter. I caught the owl and it stayed beside me then as a kind of 'totem' and from the box burst all the cards and several jewels and diamonds glinting in the sunshine (though it was night up until then). Since then I get the sense of that owl sometimes, like if I looked behind me it would be there. Of course its all in my head, but its interesting the kinds of personalities/timbres that can sometimes be invoked from the cards. From Thoth it was a sensation of standing beside someone with a megaphone, as though my ears were ringing after wards and a sense of nausea after using them.
I think Nexus (a poster on tribe) has developed her own deck. That's an interesting idea. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 2:44 AMPaul and Teresa ~
There is more than one form of psychometry. We hear about that most in terms of things that have been physically handled or are actual parts of a person, such as hair or nail clippings, etc. But there is a subtler form as well that does not require actual physical contact to be perceived. The origins of those types of objects ~ those endowed with the incorporeal energies ~ are of another order entirely. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 2:58 AMamiable
I'm not dismissing what you're saying, but it sounds like a lot of work for someone to have gone to and for what purpose? It may well be that crowley has indeed somehow embued the cards with some subtle energy which it seems you're alluding to, a good test might be to be handed blindfold different cards from either thoth or rider-waite to see if you perceive any difference or nausea etc.
However I think it more likely that the images depicted on the cards are designed in such a way to address certain parts of the psyche more suited to Crowley's way of thinking, which for whatever reason, is just not suitable to my own way of thinking. I don't really know enough about Crowley as a person, I obviously know enough to know he was a member of the Golden Dawn and has sprouted several offshoots modelled in his own mindset of thinking such as the OTO etc. and I know several people seem to swear by him. I'm just not one of them. I do know that after using them the first time I had a connotation that if we use the analogy of hearing, that the Thoth were designed to be more forceful/loud in order to be able to get across the message for those who are harder of hearing, whereas rider waite just whisper the message in a straight forward manner. I also got the feeling from the Thoth (though perhaps unfairly/unjustly/imagined) that there was some other 'underlying' message to the one I was looking for, like some subliminal message or advert. The equivalant of pop-up boxes on a website that open discreetly beneath the main browser window.
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 3:15 AM<I'm not dismissing what you're saying, but it sounds like a lot of work for someone to have gone to and for what purpose? It may well be that crowley has indeed somehow embued the cards with some subtle energy which it seems you're alluding to, a good test might be to be handed blindfold different cards from either thoth or rider-waite to see if you perceive any difference or nausea etc. >
It sounds to me like exactly the sort of thing an occultist would do with an important project. And the images themselves are the vehicle for those.
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 3:08 AMPaul ~
There is a novel by Charles Williams, one of the Inklings from Oxford back in the 1930's ( group that included C. S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien), that I believe you would find most interesting in light of your dream. It is called The Greater Trumps.
The deck I use is a facsimile deck of an 18th century French deck called Besançon Tarot. The artist was Jean-Baptiste Benoit. I have also used David Palladini's Aquarian Tarot, which was my deck as a teen. It was printed in 1970. At one time I started making my own deck, but, as with virtually all my art projects, that was derailed indefinitely.
Yes, there are number of Nexus's artworks that appeal to me, including her Tarot images and calendar, but I don't have the funds to purchase much of anything at the present time. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 3:14 AM"Yes, there are number of Nexus's artworks that appeal to me, including her Tarot images and calendar, but I don't have the funds to purchase much of anything at the present time."
I meant more that it woudl be interesting to create your own deck and use them. It would of course take a long time to do and would prbably take several time before you were satisfied but I would wonder if doing so would make the readings more/less accurate.
"There is a novel by Charles Williams, one of the Inklings from Oxford back in the 1930's ( group that included C. S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien), that I believe you would find most interesting in light of your dream. It is called The Greater Trumps. "
Thanks! I'll check it out!
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 3:22 AMIt does take a long time to do ~ I barely started beofre I had to abandon the project myself.
