Advertisement
It feels so good here right now. I don't have any fear of saying how I feel or what I want, don't want, like, don't like, etc. I feel free. I want it to stay this way. I can delete my own posts if I want. Or my own thread. Or not. I want us to NOT have a moderator at all.
posted by:
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Wed, June 10, 2009 - 11:40 PMdiasy,
it does feel better here.
didnt you say it is not possible to
not have a moderator?
if they require it, why
dont you and W.L. moderate,
in a non-moderate kinda of way?
aD -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Wed, June 10, 2009 - 11:58 PMYes it would be great not to have a moderator. -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Thu, June 11, 2009 - 10:48 AMWhats going on ? wheres Nathan? ....did he get flushed from the bathroom of this forum? -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Thu, June 11, 2009 - 11:09 AMevil chuckles heard from down in a drain
Yea, Gandalf came along and took the Balrog down in your 'nine levels of fiery hell'
burning-cleansing the WRONG of ye olde Nathan
He whipped back up snatching his threads and confusing W.L.
he's right about your use of the word, love
wink
Brother went down with brother
You stood on a crag inbetween cheering
either one
both
him
whatever -
-
Unsu...
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 1:08 PMThere's no "evil chuckles' going on here Scott.
Your puffing up of yoruself in some sort of "heroism" is just plain hideous and about the only 'evil' i see anywhere here. -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 1:10 PMTribe said we could live without a moderator if that's what the group wanted. That's what the Good News thread is all about. Isn't that what everyone wanted? It seems so. And it feels so good here now, so free.
I sent tribe a message asking them to give us a tribe photo, hence the burning candle image. I like it. It's relaxing. :) -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 1:13 PMAD, to answer your question, I don't want to be the moderator of this tribe. Really, I don't think anyone does. So, if tribe says we don't have to have one for now, that's fine by me. -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 4:03 PMthe candle flame is relaxing.
And no to tribe moderator here. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 4:04 PMps I like the other images too, Scott
K
-
-
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 4:40 PMI'd be okay with that.
W.L.
-
-
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 4:41 PMScott
What is the Balrog in the story? -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 5:22 PMFortunately I don't have THOSE references at hand, W.L.
I think it's true,Tolkien being channeled-the interview is here
guide.opendns.com/
He's moved on, in short
Belladonna Took-little riddle there-
The Simalrrilon I keep at heart b/c it mentions early God in a pleasant-enough description
though when getting to Feanor's lineage and patricide, yuk-the darkness seems to begin between God's dark' and Man's.
He's the maker of the Silmarils;
loving light Capsules, really :)
So, a Balrog was one of the HUGEST, baddest monsters
what an asura/spiritual parasite could do when taking an essence, a form..
They REALLY don't want to be in this Creation
anyway, back to my Orb-job -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 5:33 PMwhoops, wrong link;
Tolkien's interview more easily found here:
www.onegoodkitty.com/OGK-Desteni.htm
specifically,
video.google.com/videoplay
just a bunch of priceless stuff there -
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Sun, June 14, 2009 - 5:36 PM'Silmarillon' rather
-
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Mon, June 15, 2009 - 6:44 PMScott
I have never read the Simalrrilion, but I have heard it makes sense to fill many neede holes with the story.
W.L.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Mon, June 15, 2009 - 6:07 PM"Whats going on ? wheres Nathan? ....did he get flushed from the bathroom of this forum?"
Pretty much.
-
-
-
-
Re: Wouldn't it be great to NOT have a moderator?
Wed, July 15, 2009 - 2:15 PMlucy lawless has a daughter named daisy
(coinky dink)
ya know
if we were all moderators...
i'm aware of The Unseen Role Of Denial, as well as its' neutralizing complement,
the sacred power of choice...
simple: when we see NEGATION words
(isn't, don't, can't wasn't and the rest)
are we seeing choice? or denial?
choice is action, denial attempts to negate action, eh?
so...
if we were all moderating...
anyway like it says
not everyone feels Parental
some Parental types don't feel like mothering/fathering in OVERT ways
but in ways that SEEM SUBTLE to those who don't understand.
i'm content moderating @ punx.com
i modded at courtney love's site.
jealous assholes took over and i quit modding.
i still post though.
kittyradio.com
(not clove's anymore...slimy fuckers.)
