JPG Magazine, Issue 5: Photography is Not a Crime:
"There's another example every day. An overactive security guard harassing a photographer on a public sidewalk. Cops intimidating people with cameras. Photography bans in subways. In a post 9/11 age of paranoia and suspicion, public photography is increasingly seen as threatening, or mistaken as criminal...
jpgmag.com/issue5.html
"There's another example every day. An overactive security guard harassing a photographer on a public sidewalk. Cops intimidating people with cameras. Photography bans in subways. In a post 9/11 age of paranoia and suspicion, public photography is increasingly seen as threatening, or mistaken as criminal...
jpgmag.com/issue5.html
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Sun, July 2, 2006 - 9:16 AM -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Sun, July 2, 2006 - 2:53 PMaccording to this guy's story and the way he was trying to provoke the security guard and asks more people to do the same as he, i have no necessity to applaud to him and i think he needs to have a good kick in the bu**, Photography is a Delicate matter and the word Respect and Boundries should be examined each time we want to shoot, if our intention in Life is to piss people off than it'll be a good starting point to hold a camera in our hands, and i totally agree with Jay here!
if we're Photographers (professionally or not) we should use our Eye, not only the Good eye for Photography, but also our Good-Inner-Eye - the one that sees and knows when is the right time to place our camera in front of a person/building/animal without crossing that Delicate line, when the dog is growling - this guy would not cross the line - that's obvious, if a person is asking him not to take a photo whether it's on a public street or not - he should Respect that and if the security guard is simply doing his job and asked him not to do it - he should have Respected that!!! and he didn't!!
is point of view is so narrow (that i wonder what lens he's using) that all he could think of was about HIS rights, never for a minute was he concidering the fact that he could harm this men's job and have him fired and that this guy was simply following what he was told to do.
"So I've been hassled and harassed many time in the past for shooting photographs in privately owned public spaces (Starbucks, PF Chaings, Toys 'R Us, the new burger spot on Sacramento St. at Drumm, Tosca, Grand Central Terminal in New York, etc.) but yesterday was the first time I've actually been harassed on a public street over photography."
Good!!! this guy he's all over the place annoying people in private places as well and that's apperantly his day job, not Photography!!!
and what he does is hurting others in the process, Photographers and Photographed...
i wish he'll Grow-up or move to another hobby!
Bliss to all the Delicate Photographers out there!
i know you're there!
Gita. -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Mon, July 3, 2006 - 12:05 AMHey Gita,
I agree. Like any activity, photographing public spaces and the people/circumstances in them has to be done with a great amount of situational awareness. Try locking eyes with someone you don't know then continue to stare at them intensely wherever they go. It's a perfectly "legal" thing to do but what reaction do you think you'll get? Many react the same way having their photo taken by someone they don't know. Insisting on proceeding with your photography regardless how it impinges on the personal space of others, yields a very real chance you'll end up in a conflict.
Security guards doing their jobs? I did volunteer work at a local air museum for many years. The airfield was at the center of our local 4th of July celebration with a crowd as large as 100,000 people. Aircraft would fly in then line up for display behind rope barriers. Given the attendance, the celebration atmosphere and the public access we were very heavy on security.
I had no shortage of incidents stopping people photographing the aircraft because they were doing something inappropriate. Usually just stepping past the rope but many would jump the rope then climb on the planes. In one instance a photographer (professional) grabbed a plane's prop and began rotating it. He got quite indignant until I explained that if the pilot had improperly shut down the ignition, turning the prop could start the engine - killing him and possibly sending the plane into the crowd. His response" "I didn't know but I need the sun to hit it at a better angle".
Just because you have a camera in your hands doesn't relieve you of your obligation to respect the wishes / property / circumstance
of others. If you think it does, then take the lumps because you're certainly going to get them. -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Tue, July 4, 2006 - 3:51 PMHey Neil,
"Try locking eyes with someone you don't know then continue to stare at them intensely wherever they go. It's a perfectly "legal" thing to do but what reaction do you think you'll get?"
it's a good example and comparison.....
