A question/those who have told someone about their limerence

topic posted Mon, October 26, 2009 - 9:48 PM by  offlineanne
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
How did you explain to a non-limerent what limerence is without making it sound like it's a pity party for having fallen in love with someone you shouldn't have fallen in love with?
posted by:
anne
Chicago
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Rob
    Rob
    offline 3
    Hi Anne,

    Who is someone that you shouldn't have fallen in love with? If love is involuntary, how can you control who you love? With that said, to me, explaining my limerence to anyone who would belittle it as a "pity party" really isn't someone I'd care to explain it to. However, if you've copied Tennov's basic tenets and let that person read them and they still don't get it, I'd question whether that person has the capacity to feel romantic love. Not everyone possesses this ability. Now, if this person is indeed your LO, then all bets are off and nothing that I've said previously matters. ;)

    -R
    • KT
      KT
      offline 0
      from a mans point of view the female freinds i tell just think i am a wuss mostly and berate me for not being strong enough to get on with things like a "man should", they are the ones that come to me when they are in the romantic shit ironically. The men just dont get it at all and I have avoided telling one of them who is very successful with women as he definitely thinks "the Game" is the only thing that a woman responds to. ie treat em mean keep em keen push and pull, etc, and i have to say he has been very successful and even played a lesbian online and used the techniques there in chat rooms to get lesbian women to fall in love with his alta lesbian ego and send he love notes and gifts. I think only those who really have experienced real limerence rather than a crush and infatuation can understand the debilitating nature of it. I hope this is the last one i ever go through and i want it to end now.
    • "Who is someone that you shouldn't have fallen in love with?"

      In reading your posts she sees that either the limerent is married or emotionally unavailable or the LO is married or emotionally unavailable. She understands that love just happens sometimes, but thinks when it happens in an unhealthy way, i.e., one of you is not available for an intense romantic relationship, that one would use their coping skills to get over them. Then she is unable to explain exactly what coping skills to use.
      • Rob
        Rob
        offline 3
        Well that sounds like she's looking at it more maturely at least.

        "[T]hat one would use their coping skills to get over them. Then she is unable to explain exactly what coping skills to use."

        And therein lies the rub. The limerent is in a state much like someone with suicidal thoughts. Suicide happens when pain exceeds the resources for coping with the pain. Limerence is just like that. There is too deep of an emotional love to deal with it in any normal coping manner. I know for me, every other word in my mind can be my LO's name. Ask her how to cope with that.

        -R
        • So would would you say limerence is:

          The inability to use one's innate coping skills to overcome having fallen in love with another when one or both are unavailable for a romantic relationship with each other.

          ?
          • Rob
            Rob
            offline 3
            Yes. That's certainly a part of limerence. However, if you're going to attempt to define limerence in that manner, you're going to have to go back and identify these "innate coping skills."

            It really does get back to what many have said here before me. If you've never experienced limerence, it's doubtful that you'll be able to understand it.

            I've had some bouts with normal depression before, but never to the extent of those brought on by unrequited love. I've never previously been able to understand the mind of someone who took their own life (and I personally know two); however, I do now. It's akin to that.

            -R
            • But my girl would really like to understand it in a way a 13-year-old with average intelligence would understand it.

              So, how about we agree that:

              Innate as defined as “originating in or arising from the intellect or the constitution of the mind, rather than learned through experience: an innate knowledge of good and evil”. (I’m making no implications of any kind here, this is copied from Dictionary.com., really.)

              Coping: “to face and deal with responsibilities, problems, or difficulties, esp. successfully or in a calm or adequate manner”

              And
              Skills: “coming from one's knowledge, practice, aptitude, etc., to do something well”.


              Remember for the best written definition so far, all she has is Wikipedia's "an involuntary cognitive and emotional state of intense romantic desire for another person." I agree that doesn't say enough to be clear enough for a 13-year-old. If I was that age I would translate it to mean "inability to love someone". can we agree it means "the inability to use one's innate coping skills to overcome having fallen in love with another when one or both are unavailable for a romantic relationship with each other. ", which I take to think could also be said as "inability to fall out of love with the wrong person".

              Which she says, then they should get help from someone who can do something for them about it. But limerents rarely get help, because they feel like they can handle it themselves, I say. She responds: isn't that the opposite of coping?

