A recurring theme, here. *g*
Here's the question: Is it possible for a man and woman to love each other UNCONDITIONALLY? I'm not speaking of family relationships here. I'm talking about true and total acceptance by a member of the opposite sex/world/species. What I'm wondering is if the "When Harry Met Sally" sexual tension/expectation/whatever makes it impossible for two members of the opposite sex to truly achive the Platonic ideal.
Let's face it: the sexual possiblity is *always* there, even when both parties agree to ignore it, and that tension makes expressing such a love.....difficult, especially through the clumsy blocks of language.
Here's the question: Is it possible for a man and woman to love each other UNCONDITIONALLY? I'm not speaking of family relationships here. I'm talking about true and total acceptance by a member of the opposite sex/world/species. What I'm wondering is if the "When Harry Met Sally" sexual tension/expectation/whatever makes it impossible for two members of the opposite sex to truly achive the Platonic ideal.
Let's face it: the sexual possiblity is *always* there, even when both parties agree to ignore it, and that tension makes expressing such a love.....difficult, especially through the clumsy blocks of language.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 5:54 PMi have to agree w/the yes. love, IMO, transcends petty differences. i mean my fiance and i disagree on all kind sof stuff but none of it makes me love him neless, in fact i love him all the more for some of it, for his stubborn uniqueness.... its all part of him and i accept that.... even when he gets on my nerves, my love for him does not waver.... i believe that love is bigger than that. -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 8:26 PMHmmmmmmmmmm
I'm going to say it depends on who the individuals are.
I have a former Prof. (who's on wife #4) maintain a resounding "no" to your question.
What I know in my experience is that I had a friend - male - who I slept with for years - slept as in snoozed, cuddled, snored, etc. without one ounce of sexual tension. And when that tension did manifest and we did act - friendship gone. I haven't seen him now for 10 years.
I wish I could give a black and white answer here - but I can't. And it may be just because I am who I am. As when I dance at a club or bar - I can no more purge my sexuality from that dancing than I can stop breathing. I can no more toss aside my sexual being even during close friendships than I can stop my kidneys from functioning. Do I ACT on that attraction - again depends. I have two beloved male friends who are also lovers - and just the kind of lovers I need as they are slowly teaching me through our interactions that maybe it's okay to be BOTH physically and sexually intimate. In my life I've usually only managed one or the other but rarely (I can think of one relationship) both together.
I think no matter what the rest of us have experienced and believe because of that experience - in the end - it's going to depend on what YOU believe. If you have to this point thought it was impossible but want to explore a paradigm shift - do so.
I have another friend who's essentially a catalyst for challenging many of my own heretofore ideas about "this is how it is." And that can make for feeling darned uncomfortable. Learning that people cannot be categorized in groups at ALL (as in "men are y way and women are x way") is always unsettling for me (I have a habit of wanting the world to stay the way I perceive it darn it and not through wrenches in the works or mess with my paradigms dammit *G*).
Wow....a rambling there I went.
Hope there's something in there that helps.
Peace,
Raven -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 8:28 PM*sigh* blasted typos - that's "...former Prof. who maintains..."
sheesh....can you BELIEVE I teach writing at the collegiate level?
Peace,
She Who Should Proofread aka Raven -
-
Unsu...
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 9:04 PMYes there is unconditional love but it shows itself in different ways from different people.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 10:00 PMThe reason I asked this question came from a simple occurance: hearing a song dedication from one woman to her best girl friend. And it got me to thinking:
Is it possible that the closest Platonic relationships are men-to-men and women-to-women? *WEG* ok, there's an unexpected pn there.... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 10:04 PMI think it is easier to have platonic relationships when you stick to same sex.But then again all of my BEST friends are women and the sexual tension is just part of it and a part I like by the way;o) -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Fri, June 10, 2005 - 10:50 PMI dunno, my thread about my 'blog post', pretty much describes what I know as truly UNconditional Love with members of the opposite sex. I've known the same with two guys in my life, but the experience was so completely different, that I don't even think of it in those terms, but instead allow myself to respond to cultural programming, in terms of "tighter than blood" and "brothers in fact" and "closest relationship with any guy that I, as a straight man, can imagine".