"......but I need the sun to hit it at a better angle".
ah! What can i tell you......????
is this guy only practicing innocence or "playing" dumb?
it's those "funny" stories that makes you feel sad!! -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Wed, July 5, 2006 - 8:19 AMHey Gita,
I don't think he had a clue as to the possible consequences. To him it was just a big toy ( a real common perception) that made a good subject for a shot. After he spent considerable time trying to explain to me why he should be allowed to do what he wanted (calling me names in the proccess) he calmed down and asked if he could take pics with permission. Several times during the day I escorted him behind the ropes to get the angles he wanted. Funny how if you just put in a little effort up front connecting with the world you're trying to capture on film, you'll find those who will welcome you in to it. -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Wed, July 5, 2006 - 4:27 PMHey again Neil :)
"Funny how if you just put in a little effort up front connecting with the world you're trying to capture on film, you'll find those who will welcome you in to it. "
so right!!! and connecting is the main issue here, if you're wanting to take a photo of something, it means that something about you felt a connection to the subject, with people it's obvious how one can and should see if the connection goes both ways, sometimes it's simply an eye contact and sometimes it takes more than that, one needs to decide if the "effort" is really an effort!!!
if you want to go inside a private house (with or witout a camera) you need to talk to the people who live there.
if you want to shoot a plane in the museum from behind the ropes line you need to have a permission to do it.
it's as simple as that....
trying to fight these simple things is childish and will get you nowhere....
nice for you for having the patient to wait untill he gets his common sense back! :)
-
-
-
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Wed, July 5, 2006 - 8:30 AMDeliberate harassement asside, a public space is just that, a public space.
If you don't want to be photographed, stay out of the public space. Don't want your building photographed, buy private land and situate it well away from any edges, plant lots of trees, etc.
I'm really tired of companies trying to appropriate the commons.
(And yes, the company I work for is on the bay area photo tour.) -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Wed, July 5, 2006 - 4:33 PM"If you don't want to be photographed, stay out of the public space"
sorry???????????????
do we have a say in this or simply because we're in a public place makes us public property????
i so don't agree with you!!!
but i'm tired so.... :) -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 6:28 AMDoes public being in a public space NOT make you public property? isnt that why different laws govern public and private space? I understand where you are coming from Gita and i agree the it is "right or moral" to be considerate but, where are we free? Locked in our houses? Personally and i say PERSONALLY because i understand that some people are different, I have no intention of abusing public space, but i find it frustrating when I cant take an image, solely for its beauty because someone is offended or uncomfortable. I am of course obligated to oblige this persons wishes but it sure would be nice to have that freedom. -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 8:58 AMHey Greg,
"Does public being in a public space NOT make you public property?"
No, it makes you social property. Participating in the unspoken agreements that make living shoulder to shoulder with thousands/millions/billions of other humans possible. Very few of these agreements are laws that will put you in jail. They're more powerful than that.
For the most part you ARE free to take any photo you want in a public venue. What's at issue is SHOULD you.
You do have the freedom to do what you want across a much broader spectrum of behaviour than we typically practice. Question is will you? And if so, will you complain or rail against the consequences?
I've been taking photographs for fun for 35 years (public spaces, private spaces, emotional spaces) and not once have I been harshly told or asked not to take the picture. I've not offended anyone in that process because I took the time to assess my situation and when necessary made a point of inviting the subject to participate.
It's all a dance. It can be eloquent and graceful or clumsy and full of stepped on toes. It's completely up to us.
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 9:51 AMHi Greg,
"Does public being in a public space NOT make you public property? isnt that why different laws govern public and private space?"
NO IT'S NOT!!!!
i'm not a lawyer (no thank you :) but due to my work in the Film/TV industry i can tell you that whenever we're shooting outside on the streets (documentry or not) it's the production responsibility to acknowledge the people that they're going to be inside the shot and after they say it's o.k with them, they're being signed on Release Forms which are made by lawyers, if they do not wish to be in the frame we ask them nicely to move to a different table in the case of restaurants/coffee shops, sometimes the production is even paying for their deserts to make the transition smoother , if it's on the street passer-by are usually moving aside by themselves if they do not wish to be in the frame or simply stand so close infront of the camera that we need to help them let go of their Hollywood dreams.... :)
and i'll tell you where and when are we free to shoot, we are Free to that whenever we are approaching the situation same as we wish to be approached if/when the situation is happening to us or to our Loved ones!!!!
