Can somebody recommend a good live electronica performance?!!?!?

topic posted Sun, April 6, 2008 - 2:05 AM by  joel
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Hey All-

I haven't been here much lately, I've been crazy busy. Of the many things I've been into, I've been doing a little research for my project. Now, to be honest-I'm old-37. I've worked for a lot of bands (many of which you guys would know) and have seen tons of shows from amazing musicians and crappy ones. I always loved Massive Attack and think of them as one of the first electronica groups (don't know if others do) and once I was in position and had support for my current project, I focus it along those lines (with a little more edge). So that being the case, I started to check out some of the artist/bands who's music I was feeling in the electronica field...

Here's where it got bad. I started to check out some of these groups live and have been HORRIFIED. Prefuse 73 and Autechure bored me to the point of pain. I walked out of both shows. I love both of these group's music, but I can not understand what's interesting about watching a guy hit buttons on a laptop. Don't get me wrong-I'm a knob twiddler-I often tweak my sounds using my Novation Zero, Dave Smith Evolver and Ableton, but no matter how extreme I get, I wouldn't consider that a performance. I've also had the privilege of working with some phenomenal DJ's, so I'm familiar with performance on that level. I WAS SO BORED WATCHING THESE GUYS I CONSIDERED HANGING MYSELF. I could not believe the lack of energy, crowd interaction, stage presence, etc. If the whole room had been dancing that would be one thing, but to have the whole room looking at you while you stand there and hit buttons...I would not want to be the one...

So...am I just old? I can understand if I am. I just can't relate to this as a performance...is newer electronica mostly like this? Is this what's really good nowadays? Is this like what happened with early Hip Hop, where artist didn't understand performance? Where these great performances and I'm just too old or clueless to know?

Somebody tell me...!?!
posted by:
joel
SF Bay Area
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Wow, there was an amazing one in SF tonight:

    Massey from 808 State, DJ Rob Hall and Autechre.

    Massey was cool.............he played saxaphone, guitar and keyboards in his
    laptop driven set............there was even some live looping (yeah!!!)

    Autechre was really cool but odd...............they performed in total darkness ,
    no lights, no video projections, not even the glow of laptops..................it was just dark.

    And hellllllllaaaaaa loud, with ear damaging subsonics the whole time........................but the sound design was slammin"

    I"m glad I went.
    • <MAutechre was really cool but odd...............they performed in total darkness ,
      no lights, no video projections, not even the glow of laptops..................it was just dark.>

      those guys are just ODD. if you haven't seen "modulations" there's a scene where they interview autechre and one of the guys is *literally* digging in his nose (for boogers, i guess) and it's like he realizes he's on camera, thinks about it and then goes back to what he was doing before (i.e., digging for gold.) massive talents, however.
  • most of the truly extreme live PA acts you'll see nowadays will be in the breakcore/gabber/digital hardcore/drill'n'bass realm. there are a lot of brilliant artists out there. I'm not so sure about in North America, but you have guys like hoonboy,

    www.youtube.com/watch

    bong ra, who puts his kaoss pad and midi effects to great use,

    www.youtube.com/watch

    venetian snares of course puts on a sick show (I GET TO SEE HIM MAY 7TH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!), and then you have otto von schirach, shitmat, babyshaker, xanopticon, badass & sinnatagg, ars dada, ladyscraper, all of them and many more put on a great show.

    as far as DJs go, the one that I've seen with the hardest style and the most stage presence is DJ Subway. He spins nothing but sick, rude, dirty drumandbass, and he gets everybody rabid with the way he pumps it forward.
    • You should check out Amon Tobin at Yuri's night up in SF next weekend. I've seen him play and he'll work the crowd and uses at least some minimal crown interaction. Also, Tipper will be there playing a downtempo set which should be a good thing to hear. I can't make it, but I want to really badly.

