Israel is involved in 9/11 up to it's elbows.
Fox News reports show Israeli spies were 'shadowing' the alleged hijackers. Whatever you make of this, 'Israel knew'. Silverstein is good friends with Bibi Netanyahu the Israeli terrorist supporter and former PM was even warned away from a speaking engagement he had on the day of the 7/7 tube bombings in London.
zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...ment/
One motivation for the Iraq war(and by extension the 9/11 plot) was the pipeline from Kirkuk Iraq to Haifa Israel. It had been closed since 1948, when Israel was founded.
zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...8/54/
Harper has established a secret liason with the Israeli Knesset.
Knowing the history of Israeli terrorism using provacateur terror, with the USS Liberty attack as only one, relatively minor example, Canada is in grave danger.
zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...p-to/
Fox News reports show Israeli spies were 'shadowing' the alleged hijackers. Whatever you make of this, 'Israel knew'. Silverstein is good friends with Bibi Netanyahu the Israeli terrorist supporter and former PM was even warned away from a speaking engagement he had on the day of the 7/7 tube bombings in London.
zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...ment/
One motivation for the Iraq war(and by extension the 9/11 plot) was the pipeline from Kirkuk Iraq to Haifa Israel. It had been closed since 1948, when Israel was founded.
zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...8/54/
Harper has established a secret liason with the Israeli Knesset.
Knowing the history of Israeli terrorism using provacateur terror, with the USS Liberty attack as only one, relatively minor example, Canada is in grave danger.
zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...p-to/
posted by:
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Re: The Zionist Connection
Sat, July 21, 2007 - 8:50 PMOK I have never heard of zionism before and maybe others here have not neither. I will research more on your post but here is a definition of what zionism is \. I thank you for your post you who are unwilling to reveal yourself.
I can see the Israel connection I haven't figured out the Jewish connection yet.
Dateline Durban: U.N. World Conference Against Racism
What is Zionism?
Zionism is the Jewish national movement of rebirth and renewal in the land of Israel - the historical birthplace of the Jewish people. The yearning to return to Zion, the biblical term for both the Land of Israel and Jerusalem, has been the cornerstone of Jewish religious life since the Jewish exile from the land two thousand years ago, and is embedded in Jewish prayer, ritual, literature and culture.
Modern Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in response to the violent persecution of Jews in Eastern Europe, anti-Semitism in Western Europe. Modern Zionism fused the ancient Jewish biblical and historical ties to the ancestral homeland with the modern concept of nationalism into a vision of establishing a modern Jewish state in the land of Israel.
The "father" of modern Zionism, Austrian journalist Theodor Herzl, consolidated various strands of Zionist thought into an organized political movement, advocating for international recognition of a "Jewish state" and encouraging Jewish immigration to build the land.
Today, decades after the actual founding of a Jewish state, Zionism continues to be the guiding nationalist movement of the majority of Jews around the world who believe in, support and identify with the State of Israel. Zionism, the national aspiration of the Jewish people to a homeland, is to the Jewish people what the liberation movements of Africa and Asia have been to their peoples.
History has demonstrated the need to ensure Jewish security through such a homeland. The re-establishment of Jewish independence in Israel, after centuries of struggle to overcome foreign conquest and exile, is a vindication of the fundamental concepts of the equality of nations and of self-determination. To question the Jewish people's right to national existence and freedom is not only to deny to the Jewish people the right accorded to every other people on this globe, but it is also to deny the central precepts of the United Nations. -
-
Re: The Zionist Connection
Sun, July 22, 2007 - 8:33 PMIt is a complex question. Some good background reading on Zionism and how it affects us would be Walt and Mearscheimer's THE ISRAEL LOBBY. www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html
This caused a stir March 2006 when it was released because it is the first Harvard publication to shine a light on this subject. It turns out that Zionists(neocons ARE Zionists), whose numbers include Evangelical Christians in large numbers due to a hare-brained apocalypse belief concerning the Israel in the Bible, were behind the war in Iraq and they are foremost in calling for war against Iran, based on the statement "...wipe Israel off the map", which he didn't actually say. Believe me, the content of THE ISRAEL LOBBY is very applicable to Canada. It isn't about Jews, but about a group that is loyal to Israel first no matter what country they reside in. -
-
Xymphora: Using human rights as an offensive weapon
Sat, July 28, 2007 - 3:32 PMXymphora blog gained prominence in the leadup to the Iraq war, for exposing the lies. Xymphora is at the forefront of exposing the Zionist connection to these wars.
