Advertisement
Advertisement
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:01 AMyou figure it out what the meaning "faculty" is, Zappa. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:07 AMCanela,
Faculty can apply to many professions, so either answer the simple question or piss off.
www.thefreedictionary.com/faculty
faculty: All of the members of a learned profession -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:11 AMOk. I am not all of them, I am one of them.
You might also try www.dictionary.com
And no, not in a school. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:14 AMI sell consulting services to hospital networks relating to Quality Improvement initiatives and patient safety. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:21 AMMeaning, you are a salesman for hospital equipment? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:32 AMCanela,
No, what I wrote is exactly what I do. Where is there any reference to hospital equipment? -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 10:34 AMwww.lean.org/WhatsLean/Principles.cfm
This link will give you a better idea of the methodology that the firm I work with specializes in. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 3:58 PMAndrew's a jet set playboy who doesnt have time to work
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 12:16 PM<And no, not in a school. >
yeah, why does THAT not surprise me.
Canela, you can be a smart ass all you want, but 'faculty' in the US tends to mean a university 'faculty', which can refer from tenured PhDs to undergrad TA's.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 6:27 PMI wrote:
<And no, not in a school. >
Salil commented:
yeah, why does THAT not surprise me.
Canela, you can be a smart ass all you want, but 'faculty' in the US tends to mean a university 'faculty', which can refer from tenured PhDs to undergrad TA's."
My, you don't say, Salil! ; )
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:12 AMso then you were deliberately misleading your audience, because you KNEW what you would imply via the term 'faculty'
good job
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 12:14 PMI kill brown people and steal their oil, crushing all minorities under the oppressive heel of Liberty. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 9:37 AM<<I kill brown people and steal their oil, crushing all minorities under the oppressive heel of Liberty. >>
lol
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 7:06 PMIs that a euphemism for a house husband, as in "cooking for your wife"? -
-
Unsu...
Re: Question....
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 8:38 PM1981-1984, delivery captian sailed yachts from the east coast to west coast, and up and down the eastern, and western seaboard.
1986-1993, firefighter/paramedic.
1994-2003, staff herbalist.
2004-2009, hobby farmer/semi-retired
-
-
Re: Question....
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 11:51 AMAnyone else???
What do you all do for work?
-
-
Re: Question....
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 11:59 AMinternet tough guy
UFC cage fighter and international banking sensation
-
-
Re: Question....
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 12:31 PMDust,
What do you really do?? If you would rather not say, that would be better than joking. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 12:41 AM<<<If you would rather not say, that would be better than joking. >>>
I disagree. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 1:43 AMuh, as do I, because i was clearly joking myself. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 9:45 AMHe is joking because he actually believes in doing that stuff, I guess, and just apes what other people think about him. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 1:53 PMCanela you're the least impressive troll I've seen yet on tribe.
How about a little more effort and creatively at least since you obviously don't have the intelligence to match up here. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 3:29 PM<How about a little more effort and creatively at least since you obviously don't have the intelligence to match up here.>
Funny how no one will confront him on saying this, but if I did, y'all would be up in arms. Frigg'n partisans. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:22 PM"Funny how no one will confront him on saying this, but if I did, y'all would be up in arms. Frigg'n partisans. "
Andrew,
Instead of going out of your way to be obnoxious, you need to consider your own comments. YOU'RE NOT BEING HELPFUL!!!!!
Would you like for me to produce everyone of your arrogant comments to demonstrate how hypocritical you are when it comes to telling other people whether or not they are being "helpful"? -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:32 PM<Instead of going out of your way to be obnoxious, you need to consider your own comments. YOU'RE NOT BEING HELPFUL!!!!!>
Sheik, there's a difference between what YOU did, which was to call someone stupid, and me - where I pointed out the ridiculousness of the partisanship here. Hypocrisy, too (but I didn't mention that at that time).
<When did you become the arbiter of what is or isn't helpful and why is your judgment of the helpfulness of other people important anyways.>
When I found my upgrade, and it came with a humor inclusion in this version. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:37 PMAndrew,
You say rude shit all the time so don't you dare try to portray yourself as being anything but obnoxious. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:41 PMtribes.tribe.net/mideastpo...36a350cb54
"Fucking hypocrites."
Andrew,
This is what you said last week hotshot. Get your shit together and quit being such a hypocrite.
You need to find another upgrade. You're a joke.
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 8:24 PM<You say rude shit all the time so don't you dare try to portray yourself as being anything but obnoxious.>
Hmm. Who would portray me in the movie? Uh oh. Loaded question. BUT! Still, I would suggest ... Arnold. Yeah. Arnold.
<This is what you said last week hotshot. Get your shit together and quit being such a hypocrite.>
The difference? I KNOW that I'm a hypocrite. The first step is always the hardest, Sheik. BUT! You can do it. I'll be your sponsor.
<You need to find another upgrade. You're a joke.>
Why? That WAS the upgrade! Jokes v1.2.1, son!
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 11:48 PM<<<<You say rude shit all the time so don't you dare try to portray yourself as being anything but obnoxious.>
Hmm. Who would portray me in the movie? Uh oh. Loaded question. BUT! Still, I would suggest ... Arnold. Yeah. Arnold. >>>
Tom Arnold? yes definitely.
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:28 AM"I KNOW that I'm a hypocrite. The first step is always the hardest,"
Andrew,
And here is the exact reason why you're a joke and totally full of shit. You try to get on my shit for something that you KNOW that you do, and still you don't do anything to change your own behavior. Instead of ridiculing people for what you do, get your own shit together. Yes you are a joke and it's pathetic how unbelievably stupid you are. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 3:29 PM<And here is the exact reason why you're a joke and totally full of shit.>
Really? That's it? Well, I thought that you had something actually BAD!
<Yes you are a joke and it's pathetic how unbelievably stupid you are.>
Yes. I'm too stupid to get it though.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 1:13 AMDUDE. ANDREW. LEARN WHAT THE WORD PARTISAN MEANS.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 2:25 PMWow Canela. You really need a refund on those psychic powers you bought.
I guess you think that with a name like 'Salil' I'm a blonde haired blue eyed nordic type, eh? -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 6:04 PMCanela you're the least impressive troll I've seen yet on tribe.
How about a little more effort and creatively at least since you obviously don't have the intelligence to match up here.
reply to this post
first of all, I am not a troll. Second, your tribe is not worth the effort since you don't know what the word "discussion" actually means, and third, as far as matching you turkey's intelligence goes, LOL! Get a life, guys.
And no, Salil, you can be Indonesian or whatever, and still be an a... in my book. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 6:13 PMCanela,
You're right, you matching the intelligence of anyone is hilarious. Your comments are childish, ignorant, thoughtless, and useless.
If the tribe isn't worth the effort then don't post anything. What you're really saying is that you aren't going to put any effort into your comments, so why pollute the threads with bullshit that you don't even care about??? It makes absolutely no sense.
Once again you show how completely stupid you are. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 6:43 PMYou see, Zappa, reading your "discussions" is a bit like Sharif's and Milgram's nazi group dynamics experiments together, so it can still b mildly interesting to a researcher. ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 6:46 PMCanela,
You're only fooling yourself. Everyone here sees right through your bullshit. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 6:48 PMCanela,
And smart guy, it's Sherif, not Sharif
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 8:19 PMYes, indeed, Zappa, it IS Sherif. Typo. Kudos to you.
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:18 PM<Once again you show how completely stupid you are.>
Sheik, that's not helpful. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:27 PMAndrew,
When did you become the arbiter of what is or isn't helpful and why is your judgment of the helpfulness of other people important anyways.
Not only are you not helpful, you're useless and obnoxious.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 1:14 AMIndonesian? Anyway, you clearly missed the irony in my statement.
Not surprising. Good job. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 2:50 AMThe name "Salil" is used widely used in Arabic.
Meaning: son / descendant / Sword.
Example: Salil Al-Islam.
Sami; -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 2:59 AMfunny how that just came up in the other thread -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 3:08 AMIndeed. The same minitue too.
