okay, honest question here... do you feel the project being located in nicaragua is drawing more people, or turning more people off to the idea?
im really not sure. i love the idea of doing this in on a tropical island far from anything most of us know. the closest city being colonial grenada, the second (?) oldest city in the americas charms me. rainforests and active volcanoes as the backdrop of our adventure inspires me. knowing there is a point within a daytrek that you can look out and see two vast oceans awes me. and it having a low cost of living, and what we will bring to the economy says it has a real chance of working out...
but this project has been from the very beginning a stepping stone out into the world. one step past BM... then two... and who knows where we are by then? this was never an end in itself (though there is no reason it couldnt be for some). choosing a foreign country, and one with a bad reputation (deserved or not), brings real challenges to the project's success. it scares people that would otherwise join up. and if this is simply a stepping stone, if we could make the project happen faster elsewhere, that might be a more logical step. once we can make it happen once, our credibility might be enough to convince those people we scared off before, or we might have enough people already onboard and ready to take the next step.
i might be willing to take smaller steps towards a dream, as long as those steps are taking me forward.
consider, as an example: we never really even considered an island in america, for a variety of reasons; arguably the main concern being that there were no islands of a decent size for sale at a price we could work with in a climate we wanted. there just wasnt an option, so it wasnt considered. then we got to the nica island... and started considering, for a moment, lakefront property instead of just islands. now that opens up a lot more options. just randomly skimming around for 15 minutes or so i found several lakefront properties in new hampshire (which is the focus of the free state project, look that up if you havent heard of it www.freestateproject.org/ ) in the range of 80 acres, for the price of the grenada island or less. 80 acres is almost four times the size of the island, which means we could 'support' 4 times the number of people, reducing each persons share cost to $1000 or so, to buy it outright. think we could find 400 people with that kind of cash willing to take the plunge? a wider search would invariably find better properties, this was simply an example.
it would be a compromise on just about all counts... but a significant step towards a greater dream. it would not excite the imagination as much (though any community that is attempting to make year round the vibe one feels at BM is pretty exciting in my book). it may not be as remote as our own island (but then again there are some pretty remote pieces of water). it would probably not be tropical. it would be less scary. it would be more economical (in some ways, not in others). it would not be as much of an adventure. people might also be able to make a commute into work (is that a good or a bad thing? both?). it would be less of a gamble.
and it might stand a greater chance of happening sooner.
im really not sure. i love the idea of doing this in on a tropical island far from anything most of us know. the closest city being colonial grenada, the second (?) oldest city in the americas charms me. rainforests and active volcanoes as the backdrop of our adventure inspires me. knowing there is a point within a daytrek that you can look out and see two vast oceans awes me. and it having a low cost of living, and what we will bring to the economy says it has a real chance of working out...
but this project has been from the very beginning a stepping stone out into the world. one step past BM... then two... and who knows where we are by then? this was never an end in itself (though there is no reason it couldnt be for some). choosing a foreign country, and one with a bad reputation (deserved or not), brings real challenges to the project's success. it scares people that would otherwise join up. and if this is simply a stepping stone, if we could make the project happen faster elsewhere, that might be a more logical step. once we can make it happen once, our credibility might be enough to convince those people we scared off before, or we might have enough people already onboard and ready to take the next step.
i might be willing to take smaller steps towards a dream, as long as those steps are taking me forward.
consider, as an example: we never really even considered an island in america, for a variety of reasons; arguably the main concern being that there were no islands of a decent size for sale at a price we could work with in a climate we wanted. there just wasnt an option, so it wasnt considered. then we got to the nica island... and started considering, for a moment, lakefront property instead of just islands. now that opens up a lot more options. just randomly skimming around for 15 minutes or so i found several lakefront properties in new hampshire (which is the focus of the free state project, look that up if you havent heard of it www.freestateproject.org/ ) in the range of 80 acres, for the price of the grenada island or less. 80 acres is almost four times the size of the island, which means we could 'support' 4 times the number of people, reducing each persons share cost to $1000 or so, to buy it outright. think we could find 400 people with that kind of cash willing to take the plunge? a wider search would invariably find better properties, this was simply an example.
it would be a compromise on just about all counts... but a significant step towards a greater dream. it would not excite the imagination as much (though any community that is attempting to make year round the vibe one feels at BM is pretty exciting in my book). it may not be as remote as our own island (but then again there are some pretty remote pieces of water). it would probably not be tropical. it would be less scary. it would be more economical (in some ways, not in others). it would not be as much of an adventure. people might also be able to make a commute into work (is that a good or a bad thing? both?). it would be less of a gamble.
and it might stand a greater chance of happening sooner.
