Libel or defamation seems to be a reoccuring complaint on Tribe.net.
And the supposed victims claim all kinds of psychological effect.
This is actually easier to deal with than you may think.
1. Deny the allegations. And by that, I mean, just say "I deny that." Deny does not mean post 1,000 words in your defense. A simple "I deny that" will do.
2. Demand proof from your accuser.
3. If no proof is forthcoming, demand a retraction from your accuser. If there is proof, well, I guess you haven't been defamed, have you? Stop. You are done. But if the "proof" is just more lies and defamation, proceed to next step.
4. If no retraction is forthcoming, determine if you have suffered any real, monetary harm. If not, forget about it. Ignore it. If anyone brings it up, just refer them to the link where you denied it and demanded proof.
5. If you have suffered actual monetary damages of say, at least five figures, and can prove these damages. consider hiring a lawyer.
6. Mind the statute of limitations. It is one year in California.
And the supposed victims claim all kinds of psychological effect.
This is actually easier to deal with than you may think.
1. Deny the allegations. And by that, I mean, just say "I deny that." Deny does not mean post 1,000 words in your defense. A simple "I deny that" will do.
2. Demand proof from your accuser.
3. If no proof is forthcoming, demand a retraction from your accuser. If there is proof, well, I guess you haven't been defamed, have you? Stop. You are done. But if the "proof" is just more lies and defamation, proceed to next step.
4. If no retraction is forthcoming, determine if you have suffered any real, monetary harm. If not, forget about it. Ignore it. If anyone brings it up, just refer them to the link where you denied it and demanded proof.
5. If you have suffered actual monetary damages of say, at least five figures, and can prove these damages. consider hiring a lawyer.
6. Mind the statute of limitations. It is one year in California.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Unsu...
Re: Defamation
Thu, February 28, 2008 - 9:06 PMThat does make sense.
And I found that writing out 150,000 words in my defense were probably less effective than simply saying "I deny that."
We need one of those flow-charts. With the boxes and arrows.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Defamation
Thu, February 28, 2008 - 9:12 PMGlad to be of service.
that will be $200. Cash, credit or check accepted.
sorry, I don't do paypal. I maybe cheap, but I still have my pride. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Defamation
Thu, February 28, 2008 - 9:39 PMI prepaid.
Didn't you get the envelope clearly marked "$200.00 (TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS) CASH ENCLOSED"
It was all in non-sequential dollar bills, just like you said. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Defamation
Thu, February 28, 2008 - 9:50 PMGee, I am sorry. Without a receipt, there's nothing I can do. -
-
Re: Defamation
Thu, February 28, 2008 - 11:22 PMi hate it when grundig is rational and i agree with him. shoot!! -
-
Unsu...
Re: Defamation
Fri, February 29, 2008 - 7:22 AMBut I am never rational.
If you read my post carefully, you will find it is not the least bit rational and is actually nothing more than my endless campaign of hate-filled, harassment, spewing of vile lies, trolling and sick, twisted mind games intended to destroy everyone's tribe experience. If you examine it even closer, you might find that it contains alarming death threats and admissions under oath to having participating in the genocide of over 500,000 tribesmen in central Africa. But don't stop there. Even closer examination reveals that I am the anti-christ. -
-
Re: Defamation
Fri, February 29, 2008 - 8:00 AM!! THE ANTI - CHRIST !!!
* running for the Bible *
lol
-
-
-
-
-
-
