Survival of the fittest, hombre!

Do you know much about astronomy? Venus, the 2nd planet, has an atmosphere composed mostly of CO2.
The surface temperature is somewhere in the neighborhood of 800* F.

www.daviddarling.info/encyclo...mos.html

"What about the reports of Greenland losing its ice?"

What? Are you such a zealot that you believe everything that the AGW central tells you? What about reports to the contrary?
Did you not everv make the connection between the name of 'Green-land' and what it signifies? Are you not aware that it was so named by the Norse people who farmed there when it was green? How could they have farmed there and called it 'green' if it was covered in glaciers? D'uh!
So for clarity's sake, Greenland was called 'green' because it was green, and not because it was covered in ice. The settlers grazed animals and grew crops there because it was largely free of ice and the winters were sufficiently less cold for them to survive. It occurred during a period of global warmth. It is well-known, by any objective climate scientist, that Celtic Europe was far warmer than it is now, as was the rest of the globe. This warming was not during a period of high CO2 levels, it was caused by the Sun, just as the warming up to 1998 was caused by the Sun.
So to use Greenland as evidence for AGW is a ridiculous straw man argument and one which betrays the level of ignorance.

"Have you noted the stories of pacific islands starting to disappear? Sea level rise?"

Where? Which Islands are apparently disappearing? Why has the media gone quiet about it? Where is the sea level rising? Where is the evidence for this? There is NO evidence because it's not happening. The computer models which this assumption was based upon are wrong and disproven. So this means that you believe all the little 'stories' that you are told in the media? D'uh!

And now, with winters getting colder and 2008 reported as the coldest year on record in various parts of the world, with snow having fallen where it has never been seen before, we can see the direct correlation with the Sun and its cycles.
With millions of undersea volcanoes it is obvious that the oceans have been warmed by the Earth Herself, and thanks to the energy of the Sun, and absolutely nothing to do with CO2 or human activity.
It is always a surprise when people are so unaware of basic scientific truth. The only thing that either side of the GW debate can say with certainty is that CLIMATE CHANGES.
There is NO real proof of any significant effect of human activity causing CO2 in sufficient quantity to cause any climate change whatsoever, and actually there is plenty of real scientific evidence to show that warming occurred for a number of reasons which have been natural.

And all the evidence that any rational person should need can be accessed through this tribe and its many links and articles