xymphora.blogspot.com/2007/07...pon.html
Using human rights as an offensive weapon
Claus Jacobsen, a columnist on Newsvine, banned a couple of members of the website for using the term ‘anti-Semitic’ about an article he wrote, effectively calling them trolls (the social networking sites are pioneers at speaking the truth about Zionism, reflecting increasing American awareness of the truth). Jacobson said (emphasis in red; slight spelling editing by me):
“I believe the consensus will be, once their opposition is broken, that the term ‘anti-Semitic’ can only be used in the rare and extreme cases where actual persecution or discrimination of Jews is advocated.”
In today’s era of human rights we’re now seeing the use of phony human rights concerns as an offensive weapon used to stifle debate about real human rights abuses (in some cases, e. g., Darfur, phony human rights concerns are actually being used a method of encouraging military violence). I believe that it is perfectly legitimate to wonder why the Democrats, mostly funded by Jews, refuse to look out for the most basic interests of their own political party in issues like impeachment, Iran talk, and Iraq withdrawal. There is only one possible explanation for this, but if you raise it, you are immediately called an anti-Semite. This is bullshit. In fact, people who use this technique are, in my opinion, aiders and abetters of one of the greatest systematic campaigns of human rights abuse in the world, that being carried out by Zionists in the Middle East. You may feel yourself to be righteous when you pose as an advocate of human rights, but almost all discussion of the evils of anti-Semitism is just a method of stifling legitimate political debate. I hardly need note that describing the particular individuals involved is not an invitation to persecution of a larger group, but is in fact the opposite, placing blame where blame is due. The reason for the controversy isn’t a legitimate worry about prosecution or discrimination, but a concern that airing the facts will put an end to the real human rights abuses.
Of course, Americans and American wannabes are the most egregious of the offenders. It is difficult to take complaints of human rights abuse seriously from a country which is killing tens of thousand of innocent Iraqis a month, without even the vestige of an anti-war movement. In most cases, claims of anti-Semitism are really claims of anti-Americanism, with Americans rightly embarrassed that the greatest Empire in the world could so easily be destroyed through undermining by a tiny group of Jewish intellectuals and the Jewish Billionaires who fund them. Pointing this out is actually a compliment to the intelligence and derring-do of the people involved, much as we despise their motives, and an insult to the intellectually lazy and so-easily corruptible Americans, who squandered their Empire and now refuse to admit how it happened. -
-
Xymphora: American Zionism Jumps the Shark
Sat, July 28, 2007 - 3:38 PMAmerican Zionism jumps the shark
xymphora.blogspot.com/2007/07...ark.html
One of my newer themes is that Americans actually know a lot more than it is permissible to say. While the scope of censorship is narrowing every day, it is still strong enough to block almost all outright statements of the truth. Americans live in a world much like the old Soviet Union, where everybody knew what was going on, but truth had to communicated in secret, using a complicated code. The main bafflegab used by Americans is the anti-Semitism slur (they reach for it so instinctively it is almost humorous), but even that is soon going to look quite silly, or even quaint.
Anthony DiMaggio surveys the evidence that points to the fact that Americans are a lot hipper to the realities than it would appear, once we clear away the barriers put up by various levels of gatekeepers. Almost all the homilies about Israel spouted by the mainstream are pure bullshit, and the ubiquitousness of the bullshit is quite misleading:
“Unconditional support for Israel is relegated primarily to American elites, who, although a tiny minority of the U.S. public, speak with the loudest voice due to their dominance of American political, economic, and media institutions. The commitment of this loud minority to demonizing those who criticize Israel (a category which could easily be defined to include the majority of Americans) is as impressive today as it has ever been.”
Even the term ‘American elites’ defines the group too widely, as it is really limited to the Zionists and those they pay to speak for them. A large reason for my general optimism is that both the American Establishment and real American popular belief is headed towards the truth. Let’s give the average American some credit, as his/her appreciation of the facts is achieved in the face of absolutely no help whatsoever from the American mainstream media, which lies consistently about all matters concerning the Middle East and the American relationship to Israel.