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sat, October 27, 2007 - 3:39 AMHonest answer - nicaragua is turning more away.
It does inspire thought and hopefully more action.
Somewhat off the grid is interesting. Tropical would be amazing. Location could be, because of comparative costs, remarkably doable. Yet it is very large leap to make, an unclearness certainly surrounds it for me (title search and other issues with the country's pick).
You noted most of the others so I won't repeat them. Many will not be able to do this because it is in a far away island - that's neither good or bad - I do think it holds downsides with being able to continue to work unless one is already telecommuting or earning significant money to be put aside for the venture. -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sat, October 27, 2007 - 12:50 PM>Honest answer - nicaragua is turning more away.
It does inspire thought and hopefully more action.
that was the part i thought might redeem the scaring people off part. the people that do join are then the type that are more willing to DO something. but im getting frustrated, how rare are these people??
>Somewhat off the grid is interesting. Tropical would be amazing. Location could be, because of comparative costs, remarkably doable. Yet it is very large leap to make, an unclearness certainly surrounds it for me (title search and other issues with the country's pick).
thats the part of the argument i dont get. if the issue that is preventing people from joining is the legal status of the title/realtor and such... that is an issue for everyone. the solution is already in the works, planned out. the solution is that as soon as we have the money, as enough people join, we have it looked up by a third party local lawyer that specializes in such things. so on the issue that is keeping people from joining, the answer is to join, yet they dont? (this was not directed at you tia, i know you know all this. im just frustrated at the arguement itself.)
-
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sat, October 27, 2007 - 11:54 AMTrae:
America concerns me for two big reasons.
First of all, I think that having a place which "inspires the imagination" isn't something that we can compromise on It's a very subtle thing, but an amazing environment, will encourage people to be creative, and we need that or else we might just head towards being like any other commune. Head out to the playa sometime when no one else is around. It is a truly incredible place (somewhat diminished when it's full of people). I think that the playa itself is largely what made Burningman such a huge success. And I think that we do need a new inspiring environment for our project to succeed.
Secondly, the insanely conservative legal restrictions in America will undoubtedly effect any project in the states. I'm not just talking about criminal activity, but building and health codes. Even in rural Nevada, on the playa, you now need a permits from the health department to serve food to anyone beyond your friends. In Oakland, kitchens now have to have hardwired florescent lights, and bathrooms need to have lights which turn off by a timer. These requirement vary from place to place, but they'll surely effect us much more in America than somewhere in the developing world.
I think that our problem is largely one of false perceptions.
* It very far.
* It dangerous.
* You have to have a trust fund to be able to travel overseas.
These things are wrong, or just grossly exaggerated in people's thoughts about Nicaragua.
I think that the solution is going to be to fix these incorrect perceptions. And I think that the right way to do it is the week long burn/adventure down there.
If people are scared of Nicaragua, or if they feel that committing to being down there for a chunk of every year is too big of a step, tell them to come down for a week. They may find that they love the country (and the rum).
And to further dispel mistaken preconceptions, whomever does join us, will be able to share their stories with others. This seems like the best approach to me. -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sat, October 27, 2007 - 12:35 PMim not arguing for either side right now, im just not convinced.
>America concerns me for two big reasons.
1. i completely agree, inspiration is key... yet even BM started off simply on a beach. small steps towards a greater dream.
