I just read this weekend about some of the effects of the depleted uranium bombs they have used in Iraq. I can't tell you all how appalled I am - and this definately needs to be in the national discourse. These are WMDs and the effects are truly unmeasurable and we don't know how long it will last....

This was from the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Home > Archives > November_2005 > An Arab-American Priest, Depleted Uranium, and Iraq
Washington Report, November 2005, pages 29, 67

Special Report

An Arab-American Priest, Depleted Uranium, and Iraq
By Robert Hirschfield

Father Simon Harak (Photo R. Hirschfield).

TRAVELING around southern Iraq in the late 1990s to investigate the effects of U.N. economic sanctions on ordinary Iraqis, Jesuit Father Simon Harak stopped at a hospital in Basra. Meeting with him and his colleagues from the anti-sanction group Voices in the Wilderness, Dr. Jenan Hassan briefed them about the medical horrors she and other doctors were confronting as a result of the use of depleted uranium (DU) weapons by the U.S. Army in southern Iraq during the 1991 Gulf war. There was a fivefold increase in cancer, especially leukemia, she said, and a five- to eightfold increase in children born with genetic defects.

Dr. Hassan showed the Voices group some of the newborns.

“We saw a baby with a head growing out of his head,” recalled Harak. “We saw babies with intestines growing outside their bodies.”

Sitting in his spartan cubicle in Lower Manhattan, where he works as the anti-militarism coordinator for the War Resisters League, Harak, a 57-year-old Arab-American whose parents are from Lebanon, emphasized that, in comparison to the 300 tons of DU weaponry used against Iraq in the first Gulf war, U.S. forces deployed more than 1,000 tons during the 2003 invasion.

“Given the fact that there is an incubation period involved here,” he pointed out, “we shall soon be seeing the second wave of cancer and birth defects as a result of that war.”

From his computer, a crucial weapon of 21st century dissent, the Jesuit dispatches the results of his DU research to hundreds of people throughout the country. He maintains close contact with the Manhattan Project, the only group that devotes itself exclusively to DU. Their collaboration is still mainly on the level of information gathering. Harak’s goal is for information to translate into social action.

“Depleted uranium,” he explained in his methodical, professorial way (having once taught ethics at Fairfield College), “is 60 percent radioactive. It is also heavy metal toxic. It is a byproduct of the uranium enrichment process of nuclear weapons production from which uranium’s most radioactive isotope, U235, is recovered for re-use in new fuel rods.”

The DU weapons used in Iraq were far more deadly, he explained, far more enduring—Japanese scientist Katsuma Yagasaki estimates that DU’s radiation has a half-life of 4.5 billion years—and far less publicized than car bombs and roadside bombs. The DU was present in missiles, tank shells, and rocket-propelled grenades. Formidable at armor piercing, these weapons were known to aerosolize on impact into tiny particles that could be inhaled or ingested.

Harak used the case of Basra to illustrate how the damage was done.

“Basra is on a river,” he noted. “A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic alterations.”

Harak recalled being told by doctors in Basra that the deformed children they were delivering reminded them of the pictures they had seen of Chernobyl babies. When a baby is born in Basra, the doctors said, the first question the mother asks her obstetrician is: “Is it all right?”

Lacking in the late ‘90s, when he was in Iraq, and needed now, he said, were scientific studies, longitudinal and cause-and-effect studies, that would prove conclusively that there was uranium in the blood of deformed children and cancer victims.

“The tests cost $1,000 each,” Harak bemoaned. “And when the sanctions were in effect, the equipment doctors would have had to bring in to run the tests were banned. The sanctions forbade pencils, for the love of God!”

As an Arab-American, Harak was powerfully moved by the suffering of Iraqis, and said he would like to go back. But he doesn’t want his Iraqi friends to run the risk of being seen with an American, even an Arab-American—in his case, an Arab-American who speaks no Arabic. Lamented the Christian Arab: “Catholics always took so seriously the words of Jesus when he said, ‘This is my body.’ But Jesus also said, ‘Love your enemies.’ That, unfortunately, was never taken so seriously.”

Harak reflected on the underpublicized issue of the exposure of U.S. veterans to DU.

“How much of what was called Gulf War Syndrome was due to exposure to DU?” he asked. “It’s hard to say. But some of the symptoms are similar to those Iraqis suffered from: fatigue, blood disorders, heart conditions, the damaging of the genetic code. You see parallel defects in children of American veterans and Iraqi children: the little flipper hands growing out of the children’s shoulders without any arms attached.”

Soldiers worried about exposure to uranium and wanting to be tested found that their veteran’s medical insurance refused to cover the cost. Harak recalled one case in which The New York Daily News agreed to pay to have nine Gulf war veterans tested. Four of them were found to have uranium in their bloodstream.

Last year, Harak helped organize a small rally in New York’s Washington Square Park at which speakers and singers alerted people to the dangers of DU. On the question of why this issue has failed to make more of an impact, Harak speculated, “Maybe it’s because a lot of the damage is not immediate. There is an incubation period involved. You don’t see hands being blown off, or people being cluster-bombed,” he noted. “It’s much more insidious.”