You probably cheated! ;)...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:30 PM"What do you really do?? If you would rather not say, that would be better than joking. "
Sheik, you aiming to get some free tickets to the gun show? -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:34 PMDust,
Yeah that's the logical conclusion. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 7:51 PMDust,
Another example of your wisdom and intellect. Way to go little guy.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 8:25 PMAnd here we have Zappa using Salil as a leading example how to "insult" people. The vocabulary has now been expanded from "stupid" and "ill informed" to "unhelpful" (what a scream! ; ) ) and, wow, something difficult which has actually been spelled correctly, the exotic little word "obnoxious"..! Congratulations, Zappa. And he knows, it was actually Sharif, WOW! I am impressed. Well, a little. Two legged rats can be entertaining, occasionally. Keep going. -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 8:28 PM"it was actually Sharif, WOW"
here we go again, I said, it was a typo. Sherif, goddamned, yes, ShErif, for chrissakes. Ok, you can call me stupid and unhelpful for free, once, unless you can come up with something more imaginative. Crayons, anyone? -
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 8:38 PMCanela,
Where did I say anything to you about being unhelpful?? Do you have any reading comprehension skills?? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 12:23 AMRight, Zappa, the "unhelpful" bit was aimed at Andrew. That makes more sense than expecting any help with this mess from me, you are right. ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 12:27 AMthis is the most pointless thread I have seen on this tribe. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 12:37 AM~this is the most pointless thread I have seen on this tribe.~
No shit, reminds me of two kids riding in the back of the car each one trying to get the last poke in before one of the parents smacks em up side the head...
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 8:39 PM
<<Crayons, anyone?>>
Cynthia might have some left, maybe? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 2:14 AMWould you pass me the mineral water while I'm drivin', Michael? Thanks. And Inna, who is Cynthia, I don't think, I have ever met her. And by the way, it is me offering the crayons, they are over there in the glove compartment. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 2:40 AMoh. my. god.
Cynthia McKinney, Canela, Cynthia McKinney. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 2:55 AMare you kidding? do you even read the threads?
I'm not going to explain something that a five year old could figure out -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 5:42 AMThis 5 year old does not happen to live on your island, within your myopic vision. Which will be, of course, incomprehensible to you.
And you are right, most of the threads here I choose not to read. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:09 AMAnyone living anywhere could follow the simple thread of conversation.
Lets spell it out for you:
Inna mentioned Cynthia and her crayons
You responded saying you hadnt met this Cynthia yet, and didnt know who Inna was talking about
Given that there is only one Cynthia in the news right now, thats also relevant to this tribe, coupled with the crayon remark, its clear that Inna was referring to the only Cynthia McKinney who was bringing crayons to Gaza, and who was detained by Israel on the Free Gaza ship.
I pointed this out.
You then again responded as if you had never asked, and had no idea what anyone was talking about.
maybe you should do yourself, and all of us, a favor, and educate yourself on current events? Oh, and maybe history too, since you're obviously lacking in the most BASIC comprehension of that as well. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:20 AMThe most BASIC comprehension being, of course, exactly what you memorised in your classes at the US military academy, Salil. A version of events which you would not doubt even for a minute, otherwise they would put you out on the street, right? A German telling you what role that "most BASIC of events" plays in our version of history making no bloodydifference whatsoever.
Welcome to the real world, Salil.
And has it ever occured to you that this Cynthia may not be regarded with the same burning interest over here as in your world? And that there are news outside "THE news" that you happen to be watching? Just like I said, totally incomprehensible to someone as conveniently myopic as you. They need guys like you in the military, otherwise it would never work. Good for you. Free education and all that and hopefully a scholarship thrown in. After all, I am not on THAT jury. ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:28 AMYeah, you clearly can't read, you dont pay attention to the news, you have no idea what you're blabbering on about, and you're immune to cognitive dissonance, or at least you make no attempt to resolve it.
First off, I've got a multi-continental upbringing, I never went to a US military academy (those are colleges that turn out commissioned officers, like West Point), my "version" of history is the accurate one, based on well established facts and evidence - LIKE THE NAZIS WERE ALLIED WITH THE JAPANESE DURING WW2, and was never taught to me by the military, and I consume multiple news sources, including the BBC and al Jazeera, etc.
The fact that you had no idea what Inna was talking about has NOTHING to do with me being myopic.
The fact that YOU have the right to live in a free Japan, and to have been raised safely and securely in Germany, is thanks to that military you so love to derogate. Ingrates disgust me. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:29 AMOh, and I already explained to you that i worked my way through college. And no one who serves in the military gets a 'free education' - they work their ass of for that benefit. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:33 AMCanela,
That is your way of surrendering. You finally have demonstrated that you have nothing more to argue, so now you're showing mock pity. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:57 AMIndeed. You got me, Zappa. ; ) I do not pursue argument ad absurdum, I've got work to do. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:10 AMunsurprisingly, Canela misuses the term "argument ad absurdum"[sic]
Its argumentum ad absurdum or reductio ad absurdum.
And you obviously think it simply means 'an absurd argument'
when in fact it is an informal fallacy with a specific definition:
www.friesian.com/valley/fallacie.htm
"based on the principle [the Law of Clavius, (-P -> P) -> P] that the introduction of the denial of the conclusion into a valid argument produces a contradiction and establishes the conclusion"
Let me know if you can't wrap your head around that. I'll explain it to you nice and slow. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:14 AMSweetheart, some Germans do six years of Latin in high school, before starting university. I was making it easy for you. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:20 AMIf this is of any help, "ad absurdum" is one idiom, and "argument" was the object related to the verb "pursue" in the sentence above. And there are some people who know enough about grammar AND Latin to not have to resort to some online dictionary before they can respond to something like that.
Shall we continue this discussion in German, my dear? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:28 AMCanela,
Using a dictionary is terrible. How could anyone do such a thing. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:34 AMUsing a dictionary is helpful to people who need to figure out what someone is talking about. No need to mock me for mocking Salil. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:42 AMCanela,
Using a dictionary to provide a point of reference in defining a term within an online forum demonstrates evidence. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not someone knows what they are talking about. And I wasn't mocking you for mocking Salil. I was recognizing another or your many examples of bullshit nonsense.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 8:57 AMuh no, ad absurdum is not an idiom. nice try though.
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:22 AM<some Germans do six years of Latin in high school>
Obviously you werent one of them. Some Americans only spend 4 years in high school, and some of us take Latin for those 4 years. Oh wait - that's me.
<I was making it easy for you. >
yeeeeeeeeah, right.
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:23 AMCanela,
Using terms incorrectly and referring to scientists in ways that are not relevant to a discussion doesn't make anything easier for anyone, and in fact exposes that you think these references make you look informed when you simply don't have the intellect to consider if there is any actual correlation to the discussion. You just aren't a very intelligent person and you don't write effectively nor do you show any consideration to read the comments of other people that you respond to.
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:30 AM"referring to scientists in ways that are not relevant to a discussion"
Which scientists are you referring to, Zappa? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:43 AMCanela,
Pay attention to you postings. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 8:06 AMI know my postings, Zappa, and judging from this thread and what anybody here is ready to reveal about themselves, I seem to be the only scientist around whether you like it or not and you obviously don't.
Salil is always hastening to announce to everybody who I am, without checking.
And as far as "providing evidence" is concerned, yes, this works for people who know even less about the subject concerned, but did you actually read what was behind the link? ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 8:48 AMCanela,
Being a Christian Scientist doesn't count. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 8:59 AMyeah, Canela's a scientist. Okay. Well, I'm a scientist too. I'm a military scientist AND a political scientist!
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 4:07 PMThat's right, Zappa. A "Christian scientist" does not count. Now why would you bring this irrelevant fact into this thread? Getting desperate with coming to conclusions, any conclusions, and trying to catch up after being a little slow yesterday, I assume?