      As far as entertaining...meh. You're right, it's not a blast to watch a laptop set in general. It's hardly any fun to watch a DJ set for me anymore as I know what they are doing every step of the way most times. At this point, I have to just listen to the music and dance. If I get too worried about what the artist/performers are doing, I lose interest all together in the music and the vibe I'm feeling. Now, I look over to see what they are using (if I can) and I pay a bit of attention to check out how they are using it (tips and tricks mainly), then I just enjoy the music. One of the worst that I've seen was eDit. I love his music, but at a downtempo set he played, he basically played the leads on his vintage synth and segued the tracks nicely. He rarely touched the production itself and the songs were just as heard on the album "Crying Over Prose for No Reason". I want to hear it a new way with new tricks, sorry, guy. To be honest. watching a DJ is often more entertaining than a laptop performance. I miss seeing bands. I'mma make more of an effort to do so.
  • Unsu...
     
    rabbit in the moon blew me away... not only do they have all forms of stimulation accounted for...

    -beautiful bangin' techno music
    -giant video screens with interesting thematics
    -one dude dedicated to all the audience interaction with costumes and props

    ...but somehow the whole is more than the sum of the parts... really one of the best electronic shows I've ever seen! this was a few years back... not sure if they still do it up the same way.

    underworld was really good this past summer... they know how to pump up a crowd... and their music sounded fantastic.

    I've also really enjoyed the orb in the past... though I'm not sure if they still put on the same sort of spectacle like they did back in the day. they were really good at fucking with people... they seemed to have their beats recorded on vinyl and synths layered over them. at one point... they had two beats going... deep slow funky beat... and another with snares and cymbals... and they eased the speeds so that one was getting slower and one was getting faster. then at the moment that you were about to get annoyed and stop dancing *SLAM* the fader back to the bass groove... then they hi-5 each other... genius!
  • Thanks all-and yeah...I'm old...LOL! It's interesting to me that the crowd would be expect to react to sound design in my mind because I wouldn't expect them to really have a deep grasp of it unless they were a technical crowd.

    So-next question-how well do you all think a band that give a little more traditional performance (dynamics, crowd interaction, etc) would do in this kind of enviroment? The would be video work and such but I'm curious...would you all pay to see that?
  • Hmmm-

    This, for those who don't know, is DJ Quest the DJ I'm working with. He's one of the original Turntablist and a contemporary Q-Bert:

    _______________

    www.youtube.com/watch

    www.youtube.com/watch

    _______________

    This is what I think of when I think DJ performance-not saying I'm right or wrong...

    So do 'electronica' perform/think this way?
    • Unsu...
       
      I think you should narrow down your scope away from "electronica" to the genre you are actually thinking.

      autechre and massive attack and Q-bert are all dimensions apart from each other... and I personally don't consider any of them "electronica".

      are you looking to understand what a crowd wants... or are you looking to be in a satisfied crowd?
      • Thanks for asking...

        The first part of the answer is kind of 'no.' I've been into music since I was four and I've seen a TON of amazing and shitty performances. I've studied the elements of call and response, crowd interaction, etc. I even advised a few artist on how to make their performances better...(I'm not saying who...)

        The second part-I guess I'm trying to understand if there is some sort of generation gap going on. If I had gone to this show strictly as a fan I'D BE PISSED (and sorry Rick, but it was the SF show on Saturday).

        I grew up on soul, got into Hip Hop in '79 (and saw the Sugar Hill Gang with the Gap Band Live back then) and then got into Punk and Thrash Metal (and saw Megadeth and Exodus then), after that I got involved in working with band and making music-alternative and Hip Hop-saw got to work with the scene that eventually produced Primus and Faith No More while watching and assisting other Hip Hop crews like Hieroglyphics and still being a huge jazz and fusion fan. I've seen all kinds of shows-from Segovia to GBH to Parliment to the Cocteau Twins...I could not understand why anyone would enjoy laptop DJing. I also couldn't understand how the performers saw what they were doing-I'd be wondering why the audience wasn't throwing things...! I thought the show would be more like the footage I've seen of The Prodigy or something...