Robert Hirschfield is a New York-based free-lance journalist.
posted by:
Brittany
Los Angeles
  • Re: Depleted Uranium Bombs...

    Mon, May 5, 2008 - 12:25 PM
    another thing to add to the list of things to lobby the next administration about. pull them from the inventory and take care of those exposed.
    god it's a long list . . .
    • Re: Depleted Uranium Bombs...

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 3:32 PM
      Its a hell of a long list. The most interesting thing about this is how many times legistlation has been introduced and it has never gone anywhere. There was a bill in 2005 that didn't even go up for a vote. There was a full study given to Congress in 1994 after the first Gulf War (which means it was Clinton era), and there was a UN resolution that never passed about it. Throughout this time the Pentagon has always maintained that it is perfectly 'safe'. YIKES!!!
  • Re: Depleted Uranium Bombs...

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 5:17 PM
    Ah yes, we can dispose of that nasty nuclear waste by shooting it at Muslims, what a brilliant plan, unfortunately it wasn't Bush or Cheney who came up with that one. I have known about this for some time, and it sounded at one point like the military was "phasing them out".
    This has been in development for years.
    Depleted uranium bullets are pyrophoric, meaning they burn under the extreme pressure of being slammed into a hardened target. Some or all of the radioactive material then becomes airborne as it is vaporized; other parts of the bullet remain as a fine dust.

    The vaporised mist is much more likely to enter the environment at some distance from the point of it's use. Spreading the radioactive material over a larger area then would otherwise happen.

    So now every shot fired becomes a mini Hiroshima, every shell fired is part of a nuclear war. A nuclear and space war fought from unmanned vehicles and emerald cities. People in Frisco and Florida are shooting at "suspected militants " half a world away like some giant real time nintendo.
    • Re: Depleted Uranium Bombs...

      Thu, May 8, 2008 - 2:56 PM
      Unfortuately only the 'smart bombs' are detonated from far away (like Frisco). The rest are tank munitions, which have to be loaded by our guys and shot at a nearby target. The dust gets inhaled by then the 'enemy' and the soldier. They come home and if they reproduce it gets into our genepool as well. There is no end to the problems with shelling this shit out there on the battlefield. And I heard they were coating the insides of tanks with it as well because it is a super-hard metal that resists bullets, but it also fucks up the men inside the tank. Why in the world would anyone agree to use this stuff??

      And why doesn't the legistlation ever seem to get through on it?
      • Re: Depleted Uranium Bombs...

        Fri, May 9, 2008 - 6:02 AM
        To answer your question, I would refer you to the last speech made by Eisenhower before he left office. To paraphrase " never allow the military-industrial complex to assume undue influence in our democratic system of government". Well that is what happened quite precisely.
        Soft money rules the day- and no matter how idealistic "mr. Smith" is when he sets off for D.C., the corrosive power of the corporate money will corrupt them with time.

        Why are 2.4 million Americans in jail? Because corporations are getting rich
        Why is the U.S. the largest exporter of munitions in the world? " "
        Why is money the main object of our society ,above human life and even the health of our own soldiers?" "

        The good news is that according to David Holmgren, who I happen to agree with, Using resources and violence to acquire more resources only works in a time of increasing availability. In our "post peak "world this expenditure of billions in cash, human life and half our daily oil usage is not going to return the wealth the way that the neocons thought it would. We'll be lucky to break even on our military adventures in Iraq.
        Holmgren says that we are going to be the ones to set a bad example for the rest of the world not to follow. They will see that it would be better to spend three trillion dollars on removing ones dependency on oil ,rather than spending the same to invade oilfields. Unfortunately we will take an economic hit to learn this harsh lesson.

        Only 51% of the eligible voters cast a ballot in the 2000 election, allowing extremists to take over the government.

        " Yet, turnout did not increase after the 1950s. In fact, the period from 1960 to 2000 marks the longest ebb in turnout in US history. Turnout was nearly 65 percent of the adult population in the 1960 presidential election and stood at only 51 percent in 2000. In 2002, turnout was 39 percent in the November election and a mere 18 percent in the congressional primaries.

        Fewer voters are not the only sign of the public's waning interest in political campaigns. In 1960, 60 percent of the nation's television households had their sets on and tuned to the October presidential debates. In 2000, fewer than 30 percent were tuned in."
        • Re: Depleted Uranium Bombs...

          Fri, May 9, 2008 - 7:49 AM
          My cousin married a dude who flies "predators" for the navy. He is stationed outside Frisco flying his predator with a joystick and a little video screen, Shooting missiles at "suspected terrorists" thousands of miles away.

          The last Pentagon computer war games involved the U.S. launching a "preemptive" nuclear strike on China using the new "space plane".
          The space plane dips down into the atmosphere and drops it's bomb and then returns to space. Death by remote control is what the future holds.

Recent topics in "! * Environmental Protection * !"