You seem to be one of those types that needs to have spelled everything out directly to them before they can see it. ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 4:10 PMYou seem to be one of those types who hides behind hidden meanings and allusions in order to avoid being held to account for the things she says,
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;) ;) ;) ;)
;)
;) ;)
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:37 PMCanela,
One of "those" types huh. Tell us more about "those" types that you have concluded that I'm one of. In your attempt to demonstrate your infinite intellect you have resorted to a grossly ignorant generalization based on nothing more than your elevated frustration to persuade anyone to believe what you say. You give incomplete answers, ineffectively assert that certain studies have a correlation to this tribe when they don't, show that your basic reading comprehension skills are dismal, and in your futile attempts to sound intelligent you make a total ass of yourself by trying to use latin terminology that you don't even write correctly. Remember telling us that you don't need a dictionary? Apparently that was just one more example of your bullshit.
Yeah, I'm one of those people that laugh at pretentious fools like you.
Keep posting and trying to insult me, I'm enjoying watching you get your ass handed to you.
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:28 PMI have a GREAT idea!
Let's just change this tribe to where we ONLY talk about each other! Let's make it OFFICIAL! I mean, then there'll be no issue with calling each other out for being so immature as to call each other's issues out!
What should we rename the tribe? Should we take a vote? Hmm. I think that we should call it, "Partisans Taking Out Interpersonal Issues". Whatcha think? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:33 PMhowabout the 'LEARN HOW TO USE WORDS CORRECTLY ANDREW'
tribe?
Unless you're so full of yourself to think that just because people realize you've lost your marbles that they've created a party alliance around it, with you on your lonesome as one party and the rest of the world on the other, PARTISAN IS NOT AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION.
Sheesh.
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 3:13 AM<<<What should we rename the tribe? Should we take a vote? Hmm. I think that we should call it, "Partisans Taking Out Interpersonal Issues". Whatcha think?>>>
How about mideast propaganda tribe? -
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 4:11 PM<How about mideast propaganda tribe?>
That's in no small part what this group is. -
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 4:31 PMAndrew,
The fact that you provide much of the propaganda makes you a real expert.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 8:55 AMOh Canela, I provided the dictionary so that you could educate yourself, since you were clearly using terms you didn't fully grasp.
The notion that I had to rely on that link in order to understand the phrase you mis-used is laughable nonsense, as I have been very familiar with the terms of logic, debate, and rhetoric, for the majority of my life, having studied Aristotelian as an adolescent in Europe. And your shoddy attempt at a grammar lesson isn't even worth spending more time on.
If you were comfortable with Latin you would have immediately recognized the case ending was missing and not made the error. Maybe you got confused by the declension of argumentum, since its a second declension n. word and you never got past the first declension.
Or maybe you had simply come across the phrase somewhere, thought you knew what it meant, and decided to use it, not realizing that you didnt in fact understand its use or its grammar.
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 3:46 PMBy "n word" you mean neutrum, I assume? LOL. And your conclusions continue to be pathetic. Wishful thinking does not make it true, what you think about me, and if you had actually grasped what I was telling you about sentence structure you would not be wasting your breath on trying to explain things to me.
And you have studied "Aristotelian", eh? What kind of subject is that? ; )
Whatever you are trying to say here , the results are blatantly obvious. Your studies have expanded the size of your mouth. How pathetic is that? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 4:08 PMby "n. word" not "n word" I mean neuter.
You didn't tell me jack squat about sentence structure, you just tried to explain away your ignorance of the term by justifying it with the bogus claim that the idiom was simply 'ad absurdum'.
This is simply not the case. Any google of 'ad absurdum' will show you that it is not an idiom on its own.
Argumentum ad absurdum was the object of pursue. Its pretty clear that my grasp of grammar, both Latin and English, is far, far superior to yours.
<And you have studied "Aristotelian", eh? What kind of subject is that? ; ) >
sorry, I guess you didn't know that Aristotelian is usually followed by the word logic when discussing logical fallacies. Again, my bad for assuming you'd be able to fill in the obviously erroneously deleted word.
What's obvious is you're way out of your league, and have been since day one, but have been grasping and flailing about desperately trying to backtrack and backpedal from your nonsensical trolling.
-
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 9:32 PMFine, so you cannot even recognise a grammatical explanation when you see one. Maybe German is a little more educated than English and uses more Latin idioms? It is an idiom in my language alright. Too bad if you have to change argument to "argumentum" first and then show other people a page in an online dictionary so that they can still get an idea of what people are talking about. This shows how rarely these expressions are used in English, if it is indeed so, along with the rest of proper rhetorics.
As far as "Aristotelian" is supposed to be followed by "logic" , I assumed that you simply committed a typo and was teasing you about this. But rather than exhibiting even a fraction of an ounce of a sense of humour, you resort to harping on your infinite "superiority" once again which, as you have already been told, makes you only more transparent to the rest of us. Apart from Inna, maybe, who seems to be your groupie for better or for worse. Everybody of your character type needs some naive little groupie, so you are lucky to have at least one. Or two.; )
I can only wish you that you will grow one day to reach the kind of integrity where you no longer feel the need to constantly stomp about loudly announcing your "education", all the stuff your leaned in high school and college, your claim to infallibility which has reached a degree equaling paranoia of exposure as being merely human and ordinary, and that one day sooner or later you will actually feel confident that people will respect you with you trying to bully them into it. Class is something that is visible, recognisable and in no need of constant advertisement, Salil.
Now show me where posting a pic you made available yourself is against tou. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 9:47 PMCanela, what's sad is how you willfully misunderstand an explanation that was provided to you for your edification and attempt to transform it into something it clearly wasnt.
I recognize your explanation for exactly what it is: an attempt to cover for ignorance. you were unfamiliar with the Latin idiom and its use in English (I only studied german for a year and hated it, so I'll concede maybe in your native tongue ad absurdum is an idiom on its own), and if not then your grasp of Latin is atrocious, not understanding case agreement and the second declension.
If you weren't such a newbie to this tribe, you'd have realized that I REGULARLY reference a wide variety of rhetorical idioms, like argumentum ad populum, petitio principii, etc.
<rather than exhibiting even a fraction of an ounce of a sense of humour,>
I don't have a sense of humor. how long will it take you to learn this. And sorry, incessantly annoying emoticons are not a substitute for a sense of humor.
Inna is hardly my "groupie". She and I disagree on substantive issues ALL THE TIME. And unlike you, she's an actual scientist, who does actual scientific things, with microbiology.
I've never claimed infallibility - this is yet another lie on your part.
I didn't make ANY picture of myself available. You're a liar. All my pictures, of me, are labeled 'friends only'. Somehow you managed to snag one anyway. Why were you stalking my profile anyway? What does it matter? Lets go take a gander through yours.
Oh. jeez. I should have known.
wow.
seriously?
no wonder.
Don't lecture me on anything, Canela. You've been called out by a wide variety of people here as a troll, and that's what you are. A creepy stalker troll.
The last thing I need is another tribe stalker. seriously. What is wrong with you people? -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 10:19 PMPathetic, Salil. So it looks like magic to you if some "eery stalker" finds your pic on tribe.net that you, in all likelihood, posted there yourself. And Inna, the "scientist who does things with microbiology", haha, who is probably every bit as much of a scientist as you, although she does not even have the guts to say what she thinks, other than occasionally complaining about other people's way of relating like some small time high school girl , believes I hacked into your profile. What's wrong with you guys? Don't you know how to use search? Do you ever check out who you are actually talking to? You are so full of yourself that you keep shooting off at the mouth, eager to hear yourself talk, rather than paying any attention, and cannot even remember what you posted where. So, first it was SOT, then it was Kelly the moderator...wildy looking for accusing explanations, all because you cannot do the simplest act that should come to mind first which is checking who posted this pic. It was you, Salil. And it is not friends only. Think. Think real hard. If this does not work, check the date when you made it public. Yes, you!
Festinger at work again, boy oh boy, are you deluded about yourself. -
-
Re: Question....