              And so it goes.


              • A limerent rarely gets help because (I believe) most limerent rarely know what's going on--i.e., that they *have* limerence--so how can they get support for something they don't even know exists? That was my problem at the beginning. Once you come across the term, a quick Google search will bring up other resources, like this tribe, and you can at least understand that other people are going through the same thing.

                In the same vein, I'd wager that most of the practicing psychological community does not know of limerence, and therefore cannot treat it. Tennov even writes about how "therapy" can actually exacerbate the situation (also something that happened to me in some measure). There are no drugs for it, either.

                Last, many of us are in compromising situations. For example, we may be married and limerent for someone outside of our marriage. Because of social rules, we can't exactly go around talking to and getting support from other people (even close friends) for fear that we might lose them; they will think less of us for this kind of "cheating" or may drop hints to our spouse/feel compelled to intervene, or who knows what. We feel like we have to keep it inside or we might end up destroying our life as we know it. Even with coworker limerences, we may lose our job, depending on exactly what we are doing and how the LO and other people are responding.

                So:

                1) We might not know what limerence is, and therefore can't get help
                2) Therapy might not help if the therapist doesn't understand what's actually happening
                3) We are in socially uncomfortable situations (such as potential affairs or "inappropriate" relationships at work) where telling another person can be embarrassing and costly in other ways as well...it can cost us our family, spouse, friends, and/or job, not to mention our self-esteem.

                *there are probably more scenarios if someone wants to add them :)

                In short, we're cut off in many ways, and traditional coping strategies may not be applicable. We deal with a lot of this internally, attempting to rationalize and explain our experience--but to make matters worse, our entire perspective on life and our priorities are skewed/distorted by the limerence. We don't really know what's what a lot of the time. We try to "fight" it and shake ourselves out of it, but the feeling is always there, our thoughts always snap back to the LO.

                You could tell your 13 year old to try to stop thinking, if you want. Just altogether stop thinking about *anything.* It's extremely difficult to do for more than a few seconds. This is like limerence--we can try all we want to stop thinking about an LO, but they will come back, just like her thoughts will. It's hard to cope with something like that...especially when it can make you feel so good.

                I hope that might help. :)
                • Rob
                  Rob
                  offline 3
                  It helped me.

                  Thanks, Thinker. :)
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    So would you say a limerent is one who has fallen in true, romantic love and a non-limerent is one who has never fallen in true, romantic love or if they have ever fallen in love it would be fallen in ordinary romantic love?
                    • LOL you really like the definitions! :)

                      We've got differing opinions in this tribe about whether or not limerence is love, contains love, or can occur alongside love...so I'm not sure how to answer your question. If by "true, romantic love" you mean the obsessive and unhealthy kind sometimes described in pop culture, music, literature, the arts, etc., then yes...I think limerence is what these people/mediums might actually be describing. I believe Tennov says something to this effect, too. But if you mean "true, romantic love" as a more ripened, mellow/steady relationship, limerence is not that. :D

                      Non-limerents are people that just don't feel this intensely about a person, I think...to the point where their lives revolve around them. "Normal" people probably feel that nervousness, the butterflies, and want to impress their potential BF/GF, but it's not to the point where they feel so physically ill that they can't function normally, or they look for the most crazy, minute signs of similar feeling, or fantasize in most of their free moments, and basically restructure their life around someone else. Our moods depend on one person's actions. Limerence is also truly amazing in that it can make you completely single-minded in the pursuit to acquire/achieve whatever you think you need to impress an LO. Things that you wouldn't normally ever consider doing suddenly become attractive if they *might* grab an LO's attention. I personally know that I become quite socially outrageous while limerent, and normally I'm pretty shy and quiet. :) I think some on here have said how they obtained doctoral degrees or something in subjects that an LO was interested in or taught...and there's a whole host of relatively insane things we've done in the name of our LOs. (I remember a thread on this topic from a while back...) Now that's some serious dedication, and it underscores the difference between non-limerents and limerents, in my opinion. We'll go the extra mile (er, the extra 100 miles) for this person, often at the expense of ourselves. In some situations, this is okay--self-sacrifice can be a very noble and caring thing to do. But we take self-sacrifice to the extreme and tend not to get much back in return.