- with Respect and Tolerance and without one's crossing our lines, if a Photographer wants to take a shot of us crying because it'll make a great Photo, but has no commpassion in his Heart for what made us crying in the first place, we'll be pissed off for a good reason, if you carry that thought in your Heart when you're the Photographer this point of view will bring you to your subject with such a Beautiful Compassion and Love in your Heart and the people will sense it, they will feel comfortable and safe, they'll know you have no bad intentions and they'll let you take their Photo!
if you do the same in a private space and approach with a smile of your face the chances are that the one who's giving the permission to shoot will give it to you!
if one walks inside with no respect (and i'm not saying you do) and simply because he's holding a camera thinks he owns the world, he's got another thing coming! and he needs to change his attitude and perspective.
we can only change ourselves when the outcome doesn't fit anymore and pushing us away from what we wish to achieve, (and i'm not only talking about Photography....) so instead of blaming the world we should all take a good long look on ourselves and in ourselves!
Love Approach..... -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 12:00 PMGita, I sure hope you dont think im some monster. I guess i did not make myself clear. beauty comes from within. A person crying is not beautiful. And as Ansel Adams says (at the top of the main photography and zen page) there are always two people in every picture. That is actually the point I was trying to make is that it would be nice if certain people before us hadnt abused public space and made everyone so afraid / weary. It would be nice if public place were just that and we could all respect the spirit of the law as opposed to being bound by the letter. By NO means do i feel like we have the right to take whatever we wish because we are in a public place, I just WISH that people in general had enough respect for eachother that we could. -
-
Unsu...
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 12:23 PM"There's another example every day. An overactive security guard harassing a photographer on a public sidewalk. Cops intimidating people with cameras. Photography bans in subways. In a post 9/11 age of paranoia and suspicion, public photography is increasingly seen as threatening, or mistaken as criminal..."
This actually happened to a couple of weeks ago as I was walking around SF one Sunday.
I was taking pictures of the exterior of a lovely artdeco...esque building and a security guard came out, stating I couldn't take pictures.
I asked why and she couldn't really articulate an answer...she went back inside to ask a co-worker and came back, stating well, now I could but not of the interior...I pushed nicely, asking for the Property Mgmt's contact name.
Another fellow came out and invited me in and then said I could take pictures of the interior from the outside but not from inside as they didn't want the marble work showing up in a magazine or something.
It was all very nice...and I have to call the contact...but it was a little weird.
~MTS~ -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 5:01 PMI had a wierd experience myself...
I was in a mall in Kalamazoo my son and his girlfriend and their kids were on an upper level so I got out my camera hoping to get a family shot... when a security gaurd ran (yes ran) up to me and told me I couldn't take photographs inside the mall. How absurd I thought until the kids moved and behind them was a jewelry store. My conclusion was that some unscrupulous assholes had at one time or another cased the mall using pictures thereby ruining a great photo opportunity for all that followed. -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Sun, December 31, 2006 - 8:29 AMI've also been stopped from taking pictures in a mall. But at least the guard explained that it was because the mall is private property. The mall owners do in fact have the right to prohibit photography within their property, just like you or I can in our own homes.
I belong to a yahoo group that focuses on selling photographs at art shows. This topic has come up several times and has generated quite a bit of discussion. Generally speaking, if you are standing on public property, such as a sidewalk, you can shoot whatever you want. But even then, if you are standing on the sidewalk and taking a picture of a private home or garden or whatever, it is probably a good idea to ask, if you can find someone to ask.
If a person is in the photograph and you plan to sell it and the person is recognizable, it is a very good idea to at least ask, if not get a model release.
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Tue, February 13, 2007 - 1:23 AM>> a security gaurd ran (yes ran) up to me and told me I couldn't take photographs inside the mall. How absurd I thought until the kids moved and behind them was a jewelry store. My conclusion was that some unscrupulous assholes had at one time or another cased the mall using pictures thereby ruining a great photo opportunity for all that followed. <<
I was stopped a few weeks ago at a local mall for taking pictures myself. Shocked, I was told the mall management didn't want people taking pictures of the design and duplicating it.