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 10:42 PMCanela, are you illiterate? I already accepted that I posted it there, FIVE YEARS AGO. I had made a concerted effort to remove these things from tribe, and had previously had a difficult time removing it from one of Kelly's other tribes. You cant remember what you posted in the same thread, from one moment to the next, and you're going to criticize me for not remembering something from HALF A DECADE AGO?!
Good grief.
NO ONE here is defending you. There's a reason for that. I dont go around doing anything with your pictures, and having looked at them, oh, hell, there's a lot of material there, so why do it with mine?
What's your goal? You want everyone to see what I look like? Why? We know you're not trying to prove Inna's point that I was a good looking kid.
yeah, Inna's an actual scientist. You're a joke. What do you do, teach belly dancing to Japanese women? Is that your 'faculty' position?
Go away. You don't discuss the issues here, you don't even know the most elementary history, you confuse Afghanistan with Saudi Arabia, and your entire purpose here is to troll and stalk me.
Go away. You don't need my attention. Go play with people who like you.
-
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 2:07 AMHalf a decade ago. And half a decade ago, by the way, people on tribe were also complaining about the fact that you keep calling everyone around you stupid. Whatever you post here comes up in search, keep that in mind. Do you ever think about how many people there may be laughing at you who is running like a little dog after every stick someone throws him? -
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 2:45 AMI'm pretty sure you're the only one laughing at this point. The rest of us were laughing AT you, now we're pretty shocked and dismayed.
No one's in your corner, Canela. Time to take your ball and go home. No one likes you. -
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 7:05 AMYou believe, you just scared the hell out of me with your idea of the horror scenario of being all alone, right? Am I supposed to break into tears now? ; P Heehee. -
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 8:34 AMastird there will always be men who are into potbellied dancers, fear not. -
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 5:05 PMhilarious play on words, John.
hilarious.
and
shudder.
-
Re: Question....
Tue, July 7, 2009 - 8:40 PMOh my god, John, this was really painful. Just when I thought that my bellydancing skills would deter people's attention from my lack of intelligence and substitute for credentials in following your complicated copntributions to the discussions here, ouch, John! ; )
And I promise you, Salil will be delighted to hear me saying this and believe every word of it. Just wait for the reaction with him gloating and stomping around victoriously. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 11:31 AMAnd by the way, today I saw an ad on this tribe for the scientology church. They are here. It is all your fault, Sheik. ; )
Now, Salil, which online dictionary did you use to look up the meaning of "irony"? Can we have a link to that one too, please? -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 1:40 PMput the bong down, Canela. Drugs rot your brain. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 3:55 PMOut of your wits, now, Salil? Why don't you ask the "Arabesque" John how to come up with a better answer to something like that next time? I already told him to join your club, he's probably waitihng for you there by now. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 4:06 PMCanela,
Something is seriously wrong with you. Look at your postings, there is nothing in them that suggests and knowledge or even interest in Mideast Politics. All you do is expose your obsession with Salil. It's beyond apparent that you create a conflict with him so that you gain his attention. Very pathetic. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 4:29 PMIs there such an expression as "very pathetic"?
I would say, the word "pathetic" is enough, which may also apply to suggestions such as any woman wanting to "gain the attention" of someone like our little Salil, here. Is the word "cradle robber" part of your vocabulary, Sheik? John did not get that one either when I wrote it.
And by the way, I don't think you have finished reading your messages here. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 4:51 PMIts so funny how she pretends that just because someone doesnt specifically address something she said, like 'cradle robber', they must not get it.
kinda goes along with her failure to comprehend that when someone provides a link to support their assertion, they were not relying on that link for THEIR edification, but rather to foster hers.
John and SY got it just fine, Canela. Its YOU who fails to "get it"
And yes, "Very pathetic" is perfectly fine as an expression. Thanks for once again showing us how much you lack in basic English communication ability.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 4:53 PMWhere is this club, Canela? seriously, where might he be waiting for me?
Oh, its in your imagination? like pretty much everything you post here?
Got it.
Your lying is starting to resemble a pathology. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:42 PMIf you got it yourself, Salil, you would be complaining by now about yet another insult. Or maybe you would be humiliated enough to shut your goddamn for once but there was not one word of complaint which means, also you do not have a clue what I am talking about.
And I can't wait for your face when you discover the door to that club.
As far as talking about me in the third person is concerned, I take that as a sign of your need for reinforcement. Sure, go ahead and gang up with SY and John, if that makes you feel safer from me, kiddo. Laughable braggard that you are. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:45 PMCanela,
Still obsessed I see. You're a stalker who can't control your behaviors. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:46 PMCanela,
And nobody is ganging up on you. Do you often resort to playing the victim?
-
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:46 PM"shut your goddamn for once"
that was meant to read "shut your goddamn trap for once" -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:48 PMCanela,
You're the first in line to dish out the insults, but when it comes to people criticizing your awful behavior and emotional distress you simply can't handle it.
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:52 PMSheik, how about you stop worrying about me and busy yourself with your "mideast politics".?The reason I am not so terribly interested is that, as we have established before, Israel is not even actually part of the mideast, but rather belongs to the Near East, and therefore, may I suggest that Inna change the name of this tribe, if this is all you want to talk about in here? Gaza strip politics would sum up about 80% or more of what you are discussing in here.
Adam once started a thread about Iran, thank God, and I did not see any of you take any interest in that except me. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:55 PMCanela,
I don't care about you enough to worry, but I do recognize dysfunctional behavior when I see it and also am aware at how badly you ruin discussions with your stalking behavior and inability to handle your emotions. Your claim that Israel is not part of the Mideast mystifies me. Show me where you come to this conclusion please. What according to you does the Mideast encompass?
Funny, but you don't seem to start any threads yet you are complaining about the subject matter. Maybe you should take the initiative to begin threads based on your interest instead of this stalking behavior that you demonstrate.
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:56 PMIsrael is part of the Mideast. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:56 PM -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 6:59 PMFrom the link above
In 1958, the State Department explained that the terms "Near East" and "Middle East" were interchangeable, and defined the region as including only Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar. -
-
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 8:03 PM<Canela's not too bright >
That about sums it up.
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 8:02 PM<The reason I am not so terribly interested is that, as we have established before, Israel is not even actually part of the mideast, but rather belongs to the Near East, and therefore, may I suggest that Inna change the name of this tribe,>
OH MY GOD YOU'RE UNBELIEVABLE.
Israel is part of the Middle East. It is ALSO PART of the Near East. You are SO UNINFORMED just shut that massive feed hole - it'd do you a world of good, and keep us from losing IQ points every time you talk.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 8:00 PMUh, no, its not an insult. I enjoy being as young as I possibly can. The only thing laughable about your use of the term is the implication that you even have a shot at robbing this cradle.
Its not just SY and John, even Inna Sami and Brent think you're off your rocker.
