Advertisement
By Nassim Nicholas Taleb
1. What is fragile should break early while it is still small. Nothing should ever become too big to fail. Evolution in economic life helps those with the maximum amount of hidden risks – and hence the most fragile – become the biggest.
2. No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains. Whatever may need to be bailed out should be nationalised; whatever does not need a bail-out should be free, small and risk-bearing. We have managed to combine the worst of capitalism and socialism. In France in the 1980s, the socialists took over the banks. In the US in the 2000s, the banks took over the government. This is surreal.
3. People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus. The economics establishment (universities, regulators, central bankers, government officials, various organisations staffed with economists) lost its legitimacy with the failure of the system. It is irresponsible and foolish to put our trust in the ability of such experts to get us out of this mess. Instead, find the smart people whose hands are clean.
4. Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks. Odds are he would cut every corner on safety to show “profits” while claiming to be “conservative”. Bonuses do not accommodate the hidden risks of blow-ups. It is the asymmetry of the bonus system that got us here. No incentives without disincentives: capitalism is about rewards and punishments, not just rewards.
5. Counter-balance complexity with simplicity. Complexity from globalisation and highly networked economic life needs to be countered by simplicity in financial products. The complex economy is already a form of leverage: the leverage of efficiency. Such systems survive thanks to slack and redundancy; adding debt produces wild and dangerous gyrations and leaves no room for error. Capitalism cannot avoid fads and bubbles: equity bubbles (as in 2000) have proved to be mild; debt bubbles are vicious.
6. Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning . Complex derivatives need to be banned because nobody understands them and few are rational enough to know it. Citizens must be protected from themselves, from bankers selling them “hedging” products, and from gullible regulators who listen to economic theorists.
7. Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”. Cascading rumours are a product of complex systems. Governments cannot stop the rumours. Simply, we need to be in a position to shrug off rumours, be robust in the face of them.
8. Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains. Using leverage to cure the problems of too much leverage is not homeopathy, it is denial. The debt crisis is not a temporary problem, it is a structural one. We need rehab.
9. Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement. Economic life should be definancialised. We should learn not to use markets as storehouses of value: they do not harbour the certainties that normal citizens require. Citizens should experience anxiety about their own businesses (which they control), not their investments (which they do not control).
10. Make an omelette with the broken eggs. Finally, this crisis cannot be fixed with makeshift repairs, no more than a boat with a rotten hull can be fixed with ad-hoc patches. We need to rebuild the hull with new (stronger) materials; we will have to remake the system before it does so itself. Let us move voluntarily into Capitalism 2.0 by helping what needs to be broken break on its own, converting debt into equity, marginalising the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics, banning leveraged buyouts, putting bankers where they belong, clawing back the bonuses of those who got us here, and teaching people to navigate a world with fewer certainties.
Then we will see an economic life closer to our biological environment: smaller companies, richer ecology, no leverage. A world in which entrepreneurs, not bankers, take the risks and companies are born and die every day without making the news.
In other words, a place more resistant to black swans.
www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5d5a...4feabdc0.html
Makes so much sense it is assured to never be implemented. Doesn't give the disaster capitalists and bottom feeders any room to collect nickels in front of a steamroller.
1. What is fragile should break early while it is still small. Nothing should ever become too big to fail. Evolution in economic life helps those with the maximum amount of hidden risks – and hence the most fragile – become the biggest.
2. No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains. Whatever may need to be bailed out should be nationalised; whatever does not need a bail-out should be free, small and risk-bearing. We have managed to combine the worst of capitalism and socialism. In France in the 1980s, the socialists took over the banks. In the US in the 2000s, the banks took over the government. This is surreal.
3. People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus. The economics establishment (universities, regulators, central bankers, government officials, various organisations staffed with economists) lost its legitimacy with the failure of the system. It is irresponsible and foolish to put our trust in the ability of such experts to get us out of this mess. Instead, find the smart people whose hands are clean.
4. Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks. Odds are he would cut every corner on safety to show “profits” while claiming to be “conservative”. Bonuses do not accommodate the hidden risks of blow-ups. It is the asymmetry of the bonus system that got us here. No incentives without disincentives: capitalism is about rewards and punishments, not just rewards.
5. Counter-balance complexity with simplicity. Complexity from globalisation and highly networked economic life needs to be countered by simplicity in financial products. The complex economy is already a form of leverage: the leverage of efficiency. Such systems survive thanks to slack and redundancy; adding debt produces wild and dangerous gyrations and leaves no room for error. Capitalism cannot avoid fads and bubbles: equity bubbles (as in 2000) have proved to be mild; debt bubbles are vicious.
6. Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning . Complex derivatives need to be banned because nobody understands them and few are rational enough to know it. Citizens must be protected from themselves, from bankers selling them “hedging” products, and from gullible regulators who listen to economic theorists.
7. Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”. Cascading rumours are a product of complex systems. Governments cannot stop the rumours. Simply, we need to be in a position to shrug off rumours, be robust in the face of them.
8. Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains. Using leverage to cure the problems of too much leverage is not homeopathy, it is denial. The debt crisis is not a temporary problem, it is a structural one. We need rehab.
9. Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement. Economic life should be definancialised. We should learn not to use markets as storehouses of value: they do not harbour the certainties that normal citizens require. Citizens should experience anxiety about their own businesses (which they control), not their investments (which they do not control).
10. Make an omelette with the broken eggs. Finally, this crisis cannot be fixed with makeshift repairs, no more than a boat with a rotten hull can be fixed with ad-hoc patches. We need to rebuild the hull with new (stronger) materials; we will have to remake the system before it does so itself. Let us move voluntarily into Capitalism 2.0 by helping what needs to be broken break on its own, converting debt into equity, marginalising the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics, banning leveraged buyouts, putting bankers where they belong, clawing back the bonuses of those who got us here, and teaching people to navigate a world with fewer certainties.
Then we will see an economic life closer to our biological environment: smaller companies, richer ecology, no leverage. A world in which entrepreneurs, not bankers, take the risks and companies are born and die every day without making the news.
In other words, a place more resistant to black swans.
www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5d5a...4feabdc0.html
Makes so much sense it is assured to never be implemented. Doesn't give the disaster capitalists and bottom feeders any room to collect nickels in front of a steamroller.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 6:47 AMOnce something is assumed to be possible, and this assumption is acted upon, that thing ceases to be a black swan.
If people want to live below a dam, that's fine.
But maybe we shouldn't build hospitals and nuclear power plants below them... you know... just in case? -
-
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 6:56 AMI love the way Taleb is ripping the quants and financial industry. problem is they still are the ones who have all the seats at the government table.
His humor is quite a hoot.
From a recent talk he gave;
----------
[snip]
October 2008 was certainly a spectacular month in the stock markets....
Those of us who studied modern finance theory, however, were truly astonished by the sheer improbability of the events occurring in the stock markets during that fateful month. One of the basic assumptions used in almost all our finance models is that returns are normally distributed. These models are widely used to price derivatives and other complex financial products. What do these models tell us about the probabilities of the events that occurred in October?
The following table gives an answer. We selected the six largest daily percentage changes in the Dow Jones Industrial Average during October, and asked the question of how frequent these changes occur assuming that, as is commonly done in finance models, these events are normally distributed. The results are truly astonishing. There were two daily changes of more than 10% during the month. With a standard deviation of daily changes of 1.032% (computed over the period 1971-2008) movements of such a magnitude can occur only once every 73 to 603 trillion billion years. Since our universe, according to most physicists, exists a mere 20 billion years we, finance theorists, would have had to wait for another trillion universes before one such change could be observed. Yet it happened twice during the same month. A truly miraculous event. The other four changes during the same month of October have a somewhat higher frequency, but surely we did not expect these to happen in our lifetimes.
[/snip]
-
-
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 11:03 AMSorry to spike Taleb's premature celebration of a Capitalism 2.0 (particularly since such a "vision" is what produced this calamity in the first place), but it sounds to me like he's talking about economics in some alternate dimension.
Since capital tends toward centralization and even the most ironclad regulations designed to modify that get torn into confetti in practice, it's hard to see how we won't be back in precisely the same predicament even if we do everything he suggests.
Actually, *especially* if we do what he suggests.
< marginalising the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics >>
HAHAHA!! This entire downturn has "MILTON FRIEDMAN" stamped all over it and I can remember a time when no one was allowed to question that fool's gimme-gimme "ideas" because of his talismanic Nobel Prize. Gone are the days... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 11:32 AMWhat system doesn't tend to move towards a centralization of power?
-
-
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 1:55 PMAnarchism. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 2:13 PMon paper? Yes. In real life? I doubt it.
People are pack animals and we gravitate towards charismatic individuals. Just look how Pericles was able to exploit the Democratic system in Athens
-
-
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Sat, April 25, 2009 - 2:34 PMDecentralization is something that always has to be sought. In reali life, it did happen in Spain in the '1930s. It also is being practiced in many enclaves.
-
Re: Ten principles for a Black Swan-proof world
Tue, April 28, 2009 - 5:43 PM
-
Re: Ten Lovely Prizes for the Barony's Loyal Serfs and Voluntary Defenders
Wed, April 29, 2009 - 2:33 PM>>on paper? Yes. In real life? I doubt it. <<
Ha! Can anyone else spot the irony? I don't want to sully my visit with bloodshed.
But come on, man: anarchism is not only nature's government, it's the only system that *hasn't* been *proven* to fail in the modern world.
"I doubt it" is a euphemism for "I am a terrified lazy chattel ape" and you know it.
-
-
-
-