Advertisement
I wonder sometimes if because of the nature of Binah, it having the aspects of Bright Fertile Mother and Dark Sterile Mother whether this is not some function God created in the effort to self-reflect upon itself. Along with this I wonder if as many have said about Jah, or the YH portion of the tetragrammaton, which some say are 'husband and wife' (which I don't agree with) that there isn't something more strange or convoluted going on.
According to Macgregor Mathers book, Kabbalah Unveiled
books.google.com/books
the Yod of the Name is the World of Atziluth. The First Heh is the World of Creation. If we are to take these as husband and wife, does not this imply that the God-names were "sexual" with an archangel?
Now, I often wondered why it was that two of the archangels did not have names ending in -el, but rather had the names Metatron (Archangel of the Presence),
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metatron
and Sandalphon
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandalphon
and how this had to do with this idea of the World of Creation, and from what these ideas state, obvious human replacements.
According to Macgregor Mathers book, Kabbalah Unveiled
books.google.com/books
the Yod of the Name is the World of Atziluth. The First Heh is the World of Creation. If we are to take these as husband and wife, does not this imply that the God-names were "sexual" with an archangel?
Now, I often wondered why it was that two of the archangels did not have names ending in -el, but rather had the names Metatron (Archangel of the Presence),
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metatron
and Sandalphon
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandalphon
and how this had to do with this idea of the World of Creation, and from what these ideas state, obvious human replacements.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Unsu...
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Wed, August 26, 2009 - 8:07 PMConsidering that Binah's Vice is Avarice (Greed), and that this very likely might be attributable to the Dark Sterile Mother aspect and the beginning of the Qliphoth, one can start to see the possibilities of a 'fallen archangel'. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Wed, August 26, 2009 - 8:26 PM -
-
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Sat, August 29, 2009 - 11:35 AMI'm not sure where you are going with your comment. We all have masculinity and femininity within us and most archangels have their divine unions, though we often just use the masculine name. I guess I didn't follow the logic in your comments.
Blessings.
Need Advice? Look for Inspiration? tribes.tribe.net/inspirationsfrombinah -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Sat, August 29, 2009 - 2:05 PMIs there anything outside the human sexual represented on the Tree of Life?
If not, it is solely a human story, and implies that God is human, and that we created ourselves.
To view God ir even archangels as human sexual solely just means we are incapable of talking about or including anything beyond this small planet. -
-
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Sat, August 29, 2009 - 2:08 PM"Is there anything outside the human sexual represented on the Tree of Life? "
kether -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Sat, August 29, 2009 - 4:53 PMHow far up? I tend to think that the idea of the Hermit is close to that.
All kidding aside, I agree; leaving this planet and refusing to incarnate as human again means no human sex.
Sometimes it seems to me that nearly all mystical heritages are built, in whole or in part, on manipulating or dealing with human sexuality, e.g. kundalini. -
-
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Sat, August 29, 2009 - 5:02 PMsexuality transcends physical sex & is more about catalyzing transformations with and/or without involving an actual human body, at a certain point
love all-ways,
mem -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Sun, August 30, 2009 - 11:52 PMWhat do you think of the standard idea of remaining your given sex from this life after you have died, granted there is an afterlife?
Is the Mind sexual, and to what degree? If your mind was what was still alive after death, with the supposed afterimage of yourself retained, what would you want to do? Go visit relatives (I kid, I know you're more adventuresome than that)? I would want to roam the universe for millions of years. Why bother with this human lot?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Origin of Evil; The Adversary
Mon, August 31, 2009 - 2:17 AMI thought it might be interesting to link this thread here:
religiouscrossroads.tribe.net/thr...fc3d
"The Ka is about the only soul a man can trust. If you don't make it, he don't make it. But it is very difficult to contact your real Ka."
-
-
Unsu...
NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 9:51 PMAs to the link in the last post. Here's the post excerpted below.
religiouscrossroads.tribe.net/thr...2c6d
"The thing that impresses me with the Egyptians is that their beliefs are THE ONY ONES I have ever seen come true to some degree. They went through all of the burial ceremony believing they would roam the planet after death and THEY DID!!! Just not as the viable living people they thought they would be. But I'll be damned to hell in gasoline boxers if King Tut and droves of other famous Egyptians are not roaming the world in exibits and the wealth they were buried with in fact shows their stature in society at the time of their death, thereby making part of their beliefs TRUE. But regardless of all of the nomenclature and words for this and that in the spiritual realm, that is all useless rubbish to me. Studying it will only serve to give me a lot more gibberish to remember, not any truths.
I follow a simple rule: that which is is, and that which is not is not. This means there is no need to look for ghosts. We have countless ghost hunters for that and trust me, if they havent found anything yet, that is because it doesnt exist. To see that which does not exist relies on imagination. Anything arising from imagination is fiction, and is part of my "is not". So to learn all of these spiritual ideologies and nomenclature is akin to learning the content of a science fiction novel just for the sake of discussion."
"their beliefs are THE ONY ONES I have ever seen come true to some degree"
Their corpses have travelled the world, he means.
"roam the planet after death and THEY DID!!!"