The shit is really going to hit the fan when the Walt/Mearsheimer book appears. They have received a considerable advance (I’m waiting for some wag to suggest the figure of $6,000,000), so the publisher expects to sell a lot of books, which will entail a lot of discussion. As the main thesis is undeniable, but must be denied for Zionism to continue to thrive, I don’t expect that Alan Dershowitz will get any sleep for the next six months. Largely due to the Iraq war and the common American knowledge who is really responsible for that disaster, Zionism has ‘jumped the shark’ in the U. S., and the usual blanket attack by the usual suspects will only confirm what everybody already knows. -
-
Re: Xymphora: American Zionism Jumps the Shark
Sat, July 28, 2007 - 3:41 PMAnother excellent piece from Xymphora exposing Zionism.
xymphora.blogspot.com/2007/02...its.html
The hate that (used to) dare not speak its name
In the last six months, we’ve made enormous advances in understanding the unwholesome hold that Zionists have over the American government, and I am optimistic that the truth will continue to come out (six months from now, people behind the curve are going to look quite silly). Just recently, those who were brave enough to point out the massive influence of the Lobby weren’t just considered to be mistaken, or even crazy. The issue was literally unspeakable (at least in polite society). Zionism was the hate that dare not speak its name. The Zionists don’t yet realize that they lost the battle and the war once these issues became debatable.
The United States is currently under a Zionist Occupation Government. Still don’t believe me? This past week the Democrats started to exercise their newly acquired power with a hearing of the Middle East Subcommittee of the House Foreign Affairs Committee on the ‘next steps in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process.’ Do you think they invited Jimmy Carter? Bishop Tutu? Nelson Mandela? An neutral expert on the Middle East? A Palestinian? Nope. The three invitees – the only three invitees – were (drum roll, please):
1. Daniel Pipes (who, it is claimed, was forced on the committee as a witness by the Republicans);
2. Martin Indyk; and
3. David Makovsky.
Makovsky works for the ultra-Zionists at WINEP (the Lobby’s think tank). Indyk, the original founder of WINEP and a former research director at AIPAC, is the Director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution (Saban is the Israeli who is biggest donor to the Democrats and thus the leading member of the Jewish Billionaires Club). I really don’t need to describe Daniel “brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene” Pipes. Indyck comes across as moderate but non-committal, Makovsky as a complete hard-ass, and Pipes as absolutely, over-the-top, insane. I imagine the three of them arriving at the hearing arm-in-arm, deftly performing Jewish folk dances, singing Hava Nagila, waving the Israeli flag, and sporting their medals from Israeli for service to Zionist colonialism. For guys like these, a ‘debate’ about the Palestinians consists of a discussion of the appropriate caliber of ammunition to use to shoot Palestinian children in the face. It is not unreasonable to wonder why all the witnesses are on one side of the issue (and for similar shenanigans – more of the ‘diet plan’ – from the same bunch of politicians, see here). Is Congress just the New Knesset?
From the comments to the excellent note by Daniel Levy linked to above (and see also here), I select that of madison1776 (emphasis throughout in red):
“So the Jewish Committee chair Tom Lantos (Likud-CA) and the Subcommittee chair Gary Ackerman (Likud-NY) will hold a hearing on the I-P conflict with David Makovsky (a former US citizen now an Israeli who works for the AIPAC cutout, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy), Martin Indyk (an Australian brought to the US by indicted AIPAC spy, Steve Rosen, to work as his assistant at AIPAC and somehow became a US citizen and our ambassador to (not from) Israel) and Daniel Pipes (National Socialist-Philadelphia).
Thar's it! No Arab-Americans. No Palestinians. Not even one goddam gentile.
Is this a joke.
AND by the way, the staff director of the committee is David Makovsky's brother, Alan Makovsky.
I am not making this up.”
and Mark Weinberg:
“This in nuts. As a Jew and a Zionist, I believe that this type of arrogance – using the US congress as a venue to promote right-wing zionist propaganda – is going to blow up in all our faces someday.
How dare they? Does it ever occur to Lantos or Ackerman that they are Americans (sort of, in Lantos's case) and should act like it.
This is truly disgusting. Read ‘The Truth About Camp David’ by Clanton Swisher to find out whose these characters are.
God, as a Jew, this is just embarrassing. It's like a bunch of Catholics holding hearings on birth control with the witnesses being Father Mulcahy, Msgr. Herlihy, and Cardinal O'Connor.
Madison 1776 is mad. The real Madison would puke.”
I really have to wonder what evidence would be required to prove the existence of the ZOG to those hold-outs who still refuse to believe it.
-
-
-
-