                      I'm sure this will add to the ever-evolving definition quest we have! :)
  • Anne wrote:
    << But my girl would really like to understand it in a way a 13-year-old with average intelligence would understand it. >>

    I admire the quest to define limerence in more precise terms, and I can see some interesting results. I just want to say though that I think trying to define it for a 13yo is ultimately a quixotic quest.

    Limerence is an *experience*, and any attempt to describe it prosaically will always drain the concept of its pathos. Defining it is left-brain; living it is right-brain. What most of us are looking for when we try to share this experience with peers is understanding, or more accurately, empathy. Empathy is a kind of emotional resonance - an act of vicarious feeling - which relies on experience and emotional intelligence. This is beyond most people until they experience it directly, much like other powerful spiritual experiences like falling in love, or contemplating suicide. It's certainly beyond the realm of most 13yo's.

    I think the essential features of limerence are involuntary cognitive obsession, coupled with contradictory and juxtaposed experiences of spiritual expansion and contraction (e.g. joy and despair). It can definitely be accompanied by what most of us would consider "love" - whether that makes it a necessary and sufficient condition of limerence, or simply "co-morbid", is a matter of personal narrative.

    In experiential terms (which are more interesting I think), I can only really describe my own experience as a married limerent - which I would describe as having my soul ripped in two ... to prostitute my value system in the service of an epic romantic love which I had no other choice but to pursue, while another part of me looked on in horror, bound and gagged. Life became a rapid-cycling of hope and despair, bounded by the interval of time between my LO's emails ... floating and drowning, over and over and over again.

    I think it needs poetry along these lines to describe it. Prose drains it of its meaning. Each person experiences it differently too, so a universal definition seems unlikely to me.
    • Damn you Meowbie - that WAS poetry.

      I have been trying very hard to tread water with my limerence - to keep occupied and avoid both the floating and the drowning. Sometimes I feel like it is working - just a little. Right now - I feel like I have just been left broken and gasping by a huge wave!

      Your experience (as a married limerent) seems very close to what I have been feeling lately. Your powers of expression somehow imbue these feelings with a sense of beauty and wonder. No no no no no.

      Squirrel...treads...water...imagining...some...13....year...old...scoffing...brat...saying...get...over...your...lame...pity...party...

      LOL
      • Meowbie, nice to see you again! I was wondering whether you might pop into our discussion. :) Your reply was very aptly stated--I think most of us can agree with what you wrote and probably resonate emotionally with it. What you said definitely holds true in my experience, but I also see what you mean about each person needing to express their own experience in their own way--in their own poetry, I guess. We all experience limerence slightly differently.

        I'm left-handed, and so naturally I'm in my right mind. ;) Experience is the way to go for me to understand something!
    • I agree with RD, WOW Meowbee, you hit my feelings right on target, I just hate myself for that.
      • Meowbie wrote" " What most of us are looking for when we try to share this experience with peers is understanding, or more accurately, empathy. “

        And some are looking for treatment or a cure, I read. It seems to depend on the phase.

        “Empathy is a kind of emotional resonance - an act of vicarious feeling - which relies on experience and emotional intelligence. This is beyond most people until they experience it directly, much like other powerful spiritual experiences like falling in love, or contemplating suicide. It's certainly beyond the realm of most 13yo's.”

        Not to be disrespectful, but at what age do you think empathy can be felt if not 13?

        “In experiential terms ...I would describe as having my soul ripped in two ... to prostitute my value system in the service of an epic romantic love which I had no other choice but to pursue, while another part of me looked on in horror, bound and gagged. Life became a rapid-cycling of hope and despair, bounded by the interval of time between my LO's emails ... floating and drowning, over and over and over again.”

        Great writing, but if you put yourself in the non-limerent’s place, I think it can sound like someone who is just lovelorn, again not to be disrespectful to your feelings.

        Thinker wrote:
        “LOL you really like the definitions! :) “

        Thanks. I think productive conversation needs to start with making sure participants agree on meanings, esp when some words can have a wide range of definitions.