And the word is braggart. Maybe you really do need to spend more time with the dictionary. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 9:06 PMFine, Make that "Israel is part of the Middle East AND the Near East" as we have:
Country Bureau of Near East
Affairs[3] Washington Institute
for Near East Policy[4]
Egypt + +
Iran + +
Iraq + +
Israel + +
Jordan + +
Lebanon + +
North Africa + +
Oman + +
Palestinian Authority + +
Persian Gulf States + +
Saudi Arabia + +
Yemen + +
Turkey – +
as well as:
Main article: Regions of the Middle East
Country, with flag Area
(km²) Population Density
(per km²) Capital GDP (Total) Per capita Currency Government Official languages
Persian Plateau:
Iran 1,648,195 71,208,000 42 Tehran $753 billion (2007) $10,600 (2007) Iranian rial Islamic Republic Persian
Mesopotamia:
Iraq 437,072 24,001,816 55 Baghdad $102.3 billion (2007) $3,600 (2007) Iraqi dinar Parliamentary Democracy (Developing) Arabic, Kurdish
Arabian Peninsula:
Kuwait 17,820 3,100,000 119 Kuwait City $130.1 billion (2007) $39,300 (2007) Kuwaiti dinar Constitutional Hereditary Arabic
Bahrain 665 656,397 987 Manama $24.5 billion (2007) $32,100 (2007) Bahraini Dinar Constitutional monarchy Arabic
Oman 212,460 3,200,000 13 Muscat $61.6 billion (2007) $24,000 (2007) Omani Rial Absolute monarchy Arabic
Qatar 11,437 793,341 69 Doha $57.7 billion (2007) $80,900 (2007) Qatari Riyal Monarchy Arabic
Saudi Arabia 1,960,582 23,513,330 12 Riyadh $564.6 billion (2007) $23,200 (2007) Riyal Absolute monarchy Arabic
United Arab Emirates 82,880 5,432,746 30 Abu Dhabi $167.3 billion (2007) $37,300 (2007) UAE dirham Federal Constitutional Monarchy Arabic
Yemen 527,970 18,701,257 35 Sanaá $52 billion (2007) $2,300 (2007) Yemeni rial Republic Arabic
The Levant:
Israel 20,770 7,029,529 290 Jerusalem3 $185.9 billion (2007) $25,800 (2007) Israeli new sheqel Parliamentary democracy Hebrew, Arabic, English
Jordan 92,300 5,307,470 58 Amman $28 billion (2007) $4,900 (2007) Jordanian dinar Constitutional monarchy Arabic
Lebanon 10,452 3,677,780 354 Beirut $42.3 billion (2007) $11,300 (2007) Lebanese pound Republic Arabic
Syria 185,180 17,155,814 93 Damascus $87 billion (2007) $4,500 (2007) Syrian pound Presidential republic Arabic
Anatolia:
Turkey1 783,562 72,334,256 91 Ankara $888 billion (2007) $12,900 (2007) Turkish lira Parliamentary Democracy Turkish
North Africa:
Egypt 1,001,449 77,498,000 74 Cairo $404 billion (2007) $5,500 (2007) Egyptian pound Semi-presidential republic (democracy) Arabic
Autonomous region: Palestine:
Gaza Strip 360 1,376,289 3,823 Gaza $5 billion (includes West Bank) (2006) $1,100 (includes West Bank) (2006) Israeli new sheqel Palestinian National Authority Hamas Arabic
West Bank 5,8603 2,500,0005 4323,4 Ramallah Israeli new sheqel Palestinian National Authority Fatah Arabic
Source:
The World Factbook, United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), 15 July 2008.[3]
Notes:
1 The figures for Turkey includes Eastern Thrace, which is not a part of Anatolia.
2 Under Israeli law. The UN doesn't recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
3 Includes the whole of the West Bank, according to the pre-1967 boundaries.
4 In addition, there are around 400,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, of which half are in East-Jerusalem.
Greater Middle East
Main article: Greater Middle East
Country, with flag Area
(km²) Population Density
(per km²) Capital GDP (Total) Per capita Currency Government Official languages
Caucacus:
Armenia 29,800 2,968,586 111.7 Yerevan $19.298 billion (2008) $5,437 (2008) Armenian dram Presidential republic Armenian
Azerbaijan 86,600 8,621,000 97 Baku $65.523 billion (2007) $7,618 (2007) Azerbaijani manat Presidential republic Azerbaijani
Georgia 20,460 4,630,841 99.3 Tbilisi $20.516 billion (2007) $4,694 (2007) Georgian lari Presidential democratic republic Georgian
Persian Plateau:
Afghanistan 647,500 31,889,923 46 Kabul $35 billion (2007) $1,000 (2007) Afghani Islamic Republic Persian, Pashto
Pakistan (NFWP, FATA, and Balochistan) 880,940 169,300,000 206 Islamabad $505 billion (2007) $3,320 (2007) Pakistani Rupee Islamic Republic Urdu, Pashto
North Asia:
Kazakhstan 2,724,900 15,217,711 5.4 Astana $168 billion (2007) $10,837 (2007) Kazakhstani tenge Presidential republic Kazakh, Russian
Uzbekistan 447,400 27,372,000 59 Tashkent $64 billion (2007) $2,389 (2007) Uzbekistani som Presidential republic Uzbek
Turkmenistan 488,100 5,110,023 9.9 Ashgabat $27 billion (2007) $5,171 (2007) Turkmenistani manat Presidential republic Turkmen
Tajikistan 143,100 7,215,700 45 Dushanbe $12 billion (2007) $1,842 (2007) Somoni Unitary presidential republic Tajik
Kyrgyzstan 199,900 5,356,869 26 Bishkek $11 billion (2007) $2,000 (2007) Kyrgyzstani som Unitary presidential republic Kyrgyz, Russian
China 9,640,861 1,321,851,888 140 Beijing $8 trillion (2008) $5,943 (2008) Yuan Socialist state, Single party communist state Chinese
Mediterranean Sea:
Cyprus2 9,250 792,604 90 Nicosia $21.4 billion (2007) $27,100 (2007) Euro Republic Greek, Turkish
North Africa:
Algeria 2,381,740 33,333,216 14 Algiers $224.7 billion (2007) $6,500 (2007) Algerian dinar Presidential republic Arabic
Mauritania 446,550 33,757,175 70 Nouakchott $6 billion (2007) $2,011 (2007) Ouguiya Military junta Arabic
Western Sahara 163,610 10,102,000 62 El Aaiun Moroccan dirham Arabic
Libya 1,759,540 6,036,914 3 Tripoli $74.8 billion (2007) $12,300 (2007) Libyan dinar Jamahiriya Arabic
Morocco 446,550 33,757,175 70 Rabat $125.3 billion (2007) $4,100 (2007) Moroccan dirham Constitutional monarchy Arabic
Tunisia 163,610 10,102,000 62 Tunis $77 billion (2007) $7,500 (2007) Tunisian dinar Republic Arabic
Northeast Africa:
Djibouti 23,200 496,374 34 Djibouti $1.641 billion $2,070 Djiboutian franc Parliamentary republic Arabic, French, Somali, Afar
Eritrea 117,600 4,401,009 37 Asmara $3.622 billion $746 Nakfa Transitional Government Tigrinya, Arabic
Somalia 637,661 9,588,666 13 Mogadishu $5.26 billion $600 Somali shilling Semi-presidential republic Somali, Arabic
Sudan 2,505,813 39,379,358 14 Khartoum $107.8 billion (2007) $2,552 (2007) Sudanese pound Dictatorship (democracy) Arabic
Source:
The World Factbook, United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), 15 July 2008.[4]
So, this would imply that there is either a Near East and a Far East, or only Middle East and Far East while the Near East in this case would be...Europe, maybe? Lol. Thank your own authorities for this mess in presenting definitions.
And now, Salil, after receiving a hint from me, you have finally gotten a grip on what I was talking about re the cradle robber thing, and are now pretending that you knew this all along. What else is new. Bragging, muddling, lying and expecting us to be dumb enough to not look through your act. And moreoever, you prove me right in showing that you are childish enough to believe that a fully grown woman would actually want to waste time with being aggravated by your obnoxious, tiresome presence for any longer than absolutely necessary. What I am doing here is trying to get rid of you, so we can actually start talking to each other in peace, if you need to know. You won't shut up and keep getting in the way, you see?
And now, looking for additional insults, you accuse me of "not knowing basic English". Laughing out loud, kid.
Also, you were eager to defend Sheik's glitch about the non-existent use of "very pathetic". "Very pathetic" is just as absurd as "very wonderful", and it is REDUNDANT in expression, as ridiculous sounding as "the big maximum". *Redundant*, does this mean anything to you, Salil?
I rest my case, with the conclusion that our "Sheik Yerbouti" here (about as "arabesque" a name as Frank Zappa would allow) is no native speaker of English either.
