Advertisement
The private homes that New London, Conn., took away from Suzette Kelo and her neighbors have been torn down. Their former site is a wasteland of fields of weeds, a monument to the power of eminent domain.
But now Pfizer, the drug company whose neighboring research facility had been the original cause of the homes' seizure, has just announced that it is closing up shop in New London.
To lure those jobs to New London a decade ago, the local government promised to demolish the older residential neighborhood adjacent to the land Pfizer was buying for next-to-nothing. Suzette Kelo fought the taking to the Supreme Court, and lost. Five justices found this redevelopment met the constitutional hurdle of "public use."
The Hartford Courant reports:
Pfizer Inc. will shut down its massive New London research and development headquarters and transfer most of the 1,400 people working there to Groton, the pharmaceutical giant said Monday....
Pfizer is now deciding what to do with its giant New London offices, and will consider selling it, leasing it and other options, a company spokeswoman said.
Scott Bullock, Kelo's co-counsel in the case, told me: "This shows the folly of these redevelopment projects that use massive taxpayer subsidies and other forms of corporate welfare and abuse eminent domain."
www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin....html
But now Pfizer, the drug company whose neighboring research facility had been the original cause of the homes' seizure, has just announced that it is closing up shop in New London.
To lure those jobs to New London a decade ago, the local government promised to demolish the older residential neighborhood adjacent to the land Pfizer was buying for next-to-nothing. Suzette Kelo fought the taking to the Supreme Court, and lost. Five justices found this redevelopment met the constitutional hurdle of "public use."
The Hartford Courant reports:
Pfizer Inc. will shut down its massive New London research and development headquarters and transfer most of the 1,400 people working there to Groton, the pharmaceutical giant said Monday....
Pfizer is now deciding what to do with its giant New London offices, and will consider selling it, leasing it and other options, a company spokeswoman said.
Scott Bullock, Kelo's co-counsel in the case, told me: "This shows the folly of these redevelopment projects that use massive taxpayer subsidies and other forms of corporate welfare and abuse eminent domain."
www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin....html
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Pfizer abandons site of infamous Kelo eminent domain taking
Wed, November 11, 2009 - 8:03 AMMaybe they should donate it to Ms. Kelo.
-
Re: Pfizer abandons site of infamous Kelo eminent domain taking
Wed, November 11, 2009 - 10:47 PMTexas is one of many states to recently pass laws against this.
When the Texas legislature is affording more rights than the supreme court, you know the supreme court is out on a limb.
Property rights have always been paramount in Texas, however. We have the strongest homestead protection law in the nation, dating back to the state's original constitution. -
-
Re: Pfizer abandons site of infamous Kelo eminent domain taking
Thu, November 12, 2009 - 6:07 AMYes Texas had to pass those laws to protect the ranchers that took the land from the Mexicans who owned it before them. -
-
Re: Pfizer abandons site of infamous Kelo eminent domain taking
Thu, November 12, 2009 - 6:11 AMYou're entirely wrong.
The Republic of Texas was founded by dead beat debtors from Tennessee. These fellows left Tennessee owing a lot of debts.
After they acquired property and homesteads in Texas, they did not want their creditors from Tennessee to be able to make claims against them, so they enacted the homestead acts.
By and large Texans did not enact laws to take land away from the Spanish land grant Mexicans. That was done simply by force, as is usually the case when one group tries to lay claim to the land of another. -
-
Re: Pfizer abandons site of infamous Kelo eminent domain taking
Thu, November 12, 2009 - 10:27 AMAnd don't think Mexico isn't trying to take it back, along with Arizona, New Mexico, and California.
-
-
-