<Crowley originally intended the Thoth deck to be a six-month project aimed at updating the traditional pictorial symbolism, perhaps best demonstrated by the Rider-Waite-Smith deck; however, it was to span five years, between 1938 and 1943, as the scope of the project grew ever wider. Crowley and Harris were meticulous in their work and Harris painted some cards as many as eight times; previous editions of the deck included two of her early drafts of The Magus card, each making use of markedly different style and symbols. Neither Harris nor Crowley lived to see the deck published; the first full publication was by Ordo Templi Orientis in 1969. This initial printing was of markedly inferior quality, and in 1977 Harris' paintings were rephotographed for a second edition; the current edition is based on a further update that took place in 1986.>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoth_tarot_deck
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 1:53 AM"It is hard for me to imagine that Crowley did not endow his deck with certain potent forces that permeate the images."
See, that's my thing. When I first started using the deck (it being my first deck) at the age of 13 or so, I had no idea who he was. How is it someone knowing nothing about this person is able to pick up on those "forces" if they are not there to begin with? There is even a smell to the decks (some sort of herb?), which I am not sure I have smelled anywhere, and that smell makes me physically ill.
It feels like the deck belongs to Crowley and you are just borrowing something of his, which is probably my biggest issue.
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Fri, October 16, 2009 - 11:16 AM>>>You mean Firth,<<<
Yes, I do. Thanks for reminding me. I'm afraid I'm getting old and forgetful at times. Although it seems to me that I've seen it spelled Wirth in some sources; perhaps I'm just misremembering those occasions.
Thaks for the help.
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville
-
-
-
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 1:24 PM"hat I find to be a somewhat dogmatic approach to Tarot in terms of "good and bad" interpretations. A "good" card is simply one that gives the querent useful information. A "bad" card is simply one that is confusing (probably because not clearly understood)."
There is no such thing as good or bad cards. I totally agree. However when people use the term I generally understand and recognise it to mean good or bad in relation to the querent's desired outcome. Good/Bad are terms which are entirely subjective. We even use the term in relation to weather. Good weather is sunny and bad weather is rain. Of course in reality we need and in fact rely on rain just as much as sun and too much of either is bad for us as is not enough of either. I am happy to gloss over the pedantics of it when I see someone say something like "is this a bad card?" etc etc. and generally take it that they also know that there are no good or bad cards, but perhaps I'm giving too much credit in doing so!
When I refer to the Thoth as being a 'negative' energy, what I am in fact saying is that using the Thoth has an adverse reaction on ME, not that the Thoth themselves are inherently bad or negative or imbued by some 'evil magic' or whatever. Some things just dont agree with everyone's makeup. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Tue, October 13, 2009 - 11:23 PMPaul,
I see the two of cups as an indication to a relationship that can be a love affair. I always look at the surrounding cards to determine the nature of the relationship. Like in the above case four of wands in the hope position, hoping for joy and happiness is a good indication that I’m looking for love rather than friendship. I do not thing that people look forward for friendship. It just happens when the right people meet. But deep relationship (Love) is what people seek all the time (opinion).
Bob,
I like ‘Love under will”. I always associate the two of cups and four of wands to the spring months (April-June). Can these cards be an indication to this period? Or I’m just overwhelmed with the art I see on them. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 1:00 AMJasmeen
"I do not thing that people look forward for friendship."
They may be if they already found love, but are otherwise lonely in terms of friendship. My mum's friend is happily married but admits that other than her husband she has no real friends. She gets quite lonely cos she stays at home and looks after their child and lives kind of remote. She'd really like more friends I think as my Mum only sees her once every couple of weeks. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 7:53 AMPaul,
I agree with your point of view. What I meant to stay is that people will not go to great extent and consult the tarot for friendship. All the questions that I got is about family,love. health and careers. -
-
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 8:27 AMJasmeen
Oh I totally agree with that. People do go to a tarot reader looking for love. However what the querant woudl prefer doesn't affect the outcome of the card. Just cos the person WANTS a romantic relationship doesn't mean he/she will get one. Sometimes friendship is actually what is NEEDED and I think life has a way of catering to our needs first and our wants second. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Please Can you read this for me
Wed, October 14, 2009 - 8:30 AMI like your point of view. Great reply.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-