I LOVE having such relationships, and although EXTERNAL conditions sometimes exist, like "she's already married" or "I have a post-Catholic wife at the time" ;o), this does not place conditions or strings on the Love that we feel for one another, but instead makes it more clear how totally unburdened the Love actually is, since we can see the external impact on our relationships so clearly.
Does this help?
T -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Sat, June 11, 2005 - 10:14 AMWho says unconditional love has to be totally platonic? I married my best friend, and I would say that I get unconditional love and acceptance from him, even when I do not always give it to myself. -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Sat, June 11, 2005 - 3:28 PMTrust me to throw in a completely new twist.....one that Shaman has hinted at....
By qualifying your question as "between the opposite sex" you're leaving out a great many folks.
Consider that those who are bisexual tend to view BOTH sexes as potential lovers in the non platonic sense. Consider too that those who are lesbian or gay view the same sex as potential lovers again in the non-platonic sense.
And as Stacie has pointed out - does the relationship demand you be platonic in order for the love to be unconditional?
Frankly - in my experience and my world view from being a student and teacher of sociology and psychology....we all enter into relationships not only to give something but to get OUR needs met.
Therefore - "UN"conditional Love would imply that you seek NOTHING in return from the relationship and only are giving.
Problem is - as human beings - keeping that ideal - that the reward is in the giving and not in getting anything back for it - is damn hard if not nearly impossible.
I think what most folks see as "unconditional" love is that someone loves you even though you view yourself as unworthy of getting their love (you're really bitchy that day - you aren't putting their needs before yours enough or as much as you perceive they put yours ahead of theirs, even when you bounce 20 checks - forget to run an errand for them - and tell them you have a headache that night they still love you, etc.).
I guess that's why I pretty much have a huge problem with the idea of "unconditional love." When we can get to the point of Loving the person who has injured us grievously....
About a week ago I had an experience in meditation where I was using Shaman's technique. During the step of "cleansing the room" I had a flash of what I see as true Unconditional Love is really to be. I saw the Love I was breathing out into the room/world as going even to that heinous criminal on death row. And found myself in tears because I KNOW that's the first time I've ever been able to do that. To for one second truly feel/believe/KNOW that that person - having done whatever it was without apology or remorse - deserved Love.
And again I go off on a ramble. *G*
Peace,
Raven
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Sun, June 12, 2005 - 8:01 AMin a word: yes.
I have received unconditional love from two of my dance teachers (both female) it is joyous to have someone care for you that way. there is a serenity to it like the love of your mom; but even bigger than that because it isn't your mom...
(and one of the reasons I want to be a dance teacher, to return that gift)
I also know unconditional love through my children.
I think my husband and I have grown into an unconditional love over the years: however those first couple of weeks were honestly about the sex/passion of it.;) however now, we are truly a team very yin and yang and behind eachother always in all ways. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Unconditional Love?
Sun, June 12, 2005 - 2:22 PMClearly, I'm running up again my pwm pre/misconceptions here.
*Wry grin* Big surprize there. *Rolling eyes* Ya know, it's a true tragedy that so many of us are conditioned to see "love" as a money-like transaction, or the balance on a credit card. -
-
This post was deleted by TattooShaman
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 12:35 AM"For it to be truly Unconditional, one must not even need that Love to be acknowledged,..."
Not necessarily arguing this statement. However, I will again posit that most human beings do not attain this. Even if in the best of adult relationships - that kind of unconditional giving - just doesn't happen.
I believe it's mainly women who are socialized into thinking that they MUST give all they have or they are not "proper" women. Even today we see young women in their early and mid teens moving from that pre-teen confidence of asserting their needs and desires to being unsure and instead giving in to the needs and desires of others in order to garner approval. I'm almost to the point of categorizing this as a US societal norm. And norms do not change that easily or quickly. And they certainly are not that easily "gotten over" no matter how much self-talk or insight an individual may garner.
I do realize that there are at three types of "love" as the Greeks defined them: Agape, Eros, Filios (I think this is the third if my memory isn't going wonky)
It's the first - Agape - that I think we're trying to get a handle on here and as far as She's concerned - not a problem. I believe She (and He) are most capable of truly loving unconditionally. Human beings may aspire to that - but I'm not convinced that the bulk of us (including myself) get there. Eros of course is that romantic thing that is so much fun and relatively easy. Filios - that deep feeling of being sibs irregardless of bloodline is the other aspect that I think humans have a way of grasping and engaging in in a way that Agape escapes most of us.