        “We've got differing opinions in this tribe about whether or not limerence is love, contains love, or can occur alongside love...so I'm not sure how to answer your question. If by "true, romantic love" you mean the obsessive and unhealthy kind sometimes described in pop culture, music, literature, the arts, etc.,”
        yes
        “ then yes...I think limerence is what these people/mediums might actually be describing. I believe Tennov says something to this effect, too. But if you mean "true, romantic love" as a more ripened, mellow/steady relationship, limerence is not that.”

        No, I meant ordinary romantic love to mean the more ripened, mellow/steady relationship-- sorry for the confusion.

        "Non-limerents are people that just don't feel this intensely about a person.”

        After looking at RD’s description of the phases, I would say non-limerents understand the first phase but think that the people who experience the 2nd and 3rd are just overly dramatic .

        Regarding the soul being ripped in two comment, could the difference between limerence and non-limerence be having to do with how the heart gets broken and the process of mending? Reflecting on stories of people who claim to be in love but one of them breaks it off, the one who doesn’t want the breakup can be heard to lament, “(s)/he broke my heart!”, placing blame on the other. Most people can relate to that pain. And most who get their heart broken that way can have a difficult time getting over their beloved but can openly campaign for and get a sympathetic ear. But when a limerent person breaks it off, I can hear “I broke my heart!”. There’s no blame on the other. And empathy is hard to find, considering the circumstances in most cases. So after having fallen in love alone, the limerent has to try to heal their broken heart alone, too, is how I'm seeing it.
        • "She responds: isn't that the opposite of coping? "

          One of the wonderful things about kids is they have such great BS detectors. They cut right to the chase.

          My response to her is, "Well, yes and no.. Is denial the opposite of coping, or it it merely refusal to recognize reality? How can something be the opposite of coping with a problem if th problem does not exist?" I wonder what she would say to that.
          • This is crazy. We are intelligent, articulate people! Why can't we come up with a definition?
            • RD
              RD
              offline 16
              It is crazy isn't it?

              I think we can come up with a decent clinical definition that explains what happens but not a definition that explains how it feels or justifies the behavior because Limerence is an outlier of normal behavior - our kind of limerence, not the "crush" kind.

              In the same way, I can read the definition of the syndrome that causes grotesque obesity and gasp the concept logically but I can't understand how or why a human can/wants to/does eat enough to weigh 900 lbs. It makes no heart sense to me - I can't place it emotionally.

            • Maybe I'm oversimplyfying, but to me, limerence is a passionate romantic love feeling, of such intensity that is overwhelming and uncontrollable. No coping, no pill, no therapy against it. Maybe time and some hygienic measures (no contact, etc) can help. No known cure for it yet.

              I guess that is that "lack of control" thing that makes non-limerents cringe: "you must be such a wimp", they think, "if you can't control a thing that is all in your head". I don't blame them, I suppose they are used to fight small enemies, so they feel invulnerable...
              • How do we like the one from "Sex in the Bible: a new consideration" by J. Harold Ellens? It states "Limerence is being in love with love and involves being addicted to the idealized notion of the lover that one has conjured up in one's own mind and heart."
                • I agree, Rob! :)

                  I think part of the difficulty in coming up with a definition is that limerence is so broad and affects us all in complex, wide-ranging ways...some people get hung up on the obsessive thoughts and wasted time, others on their own behavior or LO's behavior and the highs/lows, others with guilt/regret/shame complexes, and still others who look at limerence positively and focus on the good it has done. Everybody brings their own perspective, so it's hard to distill a strict definition--especially considering how emotional the topic is.

                  Ellens has it right for some limerents in some respects, but the definition is nowhere near complete and does not adequately convey the gravity of our situation. If you simply take that definition, you wind up getting the impression that it's voluntary and that limerents do it to themselves--which we all know is false. The definition doesn't allude to how debilitating it can be: intrusive thinking, physical symptoms, the emotional roller coaster, the way it takes over your life priorities, etc. It's oversimplified.

                  Just my opinion. :)
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Trying to find the exact correct definition is like running in circles. How do you define art, love, music. We can apply definitions, but then the definition is followed by a book, which defines intricacies of the that subject. I think it's been defined and most of understand the definition. Now, redefining over and over is just playing with words, they'll always be something missing, because in terms of a definition, it is very simple. In terms of all the intracate emotions and experiences, it becomes very complex.
                    And no, I don't agree that, before a discussion can take place, the definition should be agreed upon. If we really look at it, all the definitions have pretty much said the same thing...just using different words.
                    • "How do you define art, love, music?" From Wikipedia:

                      Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions. It encompasses a diverse range of human activities, creations, and modes of expression, including music, literature, film, sculpture, and paintings.