I am still wondering though how "Arabesque" John managed to find an image from a place in El Andalus in google images by keying the word "Arab" ("or arabesque or something", as he claims) into image search without having to sort through 10000 other links before that, or whether there exists such as possibility of finding this photo via these search words at all. Suspicion stands: he ripped it from my photo album and will not admit it. Rather he claims "Why would anybody want to take ANYTHING from your photo album", thus claiming this image is not even contained in there (I invite you to check if you have any doubt). Now what may be his reasons for pretending he did not find it in there? Is he trying to say, he never looked at my photo album? While complaining about the shape of my body? In this case, unfortunately, I can only conclude, that he is one of Rajalee'S, i.e. S.O.T.'s pathetic alts as "bellydancers' stomachs" is one of S.O.T.'s new pet pieves which he has already stated in almost identical words to John's posting, elsewhere, recently. The difference being ,that SOT tends to sound a lot more intelligent than John (except in this case, but then, this is "Rajalee" his "dumb bellydancer girlfriend"-alt, so I would tend to believe the other version. John waded through my photo album, stole my pic, and is now resorting to the same cheap riffraff style tactics like Salil, trying to cover his tracks and making up bullshit explanations about what he did.
Whatever. Take it and run with it, John. It's meaning is wasted on you anyway. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 9:50 PM
<<John waded through my photo album, stole my pic, and is now resorting to the same cheap riffraff style tactics like Salil, trying to cover his tracks and making up bullshit explanations about what he did.>>
wow. :shakes head:
just wow.
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 10:36 PM<<<What I am doing here is trying to get rid of you, so we can actually start talking to each other in peace, if you need to know. You won't shut up and keep getting in the way, you see? >>>>
ROFLMAO
Perhaps only the voices in your head will talk to one another -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 10:46 PM*footnote for the educated reader:
...just to give you an exemple of the people who are fans of this sorry character I was talking about. -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 11:07 PMidle ways to while away a spare 5 minutes:
reproducing John's search results for "arabesque":
images.google.co.jp/images -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 11:15 PMdid a search for "arabesque tiles" and got the image of the fourth page.
1st image, fourth row
images.google.co.jp/images -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 11:26 PMGood job, Dustin. Did you like what you saw on the way? -
-
Re: Question....
Wed, July 8, 2009 - 11:33 PMOnly, the problem is, we are not talking about "arabesque tiles", we are talking about this:
people.tribe.net/47e6545c-...9f3acfad3c -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 12:17 AM<<<<did a search for "arabesque tiles" and got the image of the fourth page.
1st image, fourth row
images.google.co.jp/images>>>>
correct Dustin. Same exact size you notice as well.
I understand better why Germany sought and fought (and lost) the wars they did. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 12:25 AMWhat's funny is that she thinks two people can't independently come to the same conclusion about her pot bellied dancing. I promise its way more than two, actually. usually I'm really against attacking people based on physical characteristics, but in Canela's case, even though there's plenty of topical material, there's just something too demanding about an unattractive person who gets up on stage and flaunts her un-fit body in a culturally awkward manner.
Me, if my Body fat percentage gets over 10% I start doing something about it.
But then again, I don't like the idea of being stupid OR ugly.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:48 AM"Only, the problem is, we are not talking about "arabesque tiles", we are talking about this: "
Yes, that's the image in the 4th row that i linked to above
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 12:14 AM<And now, Salil, after receiving a hint from me, you have finally gotten a grip on what I was talking about re the cradle robber thing, and are now pretending that you knew this all along>
You are out of your mind, you know that right?
I mean, you're beyond unbelievable.
<What I am doing here is trying to get rid of you, so we can actually start talking to each other in peace, if you need to know. You won't shut up and keep getting in the way, you see? >
Oh Canela, here's the problem, no one wants YOU here. I actually understand the Middle East (gasp, I even know which countries make it up).
<Also, you were eager to defend Sheik's glitch about the non-existent use of "very pathetic". "Very pathetic" is just as absurd as "very wonderful", and it is REDUNDANT in expression, as ridiculous sounding as "the big maximum". *Redundant*, does this mean anything to you, Salil?>
Please stop embarrassing yourself and slaughtering your understanding of elementary English. Seriously, the fact that you would write this, and think it was true, is just shocking.
Pathetic and Wonderful are two adjectives which are correctly modified by the adverb "very". 'Very" is used to stress the intensity of the adjective or the superlative (technically it's an example of the use of an elative in English - ie, Canela is very annoying, Inna is very smart).
Your analogy regarding the 'big maximum' also indicates a lack of comprehension regarding valid analogies and word choice. Big cannot be used as an adverb in the manner in which you are trying to use it (it can be used as an adverb in other ways - talking big, the big chill, etc). The 'big maximum' is an awkward construction because of that - it is a different form of speech than "very" in this case.
Just like one could say "This car is the very best" its use IS NOT REDUNDANT - its AN INTENSIFIER.
Your constant accusations of people being an alt are getting very tiresome. John has been here much longer than you have, and has indicated a much broader comprehension of the region than you have.
I can't get over how sad it is that you needed to be spoon fed that Israel is part of the middle east.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 12:54 AMThe only problem is that a superlative is what it is- a superlative (look up the meaning in your Latin dictionary if you have one)
I double checked about the use "very pathetic" with an English prof from the US before I posted.
On the other hand, yes, the big maximum is indeed an awkward expression, it should have read the "biggest maximum".
"Out of your mind" is something that you fall back on, along with "on drugs" when you cannot think of anything better to say.
And other than trying to do split a hair that has already been split to no avail, and playing museum with your old accusations, can you take your assumed mental powers and use them for something constructive? Just once? This is getting more boring by the minute.
Something that actually provides a topic of general interest and does not just represent yet another attempt at self aggrandisement? -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:02 AMAs it is obvious I got the photo in my profile exactly where I stated I did, do you care to comment on your assumption that I stole it from your profile astrid? Could it be that we *shock* actually have some similar tastes? such as love of sheesha? -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:29 AMWhile I do like sheesha ( which you will find, besides other places on tribe, illustrated in my photo album), the pic you have there has nothing whatsoever to do with sheesha. May I suggest you give it a more suitable title than "arabesque", at least? Do you actually know what this is, which city, which country and the name of the building? And what this place is for? Or do you believe, people will sit in there and smoke?
Comments on my assumption? After running into you here, I had 7 profile views within a very short time, you started talking about my asumed "pot belly", lol, and when I looked, I found that particular pic in your album. Inquisitive minds want to know, you see? I am an open book, i have nothing to hide, I let you backtrack my steps, I don't make up stories about what I did or did not do, and when called for, I am also ready to admit an error. Anything else would never get you a job in research and such. Moreover, you would be prone to making a complete fool of yourself if you attempted to publish any of your papers. But everybody has to make their own experiences, so I am afriad, Salil is doomed. But who knows, maybe the US is different? Remember that onion link I posted? ; )
But why would anybody choose, of all places, this particular pic for a profile to use on a tribe like this one, I wonder?
And by the way, it is not "obvious", it is "possible" that you got it there and it was me who helped you prove that. Now why would anyone want to prove themselves wrong? Good question, huh? ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:39 AMWow. Canela, the US is by far the world leader in scholarly work. Our peer review system is aped by the rest of the world. I REALLY don't need your advice on publications, thanks, as I've got that well in hand.
John had that picture in his profile long before you got here.
The reason people looked at your profile, and I was one of them, was because of your weird psycho stalker behavior.
You contribute zero value here. You don't know what the middle east is. You dont know what countries make it up. And that's that's the beginning.
What HILARIOUS is that you're a researcher - and not even for an academic institution, and you're questioning MY scholarly abilities? Canela, I had people like you working *for me* years ago.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:03 AM<The only problem is that a superlative is what it is- a superlative (look up the meaning in your Latin dictionary if you have one)>
Oh my god. I do have a latin dictionary, and I dont need to look up superlative. Very IS NOT A SUPERLATIVE
smart, smartest - that's a superlative
The use of very in question is not
dictionary.reference.com/browse/very
It is an INTENSIFIER, and more specifically, its an elative
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superlative
<I double checked about the use "very pathetic" with an English prof from the US before I posted. >
No, you didn't.
Very pathetic, very useful, very smart, very pretty, very lame, are all legitimate and perfectly common constructions.