2. the event that inspired FM began, flourished, and continues with minimal problems in america. my neighbors on the playa got a health code violation... for serving lemonade. they walked right past us, regardless that we were probably doing things they should have at least commented on. the solution to the lemonade problem? put vodka in it. the health department smiled and said no problem, i think they even had one. someone else i know of built their own house out of a barn... a 'house' has to meet certain codes which they could not meet. the solution? what is the definition of a house? apparently a building with a kitchen. and a kitchen? 'attached sink + stove' so as long as the 'house' doesnt have a permanent sink and stove, and isnt called a 'house' it gets around the codes. yeah, these things will affect us, but there are ways around them. and the legal system does give us more recourse here.
>I think that our problem is largely one of false perceptions.
yes... but its one of the preconceptions that seems to be really difficult to dissuade people from. its an arguement i havent convinced anyone of, and im usually pretty persuasive. we can link to articles, talk to people there, even reports from our people -there in person- seem to do little. it keeps coming down to the basic 'yeah, its a risk. its one im will to take. are you?' and i think that is pushing more people away then drawing.
maybe the burn this spring will help.
i think we have gotten around the trust fund baby thing. but this is still a BIG thing we are talking about here. its one thing to recognize that your money goes further in smaller economies. its quite another to quit your job, cut your lease, and move halfway across the world to a foreign country when your poor. its even more of a thing when the people doing it with you havent done it before either. this isnt exactly fair or fun thoughts, but its what we are fighting against.
-
Re: nicaragua...
Tue, March 11, 2008 - 10:11 AMI agree that a week long burn would help amelirate false perceptions...I am currently traveling around central america and everyone told me that nicaragua and hondurus were dangerous and not to travel here by myself...I have experienced the total opposite. everyone has been welcoming and kind in both countries. I love the culture and granada was particularly charming....it would be a great location for a project inspiring imagination because it is so colorful and fantasy-like. the architecture reminds me of my magical perception of Disneyworld as a child. I think if people go for one week to check it out they will fall in love with it! The adventure island in a far away land that is not so centered on capitalism and consumerism excites me worlds beyone America.....and we could do projects on the island to help the local community back in granada such as week long training courses for street children in street performance and craft skills...I think our vision would fit in perfectly there....if anyone is interested, but has questions about the location I would be happy to call them and share with them my photos and stories from Granada and Nicaragua in general. It is really a lovely place that noone shoule be frightened of...
-
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sat, October 27, 2007 - 8:10 PMi am going to bring another personal lesson to make my point. .... i forgot what i was going to say. it's Saturday night, i am home watching sports and waiting for a friend. blissfully loaded. i mean, i am.
so, let's remember the point. footall. softball. my rockies being destroyed. did i say softball?
ok, back to the point. i don't really remember my personal lesson. sorry.
but what was i going to suggest is: is it possible to stay focused and -- at the same time, not pick a final destination at this point? at this point of the project.
OK. i remember my personal lesson. i have started many companies. in my only big success, our company had a mission statement that guided everything. and because i like stories, i really tried to abide by that mission statement. and we really created something magical. and i think to the most part, it had to do with the mission statement. not only the mission statement. the fact that we followed it and made decisions based on it. in very day-to-day, real situations.
so, i know this project has a mission statement. can we not pick a final destination but, while building the community which could be a more important goal, be open about the place based on our mission statement?
this project has defined some parameters for the place. and everyone agrees to them. agrees with the parameters? everyone? i think Adam has come up with them. but i am not sure. Adam? anyways, i like them.
and, since Adam is the initial energy behind this project. OK. i know that it has taken a while to pick this place and ,it is an evolution but Adam has seen the process and he is now at the point of suggesting the Nica island. i think we should stick to the island until we collectively decide to move on.
the pros and cons are too vague and too far off. and what I AM REALLY TRYING TO SAY is that it is not that high in priority.
imagine 17 people are part of this project. if we are going to consider opinions of everyone (and at the same time remember our mission statement), you can be sure this discussion is going to come up over and over and over and over again.
OK. good night!!