Exchange theory (which is what I had in mind) applies to all interactions - not just on a micro level but on mid and macro levels as well. *G* Keep in mind it's only one theory among others.
Peace,
Raven
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 2:55 AMI am appropriately chastised.
I have edited that post to reflect the standards that I have insisted from others.
Mea culpa.
T
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 2:58 AM>>" Ya know, it's a true tragedy that so many of us are conditioned to see "love" as a money-like transaction, or the balance on a credit card. "<<
But in an ideal world, and for some people, that doesn't have anything to do with Love. I have found that I can serparate out Love from selfishness, insecurity, jealousy, balance-sheets, etc., because NONE of those things has ANYthing to do with Love, in my experience, and are ALL based instead on FEAR- fear of being alone, fear of not being good enough, fear of betrayal, fear of being unimportant in others' lives, fear of being unloved, etc., but not ONE of them is part of the act of loving, as I have known it in my life.
Conditioned behaviors and responses are just that- behaviors and responses. For me, Love isn't a behavior or a response at all. Love, in my experience, is purely a PROactive emotion, one that you feel withOUT need for even having it recognized. That desire for recognition, reciprocation, and acknowledgement is DISTINCT from the Love itself, and CAN be left behind when on truly finds Joy in the act of Loving Unconditionally.
For it to be truly Unconditional, I have learned that must not even need that Love to be acknowledged, although I do understand how other issues makes that a nice thing to know. Unconditional Love is just that UNconditional- NO strings, NO need for recognition, NO need to own, NO need for reciprocation. The desire for those things are nice to have, and in an optimal situation, one has those things as well as the Love one feels for another, but if there's linkage, it's not unconditional.
I hope that's not too confusing.
Love and Respect,
T
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 3:32 AMIn response to Raven's post....
>>"I do realize that there are at three types of "love" as the Greeks defined them: Agape, Eros, Filios (I think this is the third if my memory isn't going wonky)"<<
I have to disagree with this in its entirety, unless you were to rephrase that "there are three types of love discussed in Greek philosophy". I AM aware that in philosopy classes and other extant texts, Love is discussed in these terms, but it's also discussed in broadly differing terms in other philosophy classes, and even in humble little houses on the north coast of California. And although you do have the three 'types' listed correctly, I have never found a difference in MY life in the emotion of Love from one person to another. CONDITIONS in the relationship, and OTHER issues like sexual desire and the urge to make a family, or physical indifference are, the best I can tell, just that- distinct and separate from the love itself. The Love I feel for a close sibling is no different than the Love I feel for one not related. I certainly feel DIFFERENT things AS WELL, but the Love, aided by that "understanding that the world, and one's being, is more complete with the existence of another", is the same.
And I do not confuse the term Love with "affection", which I also feel for many that I Love. The Greeks categorized love in those three groups as INCLUDING these differing conditions, thereby calling the love itself different, but the Greeks also considered Agape as having a sense of deference to the gods as PART of this "love", as well as knowledge that 'man' was somehow 'inferior'. Is that Love? Not in my book. Again, my experience suggests that this is greatly flawed in its approach and its conclusions, which brought great consternation to my last philosophy professor.
I would discount my experience as unique, but I HAVE known more than a few who feel this same way, and was, in fact, led to awareness of this situation by others throughout my life. My point of view here is not unique, nor is it novel. It is unconventional, but I suspect much of that has to do with a 'cultural understanding' based on the writings of the Greeks, Thomas Aquinas, and other, modern philosophers, expounding on what is "natural" for people to feel for one another.
Remember, many of these same people are just as likely to tell a man that to love another man, or a woman that to love another woman with Eros, "romantic love" per the Greeks, is in their veiw, both an aberration, and if acted upon, a grievous sin (See Paul, Aquinas, Falwell, etc.- the basis for their theories are founded in an 'edited version of the Greek'.)
