Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life

topic posted Thu, January 22, 2009 - 12:10 PM by  Rene
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
This is a very interesting article from "New Scientist" magazine:

www.newscientist.com/article...ife.html

It discusses the fact that mutation and natural selection are not the only processes driving evolutionary change. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is quite important for one-celled organisms which has been well known for a while now. The article discusses new evidence this also "has been a major driving force in animal evolution." They say, "The most likely agents of this genetic shuffling are viruses, which constantly cut and paste DNA from one genome into another, often across great taxonomic distances. In fact, by some reckonings, 40 to 50 per cent of the human genome consists of DNA imported horizontally by viruses, some of which has taken on vital biological functions (New Scientist, 27 August 2008, p 38)." It also discusses endosymbiosis and hybridisation.
posted by:
Rene
Texas
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Dan
    Dan
    offline 8

    Re: Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life

    Thu, January 22, 2009 - 12:20 PM
    "In fact, by some reckonings, 40 to 50 per cent of the human genome consists of DNA imported horizontally by viruses, some of which has taken on vital biological functions"

    I saw this post on the bioevolution tribe also. It really has little to do with the evolution/creation debate as this is nothing but conjecture. On the other hand, conjecture is all the evolutionist has so perhaps it does belong here.
  • Dan
    Dan
    offline 8

    Re: Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life

    Fri, January 23, 2009 - 5:42 AM
    according to this article, you can completely scrap the philogenic "tree of life" which has adorned our textbooks and brainwashed our students for over 100 years. Now Rene will hail this is "science doing its thing". But in fact, it is a scandal on intransigent evolutionism refusing to abandon a dead theory of origins. This new theory of gene transfer? Scrap it too, this didn't happen either. It is just another story supported mainly by the assumption of evolution now becomming the evidence for evolution.

Recent topics in "Evolution/Creation Debate"