-
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 7:55 AMer....what?
the project itself has nothing to do with nica, i think that is an important point to remember right now. the project has to do with creating a year round BM style community. it might take 3 years to find enough adventurous souls to make the nica island happen.... while it might only take 6 months to make a domestic island community happen. which pushes out goals forward more?
and for the record, the island in nica was a consensus agreement. there was a long discussion about it, and that was the decision. we talked long and hard... the original island was in belize
i dont think my points were vague at all. and what i am trying to say is that i think it is a high priority, because our current idea is chasing people away. i think the land itself is a major selling point for the project. originally i thought nica would be a selling point; it seems to be the opposite.
this discussion will come up again, i am sure of it. but having discussed and decided already, beforehand, will have an impact on that discussion (as it has already). we can do no harm by anticipating discussions.
so, uh... please clarify? saturday night posts dont explain much, as much as i am a culprit (and now too!). -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 11:51 AMAwright.
So, here's your pros and cons in a nutshell, if you don't mind.
USA:
* robust infrastructure
* aggravating regulations
* easy to get around in
Nicaragua
* less robust infrastructure
* less aggravating regulations
* harder to get to
See some symmetry here? The same things that make it good make it hard - if you have support from the grid, you also have constraints from the grid. The closer you are to the ABODES OF THE MAN (not the Burning Man, you know, THE MAN) the more you have to stand on your own two feet.
You get freedom and autonomy, but the price is having to provide for your own security and safety, and not having a place to go to get help.
The balance of these factors is why it is so hard to get any kind of seriously off-grid action going. The support network falls away much, much more quickly than the authoritarian over control does - you can live in a shack in the desert, completely off the grid, truck in your own water, and still be under 17 different jurisdictions and sets of regulations covering your activities.
The thing is that if you want to get away from that stuff, even on a temporary basis, you have to PROVIDE YOUR OWN ALTERNATIVES FOR THE FUNCTIONS THAT COME FROM IT.
This might be a different matter if you were planning on doing this near a major city in Nicaragua. Or if you were doing it in a rural corner of America. But when you put yourself in a rural corner of a foreign country, you begin to have to consider a much higher level of self-sufficiency and autonomous support than most people are comfortable with.
Doesn't mean it's a bad idea, but it does mean that you can't be casual about stuff like medical, like communications, like power, like interfaces with the local legal system and government. You can get your ass handed to you pretty easily by a small town cop in America, and it gets worse, not better, in other countries.
I think that a robust and disciplined approach to this stuff can make people less afraid. Think about DPW and the extensive interfaces between BMORG and the various levels of local government and policing. That stuff doesn't exist for no reason: that's *how* Burning Man continues to exist. If you're going to do an enclave based around those values you're going to need something like DPW - a crew that does infrastructure and services in a solid, reliable, professional fashion. You're going to need contacts in the local government who understand that you're nice people who pay their taxes, and really you should be left alone. You're going to need (maybe not now, but if you have any great success) something like the Rangers to handle internal issues and to make sure they stay internal issues, and to provide security for the more vulnerable members of your population.
The price of freedom is responsibility.
I do think that it's possible to do all of this, without it being a vast burden, but you do need to go through scenario planning and mapping of your local resources.
* what happens if somebody gets injured?
* what happens if somebody "goes off their meds"?
* what happens if local law enforcement come around and hassle you about boat licenses or whatever?
* what happens if there's a fire?
* what happens if there's a fight?
The further off the grid you go, the more of this stuff you have to have local resources for dealing with. But that's where you get the freedom - it comes *from* and *with* the autonomy and the self-sufficiency.
Sorry if this is kind of long, but it's important to me that efforts like this one succeed - this is part of why I do what I do. Decentralized infrastructure and cheap housing are only one part of the puzzle of how we each attain more of the freedom which is our birthright. -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 12:33 PMVinay:
> I think that a robust and disciplined approach to this stuff can make people less afraid. Think about DPW and the extensive interfaces between BMORG and the various levels of local government and policing. That stuff doesn't exist for no reason: that's *how* Burning Man continues to exist. ... If you're going to do an enclave based around those values you're going to need something like DPW - a crew that does infrastructure and services in a solid, reliable, professional fashion.
I'm not sure that's true. We're talking about 150 people, not 40,000.
I don't think that we need to follow the model of Burningman today, or of Western society as a whole. I think that with a smaller group, we can count a lot more on personal responsibility.
I agree that we'll have to fill a few important official roles. i.e. Fire chief, and government contact.
