ignoring D (with all his 7 alts as friends) as he will pass into the old paradigm... and way of thinking...

Fahrenheit checking :
finally we fold into a new MMORPG MorF multi-inner-face fertile fierce and fabulous folk for a fine future free from futile fear.

it is a Phenomenological reality...

Ready or not here we come!

"Close, but not quite right. More correct would be to say that if embracing amorality increases fitness, then it will likely be embraced."

You are conflating the philosophy of evolution with the alledged nature of it (survival of the most fit). Evolution is an atheistic naturalistic philosophy of origins which is meant to supplant biblical truth. The end result in the mind of the evolution believer is the absense of a moral compass. What normal folks understand as being wrong, the evolution believer cannot assent to. There is nothing in evolution, the philosophy, to proscribe a system of morality. Morality must be imposed upon it and is necessarily, arbitrary.


"Evolution is amoral, but not immoral."

it is amoral which leads to immorality as defined by scripture. Everyone I speak to on these forums who has embraced evolutionary naturalism is immoral. This is clearly evident in the things they say, the tribes they belong to etc... I could spend just a few moments with you Grim to find the same.


Dan: Almost anything can be justified due to this historical fairy tale.

Grim: The act of justification is the result of an intelligent decision. We do not refer to the results of an intelligent decision as "natural selection", we refer to these results as "selective breeding." Breeding dogs for floppier ears is by no means evolution. The decision to kill humans in a tactical fashion is not evolution either.

the decision to kill can easily be understood and justified within the evolutionary framework. It can also be understood in the New Testament Christian framework. But the justification for each would be totally different. The evolutionist can justify the strong overpowering the weak as right and just, while the Christian can only justify it as a form of self defense.

Grim: Such human tactics as genocide may be arguably justified by different tactics. To say that a people should be killed because nature has selected them for death is a specious tactic.

If you listen to the cartoon that Sizzle offered you will come to understand that evolutionists over the last Century have come to conclude the we can control or manipulate our evolution going forward. This was a justification for selectively weeding out the unfit. Nothing in Christianity would allow for such an immoral notion as this Grim. You must be a naturalist to arrive here. watch out man, you are descending into a very dark world.

Grim: "we do find it within some religions."

very true. But we do not find it within the Christian religion of the New Testament. And Christianity is what i argue for here on these pages.


Grim: "Yahweh (a third of the triune god and "one" with jesus the christ) has been recorded as ordering multiple genocides."

We can deal with Yahweh and the nation of the theocracy of Israel separately on a different forum if you like. But again, no where does Jesus enjoin Christians to genocide. If they participate in this activity, the do so for reasons other than their faith. The amoral evolution believer can be expected to committ crimes against humanity because it is a part of his amoral philosophy to do so. As long as the evolution believer is "christianized", there is some measure of protection. But as civilization descends into secularism, his true nature will be realized. And what an ugly nature it is.