                      Love is any of a number of emotions and experiences related to a sense of strong affection[1] and attachment. The word love can refer to a variety of different feelings, states, and attitudes, ranging from generic pleasure ("I loved that meal") to intense interpersonal attraction ("I love my boyfriend"). This diversity of uses and meanings, combined with the complexity of the feelings involved, makes love unusually difficult to consistently define, even compared to other emotional states.

                      Music is an art form whose medium is sound. Common elements of music are pitch (which governs melody and harmony), rhythm (and its associated concepts tempo, meter, and articulation), dynamics, and the sonic qualities of timbre and texture.

                      Is anyone not satisfied with those definitions? Could we use the above as templates for the definition to limerence? Definitely so far we have: Limerence is an experience.

                      Come on people, we can do it.
                      • Actually, there have been dozens and dozens of definictions given to art, love and music, all varying to different degrees and changing over time,culture, society, philosophy and who you happen to ask.. The definitions you've selected are generalized information, touching on the basic ideas, but not really telling the whole story, which is what most definitions do. This why there are books written on the these subjects.

                        If I knew nothing about art and was given the definition from wikipedia, I would still know nothing about art, other than one generlized definition (which could be argued). Same with limerence and trying to have someone understand it, a definition is not going to do it. But if you read the book that follows the defintion, that would probably help.
                        But hey, it makes for an active thread! Good luck.
                      • Anne, I doubt very much that we can come up with any words that will enable the non-limerent to understand the power of a force like limerence.

                        I think limerence covers a broad spectrum of experiences characterised by involuntary, intrusive thoughts and intense longing. I never imagined that I could feel the depths of pain and despair that my limerence induced in me. I'm pretty sure I would have told someone who tried to describe their limerent pain to me to 'let go' and 'move on'.

                        A simple analogy: I'm blind since birth. Please give me a definition for the color blue that will allow me to understand what you see.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Thinker wrote:
                    << If you simply take that definition, you wind up getting the impression that it's voluntary and that limerents do it to themselves--which we all know is false. The definition doesn't allude to how debilitating it can be: intrusive thinking, physical symptoms, the emotional roller coaster, the way it takes over your life priorities, etc. >>

                    Well said, Thinker.
                    • Thanks. I'm so glad to have our dog-cat-bird dialogue back! :)

                      I agree with a lot of people here...I'm sure we could come up with a definition, but I'm also sure it wouldn't be universally applicable or acceptable...so if that's the goal, it's not looking too attainable. We can use Wikipedia's definition or Tennov's definition or our own personal definition, and all of them can be true. I think we already have the basic tenets for anyone who's really curious about the fundamentals, and since we're all limerent, we all know what everyone else is referring to.
                      • Rob
                        Rob
                        offline 3
                        How about dog-cat-bird-panda? :)

                        -R
                        • Another cyberspace find: "Limerence is a distinct state for which a new term was required."

                          Do we like that? Found it on the alt-usage-english site. It was written by Dorothy Tennov as a correction to her book, it says.
                          • I got to thinking, I should have put the whole FAQ page in.

                            The meaning of "limerence" falls somewhere between "infatuation"
                            and "romantic love". It was coined circa 1977 by Dorothy Tennov,
                            then professor of psychology at the University of Bridgeport,
                            Connecticut. It was an arbitrary coinage; there is no specific
                            etymology. For further information on limerence see her book
                            Love and Limerence (Stein and Day, 1979); or you may e-mail her
                            directly at [...].

                            [Dorothy Tennov has sent this correction:

                            'The intended meaning of “limerence” is not “somewhere between
                            infatuation and romantic love.” It was invented for a distinct state
                            that might look like “somewhere between” to the casual observer or poet,
                            but it is neither. It has distinct features not found in other states to
                            which the word “love” is applied. The word was created deliberately to
                            avoid association with “love.” Then why does “love” appear in the title
                            of the book you may ask? It was bending to the publisher and it was a
                            terrible mistake.