But I don't think that we need dedicated DPW, firemen, and rangers. We do need plans for handling at least the critical functions, but everyone needs to step, and help out to make things happen.
Look at these photos from Burningman 1992.
dapete.com/bm/1992/
Burningman didn't have an official DPW until it grew to be 10,000 people.
My point is that we shouldn't get carried away with structure, rules. I think that we can largely count on self-reliance and participation with a community/outpost of this size.
Are those concepts which scare people?
One of the values of Burningman, and of this project, is "radical self-reliance". What does radical self-reliance mean to you?
Another is "gifting", which I personally see as helping one another out. This duality in a community, of self-reliance and helping each other out, can create something amazing.
The model of Burningman today, and of the "default world", starts with the assumption that people are incapable of being self-reliant. How far do we have to go down that road, before we've betrayed our own values? -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 4:16 PMIt's not that you need dedicated individuals for those roles, but the roles have to be filled (even if it's part time) or the thing will likely fall apart.
Look at it another way. You're looking at starting a company with $300,000 of seed capital to do what amounts to real estate development in Nicaragua - that's the legal structure we're talking about here. It has to succeed **on that level** for the higher level stuff about community and autonomy to ever happen.
Then you've got the "no safety-net" environment of being on an island - was it two hours? - from land, and on land, you're in Nicaragua, an environment with a very different set of amenities and legal codes from the native environment of most of the people doing this thing. This is a very different story from being 20 minutes drive from Gerlach, and an hour and a half from Reno. This stuff is not trivial - the extremely competent handling of these factors is why Burning Man is allowed to continue, rather than being sued into oblivion.
I'm not suggesting this stuff has to be done in some kind of hierarchical, authoritarian fashion. But you need one of everything on your Big List covered, and the contingency planning needs to get done so that if something does go wrong, people have already thought about what to do at least in outline from the comfort of their current positions.
It's non-trivial. That's partly why there isn't so much of this kind of stuff going on. I don't know very much about Ron Rivest's group down there, but they've been settled for a couple of decades, and might be a good place to start. -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Mon, October 29, 2007 - 8:21 AMi also think that having an EMT or even a fire fighter is not only ideal but necessary.
maybe we should define self reliance in two different levels: we have self reliance at the individual level (providing food, shelter,... for themselves). and then we have self reliance at the community level (providing medical and safety expertise for the community). -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Mon, October 29, 2007 - 7:37 PMisee:
> maybe we should define self reliance in two different levels: we have self reliance at the individual level (providing food, shelter,... for themselves). and then we have self reliance at the community level
This ties into Vinay's needs mapping.
howtolivewiki.com/en/Need_Mapping
Let's figure out what our needs are, and then figure out how we're going to solve them.
I've copied his needs and added comments on our wiki.
floatingman.wetpaint.com/page/...apping
-
Re: nicaragua...
Mon, October 29, 2007 - 7:59 PMisee:
> i also think that having an EMT or even a fire fighter is not only ideal but necessary.
We need to discuss this more as a group, but personally I don't think that we need an officially licensed EMT or firefighter at all. I think that we just need to have a couple of people who are trained in the basics of firefighting and first-aid.
This book was highly recommended to me today:
www.amazon.com/Where-Ther...435-1384010
-
-
-
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 11:00 PMits good to think about these things, but some of it will just have to be answered when we get there. i agree we will need something like the rangers for self policing issues. ill volunteer for it, but someone with experience rangering at BM or a bigger regional should be the one putting it together. of course this really doesnt matter until we get down there. the onsite island council would handle arbitration issues. anything we could handle ourselves would have to get taken to local law, when we figure out what the jurisdiction is. if the local police show up on the island, the rangers would be the ones to act as liaison with them.
as a contingency the plan is to keep one of the boats for emergency org use. if someone needs to be rushed to the hospital that would be how it would happen. keys to it will probably be in the care of whatever ranger system we have in place, which would make it their responsibility to make sure it is maintained. one of the generators should probably be kept for emergency use as well.
im not trying to trivialize these concerns, as they are important, but a large focus of this project is the radical self reliance part of the ten principles. responsibility is going to be key. if there is a fire, put it out. keep your friends out of fights. if you break something, fix it. there will have to be contingency plans for these, yes, because the honor system thing rarely works 100%, but i dont think it needs to be more detailed then we already have. the plan is to get off the grid as much as possible, for the reasons you said, and we are expecting people to provide for themselves. the org isnt providing anything except composting toilets. we were trying to keep the project as simple as possible, so it actually happens. we are however keeping the possibilities open for the future, if circumstances change. -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 11:45 PMVinay:
> It's not that you need dedicated individuals for those roles, but the roles have to be filled (even if it's part time) or the thing will likely fall apart.