<"Out of your mind" is something that you fall back on, along with "on drugs" when you cannot think of anything better to say. >
No, its what I use when there's simply no other explanation for your sheer retardation. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:36 AMYes, I did check, Salil. whether you like it or not, and your childish attempts at telling other people what someone else did that you have no way of knowing are pointless. I work with this English prof, he comes in on Mondays and Thrusdays. Got it? All I have to do is look over the rim of my coffee cup from which I drink while I am having a break to see him and talk to him.
Yes, "very" is not a superlative. Nevertheless, a superlative needs no further intensifying.
While "pathetic" is not technically a superlative, it is equal to one in meaning, and along with words like "wonderful", "fantastic", "awful" etc. the word "every" is not used with it. You can use "really", if you feel the need to.
And you ignored my request to come up with something construictive and of general interest. Do you have the ability to do this, i wonder? -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:47 AMThere's a reason then that this "professor" you're talking about is working in japan at a non academic institution - he's an idiot.
And how many times do I have to keep proving you wrong? I love how you just make a bogus assertion, and then back away, back away, back away.
<Yes, "very" is not a superlative. >
Then why did you say it was?
<Nevertheless, a superlative needs no further intensifying. >
who said anything about needing?
<While "pathetic" is not technically a superlative>
No, its not. So why did you say it was?
<it is equal to one in meaning, and along with words like "wonderful", "fantastic",>
ABSOLUTELY false. 100%. "She has the most wonderful voice" "His house is utterly fantastic"
or "That's a very wonderful painting"
<the word "every" is not used with it.>
uh, no, but very is.
<You can use "really", if you feel the need to. >
OH MY GOD. STOP TALKING. SERIOUSLY YOU'RE MASSACRING THE LANGUAGE.
No. ABSOLUTELY NOT. This is a semantically incorrect usage of the word that is very colloquial. SPEND MORE TIME WITH THE DICTIONARY. Using "really" as an elative is WRONG. "Really" means genuinely, in actuality, etc. It DOES NOT INTENSIFY.
"His house is really wonderful" DOES NOT EQUAL "His house is very wonderful"
dictionary.reference.com/browse/really
Just stop. Stop being wrong all the freaking time. Stop talking about things you're just ignorant of.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:05 AMNo one likes you Canela, or finds your "contributions" here worthwhile.
Whereas you can't even find Israel on a map, I can debunk Duke's claim that Arabs were not in the Levant for 3000 years citing specific historical evidence.
Its pretty clear why. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:40 AMAnd how did you come up with the ridiculous idea that I cannot find Israel on a map? Empty accusations, Salil, red herring. You are a school yard bully. A perpetual one. Is there hope you will grow up one day?
What you are trying to do here is gain the sympathy of some of your fellow tribe members, trying to make me feel intimidated. Only, you can't because I won't. Nitwits do not impress me. Come off it and do something else, Salil, it is getting boring, I said so already. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:50 AMYou claimed Israel wasnt part of the middle east. It most certainly is. This implies a lack of geography ability.
I dont have to gain the sympathy of anyone, everyone here already thinks you're obnoxious and ignorant, and most of them have told you, multiple times. Threads have even been started over it. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 1:53 AMI did not siomply claim that Israel wasn't. I am not you, Salil, this is not how I operate. I sent you the link to the Near East countries. Then I posted another link to the Middle East countries. Then I commented on it.
And you are late, also. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 2:18 AMWhat you are doing here, Salil, is one of your cheap and very transparent attempts at manipulation: you are deliberately drawing the wrong conclusions. And then you keep insisting that your conclusion represents the truth and try to back that up by pushiness, threats, ridicule, stomping around and gloating about ti and pointing fingers and shouting it out ot everyone else here.
Only-things do not work that way. This does not make it true. And you know it not to be true in the first place, or let's say, I will give you enough credit, assuming for your own good that you will be able to notice that it isn't.
In summary- you are a bully.
And I am not impressed. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 2:27 AMblah blah blah - your claims and assertions get exposed for being complete balderdash, and all you have to offer are weak defenses.
MAYBE you can find Israel on a map. Sure, given enough time anyone can. You didn't know it was part of the middle east.
You're VERY ignorant. See how the elative works?
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 2:29 AMLie lie lie.
FIRST you said "Israel is not even actually part of the mideast"
THEN you RECEIVED the link on the middle east. THEN you pasted the info from other links.
You can't even handle linear time accurately. Wow. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 3:02 AMKiddo, links to "Middle east" and "Near East" are extremely easy to find on wikipedia. I sent you the same list long ago already, for the Near East.
And you are still wasting everyone's time here, instead of contributing anything constructive or interesting.
Now, if you insist on going on about something as petty as this, you prove to me that Israel is *only* part of the Middle East and *not* part of the Near East. And when you are done with that (remember that course on logical thinking you took?) tell us all know what then is the Near East, if Israel and everything else given on that list above isn't.
Unless, of course, you want to start on another childish temper tantrum, proving once again, make that "ad nauseam", that you are a bully. See above.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 3:31 AMYou're still having problems with linear time.
You said you did something before something else. This thread shows that is not the case.
<Now, if you insist on going on about something as petty as this, you prove to me that Israel is *only* part of the Middle East and *not* part of the Near East.>
There is nothing petty about expecting you to know what constitutes the middle east. Nor is it too much to ask that you understand basic logic sets. I never said that Israel was part of the near east. That does not preclude, as you asserted, its membership in the "mideast"
You can keep up with your name calling all you want, you're still blatantly ignorant. Howabout you lecture us more on how the elative "very" cannot be used to modify adjectives, and how "pathetic" is a superlative.
ridiculous.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 4:38 AM<I never said that Israel was part of the near east.>
I never said that Israel was NOT part of the near east, rather. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 5:04 AM>That does not preclude, as you asserted, its membership in the "mideast" .
That's right. It doesn't. I even gave you the link to that. And besides, my mind being a little more flexible than yours (to put it mildly, haha) I gave you TWO links, remember, for the near and for the middle east.
You are a little forgetful, which is not surprising. Selectively, purposely, conveniently forgetful, not as in Alzheimer forgetful. What's more, you have not answered my question. Now you may think, that you have detered people's attention from the fact that you dodged the question which was the whole point in my answer to you. Problem is, everyone can just scroll back and find it above, loud and clear. And follow up on how you dodged that one.
Y>ou can keep up with your name calling all you want, you're still blatantly ignorant. Howabout you lecture us more on how the elative "very" cannot be used to modify adjectives, and how "pathetic" is a superlative.
Whoa, not so fast, kiddo. Poor students minds get bored quickly with tasks they cannot master, but strict teachers will insist they do.
Where are the remnants in your memory of that course in logical thinking you took? THINK, kid. Think real hard. And to make that a little easier for you and to make the process of what is going on here a little more clearly visible for everyone around you, here is the question again:
If there is a Far East and a Middle East, there must be a Near East somewhere on the atlas, right? Are you following me still, Salil? Here is the problem I asked you to figure out: if Israel, Egypt etcetc. are part of the Middle East, then which countries are located in the Near East? Could it possibly be Europe?
Come now, now I have made it really easy for you and gone way out of my way, the way I only do with my worst and almost hopeless students, how much longer do I need to give you till you will produce the answer to that question?
and no supleratives and such for you yet, eat your lunch before the desert, kid.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 5:53 AMCanela,
Why are you infecting this tribe with your emotional distress??? You need help and you need it now. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 6:14 AMdoes she ever. Its like she invents her reality as she goes along. usually delusions are persistent. its very bizarre behavior.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 6:13 AMstop lying.
that's all you seem to be able to do.
YOU SAID that Israel was no part of the mideast. YOU DID. NOT ME.
You then proceeded to misrepresent the order in which these events happened. All you need to do is look through the thread to see that first you made this ridiculous statement, then you were corrected, then you took the time to research it yourself, and post the information up here as if we didnt already know it.
