9/11 - The Reason We Invaded Iraq

topic posted Sat, March 15, 2008 - 4:40 PM by 
Do you still have a hard time understanding why they hate Westerners?

www.youtube.com/watch
posted by:
  • Re: 9/11 - The Reason We Invaded Iraq

    Mon, March 17, 2008 - 6:43 PM
    Actually one reason for the invasion of Iraq(and perhaps the main reason given the overweening influence of The Lobby on US politics) was to re-establish the Kirkuk to Haifa pipeline from Iraq to Israel.

    zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007...8/54/

    Certainly Canada's Zionist establishment have been most active lobbying for both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and now the Israel Lobby wants to block internet sites in Canada.

    Those terrorist pricks want to send us to war for Israel and at the same time they want to censor what information Canadians can access on the internet.

    www.cjc.ca/template.php

    Dec 07, 2007 - CJC, UJA Federation launch “We Love Our Troops” pin
    campaign

    OTTAWA - Dec. 7, 2008 - Canadian Jewish Congress, in conjunction
    with UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, proudly announce the launch of
    the free distribution of lapel pins with the messages “We Love Our
    Troops” and “Nous Aimons nos Troupes” at Giant Tiger stores, from coast
    to coast.

    The idea for the pins flowed from the Remembrance Day ceremony in
    Ottawa last month, where Rabbi Reuven Bulka, co-President of CJC and
    Honourary Chaplain, Dominion Command, Royal Canadian Legion, roused the
    crowd in a chant of “We Love Our Troops.”
    www.cjc.ca/template.php

    ezralevant.com/2008/03/ma...eresti.html

    But the CHRC isn't the only organization that's sure to be embarrassed
    on March 25th. If I understand the order, it will permit Lemire to
    enter as exhibits correspondence between the Canadian Jewish Congress
    and the CHRC, in which the CJC discussed methods by which Internet
    companies could block access to Internet websites -- that is, to censor
    them -- without even bothering to go through the process of a CHRC
    hearing.

    This, I've got to see. The CHRC has a 100% conviction rate under its
    section 13 thought crimes section; people dragged before the commission
    have to pay for their own lawyers, and often are ordered to pay fines
    to the commission and to the person who brought the complaint to the
    commission's attention (like Richard Warman has done so frequently).
    Apparently that absurd, one-sided procedure is still too much hassle
    for the CJC. It will be fascinating to see the censorship plans cooked
    up between the CJC and the CHRC that involve short-circuiting the
    kangaroo court, and going straight to the censorship.

    ezralevant.com/2008/03/ma...eresti.html