        So I'm trying to get what THIS crowd saw in a show like this and why they did. I get the tweaker aspect, but that only seems entertaining for 45 seconds...what am I missing?

        Thanks-and please all-I'm really not trying to offend any one, so no flaming-this is a serious question.
        • Unsu...
           
          when you listen to autechre at home... do you love their music? do you feel what they're doing on their cds? when you remove the concept of people and performance and how the sounds were created... do you like them? even the songs that aren't danceable?
          • Unsu...
             
            I ask because autechre is often an acquired taste even amongst people who like electronic music...
            • Yeah-I actually really did enjoy their stuff. In the end I guess I just thought their live performance would be different. So at a show like that-is it a matter of closing the eyes and listening for little changes in the loops? Its a liitle less congruent in my mind that way. It seems like they should be up in the DJ booth in that case-not center stage. I guess I just didn't get the whole thing...
              • Well, this happens to be a topic that we've nearly beat to death in another tribe that I'm in for our local underground. I'd link the post, but it's a private tribe.

                Here's the basics. *Watching* a laptop set is not entertaining. Using a laptop and tech setup to perform gives a vast amount of mash-up and manipulation options, but it's not as neat as watching someone play on vinyl (as a group of DJs will agree), but it has its obvious up sides.

                The suggestion above for checking out Rabbit in the Moon is a good one. I've seen youtube clips of their sets and they really go the extra mile. I'd say their live performance is far more entertaining to me than their actual productions. Also check out some old Chemical Brothers clips. But, both of these groups use "live" instrumentation (people are banging in keys and pads and throwing their gear around. It definitely adds that rock'n'roll appeal that it seems your looking for. Also, groups that add a hype man or MC have a better stage presence (though I dislike most MCs outside of hip hop). I've also been mightily impressed by the few performers that I've seen bring out dancers or stage performers of some sort (fire performers etc.). There is a lot of room for improvement on a laptop set.

                Beyond that, we've likened wacthing a laptop set to watching a dog take a poop.
                • Lol! Glad you're the one who said that....! There are SO many MIDI controllers, Video Software, etc that could make that kind of performance good!!! I just can't understand what the deal was. A basic aspect of any performance is interaction-so its weird to me that any performer would want to be on stage without a high level of give and take.

                  But I guess I get it. That show wasn't for me...
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Also, I meant to point out that most rock'n'rollers get into it to be that performer on stage. Not so much the case with the average producer gone big time. Autechre I know are just some geeks that wanted to make hip hop, but got way too out there and never came back (thankfully). Plus, these guys are such a walking contradiction to music culture that I've heard this report from many people. I think they make it dull/strange/uncomfortable for the audience on purpose just to mess with people...like..."you paid for this...hahahaha." Their music is great, but I can't swear that when they started, they were looking forward to getting on stage and impressing a crowd with their music *and* presence.

                    Prefuse73 came up backing southern rappers as a DJ/producer/programmer. He got bored and started doing his own thing which is commendable. But again, from the evidence of the short story that I know of his past, he also didn't start off trying to impress on stage.

                    So there are elements of a stage performance that are foreign to these guys.

                    I totally agree with you, Joel. There is a lot to be desired in a live performance and the "I'm checking my e-mail" look is not enough. I know that's not what they are really doing (I hope at least), but the affect is there.

                    Oh, I've heard that SquarePusher puts on a great show as well, but again he incorporated live instrumentation (his bass playing will blow your mind and he uses a live drummer often etc...).

                    Personally, this is exactly why I do not go out of my way to go to "electronic concerts" but aim more for the larger events where I can catch several artists and have the option of going to a different area if I get bored. I can't get myself to pay $35-60 for a few acts on one stage anymore. Plus I'm spoiled by my local scene where we get little known, but very talented heads dropping in for $5 club parties and free mountain parties. I'd rather be able to slap someone a high five after their set anyway and we don't put people on stages.
                    • Thanks sAro-

                      That was a really great, well thought out explaination. It all makes more sense now...I honestly thought that the shows would be more like a guest DJ thing with those guys doing their songs or mix them in.

