I think it would be kind of sexy to try it, but I also think it'd probably be pretty boreing for most the males since sex acts wouldn't be allowed. Ie no fucking no sucking no anal. Any fingering would have to be done with gloves only. It'd be mostly bdsm acts like spanking an cropping and flogging and such and it'd probably have to be very light to mild since I'm not really into pain unless extreamly turned on.

Also I was wondering if an objectification girl was ok with female to female acts, could a girls dom order his sub to do acts upon the objectification girl? Or just the males. Cause I think a little girl on girl action would be hot.
posted by:
Chris
Sacramento
  • I don't know whether it would be to my taste. That would depend on the event, my mood, etc.

    However, I'm sure that at the last event I saw a number of people in a modest line to play with a girl who was offered with similar rules. So I'm positive that there's room for a girl with these sorts of rules and that she'd get some attention.

    I can't speak to girl-on-girl. I don't see any particular problems with it, but it's really a question for Stefanos.
  • I'm surprised that there aren't a lot of dominants jumping at this chance... I thought the whole problem with dominant non-participation *was* the objectified submissives who were offering sex acts? I.e., the submissives who have been offered for sexual acts in the past haven't gotten played with very much, or at all... to the point that doms were specifically guiding their submissives away from offering themselves for something sexual to spare them the big blow to self-esteem that often resulted.

    For example, a woman who was objectified and offered to be fingered for nickels (or some similar coinage), only got one or two doms playing with her all night. Other women who have been available for "traditional" sex have also had no one who took them up on the offer. (Wasn't there a discussion about that a while back?)

    I know there has been a lot of discussion elsewhere about why more men don't have sex at BDSM parties, or have sex at the Citadel, even though it's allowed - thoughts being that makes them too vulnerable, they're not comfortable performing in front of other men, some are concerned about size issues or performance issues in public, etc. - and those could be the same issues that come up (or don't come up ;-) ) at Master's Den parties.

    I don't know... any thoughts?