Advertisement
www.boingboing.net/2009/11/...-tre.html
Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
The internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama's administration refused to disclose due to "national security" concerns, has leaked. It's bad. It says:
* * That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn't infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.
* * That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet -- and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living -- if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.
* * That the whole world must adopt US-style "notice-and-takedown" rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.
* * Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)
The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting the Pieces Together www.michaelgeist.ca/content/...4510/125/
Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
The internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama's administration refused to disclose due to "national security" concerns, has leaked. It's bad. It says:
* * That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn't infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.
* * That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet -- and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living -- if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.
* * That the whole world must adopt US-style "notice-and-takedown" rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.
* * Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)
The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting the Pieces Together www.michaelgeist.ca/content/...4510/125/
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 1:31 PMAnd yet again the world greets this information with a yawn. -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 2:14 PMOr brainwashed into believing that it is beneficial.
-
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 2:24 PMSounds like more power grabbing to me. Shut down the people's ability to communicate, eliminate Freedom of Speech. The Obama way. -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 2:29 PMNot just an Obama thing... prior administrations moved in this direction
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 2:30 PMRepublicans haven't been any better, they have been much worst. -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 6:33 AM<Sounds like more power grabbing to me. Shut down the people's ability to communicate, eliminate Freedom of Speech. The Obama way.>
The Government, this one, the last one, the next one doesn't come up with any of this on it's own. Corporations and industry groups lobby, write the laws and pay off the lawmakers from both parties to pass these laws. The goal is not to clamp down on freedom of speech that would be the Patriot Act written by John Ashcroft. The goal is to move the money that is deep in people's pocket (because there is so little of it now) into the ever expanding coffers of the corporations. The failure of Capitalism in this country is the failure to intensely regulate the corporations and their abuse of corporate power.
Arm the Homeless.
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 11:58 AMCan you show us how Republicans have been worse as far as power grabbing than Obama is? Remember that all the grabs he has made have been in under a year, and he has three more years to continue his pattern. Can you name other presidents that have done things such as taking over major manufacturers, huge financial institutions, and are attempting to bring one sixth of the economy under the control of himself and his minions? -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 12:10 PMYou're forgetting, the $700 billion bank bailout (I think it's up to $800 billion now, it ran over) was Bush's plan. Obama had not even been elected.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26987291/
Government interference in the economy has been FAR less than in the New Deal.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_deal
The overall effect of economic stimulus (despite lagging employment) has been positive. My broker just called to say my personal porfolio is up 36% since the beginning of the year, which really eclipses the piddling tax hike. That's big money. I don't want Obama to fail, hell no!
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 3:34 PM>>>>>>>>Can you show us how Republicans have been worse as far as power grabbing than Obama is?
I guess you have been cut off in the last eight years while you were in prison. -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Sun, November 8, 2009 - 12:07 PMNow THAT was a witty response. Prison, eh? I'm sure it would make you happy to be able to imprison people for wanting to obey the Constitution, but Obama hasn't pushed for that law yet. Give him time. -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Sun, November 8, 2009 - 12:24 PMShow one thing that Obama did more power grabbing that republicans have not done. Obama got many of the payolas that republcans have.
Bushes exploitations in the post 9/11 era are hard to miss.
-
-
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 4:27 PMPatriot I and II both under Bush and a Republican Congress. -
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 4:40 PMLet's remember the theory that conservatives are frantically trying to forget, the Unitary Executive Theory:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit...ive_theory
They'll bring it up the next time a Republican is elected, but at least for the next four years, no such thing ever existed . . .
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
Thu, November 5, 2009 - 2:45 PMUm what earthly good is a treaty if it's a secret?