                      I see a whole lot of promise in this feild but I think that performance is a big hole-as it was for Hip Hop until Public Enemy came along (and, honestly, that was a rock show).

                      Anyway-thanks all-you've enlightened me a little bit...!

                      J
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    honestly, this is why I'm so fanatical about live looping sets:

                    the audience sees you playing instruments and producing as you go along and there is space for
                    theatrics and audience interaction (although I have seen several looping peformances that were the
                    equivalent of check the email laptop performances)

                    It was interesting, but when Massie of 808 State picked up a soprano sax (and played it rather sophmorically
                    and that says a lot coming from me, the jack of all instruments and master of none) the crowd energy
                    really picked up and people cheered. He just did simple looping and played soprano, guitar and keyboads
                    along with his set. He took more chances than the others I though, even though DJ Rob Hall had the
                    more dance energy of the show.

                    And you are correct Saro, I was enthralled from the geek, musical analysis standpoint. I did notice that most of the people
                    looked really passive (and at times during Rob Hall's overly long set) downright bored.

                    The thrill of listening to Autechre (with not a single thing to watch) was just that I love this groups creativity and , well, oddness as some one put it. Also, if they hadn't jacked up the volume so fucking radically the sonic quality was incredible with the sound system.

                    Why must every concert I go to lately be so fucking overly loud? I have played loud rock and electronic shows all of my life.
                    My nickname was 'thunderdrums' (what a stupid fucking moniker) when I was playing rock because I hit so fucking hard and
                    played so loud. I'm no wimp when it comes to volume but they were playing subs that were seriously damaging to anyone's ear.

                    The sad thing is that bass waves destroy or weaken the little cilial hairs in the ear that pick up 'intelligibility' frequencies in the sonic experience and all the hearing damage that will occur in fans at that show was painless and won't even show up for 10 years.

                    It's too bad because the time has come for law suits to be filed against sound systems that play at damaging volumes.

                    I think I posted this in another tribe, but my wife and I left the Bjork concert at Shoreline 3/4 of the way through because we were both
                    literally nauseated from how loud the subsonics were..............fuck that made me pissed off. I paid $200 for those fucking tickets and I love Bjork.

                    ahhhhh, rant over..........thanks for letting me spew
  • Unsu...
     
    ha! a dude I know posted a blog analyzing this topic... I think it's a public post...

    interimlover.livejournal.com/528777.html
    • Some music is just not made to perform. Its a device of the ear not the eye.

      Musicians with traditional instruments can improvise, make mistakes, emphasize emotion, respond to the crowd, etc.
      However, much electronic music is composed over long periods of time in pieces. Everything has its place.
      I know I would be hard pressed to do anything interesting "live" with music that I compose.

      I think of most electronic music more like a sculpture that is crafted than like a jam session.
      Live sculpture would be boring - even it parts were set up ready to chip off in front of people, it still isn't that exciting.

      I personally think we can move away from the music performance aspect of electronic music into something else. Its just a different beast. Who said we have to perform live? Why are we even trying?

      Perhaps integrating other types of visual performers without expecting the sound sculptor to entertain people visually.

      Just some thoughts.
      • At Brian:
        /signed
        /agreed

        Good points, mate. I like the sculpture analogy.

        But, to answer the rhetorical (I assume) question of why do we try to play live as producers: I have to assume that it is still the best money maker for a producer. We all know how hard it is to make a buck releasing tracks and selling CDs through a label or even yourself. It's just tough to get enough exposure these days with the hordes of producers out there. We really have to slut ourselves about to get recognition and that all mighty dollah. I can't say that I am happy with the situation as it stands, but them's the breaks, right?