                            'I would name it “Limerence: A distinct state for which a new term was
                            required.” That’s a bit long, but more accurate.' by Mark Israel

                            Anyone?
                            • Are we trying to say we have an undefinable word?
                              • Limerence refers to an involuntary cognitive and emotional state of intense romantic desire for another person. The term was coined by psychologist Dorothy Tennov to describe the ultimate, near-obsessional form of romantic love.[1]

                                The concept is an attempt at a scientific study into the nature of romantic love. Limerence can often be what is meant when one expresses having intense feelings of attachment and preoccupations with the love object.

                                According to Tennov, there are at least two types of love: limerence, what she calls "loving attachment", and "loving affection," the bond that exists between an individual and his or her parents and children.[2]

                                Limerence is characterized by intrusive thinking and pronounced sensitivity to external events that reflect the disposition of the limerent object towards the individual. It can be experienced as intense joy or as extreme despair, depending on whether the feelings are reciprocated.
                                • LOL good job, Andrew! Thank you. There we have it. The Ultimate Definition of Limerence. :) Is that from Wikipedia? (Sorry, I'm too lazy to look it up right now.) Assuming it is, what's wrong with that definition in the first place? It seems basically right to me without going into crazy detail.
                                  • Thinker,
                                    Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's the very definition that my girl doesn't understand, from Wikipedia. She says it's a lot of words that say "someone who has fallen in love". And I know it's more than that, but the Wikipedia definition doesn't seem to convey what that is.

                                    If it seems right to you, could you restate it in simpler terms?
                                    • Anne. Maybe 'your girl' just doesn't want to understand? I can be equally dismissive and uncooperative when I want to shut someone down. But in these instances it is me who has the problem, not the other person. People don't normally need a perfect definition before they can try and help you, if they truly want to support you. Hopefully she can be a good friend to you in other ways.
                                      • I was thinking the same thing, Squirrel. There's a strange disconnect here.

                                        As for the Wikipedia definition, I personally don't like it because it doesn't capture the way limerence takes over your life. It's an addiction that expands to fill all the available space, and you become hostage to it. If it was just about despair, I couldn't have given a crap. I'd been depressed a lot in my life - depression was almost a friend to me. But it was the sense of being powerless to change it that really scared the hell out of me. After a while, I just didn't know who I was anymore.

                                        Come to think of it, this is a similar problem to the one I faced when I used to read definitions of dysthymia (which is what I suffered from). The definitions all say that it's a low-grade depression. And that's true. What's missing is what that does to you, day in, day out. It's a Chinese water torture that wears you down and drives you crazy.

                                        It's the cumulative experience - the first-person perspective - that is missing from all these definitions that you have put up so far.
                                        • I'd agree, the definition could be more refined and reflective of our general experience. But as an introduction it's not terrible, it's much better than the one-sentence definitions. Most of us learned of the term from Wikipedia, and the definition was close enough for us to know that limerence was what we were experiencing. If it were me and I had to explain this to someone who had never heard the term, I'd start at Wikipedia and fill in whatever gaps I thought were there...talk about my everyday experience and what it actually feels like.

                                          Have you told her about your experience, Anne? Maybe if you described it to her she could get a better understanding.
          • It's nice to have someone love you THAT much. (((((HUGS)))))
            • She thinks I'm a victim of seduction (as in the Art of Seduction kind).

              Can a fellow limerent explain to her why we are not victims of seduction?
              • Dictionary.com's defintion of seduction includes "to lead or draw away, as from principles, faith, or allegiance". KItty (of KItty & George) is an example, she thinks, as KItty's allegiance to her marriage has been affected and her principles having been compromised.

                Kitty, care to comment?
                • Anne
                  I dont think my L.O. was trying to suduce me. We met each other in an on-line chat site and started off as someone to talk to. Things got out of hand very quickly, thus ending in an affair. I don't think he or I had intentionally want to suduce each other, it just happened. I think he is my L.O., but I'm still not sure. As I stated in my story my husband and I are working through our problems, but he hacked into my computer and found Kitty. He was very shocked to learn that I still had feelings for my L.O. and thus creating George to get more information from me.