Your question isn't being dodged, its being flat out ignored, because its a transparent attempt on your part to distract yourself (no one here is fooled) from your serious failures here.
My contributions to this tribe are not in question here. Me simply calling you out on your ignorance is a far greater contribution than your polluting it with your ridiculous claims.
You stated, very clearly, that Israel was not part of the mid east. You're wrong. You had to be corrected.
<Whoa, not so fast, kiddo. Poor students minds get bored quickly with tasks they cannot master, but strict teachers will insist they do.
Where are the remnants in your memory of that course in logical thinking you took? THINK, kid. Think real hard. And to make that a little easier for you and to make the process of what is going on here a little more clearly visible for everyone around you, here is the question again:
If there is a Far East and a Middle East, there must be a Near East somewhere on the atlas, right? Are you following me still, Salil? Here is the problem I asked you to figure out: if Israel, Egypt etcetc. are part of the Middle East, then which countries are located in the Near East? Could it possibly be Europe?>
That's rich. Canela, you are most clearly delusional. So I will tell you again, you dont have the faintest idea what you're talking about. And you CONTINUE to demonstrate this with every post. Wake up. Snap out of it.
Please read about logic sets and venn diagrams. The NEAR EAST consists of certain countries, including Israel. THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE ISRAEL FROM ALSO BELONGING TO THE REGION KNOWN AS THE MIDDLE EAST.
Why is this so freaking difficult for you to grasp?
<the way I only do with my worst and almost hopeless students, how much longer do I need to give you till you will produce the answer to that question? >
Stop lying. You already told us you dont work at a school. Any poor student that had to deal with instruction from you is being set up for drastic failure.
<and no supleratives and such for you yet, eat your lunch before the desert, kid.>
Hey old lady, get your senile head out of your fourth point of contact. I know its tough for the mentally challenged to comprehend, but I have faith that with enough time and effort, you'll grasp that you didnt understand the difference between the elative and the superlative, and I had to explain to you elementary adverb/adjective construction.
You're the one getting schooled, Canela. Its time you realized that -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 8:05 AMAnd you still have not answered the question, Salil. If Israel in the Middle East, then which countries are in the Near East?
That is all I want you to tell me.
I also mentioned that my mind is more flexible than yours . I do not get all freaked out over a thing like this but this is another question I will let you ponder over. If Canela does not get all freaked out, as she claims, then why is she acting in this insane way? You figure it out, kiddo.
I shall be expecting both answers here shortly.
Not that I do not have my hopes up that you are going to do anything other than give me more of the same drivel that you posted above, all the while dodging the same question. Ad nauseam. You are predictable. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 8:07 AM"Not that I do not have my hopes up "
should read:
Not that I have my hopes up...
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 8:40 AM<And you still have not answered the question, Salil. If Israel in the Middle East, then which countries are in the Near East? >
This question has already been answered for you MULTIPLE TIMES.
Why do you need me to point you to sources you have already been exposed to?
<I also mentioned that my mind is more flexible than yours >
Yes, that's great. You can also mention that you walked on the moon, won't make it true.
<If Canela does not get all freaked out, as she claims, then why is she acting in this insane way?>
The answer is very clear. Its because she is in fact insane. End of story.
No one dodged anything.
You made a bogus claim.
You were called out.
You thought Israel wasnt part of the Middle East. Embarrassing.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 8:58 AM"And you still have not answered the question, Salil. If Israel in the Middle East, then which countries are in the Near East? >
This question has already been answered for you MULTIPLE TIMES.
Why do you need me to point you to sources you have already been exposed to?
References, please. Anything that is not reproducable, does not count a rotten cent. Logic, Salil, logic. If there is a Far East and a Middle East, there must be a Near East. If the Middle East is Israel and so on, in this case, and in in this case only, where is the Near East located and which countries belong to it.
You sure you took that course? You cannot even get your inflexible mind around what I am asking, here. All you do is recite memorised answers. Like a parrot. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:03 AMCanela,
How can you not see how totally fucked up you are??? This is truly fascinating. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:18 AMAre you joining the ranks of Salil, as in "blurt out prepared answers, packaged, force fed and obediently memorised and felt proud to do so"?
I was actually initially under the impression that you a little more intelligent than Salil, I am disappointed in you, Sheik. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:20 AMand also, you have still not figured out the rules of the game here. You are no Arab, Sheik. ; ) -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:32 AMWhat game Canela? We're not players in some stupid fantasy of yours. You're hell bent on ruining this tribe with your trolling.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 2:15 PMCruella,
Gee, I'm crushed that you're disappointed in me. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 6:43 PMCruella...interesting twist. Can I keep this for a while? You are welcome to call me that if you want to. ; )
-
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:31 AMCanela, apparently you are incapable of reading this thread.
The answer has been presented numerous times.
Why do you need to be spoon fed information over and over and over again?
First off, what countries constitute the near east is totally irrelevant to whether or not Israel is part of the mideast. Remember, you posited that Israel WAS NOT part of the middle east.
basic logic sets.
The reference is THIS VERY FUCKING THREAD. THIS ONE. RIGHT NOW. SCROLL UP AND READ.
I know exactly what you're asking - it doesnt take a "flexible" mind to understand that you're being redundantly repetitive.
SY answered you already:
"From the link above
In 1958, the State Department explained that the terms "Near East" and "Middle East" were interchangeable, and defined the region as including only Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar."
You read that, and responded:
"Country Bureau of Near East
Affairs[3] Washington Institute
for Near East Policy[4]
Egypt + +
Iran + +
Iraq + +
Israel + +
Jordan + +
Lebanon + +
North Africa + +
Oman + +
Palestinian Authority + +
Persian Gulf States + +
Saudi Arabia + +
Yemen + +
Turkey – + "
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_East
learn to read. stop making idiotic claims that expose your total lack of comprehension -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:33 AMI know it said that, and my comment was, ask your authorities for making such a mess of this definition. Something like that. See above. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:43 AMOf course you knew it. That's why you asked over and over and over again.
Anyway - totally irrelevant. You thought Israel was not part of the mideast.
You should be terribly embarrassed.
-
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:33 AM<References, please. Anything that is not reproducable, does not count a rotten cent. Logic, Salil, logic>
Additionally, these sentences have nothing to do with eachother. Logic has nothing to do with references. No wonder you think you understand logic. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:34 AMNo, they don't. These are just sevral reminders for you. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 9:42 AMAh right, now that I told you you pretend that you knew all along.
pathetic. VERY pathetic.
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 10:56 AMCanola, you labor under the false pretense that anyone here actually cares about your opinion.
Nice spelling by the way. More of that superior German education you got from correspondence course while sitting on your ass shoveling gallons of ice cream down your throat dreaming of being a fat chick dancing on stage? I guess dreams do come true. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 11:08 AMIf you want a dancer, hire Rajalee, not me, Triana. He can dance better. He also holds the plug he pulled, still. The only problem is a little technical one with his lurex skirt but don't let that bother you.
And, as inquisitive minds want to know, if you are not satisfied with my spelling powers, you have apparently been wasting your time reading my postings. What for? Are you trying to learn something or what is this? Bad influence, I warn you. You already said so yourself, not worth it at all. On the other hand, try Salil. He'll play with you.
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 2:16 PMTriana,
It's not Canola, it's Cruella. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 2:38 PMDo all of you love spending THIS MUCH TIME talking about each other instead of the issues?
At least I spend most of my time on the issues.
Look at all these threads. Look at all the time spent. Fucking crazy. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 5:33 PM<At least I spend most of my time on the issues. >
nonsense.
-
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 6:45 PMHe's right, Triana.
2 brownie points for you, Sheik, you have risen again in my respect for you, a little. This now may disappoint you, of course, which is too bad but not really my problem,. At least someopne with a bit of creative imagination. -
-
Re: Question....
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 6:48 PMCruella,
I couldn't give a shit what you think of me. Respect, disappointment, any other judgment you can come up with is of no consequence one way or another. You're off your rocker, so considering the source and your behavior.....non of your crap means anything. You need help.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-