Look, I go through life KNOWNG that many of my thoughts and beliefs are alien to others, and that the miserable, fearful, unconscious people we all encounter in our daily lives don't often understand that things CAN be different, but I have also seen enough others who agree entirely with this viewpoint to be confident that I am not speaking of things that are either unworkable or unfathomable. They are merely unconventional and perhaps revolutionary in that they question the status-quo that keeps so many unhappy in their relationships.
And just to be clear, my discussion of things like jealousy, insecurity, selfishness and the like being based on fear, is based on personal experience. It is through examining these things as they occurred in my life that I have arrived at these conclusions, but I have witnessed far too many 'proofs' of these ideas in my life and the lives of those around me, to consider my thoughts on this as unusual or somehow off-base.
I also mean to make no claims that arriving at such a place where one might see this reality for themselves is in any way simple. It took much emotional pain to discover that the fear I felt had nothing to do with the Love involved, but that it was internal to me, either unfouned or justified, but still distinctly outside the Love itself. Dealing with that fear separately was the solution, leading to a freedom or sorts, from the effects that it produces.
I hope this clears up my position a bit.
Peace
T -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 3:27 PM*G* Okay make it specific to only Greek philosophy.
For the rest - I can only say that in my experience there are differences. I have never loved two people in exactly the same way - it's always been different. With some it's a quieter, gentler emotion that flows along and warms like a comfy quilt on a chilly evening. With others it blazes and has extreme highs and lows, more a thrill ride than anything else...always different always changing.
I guess I don't see how it can't be different when each individual is so different - the emotion is unique to the people involved. I feel for my She'enedran an emotion I have no other word for but "love" and it doesn't encompass how that emotion is far removed from the emotion I feel for anyone else - it is unique.
*G* Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one - or one of these days find a mutual vocabulary that isn't so fraught with pitfalls. After all philosophers, poets, essayists and soooo many others have been trying to define "love" for centuries.
Peace,
Raven -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 12:10 AM>>"I guess I don't see how it can't be different when each individual is so different - the emotion is unique to the people involved. "<<
Raven, are you SURE you're not going Greek on me and confusing 'extra stuff that is unique to each interpersonal relationship' with the Love itself?
Disagree, will ya? I'll show you..... heh. Now lessee, what strings can I attach that no one will see....... Hmmmmm.
8o]
T -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 12:12 AMI would say that it is like water, the same no matter what vessel it is poured in, but like water it takes the shape of the vessel that holds it. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 12:14 AMWelcome back, Saul. We've missed you terribly.
And once again, we can all see why you belong here. Thank you, Saul.
Peace
T -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 12:19 AMThanks T, it's good to be back :)
-
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 4:24 PMShaman,
If you think you can - go ahead and try ;-)
Raven
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 12:46 AM*Very carefully*: Moderator, I am not going to respond at this time. When and if I have coherent response, I will decide wheher to:
post it here
PM you
or simply let the matter drop.
Please do not reply to this post in any fashion.
-Autumn
-
-
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 13, 2005 - 3:55 PMyes.
I love you *all* unconditionally :) -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 12:13 AMDanielle, thank you. Ain't it grand Loving because you CAN?!?!
Love and Respect,
T
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 14, 2005 - 3:45 PMHow ironic this question is.
How can you put conditions in a question about unconditional love? Why limit your question to what you call "opposite" sex love? Tell me, what is the opposite of woman? Do you really believe that I am every single thing that a man is not? Do I need a man to oppose me? Who opposes you?
[This response is a respectful reminder that we could all do well to continue to question everything, smash heteronormativity, embrace diversity, spread tolerance, and stay teachable.]
My answer to your question is no, I don't believe that reality happens without conditions. Real life happens in context, within the boundaries of time and space. How can something be unconditional in real life? Humans are fallible, no matter how delicious it is to hypothesize about being absolutely perfect at something. We are all too flawed and imperfect to remove ourselves from the context of real life. But our best efforts at love and healing are good enough. That's all we've got to work with.
Here's an easy test for your unconditional love hypothesis: Would your love for them change if you discovered that they were a sexual predator? Would it change if they left you for someone else? Would it change if they killed your familiar animal for no reason? Would it change if they started hitting you in the face? Would it change if they became unable or unwilling to love you back? Would it change if they moved to Iceland without you? Would it change if they laughed at your worst pains?