                  Getting back to the real issue, which is I still have strong feelings for my L.O., but I don't know why as I don't really know this person, but my feelings are very intense when they come into mind. I'm not always dwelling on him, but never the less he is in the back of my mind that easily becomes the forfront of all thoughts. I have not contacted this person since the affair and he (L.O.) dumping me because my husband found out about it. That was the first time he hacked into my computer and found out all about the affair.

                  I have not tried to explain limerence to my husband, but by reading the post on this site he is now aware of what it means and is trying to let me deal with these feelings the best way I can. He has made me aware that if we are to survive, then at some point I really need to be done with my L.O. and that is the kind of help I am seeking on this site.

                  My husband (George) and I now have an honest open relationship and we both read the comments on this site, so if anyone wants to make a comment you are welcomed to as there are no secrets between us, just the fact that we think we will never have trust for one another just may be our doom.
  • >"you must be such a wimp", they think, "if you can't control a thing that is all in your head"

    Just like people with schizophrenia or any other mental illness should just get over it! Yeah right. Man, people say things that they just don't think through. I don't mean you, I realize you weren't saying you think that, I just get irritated that SO many people think that way. It makes me want to start a colony of only crazy people, so that I never have to deal with "regular" people again. Not that I'm saying limerence is crazy, just that I prefer people who understand that things in your head aren't so simple to control. Sound good to anyone else? We could start a commune!
  • Anne wrote:
    << Not to be disrespectful, but at what age do you think empathy can be felt if not 13? >>

    I was speaking specifically of having empathy for another's limerence. I have no doubt that 13yo's are capable of a theory of mind (upon which empathy is built), but they don't have the wide emotional palette to draw on in order to "get" what limerence is about vicariously.

    << ... put yourself in the non-limerent’s place, I think it can sound like someone who is just lovelorn, again not to be disrespectful to your feelings.>>

    Lovelornness probably *is* a byword for limerence to some people. Being lovelorn is definitely part of being limerent. But to me, it's the sense of being held captive to it that sets it apart. And the power it has to compel us to act against our self-interest sets us up for soul-crushing despair, which in turn can lead to a re-evaluation of life and a drive for new meaning.
    • Anne wrote
      << Regarding the soul being ripped in two comment, could the difference between limerence and non-limerence be having to do with how the heart gets broken and the process of mending? >>

      I think it's important to say that I wasn't being hyperbolic when I wrote those words. For me, limerence wasn't merely a profound state of heartbrokenness. It reached into my core and split my identity into two pieces. One of me was loyal to my wife, the other was loyal to my LO. But as the old saying goes, you can't serve two masters. For someone who prizes loyalty, this was an unbearable arrangement of dual disloyalty. And yet I seemed to have little ability to act in my own self-interest at the time, which led me to lose regard for myself and plumb the depths of despair.

      It must then be said that this is just one flavour of limerence, and the specifics are peculiar to my former situation and my character.
      • Unsu...
         
        The only person to whom I have confided my limerent status is one of best friends, a (now-) woman who underwent sex reassignment several years ago. She understands what I am going through because, having known since the age of four that she was "really a girl," she has a perfect understanding of the power of the mind, so limerence does not seem preposterous to her at all.

        I never discuss this subject with ANYONE else, most especially my LO--and my wife. Both would write it off as a garden-variety obsession tricked up with some pseudo-scientific terminology that I found on some website. And I am in enough trouble with both of them. To paraphrase a line in one of Hawthorne's best stories, "I look about me and, lo, limerents are everywhere," so I know there are plenty of sufferers, and if one were to ask me, I would talk about it with that person. But I don't initiate the conversation.

        But, of course, I do discuss my limerence here, because in this floating therapy session without a therapist, we have developed the power to heal and comfort each other.

        If anyone ever asks me about limerence, I'll make a point of posting about it. But as far as I can tell, it is that strange thing, a widespread condition that causes great suffering that is not generally recognized for what it is.

        Doug

Recent topics in "Limerence Experienced"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
OMG I Told My Husband Today Kate 24 Yesterday, 8:25 PM
what do the abbreviations mean? Girlwednesday 11 Yesterday, 8:22 PM
Shape of Limerence RD 44 Yesterday, 6:22 PM
I think I am my husbands LO! Girlwednesday 1 Yesterday, 2:19 PM