Okay, I think we're agreed then. :-)
We need some structure, and there are some things which are very important to get right. We will have to make some compromises on the concept of freedom, to make this project a success. I'm okay with that. I just want to be sure that structure and rules don't become the default choice; that we only add hierarchies and rules where they're necessary.
I'd like our Org to be more reminiscent of Burningman 1997, rather than 2007.
Do you think that's okay?
> Then you've got the "no safety-net" environment of being on an island - was it two hours? - from land
Just to clarify, the island is about 15 minutes from land. But 2 hours from the nearest major town.
Trae:
> im sorry, i thought i agreed to that and you were working on a draft. i am now then.
Cool. With your okay, I'll work on something.
I'll post that soon for everyone to comment. Maybe you and isee would volunteer to help out, and we can send messages to 20 people each.
-
-
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 12:06 PMisee:
> this project has defined some parameters for the place. and everyone agrees to them. agrees with the parameters? everyone? i think Adam has come up with them. but i am not sure. Adam? anyways, i like them.
I certainly came up with the ideas for "permanent" and "water". The rest of it was a synthesis of ideas from early members of this tribe. That's the history.
But I do agree that we should be inflexible about these values, and use them as the basis for our decision making.
Trae:
> the project itself has nothing to do with nica
Just a clarification, to make sure that people don't get the wrong impression. Once we arrive somewhere, we don't want to be completely isolated, we do want to have dealings with the local community. We're planning on Nicaragua - if we move down there, the project will be, in part, about Nicaragua.
But that is not the point of the project. It doesn't have to be in Nicaragua, it could be anywhere.
For anyone who is reading this and doesn't have the history, scroll down to the bottom of this page for the goals of the project:
www.floatingman.org/
> i dont think my points were vague at all. and what i am trying to say is that i think it is a high priority, because our current idea is chasing people away.
It's a valid concern.
But I'm not convinced that that it's the primary thing keeping people away. The full-time nature of the project seems equally scary. Greg is creating a full-time event in America, the cost for a share is only $200, and he's having a hell of a time getting people to sign up.
And, I'm afraid that starting with some American property as an interim step would be too much of a compromise and would hurt the long term success of the project. Our top location choice in Nicaragua is our own private island. Our backup plan is on the shore of amazing twin volcanic islands. We're not going to find anything in America, within our price range, which inspires the imagination like those places.
Plus, honestly, Nicaragua is warm and cheap. I'm only speaking for myself, but those things are very important to me. If we end up in a place which is expensive, cold, or both, my interest in the project will drop.
In the previous post, I said that I think that the week long burn to address people's concerns will be a great step towards easing people's fears about Nicaragua. I still think that's true.
But, I think that we should step back further, and do some research about what people's concerns really are. What we're are doing now, is based on part on speculation.
Let me propose an idea for the 2nd time, how do you guys feel about sending out a survey to some portion of the vast silent majority members of this tribe (10%, 20%) seeing what their interest in this project is, and what their concerns are? -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Sun, October 28, 2007 - 2:35 PM>Let me propose an idea for the 2nd time, how do you guys feel about sending out a survey to some portion of the vast silent majority members of this tribe (10%, 20%) seeing what their interest in this project is, and what their concerns are?
im sorry, i thought i agreed to that and you were working on a draft. i am now then.
>But I'm not convinced that that it's the primary thing keeping people away. The full-time nature of the project seems equally scary. Greg is creating a full-time event in America, the cost for a share is only $200, and he's having a hell of a time getting people to sign up.
the 'survivor' aspect (with voting out people that dont 'do enough') of his project turned me off to it.
i would agree with the full time thing...even us saying that it wont likely be 'full time' for most people is probably scaring people off. even for me, having to worry about flying half way across the world a couple times a year is one of the negative points of the project. something closer, in the states, might lessen that fear too.
