Advertisement
After painstaking analysis, the CBO estimated that the House health care reform bill, known as the Affordable Health Care for America Act, would reduce the federal deficit by about $109 billion during the first 10 years after it takes effect. To repeat: The bill passed by the House Democrats on the evening of Saturday, Nov. 7, “would yield a net reduction in federal budget deficits of $109 billion over the 2010-2019 period.”
The CBO experts also costed out the Senate Finance Committee bill and found that it would cut federal deficits by more than $80 billion during that first decade.
Those reassuring conclusions derive from other basic facts about reform that tend to be ignored or concealed. Reform will reduce wasteful spending by hundreds of billions of dollars annually, and will depend for financing on excise taxes imposed on the wealthiest 1 percent of the population.
Much of the misinformation about the costs of reform comes from the belief—fostered by conservatives—that the government-run health plan known as the “public option” would impose a huge burden on the federal budget. So says Joseph Lieberman, the independent senator from Connecticut who has threatened to filibuster the bill.
Section 322 of the Affordable Health Care for America Act says clearly and concisely that people insured under the public option will pay premium rates “at a level sufficient to fully finance the costs of health benefits provided by the public health insurance option; and administrative costs related to operating the public health insurance option.” In short, the public option will involve no new federal expenditure.
uspolitics.einnews.com/news.php
The CBO experts also costed out the Senate Finance Committee bill and found that it would cut federal deficits by more than $80 billion during that first decade.
Those reassuring conclusions derive from other basic facts about reform that tend to be ignored or concealed. Reform will reduce wasteful spending by hundreds of billions of dollars annually, and will depend for financing on excise taxes imposed on the wealthiest 1 percent of the population.
Much of the misinformation about the costs of reform comes from the belief—fostered by conservatives—that the government-run health plan known as the “public option” would impose a huge burden on the federal budget. So says Joseph Lieberman, the independent senator from Connecticut who has threatened to filibuster the bill.
Section 322 of the Affordable Health Care for America Act says clearly and concisely that people insured under the public option will pay premium rates “at a level sufficient to fully finance the costs of health benefits provided by the public health insurance option; and administrative costs related to operating the public health insurance option.” In short, the public option will involve no new federal expenditure.
uspolitics.einnews.com/news.php
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Health Care Bill Saves $109 Billion
Wed, November 11, 2009 - 3:57 PMI've been arguing this for months. The best time to cure a disease is before the patient gets it. The earlier the detection the less treatment is needed. This translates into huge savings when it comes to government sponsored health care. People with health insurance tend to visit health care professionals earlier on in the disease process. Pre-natal care is vitally important. Babies who are born premature or drug addicted have multiple and very expensive problems later in life.
It seems to me the current reform is simply expanding Medicare rather than re-inventing the wheel. This will benefit two ways that I know of (probably more). Will they cut back on Medicare? Yes. It will be replaced with a more streamlined, lifelong health care system. That's the part the conservatives leave out when ramping up their minions.
One way is that Medicare will be able to focus on the cheaters who have taken advantage of flaws in the system to the tune of 13 Billion dollars in Florida alone. Those freeway size flaws need fixing.
Another will be to stop paying private insurance a 14% premium to do their job. Yes that's right. 14% right off the top and on top of any profits to administer Medicare Advantage which covers part D.
These two things alone will provide up to one third the needed funds for the government insurance option.
-
Re: Health Care Bill Saves $109 Billion
Wed, November 11, 2009 - 6:04 PMAnd of course, you believe that. -
-
Re: Health Care Bill Saves $109 Billion
Wed, November 11, 2009 - 6:09 PMAnd why wouldn't he. Forrest isn't stuck on the left right fallacy that you are always on. -
-
Re: Health Care Bill Saves $109 Billion
Thu, November 12, 2009 - 10:31 AMWhen is the last time a government project has come in on budget? Left or right has nothing to do with it. -
-
Re: Health Care Bill Saves $109 Billion
Thu, November 12, 2009 - 12:05 PMIt doesn't. It has more to do with what corporate influence. Often using tax cuts which mostly benifit the rich, and increased military spending, which really doesn't have anything to do with national security, which only ended up making the only way to pay off the debts by printing more currency. Time to invest in wheelbarrows.
-
-
-