The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

topic posted Wed, November 4, 2009 - 10:00 AM by  Z
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Think about it, the Magi visited the Infint Jesus - what was thier purpose.

I've heard to corinate Him a Magus.

Any one else think or heard something differanrt?
posted by:
Z
offline Z
Atlanta
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

    Wed, November 4, 2009 - 10:39 AM
    >>>Any one else think or heard something differanrt?<<<

    I have always heard that they came to hail and honor the latest world redeemer, the Sayoshant in their terms. And a close look at the Gospels show that Jesus was no longer an infant when they arrived. The word used for "child" in Matthew 2 :11 refers to a toddler, not a new-born. And the Magi (never referred to as "kings), came into the "house" where the "young child" was, not a stable but a house, presumably in Bethlehem. So it appears from the text that Joseph and Mary remained in Bethlehem for about a year and a half after the birth of Jesus (or Yeshuah). This seems to be confirmed by the later tale of the "Slaughter of the Innocents", in which Herod orders the death of every child under two years old in the area of Bethlehem. He had asked the Magi when the star announcing the birth had appeared and, having been told it was about a year and a half ago, decided to be sure he could have the new king killed ordered his servants to kill any child of two years old or less. Of course, the Magi never had reported back to him since God had warned them in a dream not to. And this, btw, blows hell out of the Christianoid claim that astronomers are evil, since God do not scruple to give them the same kind of guidance he later gave to Joseph "in a dream". So, if astronomy was considered wicked by God, so was Joseph. It seems that every Renaissance painting of "The Adoration of the Magi" is dead wrong, as they show the adoration occurring in a stable with the baby in the manger and the shepherds gathered around as well. The shepherds are said to have come to greet the new king on the night of his birth, where they found him "wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger", whereas the Magi came a year and a half later and found him living in a "house".

    I can never understand why people who insist that the Bible must be understood literally can never get even the literal meaning of the words right. Not to mention the way they ignore the advice of Paul in 2Cor. 3:6,, which tells us clearly that the Bible is to be understood spiritually, not literally--"For the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."

    With love under will,

    Bob, Adastra,
    The Wizzard of Jacksonville
    • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

      Wed, November 4, 2009 - 10:56 AM
      Adastra

      Good post.

      "Of course, the Magi never had reported back to him since God had warned them in a dream not to. And this, btw, blows hell out of the Christianoid claim that astronomers are evil, since God do not scruple to give them the same kind of guidance he later gave to Joseph "in a dream""

      I always wonder if those people who denounce astrology as evil have even bothered to read the bible. From personal experience it would seem the answer is no. I know several 'religious' folk who have brazenly told me that I was tempting evil and inviting evil into my life etc etc when they've seen my tarot cards. I was once told that I was 'wicked and very evil' when I discussed Pluto in Capricorn only a year ago. The bible is very clear he had said. I asked him had he read any of it. No. Go figure.

      (not to confuse god with religion. I do believe in god.)
      • Z
        Z
        offline 140

        Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

        Thu, November 5, 2009 - 2:14 AM
        God and Religion are differant, God knows the Magi and speaks to them in dreams and visions. The contents of the Bible was propably written so it would strike fear in the hearts of the people and controll them.
      • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

        Sat, November 7, 2009 - 11:11 AM
        >>>I always wonder if those people who denounce astrology as evil have even bothered to read the bible.<<<

        Paul,

        I am sure they don't. They go to church on Sunday to have a professional "explain" to them what the Bible says. And they seem never to realize that if their "pastor" doesn't tell them exactly what their church tells him to say, then he will quickly be looking for another job. So his income depends on toeing the line of church dogma.

        I once was out sharing a drink with one of my students at a local tavern, when we were approached by a young man who accused me of teaching "lies". He insisted that the Bible teaches something quite different from what I was teaching. So I asked him where it said what he was claiming. He then said he didn't remember the chapter and verse, but he "knew" it was in there. So I then handed him a Bible and asked him to show me a single verse that supported his opinions. He told me that he couldn't point to a specific verse, but he knew that it was all through the Bible. "Fine," I said, "if it's all that widespread throughout the text, you should have no problem finding just one verse to support your views." He couldn't, he said.

        So I confronted him and said, "If you don't know the Bible well enough to be able to find one verse to support what you are saying then you're a phony and have no right to teach anybody anything. Get lost."

        He got lost.

        My student said something like, "Wow. That was impressive. He tucked his tail between his legs and ran, didn't he?"