-
-
Re: nicaragua...
Mon, October 29, 2007 - 8:15 AMsorry, had one too many drinks that night :)
what i was trying to say is : sticking to our value system, mission statement and the guidelines for choosing a site will eventually get us to our site. that's higher priority than questioning Nica at this point. i think we also have to be clear to outsiders and newcomers that we have picked a place but it could change. however, wherever we do end up eventually, will satisfy our requirements and major goals.
-
-
-
Free State Project - PorcFest 2008. New Hampshire.
Wed, February 13, 2008 - 1:30 PM
This should open a good debate about the Free State Project concept www.freestateproject.org in Hew Hampshire.
Many Burners in the forums boast and theorize about how to be "Radically Self Reliant" 24/7. There are some who are standing together supporting each other for smaller government, personal freedoms and not to use force against another, all the while living closer to being self reliant each day. Many of these FSP members left their lives to come to New Hampshire to live what they believe.
New Hampshire is bucking the trend by living in no zoning areas, being self reliant and as soon as the weather breaks the home building will continue, wooden and rammed earthen structures along with the stick frame homes that are the norm.
So just letting you know, the rest of this post is just my advertising the FSP and Porcfest 2008. If you can't make it to NH, I'll be at Burning Man with the Rangers/Medical/ESD after Porcfest 2008 and Burning Porcupine to let you know how teh events went......
Here's my invite those who believe action means more than words and come visit us and see what is happening at PorcFest 2008 the liberty event of the Free State Project (FSP) www.freestateproject.org June 9th – 15th Gunstock Mountain Resort in Gilford, New Hampshire. The details are online at www.PorcFest.com
PorcFest 2008 is to showcase New Hampshire and the FSP community through parties, tours, BBQs, hikes, informal discussions, concerts, shooting, trips, camping, and activities that suit the needs of families, singles, and kids alike. The liberties enjoyed by New Hampshire citizens of shall-issue concealed-carry permits, the constitutionally protected right of revolution, no income or sales tax, their interactions with local and state legislators and 101 other pro-liberty reasons.
PorcFest 2008 is an event you will remember. If you ever missed a burn before you know how it is afterwards! Don’t let PorcFest 2008 and the FSP be another "Missed Burn"! (Porcfest is the FSP.org sanstioned event ... there is also the "Burning Porcupine" like the '80's BM for those that know those that know which is by invite only).
If you believe in Liberty, Freedom, the quest for smaller government, “Bill of Rights”, support the Constitution, the 2nd amendment where open and concealed carry is the norm and are looking to achieve personal responsibility you definitely need to check this out. The quality and quantity of successful liberty activists, the community they enjoy in NH with The Free State Project and their legislators are amazing.
There’s a good and short video from PorcFest 2007 produced by Free Minds TV (one of two libertarian TV shows in NH….how many of these are there where you live ?) discussing the FSP and the festival at www.youtube.com/watch .
There's an FAQ page at www.freestateproject.org/festival/faq for any questions or information about the event or the FSP. Post as well to the PorcFest forum at forum.freestateproject.org/index.php
Friends that have made the move to New Hampshire are more self reliant than ever having their own TV and radio programs, documentaries, newspapers, homes and websites. Search the sites of what the Free State Project and its participants are about and have accomplished in the first 4 years since New Hampshire was chosen as the Free State. View the videos such as Rep. Dan Itse’s, who instructs New Hampshire citizens on their Constitution www.nhliberty.org/nh_constitution_class and trains citizens how to give testimony to state committee on legislation youtube.com/watch ( where other than New Hampshire can you find state representatives that will teach you your rights and how to challenge bills?).