What about if they made your happiest dream come true? What if they worked their ass off every day for five years to improve their deepest flaw? What if they saved the whole world in one fell swoop? What if they found a simple cure for world hunger, overpopulation, deforestation, or disease? Nothing about your love for them would change? These are all conditions. Life is conditional.
I believe that love is conditional, that relationships happen in context, that connections are meant to be nurtured, and that being a loving partner has to happen every day within real communication and behavior. It is something we can foster and practice, something we can always improve on, and something we can always learn more about.
I wish you all the best connections possible!
Bright blessings,
Bonnie -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 15, 2005 - 5:30 AMI was having a discussion just last night with a friend about how everyone's definition of love (especially romantic love) is very different and how that plays into their lives and relationships.
Byron Katie (author of "loving what is"), after naming off some negative traits about her ex husband will tell you "I love my ex husband very much, and I also love that I am not with him." This resonates with me, and in my life I can see where all these negative conditions listed above may make me love that I am not with someone like that, but wouldn't change whatever it was that I loved the person for.
In my experience, and the reason why my response to this question is yes, is that I cannot control my feelings, only my justifications of them. Those justifications, and what I *allow* myself to feel (or believe I feel) are certainly conditional. But if I am being totally honest with myself, I know that I have great unconditional love for all those who have touched me.
Much love and respect,
d
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 15, 2005 - 6:37 AMBonnie, it's great to have you here, and I appreciate your points. I can't however, quite get your notiong of 'all love is conditional' to reconcile with the things I've known and experienced. For example....
>>"These are all conditions. Life is conditional. "<<
I agree with you here, but I don't see that as part and parcel to the Love one might feel. Instead what you've listed here are things that would completely change our understanding of 'who it is we are in Love with', rather than conditions on the Love itself. If I am in Love with someone who turns out not to be who I thought they were, I guess you could say that such Love was conditional "upon the person being something close to 'who' our perceptions tell us that person is", but this seems to be more of a matter of perception, than limits, strings, or conditions placed upon the Love one might feel.
Look, I know that most of what we think we know about people, is sorely limited by our perceptions, and often filtered through unreasoned affection expectation, and desire, making statements like "she's perfect, I Love her exactly the way she is", flawed from its beginning, since it would be far more accurate to say "my perception of who she is, and my understanding of this person is that she is perfect, even though I know that I can't possibly actually Know with certainty that who I think I know is anything like what I perceive, but if I perceive accurately, I don't want her to change anything" (not gonna get into the silly idea that someone should ever expect that another won't change who they are as they go through life- I'm merely illustrating a point ;o).
If you were to say that 'the fact of our perception being imperfect makes for ALL things based on that perception to be "conditional", and therefor all Love felt, which is, by definition based on perception, is conditional as well", I guess I'd have to agree with you, but I still don't see this as reaching the level of "placing conditions on the love we have" in the sense that many people seem to be discussing.
I guess that I'm making a distinction between "conditonal Love" and "trust issues". IF we are confident that the people for whom we feel this Love ARE truly who we think they are, then there's no chance of them 'turning out to be a South American dictator in disquise', causing us to reevaluate whether or not we really do Love, then the fact of "life being conditional" CAN be distinguished from "Love being conditional", don't you think?
Or am I splitting hairs too thin to even see?
Deepest Respect,
T
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 15, 2005 - 2:46 PMWell, I have read all of the responses and just have to respond myself. (Sorry been gone a long time even.)
First there is no way to know if Unconditional Love exsists unless you look inside. Love is and emotion word, it is a concept, it is not something that is concretely definable and like truth is "in the eye of the beholder." Therefore, when I put Unconditional in front of the word Love I see something that is attainable. Wheread others may not. It is all derisive of what your definition of Love is and that is something that cannot be debated by anyone but yourself. (Like spirituality, truth, ethics, honor, etc.)
~TigressSky~ -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 15, 2005 - 6:41 PMWelcome back, TigressSky. It's good to hear from you again.
Ya know, after reading your post, it occurs to me that NO one here has bothered (thankfully) to try and define Love, but we HAVE tried to define Unconditional, and obviously arrived at somewhat differing ideas. I'm glad you reiterated the differences in definitions of Love, and suspect that this will always be a facter in how readily people agree or disagree when discussing such lofty ideas.