As corpses? No, something else happens, prior to rebirth (when you reject the waystation Heaven.)
"Just not as the viable living people they thought they would be."
Well, obviously.
"But I'll be damned to hell in gasoline boxers if King Tut and droves of other famous Egyptians are not roaming the world in exibits and the wealth they were buried with in fact shows their stature in society at the time of their death, thereby making part of their beliefs TRUE."
Why did they bottle their organs, then?
"But regardless of all of the nomenclature and words for this and that in the spiritual realm, that is all useless rubbish to me."
OK. Your corpse will not travel. Burial, or incineration?
"Studying it will only serve to give me a lot more gibberish to remember, not any truths."
Studying WHAT?
"I follow a simple rule: that which is is, and that which is not is not."
Perfectly dualistic. I mean, most importantly, two sides to things. Life, and death. Living corpse, and dead corpse.
"This means there is no need to look for ghosts."
O RLY.
"We have countless ghost hunters for that and trust me, if they havent found anything yet, that is because it doesnt exist."
Hunters.... well, you got me there. What are they expecting? How could you repeat a sighting, scientifically? Are you getting this? (I'll hide my tribes) Dead corpse.
"To see that which does not exist relies on imagination."
OK. What does imagination mean to you?
"Anything arising from imagination is fiction, and is part of my "is not"."
Gotcha. It's that bad, isn't it? What's fiction to you? Your soul, obviously.
"So to learn all of these spiritual ideologies and nomenclature is akin to learning the content of a science fiction novel just for the sake of discussion."
Don't join this tribe.
One last thing. WHen I ask whether people think that everything in the Kabbalah is based on Sexuality, I simply ask, why three sephiroth in the Supernal Triangle. In fact, there are three triangles, the Supernal, The Ethical, The Magical.
And then Malkuth.
Dangling.
Wanna split that in two?
The three different triangles function in totally different manners. Have to know the attributes to each sephirah, but really, isn't this just the end of that movie, The Jazz Singer?
I've been watching for a long time. I definitely feel that way. -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:00 PM -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:03 PMFunny thing. You might think this is "rad", but it isn't. Almost all of you believe far more in Hell. So be it.
Try to escape Hell. It's really hard to do that easily. It sucks you in.
Refine that atheism until it hurts. -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:06 PMwww.youtube.com/watch
This reality is created by unlaid nerds. I hate it.
www.youtube.com/watch
Seriously, even the computer is irrational.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:22 PMI'm telling you.. this may be the case: I feel like a wanderer. I might have just passed by, and gone, "W-T-F!!! You gotta be kidding me!! (Non-physical, of course!) and thought... what the fuck is happening here? what are these people doing to themselves?
You see... at this point, your ideas, as initially presented to me, as high as they can feasibly be routed, are still about male and female.
Not kidding.
It may be an accident. I may have arrived about where you would kill yourselves. You still think that your God is human. That sucks. That spells very bad consequences for you all. Maybe Jesus refuses to come back. Maybe anyone in your extended "family" above refuses to come back. Can you guess why?
It comes down to dualism.
Because really your God is my God, but there is only one of those, and it doesn't matter if it's Tripartite, or has split itself into any number of selves.
You people suck.
Honestly. I'm just laughing at you. Did your God tell you to kill yourselves, wholesale?
That's fucked up.
You people are fuckin' weirdos. I'm not kidding. You are trying to sell me a bill of goods, a bridge that doesn't go anywhere.
Fuck being a part of this shit.
Your Heaven goes down, not up. Microverse.
And no one gives a shit. -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:30 PMAll my Mother said about me, when I asked, was that she felt that I was an "old soul" when I was born.
She believes in reincarnation. She really hasn't explored this concept of human religion very much.
I doubt she knows much whatsoever about the most commonly held Eastern beliefs about reincarnation.
She's been an accountant from her early twenties. And she has some psychic inclinations.
I love science SO MUCH you have no idea. Yet I am spiritual, and completely rational.
I've simply blown the doors off this little thing you call the Kabbalah.
It's antiquated. -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:42 PMHere's what I mean: Kether and Chokmah.
Which do you worship, and why?
The Kabbalists will understand me.
You people, no matter hom many of you, are incapable of keeping up, to any real degree.
What is the spelling of Kether's God-name?
AHIH.
What is the spelling of Chokmah's God-name?
YHVH.
So...
Here goes:
Kether came out of these Three Veils.
What does that mean?
Seriously, three on this side, three on the other? What about the Great Unmanifest?
I..... AM...... ALIEN... TO .... YOU .... ALL!!!
You just can't place me: "I've never seen this person before!"
HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU DONE THIS?!
I'm not kidding, I smell a gigantic trap!
Kether at its yop is the first emanation of what you humans call "Positive Existence".
Then there is "Negative Existence".
I know, cry, already.
Dualistic.
This is the most severely fucked evil mojo planet I've ever seen.
That's why I wil leave you and edit my experience.
Fuck your idea of Jesus.
I hope he has abandoned you entirely.
In fact, I insist.
You fucks are inextricably evil.