So, off I went to the management office, because all I was doing was studying how people used the space for a class project, as well as how the decor contributed to wayfinding, etc. (an interior design class), and I just needed the images for reference. The management office said the real issue was taking pictures of the logos of the stores, or merchandise, and if I promised to only shoot the public spaces and keep the stores' signs out of the shots, I could do what I wanted to.
It still struck me as odd, because it's not like you can't just go online and download almost anyone's logo that you want nowadays, even if you're not allowed to photograph it in place.
Wendy
-
-
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, July 6, 2006 - 12:57 PMoh Greg.....
i didn't think that at all!!!! i also wrote "(and i'm not saying you do)" and you made yourself prety clear,
i simply gave examples and was not talking about how i thought you're acting while holding a camera, not at all and i apologize if what i wrote made you feel as if i'm judging you, i wasn't.
and i can see Beauty in crying as well, raw emotions, sacred ones, which doesn't means i'll go and click away.... but some people will, they see only the image and the end result. and it's sad.
what i did write to you was the part, that even in those suspicious times, we can make people feel comfortable, and it depends on our approach to the situation, we can have them feel unaffraid in front of us, it is up to us and i wish for it the same as you do, to have this Respectful way in general towards eachother, and i believe we can make it better, not only wishing but actually undo the situation, you can call it the butterfly effect, small changes leads to big ones....
Bliss to you Greg - you're one of the good ones :)
Gita.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Sun, July 2, 2006 - 9:20 AMPhotography may not be a crime, but most photographers are criminals! :)
Seriously, it's easy to see why this stigma may exist. There's something unsettling about looking up and seeing a big round eye transfixed on you. And then there are the few bad apples that spoil it for the rest of us, like the paparazzi, which I believe has a negative effect on photography. But an even larger group is the unaware casual photographer who never seems to realize he's standing right in front of you blocking the wview while he clicks away with his Coolpix.
I go out of my way to be curteous and respectful when I shoot in public, just to head that bad stigma of at the pass. -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Sun, July 2, 2006 - 10:14 AMI just find this a interesting current phenomena- post 9/11, in our highly visual culture, place of photography in the art world, etc.... ;-) -
-
Fuck Censorship
Mon, July 3, 2006 - 10:00 AMI agree that a persons space is their own and that taking their image can be invasive. I am ESPECIALLY careful taking images of children (playing etc) to approah parents beforehand. I dont think many of us can deny that there are alot of twisted monkeys out there and i belive that if someone dosnt want their image taken it shouldnt be taken (an advantage of digital photos) often if you just talk to someone they will understand that you have a legitimate purpose (if in fact you do) As for Censorship...... FUCK THAT SHIT!!! -
-
people, public and shooting of the non lethal (on both sides) variety
Wed, November 1, 2006 - 6:40 PMThere is something to be said for the lack of sponteanity when you go and speak to people beforehand. One thing that I've tried in the past is just to start shooting as unobrtusively as possible and IF the subject looks up and wants to know what you were doing, have a business card in your bag and hand it over - not all your info, just name, city/state and e-mail. That way, they have a way to get a hold of you. Only once in doing this have I ever had someone say they wished for the images to be erased, which I did on the spot. (digital - the pleasure and pain)
There was an article in an issue of Outdoor Photographer (I think - I can't remember exactly and I don't have it handy) a couple months ago called "Shooting from the Hip". It was about how learning to frame images without looking through the lense can give you more natural images when photographing in public because you're not walking around with 300mm of black glass sticking off the end of your face. It's a skill that I'm still working on but that has upped my 'confidence' so to speak about shooting people in public. -
-
Re: people, public and shooting of the non lethal (on both sides) variety
Wed, November 1, 2006 - 8:06 PMI've worked similarly in the urban environment... method I call run and gun. helps to have a bubble level atop the hotshoe, since I don't have the advantage of the rotating display. just hang the camera from my neck by the strap, tuck the cable release in my pocket (very inconspicous in winter garb) and fire away. being able to capture expression in an utterly candid and uninhibited state is so incredibly revealing. sure, there's a lot of cropping and balancing to do later, but isn't that what a dry darkroom is for?