There are all types of FSP members from Democrat to Anarcists working towards the common goal of Freedom and Liberty helping with the passing of:
The amendment to New Hampshire's Constitution limiting eminent domain, which passed New Hampshire's legislature on March 24, 2006
"No part of a person's property shall be taken by eminent domain and transferred, directly or indirectly, to another person if the taking is for the purpose of private development or other private use of the property"
and
HB685 No Real ID in NH
I. The general court finds that the public policy established by Congress in the Real ID Act of 2005, Public Law 109-13, is contrary and repugnant to Articles 1 through 10 of the New Hampshire constitution as well as Amendments 4 though 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America. Therefore, the state of New Hampshire shall not participate in any driver’s license program pursuant to the Real ID Act of 2005 or in any national identification card system that may follow therefrom.
The New Hampshire Legislature had overwhelming passed the bill this past spring, Gov. Lynch signed it on June 27, 2006
There are people working towards Liberty and Freedom, Now at this minute! Are you Interested in meeting people working for smaller government? It's happening in New Hampshire along with many other bills that are being fought and they need you in NH to help. There is support for a "Floating Porcupine" here in NH along with the infastructure to make it happen with help of others as by myself, a scientist and life long EMT.
www.youtube.com/watch - FTL Radio's Ian www.freetalklive.com
www.youtube.com/watch -Dale
-
Re: nicaragua...
Wed, February 27, 2008 - 1:25 AMI want to say also that by far the most important thing, over where you build and all that, is to form a strong community of people who know and like each other and want to live together. That takes time, and it's HARD, and made no easier by everyone living all over the place at present.
Who should be surprised if someone goes off to start a utopian community somewhere and nobody jumps in? Money? Volcanoes? Scary Central American country? The people you want will happily ignore these impediments if you give them what they want. You could have no stated tenets or values whatsoever. People will join you if they feel, "here is a group of people I could live with," and "here is an established group of people who interact in healthy ways," and can see some opportunity to realize their heroic instincts and creative goals within that community. If you have those things, the right people will join you in due course of time.
How can you, or we, form such a community?
I think of cooperative houses. Even people who have been friends for years shift around trying to make households where people match up by temperament, by values, by how they like to live. People come, people go, people learn more about what they want and who they are, they go off to take jobs in places, whatever. This is hard stuff, and you'll be dealing with these same issues and more at Floating Man.
My intuition is that you have to start with a small group of people who are already fairly tight-nit, and make ample space for more people to come as they may. Many will move on after a while, but hopefully some of them will come back. I expect the majority of people invested in Floating Man will lead lives elsewhere the majority of the year. Is this what you envision? Or would people be giving up their lives where they are now? -
-
Re: nicaragua...
Wed, February 27, 2008 - 6:06 PMPeter:
> Who should be surprised if someone goes off to start a utopian community somewhere and nobody jumps in? Money? Volcanoes? Scary Central American country?
With Mon[k]eys and volcanoes, who can say no? :-)
> People will join you if they feel, "here is a group of people I could live with," and "here is an established group of people who interact in healthy ways," and can see some opportunity to realize their heroic instincts and creative goals within that community. If you have those things, the right people will join you in due course of time.
We've been asking this question for a while as to why people have been so slow to sign up. This very well could be the reason.
There is another project called "Permaburn". It's not in a scary 3rd world country, it's in California. And the cost of entry is far lower. But he hasn't seemed to have any better luck than us in terms of getting people to join him.
> My intuition is that you have to start with a small group of people who are already fairly tight-nit, and make ample space for more people to come as they may.
It's a tough thing with our plan. We wanted to buy a piece of property that inspired the imagination. In Nicaragua, the price isn't too bad, but it still isn't super cheap. Then to make the price affordable, we had to split it among a large group of people. It's certainly ambitious.
Perhaps we need to reconsider our plans. Or perhaps we just need to remain patient, and keep pushing forwards. We're up at 8 people out of 100 now. At some point might that number start snowballing?
> I expect the majority of people invested in Floating Man will lead lives elsewhere the majority of the year. Is this what you envision? Or would people be giving up their lives where they are now?
It's up to the individuals. I imagine that some people would live there full-time. I imagine that others would work in the US part of the year, and live on the island part of the year. And I imagine some will just come down on 2-week holidays from work.
I'm not yet going to guess at the percentages there.
Cheers!
P.S. Thanks for all of the good thoughts and input.
-