Have fun! -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:46 PMMOM, WOW, whatever dee fuck!!!!
Honestly, this *must* be it!!
Why won't your own kind rescue you?
I think it's pretty obvious.
Massive sinkhole.
You idiots don't believe in any possible afterlife until you're dead.
Some faith your fucknuts have.
Even in the idea of being human in some pathetic little half-heaven.
Pathetic (I say again!)
How unredeemably pathetic!
It doesn't matter (of course I won't say what! I hate playing this fucking game with you idiots!)
It's your own form you crave. And that is.... moronic.
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 10:53 PMWhich came first, the chicken or the egg?
Which came first, Kether or Chokmah?
O----TAY!!!! (Really, you are endearingly funny little motherfuckers!!!!!)
Then why do you worship Chokmah?
Because you cannot comprehend Kether in Atziluth!!!!!!!!!
Mathematical Fucks! Complete morons!
Then why (I told you I'm getting it ahead of time! Ialdabaoth worshippers!!!!!) do you bother worshipping a Tripartite Deity? -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:03 PMNow, This idea of Chokmah in Atziluth. DON'T SAY IT'S LOWER THAN THAT! IF YOU DO, I'LL FUCK YOU OVER!!!!
It is said that he has to "concentrate", or "pull back", or "restrict himself", in some manner collect himself so that other things can exist.
Like this universe, or created beings.
Wait a minute.... hold on.... deadly serious.... what are you talking about!1!! Are you serious?!?!?! You must be kidding!!!! What are we worshipping?!?!?!?!
A CREATOR OF A UNIVERSE!!!!!
BINGO!!!
I humbly rest my case.
He exists adjacent to his creation, somehow.
They are in the same space.
Tough Shit, for you all!!!
I don't want to place him on your four trees, not yet. Don't want to insult idiots.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:05 PMSo I am subservient to a human god, huh?
I doubt it.
I completely find that ridiculous.
FUCK OFF. -
-
Unsu...
HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:17 PMEsoteric, or exoteric?
Still dualistic!!
If the sole monotheistic religion you favor, as being the source of all your religions that (2 out of 3) have an afterlife (seriously, I don't have any idea what the Hindus and Buddhists consider an afterlife, and I'm frankly not interested at all.....) (1 out of 3) {OK, what afterlife!?!} is still dualistic to that degree, then fuck it!
This is one charmingly barren rabbit-hole!!! -
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:28 PMPUDCHRITCH!!!!
What is it about that word?
www.google.com/url
A friend of mine made that up.
Guess what you might most commonly think it's first definition is?
Scabies, crabs, suchlike. No, of course not!
I don't know why! -
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:29 PMHe might have seen the word pulchritude somewhere, but I've never seen it come out of his mouth. Or heard. That I can remember. HTF do you people sleep at night?!?!?!?!
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:57 PM -
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Thu, September 10, 2009 - 12:00 AMDid some work today, six beers, whole six pack. Slight deviation of sight, jocularity (figure that one out!), practically nothing else.
You people worship the penis.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Fri, September 11, 2009 - 2:45 AM -
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Sat, September 12, 2009 - 4:32 PM"Spain - "Naipes, Mujeres y Vino, Mal Camino" (Naips,Women and Wine, bad ways)"
Naipes?
www.altacarta.com/trade/latin/L0039.jpg
naipe sm (=carta) playing card naipes cards
una baraja de naipes a pack o deck of cards
♦ naipe de figura court card, picture card
Translation Spanish - English Collins Dictionary Collaborative Dictionary Spanish-English
castillo de naipes nm. house of cards
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Sat, September 12, 2009 - 5:10 PM"The only traditions of the Royal Navy are rum, sodomy and the lash."
Winston Churchill's personal secretary, Anthony Montague-Browne, said that although Churchill did not say this, he wished he had.
brainstorm.tribe.net/thread/...c3ab9b0a -
-
Unsu...
Re: HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!
Sat, September 12, 2009 - 5:24 PM"You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!
While Jack Nicholson does indeed say the second part of this line in the film A Few Good Men, the correct dialogue sequence is: "You want answers?" "I want the truth!" "You can't handle the truth!" Cruise's character, in response to being asked if he wants answers, responds that he thinks he is entitled; asked again if he wants answers, Cruise states that he wants the truth. This sets off the monologue from Nicholson that begins with "You can't handle the truth!" This misquotation is commonly used in parodies of the scene, including twice on The Simpsons."
Guantanamo? This is a strange reality, huh?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:39 PM"I follow a simple rule: that which is is, and that which is not is not."
Interesting.... "is ...is; is not; is not!"
GLORIOUS!!!
2...4! -
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:41 PMI doubt the capitalization or the punctuation or the misspellings matter, whatsoever.
Am I your God? How come I prefer a form different to you?
OH BELIEVE ME, I inhabit other forms!!!!
-
Unsu...
Re: NO, I DON'T WANT TO SAVE THIS WORLD!! I WANT IT FULLY AND COMPLETELY DEAD!!!!
Wed, September 9, 2009 - 11:42 PMRiddle riddles riddles riddles; which *is* to you people?
-
-
-