        It's true, they don't read the Bible for themselves; they only know what they have been told by their church. if they ever bother to check on what they've been told, they simply read until they find something that looks something like what their preacher has told them and never look closely enough at the actual words to see whether it really says what they've been told it says. Much less do they check to see whether the translation they're using is accurate (it often isn't). Nor do they ever check to see if the "foundational beliefs" of Christianity that they've been taught are consistent with what their "Holy Book" really says. So they miss the meaning and stick to the dogma. It always astonishes me to hear Christianoids tell me that the Bible says "abortion is murder", when the Bible never mentions abortiion at all. You can search the Bible from Gen. 1:1 to Rev. 22:21. and never find the word "abortion," not once. And they tell you that Jesus was "God incarnate" without ever noticing John 17:3, in which this same Jesus is quoted directly as saying, not simply that God was his father, which appears elsewhere many timees, but that his Father, God, is "the only true God." Now shouldn't that present a problem for the morons who believe the Bible teaches that God is really three people, the Father and His son and some other guy?

        And that's why I call them "Christianoids," they pretend to be Christians, they usually even believe that they're Christians, but they have no idea what the Christian faith is all about. It's disgusting. It's also not entirely their fault, since they are raised to believe that their church has all the answers and that what it tells them is the TRUTH, which must never be questioned. They are also taught that their pastor, no matter how stupid and indoctrinated he may be is a "holy man of God", who would never, ever lie to them. It's nothing but a con game, I tell you, and the marks are told they must accept the con as honesty itself, because God will cast them aside if they ever question their church. Stupid!

        Then they are also taught that the Bible is literally true and they must believe every word as literal truth, even thought Paul warns us in 2Cor. 3:6 that "the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." I don't believe that any Christianoid church has ever taught on that verse. when they read it in their scripture lesson from the pulpit, they slide right over it or they try to claim that it refers only to the laws of the Old Testament and not to the words of the New Testament. What self-serving bullshit!

        And I apologize for my rant, but this shit really bugs me.

        With love under will,

        Bob, Adastra,
        The Wizzard of Jacksonville
        • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

          Sat, November 7, 2009 - 12:22 PM
          Bob

          I totally understand your rant. Once on the tube in London I was coming home from a club. I was drunk, fair enough. A pavement preacher shoved into a corner and told me I'd dine in hell for my drunkenness. I'm a very quiet drunk. I wasn't making any scene, just trying to get home. He told me that I should follow Jesus' words who taught that drink was evil and not to touch it. I'm fully convinced he had not even a cursory knowledge of the bible!
          Thus kinda thing bugs me too. I don't mind anyone believing what they want, but if you're going to tell other people what to do with THEIR lives, at least know what you're talking about. About abortion, I seem to recall one verse, I think in Leviticus, where god orders that the non believers of some village/town be destroyed and that the pregnant women should be slaughtered and the babies cut from the womb and their heads dashed upon rocks.
    • Z
      Z
      offline 140

      Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

      Thu, November 5, 2009 - 2:10 AM
      Saviors can come in may forms, seems like they are more than one in the Zoroastrianism litereature. Only One, Jesus Christ is to be the renovator
      "The renovation arises; and the triumph of the completion, which is through an ordinance by Soshyant, is through what occurs when through the ordinance there is thus a decree which sets aside all distress from the creatures, and gives the ordinance to the whole material existence, that which is living and also that which is dead." from Denkard
  • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

    Wed, November 4, 2009 - 10:52 AM
    What interests me is that they brought with them gifts that were fit for celebrating a king and a priest. In fact of all the figures in the bible, it was the Magi who celebrated Jesus as the son of God. How fascinating that the Church now ridicules and opposes itself against modern Magi or astrologers, when it was them that knew about christ before the rest of the world and bowed at his infant feet to celebrate him as Lord.

    The wording in the gospel of Matthew would suggest that the baby jesus wasn't exactly a baby. Certainly it would seem to have been several months since his birth. It is likely they recognised the aspects that Jupiter was making (retrograding and moving forward again) and took it as a sign of some form of Kingship. Of course in those days many 'kings' or rulers or emperors considered themselves modern day gods so its possible that this is the only reason they brought with them the gifts fit for that purpose, but its also possible that they had extraordinary knowledge of astrology lost to us now. Of course the Churches have ensured that any such knowledge has long since died out.

    It seemed the magi were following gods words when in genesis he described the purpose of the stars to be used for 'signs'. A pity that the Church now bars the doors to this knowledge for the masses and even ourselves, who study/practice/understand some astrology.
    • Re: The Magi visited the Infant Jesus

      Wed, November 4, 2009 - 11:45 AM
      >>>It is likely they recognised the aspects that Jupiter was making (retrograding and moving forward again) and took it as a sign of some form of Kingship.<<<

      I have heard that the astral event was a triple conjunction of Mars and Jupiter with Cor Leonis in the sign of Leo, marking the conception of a king of Judea, the birth of the king nine months later and the visit of the Magi a year and a half after that. This suggests a retrograde movement of both Mars and Jupiter, culmiating in the year 3 BCE, on September 11. I must confess, however, that I no longer have the source available in which I found this information and have not personally checked the calculations, so it remains an interesting idea that remains unverified (for me, anyway). Also, I am not entirely certain that I am quoting the argument accurately in places. And there remains the problem that this date conflicts with the presumed death of Herod in 4 BCE, although the authors pointed out that the traditional date of his death was taken from a single line in Josephus, which could be interpreted two different ways. The other interpretation gives Herod's death later in 1 BCE, so that is hardly a fatal objection.