So often we lose sight that both sides of a debate CAN be right at the same time, since personal definitions are often different.
More importantly, I really WOULD like to believe that the Joy I have known from such things is available to others, more than once in a lifetime. I often feel great sadness that the dream of the '60s of Peace, Love and Understanding didn't survive as a 'movement'. The sad reality is that every time I, or anyone else for that matter, begin talking to strangers about Love, the most common responses are "Hey, weirdo, shut the fuck up!" or "You some kinda religious fanatic or sumpin? Take it somewhere else!" It sure would be nice to be able to walk through a crowded park and KNOW that a large percentage of people there were able to Love even strangers.
Ah, well, it's nice to have you back, beautiful Lady.
Love and Respect,
T
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 27, 2005 - 12:32 PMIt is absolutely possible for men and women to love each other unconditionally, for women to love women unconditionally, for men to love men unconditionally.
I experience this with those I refer to as being part of my tribe. It is not sexual. It is that flowing, deep, warmth... "I love you and accept you as you are, flaws and all. You are my family, and if it is within my power to help you, you have but to ask, always." -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Mon, June 27, 2005 - 11:39 PMSomething happened today to remind me, in no uncertain terms, that the experience of being loved for who you are is not only never confined to gender - but never confined to age as well.
Two years ago this January I left a relationship that I had gone into with every intention of being there until I sailed for the Summerland. However, good intentions aren't all that's needed and I felt it needful I leave. I didn't just leave two partners - but two kids behind who had started thinking of me as "mom."
Today the youngest called me - just to see how I was. She's now 10 years old and the most amazing person I think I've ever known. That she felt comfortable calling me just to talk and make sure I'm okay brought home what "unconditional love" really is.
Peace,
Raven
-
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 28, 2005 - 12:17 AMAin't Love grand?
Glad to hear of your 'visit'. Truly Unconditional Love can arrive in the strangest forms, from the oddest directions, but when it does, I just hope that all are able to actually See it, since it's such a wonderful thing that to miss it due to distraction would be very sad.
Raven, you are correct, of course, Unconditional Love doesn't have ANY borders, boundaries, or even.... heh.... conditions upon it. It just is, as with your 10 year old 'daughter'. She just knows she loves you, and that's ALL that matters. I'm happy for you.
Respect,
T
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Unconditional Love?
Tue, June 28, 2005 - 11:11 AMI know I am coming in to the thread late but, I just have to say that I love my husband totally 100% unconditionally. (well, except for cheating and beating but, neither have occurred)
I wouldn't care if he lost all his limbs, his sight, speech and hearing..he would still be my husband and I would stay by his side for ALWAYS...no matter what.
*except for the 2 mentioned but...I know it isn't a possibility* -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 29, 2005 - 1:25 PMWow :) It's good to see so many view points... I'm coming into this very late too. Unconditional love I feel is a possibility for all. Lucky as I am to be married to my best friend and to be the mother of an amazing son I am blessed every day with unconditional love. For those that seek it I hope you find it in which ever way you experience love. For those that don't believe it a possible; I hope one day you are proven wrong. (Maybe this is selfish on my part--judge as you will-- For it is the one thing I know worth living for. I like sharing joy and believe everyone should be able to partake. )
Blessing,
Sarah -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 29, 2005 - 2:19 PMI meant one of the things worth living for. There are others :) although this is way up on the list, probably number one in my book.
sarah -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, June 29, 2005 - 11:02 PMGlad to have you back with us, Sarah. Say hello to Kyle for me. ;o)
*pssst* call me?
T -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Wed, October 31, 2007 - 9:12 AMWow. Two years since this topic's been discussed. I'm thinkin' it's time to see if there's anyone out there for whom things have changed, new folks who have something to say, or if there's just nothing worth discussing when it comes to Love and the Goddess in our lives.
Love and Respect,
T -
-
Re: Unconditional Love?
Thu, November 1, 2007 - 6:23 PMI would have to say that just from the thread title...I'm learning. The past several months have taught me so much about how to truly l
-
-
-
-
-
