Palin v. Reality

topic posted Thu, October 29, 2009 - 10:59 AM by  offlineForrest
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
In some ways, the last year has unfolded for her like a reality TV show gone wrong: a governorship plagued by ethics investigations that ended with a shocking and widely mocked resignation speech, the repeated airing of sour grapes from former McCain campaign aides, a series of embarrassing scheduling mishaps at key Republican Party events, and a bevy of tabloid reports carrying insidious allegations about her personal life.

Just-released CNN polling confirms the last 12 months have taken a toll on the Alaska Republican's popularity. Her overall favorable rating has dipped to 42 percent and she trails former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in a hypothetical matchup for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012 by 7 points. Moreover, Palin's unfavorable rating is 15 points higher than Huckabee's.

Palin has also made few of the conventional moves befitting a presidential candidate-in-waiting: She's rarely shown up at party events, has made virtually no public appearances since she resigned the governorship, or granted no national media interviews and retained no political staff.

What could be most troublesome for Palin at this stage: Most Americans can't seem to envision her ever being the commander-in-chief.

"Her biggest problem is the perception that she is not qualified to be president," CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said. "Seven in 10 Americans, and nearly half of all Republicans, say she is not qualified. It's a problem that politicians have faced before, but one that few have been able to overcome."

www.cnn.com/2009/POLITIC.../sarah.palin/


Palin backs Perry in Texas, but Cheney supports Hutchinson . . . so he's on the side of the moderates . . .

www.dallasnews.com/sharedco...92b9.html


Iowa Republicans upset over $100,000 speaker fee.

www.politico.com/blogs/ben...d_fee.html


You gotta admit, she's interesting to watch . . .
posted by:
Forrest
Oregon
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Palin v. Reality

    Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:32 AM
    She doesn't rank the acknowledgement she thinks she does.. My Vote is Blow Her tired Ass Off!!

    Her 15 minutes of Andy Warhol Infamy has worn off!!
    • Re: Palin v. Reality

      Fri, October 30, 2009 - 10:39 AM
      She's a lot of fun, though . . . what if she gets the presidential nomination? Hoo! Just the thought of it is giving the Republicans nightmares . . .

      For Republicans, she's really the Candidate From Hell, the "base" loves her, and most of the country thinks she's a joke.
      • B
        B
        offline 120

        Re: Palin v. Reality

        Fri, October 30, 2009 - 3:14 PM
        That got Bush elected remember. If Rove steps up to run her campaign we're doomed.
        • Re: Palin v. Reality

          Sat, October 31, 2009 - 8:26 PM
          <That got Bush elected remember. If Rove steps up to run her campaign we're doomed.>

          After the Bush fiasco, Rove running the campaign of ANY republican would be the electoral kiss of death, much less running Palin's campaign.
  • Re: Palin v. Reality

    Fri, October 30, 2009 - 3:33 PM
    <In some ways, the last year has unfolded for her like a reality TV show gone wrong:>

    in other ways the last year has unfolded like a realiity tv show gone really right = instantly vaulted from obscurity and small state scams to national fame and totaly legal $millions.
    • Re: Palin v. Reality

      Fri, October 30, 2009 - 4:09 PM
      The $100K speaker's fee shows where her head is at. Whoever heard of Iowa Republicans paying $100K for a visit from a candidate? Most people SPEND money on their campaigns in Iowa . . .
      • Re: Palin v. Reality

        Fri, October 30, 2009 - 4:57 PM
        GWB was like Big Brother/Survivor, all flash and no substance
        Palin is unfolding like Balloon Boys parents, just reality show wannabees, only enough of a trainwreck to warrant a few months news...
      • B
        B
        offline 120

        Re: Palin v. Reality

        Sat, October 31, 2009 - 5:44 PM
        $100K is nothing. She got something like $300K plus for her talk to the financial elite in Hong Kong.
        • Re: Palin v. Reality

          Sat, October 31, 2009 - 7:26 PM
          [That got Bush elected remember. If Rove steps up to run her campaign we're doomed. ]

          I don't think the two are remotely comparable. Bush served all of his terms as governor of Texas, a state with 35 times the population of Alaska and several actual metropolitan centers. He was part of a Republican establishment dating back three generations and could pretend to some degree of experience running an actual business (though that experience was largely fraudulent -- he had little real decision making power or responsibility in those companies -- and there is no actual evidence he could run anything more complicated than a mountain bike). He was groomed for the presidency by the Republican power structure and, while "the base" ate him up, a large part of that base -- the religious right -- was repeatedly disappointed by his failure to enact their agenda and ultimately grew disenchanted with him.

          Palin did not even finish her first term as governor of Alaska, a state with a population considerably smaller than the city of San Francisco and no real urban centers (Anchorage, the largest municipality, has fewer residents than Oakland; no other city in Alaska comes even close in population density). She was not the choice of the party hierarchy -- she was a flukey pick right out of Presidential candidate John McCain's maverick asshole -- a pick rather cynically made in an effort to palliate the "base," which wasn't crazy about McCain and was looking for somebody more in line with the party's lunatic fringe who could step in in case McCain croaked.

          I think Forrest is right. Even Karl Rove couldn't sell Dipstick Palin to most American voters.
          • Re: Palin v. Reality

            Sat, October 31, 2009 - 7:41 PM
            >>>>>>>Palin did not even finish her first term as governor of Alaska, a state with a population considerably smaller than the city of San Francisco and no real urban centers (Anchorage, the largest municipality, has fewer residents than Oakland

            I believe that Anchorage doesn't even add up to a 1/3rd of Oakland.
          • Re: Palin v. Reality

            Mon, November 2, 2009 - 8:15 AM
            I will continue to vote for her and support her because she speaks for the soccer moms, the real Americans, the Americans who want our country back, and is not part of the mainstream media.

            She's an attractive brunette, she's white, Christian, Republican, and wealthy. She looks great in $1,000 designer Japanese eyeglasses. She's got booty. She's a woman. She's a mother. She's a mom and a wife. And she was a lady governor. She can govern. She can defend herself with a rifle against bears and Russian bastards too. She's sexy. She doesn't read boring newspapers like the New York Times and neither do I. I would enjoy sitting down with her and chatting over a cup of coffee. She's a real person, an ordinary person, not an elitist, America-hating snob.

            She's pro-life. Her daughter had a baby. She and her husband are married. I've seen her interviewed in her kitchen. Her kitchen looks like that of any affluent Americans. She's like us. She's white. I want my America back.

            Democratic female candidates tend to be ugly, compared to Sara Palin. Sara Palin is beautiful. And she played sports. And she is hetrosexual. Democratic female candidates don't play sports and have lesbian friends.

            She will give us our America back.
            • Re: Palin v. Reality

              Wed, November 11, 2009 - 11:51 PM
              > She's an attractive brunette, she's white, Christian, Republican, and wealthy.

              Please continue to vote for her. And promote your ideas in swing states.

Recent topics in "Political Junkies"