      >>>It seemed the magi were following gods words when in genesis he described the purpose of the stars to be used for 'signs'<<<

      And a bit later in Genesis, where Joseph has a dream that the sun (hus father, Israel) and the moon (his mother) and the "eleven stars" (the signs of the zodiac), representing his brothers, were honoring him. It is an ancient tradition in Israel, from this very passage, that each of the twelve sons of Jacob (or Israel) was linked to one of the signs of the months. Joseph himself was the twelfth sign, which is why the text speaks of the "eleven stars." The sign of the nation of Judea appears to have been Leo, cf. "The Lion of Judah" as a title of the Messiah.

      Anyway, we have no way of knowing what actually happened that long ago, since there are no reliable accounts, the texts in the Bible having hardly been impartial and objective--to say nothing of the two thousand years of misinterpretation, misunderstanding, miscopying and mistranslation (often quite deliberate) that followed the original manuscripts as they were copied, recopied and copied again and again over the centuries. We have nothing of those original manuscripts except a few remaining fragments.

      With love under will,

      Bob, Adastra,
      The Wizzard of Jacksonville
    • Z
      Z
      offline 140

      Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

      Thu, November 5, 2009 - 9:15 PM
      The Magi also had thier Persian culture very ingreaned, the Saoshyant, Renovation, ect.

      "What interests me is that they brought with them gifts that were fit for celebrating a king and a priest. In fact of all the figures in the bible, it was the Magi who celebrated Jesus as the son of God. How fascinating that the Church now ridicules and opposes itself against modern Magi or astrologers, when it was them that knew about christ before the rest of the world and bowed at his infant feet to celebrate him as Lord."

      I think the Methodest Church focuses alot on the Magi.
      • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

        Sat, November 7, 2009 - 11:29 AM
        >>>I think the Methodist Church focuses a ot on the Magi.<<<

        There are many churches that support that view. The Magi brought 1. Gold for the king, 2. Frankincense for the priest and 3. Myrrh for the sacrifice he was destined to make.

        The text of one Christmas hymn reads "King and God and sacrifice", but the word "God" should be "Priest" since the heresy that Jesus was "God in the flesh" is specifically denied by Jesus's own words in John 17:3, where he speaks of his Father as "the only true God." I have mentioned this in a post above, but I neglected to mention that I have checked the Greek text and the translation is, in fact, accurate--in this case anyway. I am astonished that any church teaching that every word of the Bible is literally true could hold at the same time that Jesus is God, one-third of their imaginary Holy Trinity, since his own words deny that idea implicitly.

        With love under will,

        Bob, Adastra,
        The Wizzard of Jacksonville
        • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

          Sat, November 7, 2009 - 12:35 PM
          "I am astonished that any church teaching that every word of the Bible is literally true"

          Quite apart from the fact that it contradicts itself embarrassingly often, and yes even taking the 'context' into consideration!

          Some really embarrassing ones are how in one of the gospels judas the betrayer hangs himself and dies. In one if the opening verses of the Acts it says that judas fell over and his intestines fell out and he died! WTF?

          Clearly the bible shouldn't be taken literally. Sorry, I rant about this too. Other pet hates include the anti homosexual stance, although nit exclusive, the big one quoted is that wacky Leviticus again, where homosexuality is an abomination. This from the book where cutting your hair is evil, rape victims should marry the rapist, non virginal brides should be stoned to death and shrimp is also an abomination, never mind the convoluted blood sacrifices described including sacrificing goats and oxen and splashing blood on the altar. Later it says blood sacrifices are detested by god. Yup, contrdictory. I may ask the next evangelist whether my wave sacrifice (not making this up) or my guilt sacrifice should use an ox or a goat - the system is complicated to remember.

          For comedy purposes ask these people to read Leviticus out loud and ask again if the bible should be taken literally.
          Also the bible is jam packed with astrology right from genesis and stars being made for sign to jesus' own words regarding signs visible in the sun moon and stars to revelations and the four living creatures.


          (ok rant over - needed to get that off my chest)
          • Re: The Magi visited the Infint Jesus

            Sat, November 7, 2009 - 10:34 PM
            >>>rant over - needed to get that off my chest<<<

            You seem to have more knowledge of the Bible than most Christianoids, though that isn't hard at all. It's an abysmally low threshold.

            With love under will,

            Bob, Adastra,
            The Wizzard of Jacksonville

Recent topics in "< MAZDAYASNA >"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Star Calendar Z 20 Yesterday, 5:45 AM
Fire Bundles Z 10 Yesterday, 5:31 AM
Star of David in Natal Chart - What does it mean? Unsubscribed 14 December 1, 2009
13 Sign Zodiac Z 6 November 9, 2009
Christianity & Zoroastrianism Connections Z 7 November 9, 2009