Advertisement
It's not just the American dollar that's losing value. A government agency has decided that an American life isn't worth what it used to be.
The "value of a statistical life" is $6.9 million in today's dollars, the Environmental Protection Agency reckoned in May — a drop of nearly $1 million from just five years ago.
The Associated Press discovered the change after a review of cost-benefit analyses over more than a dozen years.
Though it may seem like a harmless bureaucratic recalculation, the devaluation has real consequences.
When drawing up regulations, government agencies put a value on human life and then weigh the costs versus the lifesaving benefits of a proposed rule. The less a life is worth to the government, the less the need for a regulation, such as tighter restrictions on pollution.
Consider, for example, a hypothetical regulation that costs $18 billion to enforce but will prevent 2,500 deaths. At $7.8 million per person (the old figure), the lifesaving benefits outweigh the costs. But at $6.9 million per person, the rule costs more than the lives it saves, so it may not be adopted.
Some environmentalists accuse the Bush administration of changing the value to avoid tougher rules — a charge the EPA denies.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25626294/
Where are all the "pro-lifers" Hello? Hello?
The "value of a statistical life" is $6.9 million in today's dollars, the Environmental Protection Agency reckoned in May — a drop of nearly $1 million from just five years ago.
The Associated Press discovered the change after a review of cost-benefit analyses over more than a dozen years.
Though it may seem like a harmless bureaucratic recalculation, the devaluation has real consequences.
When drawing up regulations, government agencies put a value on human life and then weigh the costs versus the lifesaving benefits of a proposed rule. The less a life is worth to the government, the less the need for a regulation, such as tighter restrictions on pollution.
Consider, for example, a hypothetical regulation that costs $18 billion to enforce but will prevent 2,500 deaths. At $7.8 million per person (the old figure), the lifesaving benefits outweigh the costs. But at $6.9 million per person, the rule costs more than the lives it saves, so it may not be adopted.
Some environmentalists accuse the Bush administration of changing the value to avoid tougher rules — a charge the EPA denies.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25626294/
Where are all the "pro-lifers" Hello? Hello?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: What Is Your Life Worth?
Mon, October 5, 2009 - 5:18 PMTo the pro-lifers the value drops when it comes out of the womb. Just like driving a new car from a showroom. If it's male and 18 and ready for the military then the life value hits zero.
-
Re: What Is Your Life Worth?
Sun, October 11, 2009 - 7:21 PMSo if I kill someone will the government give me 6.9 million when I send in the head~?
Or was that all just a lot if hollow talk?
I mean if they aren't willing to put their money where their mouth is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
-
Re: What Is Your Life Worth?
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 6:47 AMTypical debt collector. Always looking to make the big easy buck off of death and misery.
-
Re: What Is Your Life Worth?
Mon, October 12, 2009 - 12:36 PMI don't think many would agree that death has the same value as life. Not a lot of demand for corpses . . .
-