        And, Rick, I know what you mean. I don't like having to wear ear plugs at a show as I feel like I might be missing something. But, when the subsonics are that overdriven, no plugs would avail the issue.
        • I agree (as we all do) that there needs a paradigm change of how artists get financial support, especially those in the digital domain.

          Some big international psytrance festivals that I have attended gave me a good look at the varies ranges of "live" sets.
          However, despite the range of "liveness" the performance was given only that one label (versus DJ Set).

          But as we know, "live" can be anything from pressing play on ableton and twisting up a smoke and standing there, versus multiple people on analog synths with racks of gear, working hard and staying busy.

          Though one of these versions of "live" is far more interesting to watch, it also may have mistakes, and is usually not as complex of an arrangement, etc. Though it is impressive what some people can do live, I prefer better sound.

          One is for the eyes, the other is for the ears.

          I know these points are obvious, but usually only for the musicians. Some acts are amazing live, but I wouldn't want to listen to their music at home. Some acts are ridiculously amazing on a soundsystem, but near impossible to do "live".

          Its an interesting topic of discussion for sure.
          • Very nice points, Brian and Saro

            I , too have used the sculpture analogy with my music design and arrangement theory students when
            talking about producing electronic music.

            In fact, this is why I tend to alternate live looping commercial releases with abstract electronica
            releases (that are created entirely inside the computer).

            I love both aspects and they are really different.

            Nice discussion everyone......................I love threads like this.
            • and in that spirit, I love Autechre, but I'm not entirely sure if I'll every pay to go see them
              'perform' again.

              Does anyone know how much they actually do live in front of an audience.
              So much of it was so complex that it seemed to me that large amounts of their
              show had to be precomposed and recorded or sequenced (or looped).
              • Ya, I really like how this thread is turning out and that it hasn't turned into a bash the laptoppers thread. There is room for all of it here if you ask me and it's all completely interesting and relevant to my thoughts. Man, I frikkin' love this tribe!!! :tears...real tears: lol

                Rick, on the Autechre note I have no idea how much they "create" live. I have heard of some really great live set reviews from them from friends (haven't been myself) likening tracks to the sound of a rubber band stretching until the breaking point and snapping back into place and extreme amounts of sound manipulation, but I would also like to know how much is on the spot creation with them and many groups. Even watching a group/performer like that closely, it's hard to really say what is spontaneous and what is not.
                • Hey everyone-

                  Just want to make sure-I wasn't trying to diss the whole thing-I don't feel like anyone was stating that though. I would love to throw out there that a MIDI drum/pad interfaces, light show, more extreme modulations, video, a MIDI Drum kit, etc

                  I'm not a believe that it has to work the way a traditional musician would, I would like to see a whole new interpretation of music...

                  I'll check out other performers that people mentioned.
                • I know sAro? that Autechre uses Max/MSP a lot. I've also heard from Megabyte Mike (who
                  is really knowledgeable about these things) that they also use Ableton's LIVE in a live situation.

                  Max/MSP's incredibly powerful object oriented approach lends itself to
                  amazing real time manipulation of sound.

                  You have to check out the avante garde trumpet/synthesist, Jeff Kaiser to see some of the
                  truly astonishing stuff he does live........................and it's ALL LIVE!!!!

                  If you heard a recording, you'd swear that he spend hours and hours designing the sounds
                  when in reality, he has created virtual instruments that manipulate sound.

                  Another artist I have played with who is amazing in his Max/MSP live processing is Steffan Smulovitz. You can hear and watch him processing me playing found objects in real time at the Boise Experimental Music Festival if you are interested:

                  www.youtube.com/results

Recent topics in "Renegade Theory"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
soundcloud.com sAro? 2 October 27, 2009
Post new tracks here! Unsubscribed 85 August 2, 2009
Bombastia Mix - critique welcome Joe 0 March 16, 2009
ReNoise ? embersandsparks 1 January 12, 2009