the only real resistence i ever ran into was when i was obvious in shooting pictures along the tracks on an elevated train platform on the Chicago Transit Authority, when two cops ordered me to stop, advising me it was against CTA regulations. (some fool alongside me tried to hassle them on my behalf... i could have strangled the MF) Turns out the CTA is a municipal corporation, essentially private property... their roof, their rules, ya know. One of their publicity people later explained to me a few good reasons for banning 'commercial' photography along the routes... being not wanting the photographer / filmer to get injured, not wanting commuters to feel intruded upon or intimidated, not interfering with the movement of the vehicles... and they're extremely strict about not photographing / filming graffiti, criminal acts, and suicides. It costs a pretty penny to have a 'manager' accompany a commercial shoot, though she stated they plainly have no problem with sight seers and snapshots. I still have managed to surreptitiously get some very nice candids along the routes, shall we say "derivative of" Walker Evans ... though I prefer groups of people interacting (or not) rather than particular individuals. that broaches on portraiture which is, to me, a completely different approach.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Wed, November 1, 2006 - 9:35 PMOne of my most favorite pastimnes is night photography. I find it most meditative to sit by my Hassy for several minutes wauiting for the proper exposure. Very peaceful and quiet. I find that about one in three times I go out shooting, I get contacted by a policeman or security guard. I have in the past been accused of being a terrorist, and casing targets. I find it absurd that I would make such a spectacle of myself. A large tripod, camera bag, stopwatch and meter around my neck, and staying in one place for long periods of time, as opposed to just walking by a "target" with a high resolution camera, shooting from the hip. Why would I make such an effort to stand out by shooting at night, if I were contemplating evil? I regularly explain to folks that there is enough light to shoot by, if your exposure is long enough. I have had quite a number of good conversations with passersby when shooting. The look you can achieve with such long exposures is sublime, truly wonderful The luminosity you create in your work from this type of shooting is unbeatable. It's just a shame that I have to put up with the guards and cops. As for shooting peopel in an open and public environment, I do shoot that way sometimes. There is a large body of work to support the belief in the artistic expression of "street and Documentary" shooting. I do tend to be a bit more careful of who or what I shoot. I always have my business card to give to interested parties, as well as the photographer's rights card by Bert P Krages. Being pleasant and courteous has so far always paid off. Here is a link to this lawyers site, for anyone interested.
www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Good luck and happy shooting!! -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Thu, November 2, 2006 - 4:36 AMThank you for the link! I haven't had any problems thus far when out and about shooting at night, but it's bound to happen at some point. Thank you for sharing this important information!
-
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Sat, November 18, 2006 - 7:01 PMwho remembers princess diana and her tragic death... what that did to photo journalism and ETHICS -
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Tue, November 21, 2006 - 2:23 PMI remember but it's been going on longer than that - the princess' death only made it worse. then we have movies like 'papazzari' that bring it all into the limelight again and put us on the chopping block. Yet no one makes a peep about movies like 'one hour photo' which happens a hell of a lot more than 'paparazzi' and with much creepier and deadlier results. what do you think is amoung the leading jobs for stalkers?
-
-
Re: "Photography is Not a Crime":
Mon, January 1, 2007 - 10:00 PMi think as photographers, it is our respnosibility to show the world our ethcis, our morals through our shooting pratice. in our world, we all have a different feeling about how to photograph someone, somthing that we do not "own" the right to do so other than the idea of the "thing" being in public. .....
for me, i wait for permission through the eyes, a nod of the head... through my gut.. i listen to elders.. and remember the indians perspective that to take ones photo is to steal ones soul... i do not have the right.. i do have the right to express my idea of the soul in iimage making.. but not with out permission.. and that is why i am not a photojournalist.. the 911 photos of people jumping for thier lives was too hard for me to see. i could not imagine being a member of that persons family, seeing the image that was eagerly posted on the web. the princess diana event also turned my stomach. but that is just me... and i know i am out numbered.,. i am also a poor artists giving my images to non-profits that work for a higer good, a goal , a mission that i support.. but hey that is just me.