Advertisement
"I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention, greater energy independence, stronger national security, and much-needed fiscal restraint," she said. . . .
The abruptness of her announcement and the mystery surrounding her plans has fed widespread speculation. But Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein on Saturday warned legal action may be taken against bloggers and publications that reprint what he calls fraudulent claims.
"To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as 'fact' that Governor Palin resigned because she is 'under federal investigation' for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation," Van Flein said in a statement. "This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law."
enews.earthlink.net/article/us
Would this be part of your plan for "less government intervention" or something else?
And are you planning to prosecute me for asking snide questions?
The abruptness of her announcement and the mystery surrounding her plans has fed widespread speculation. But Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein on Saturday warned legal action may be taken against bloggers and publications that reprint what he calls fraudulent claims.
"To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as 'fact' that Governor Palin resigned because she is 'under federal investigation' for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation," Van Flein said in a statement. "This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law."
enews.earthlink.net/article/us
Would this be part of your plan for "less government intervention" or something else?
And are you planning to prosecute me for asking snide questions?
posted by:
|
Oregon
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 10:05 PM>MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post,<
Remember the old adage - you don't pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel. -
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 4:09 AMregardless of all that I hope and pray for, somehow this woman ends up in front of my face again?
THERE IS NO GOD
-
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 11:21 AMYou cannot build an election war chest while stranded in Anchorage...she will pull her 7 figure book advance and hit the charm offensive in the lower 48 to get on the Rep. Primary ticket in 2012...further splitting the party for another loss.
So much for your "Permanent Republican Majority" Karl Rove...you fucktard..how does it feel? -
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 4:19 PMMaybe it's her detractors she's hoping to sail on - "vote for me and I promise: I *will* resign"
-
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Sun, July 5, 2009 - 11:23 PMPalin continues to be a divisive figure among the general public, with about as many saying they have an unfavorable impression (44%) as a favorable view (45%) of the Alaska governor.
Among Republicans, however, the balance of opinion about Palin is more positive than it is regarding Romney or other leading GOP figures, Newt Gingrich and Michael Steele. More than seven-in-ten Republicans (73%) express a favorable opinion of Palin while just 17% have an unfavorable opinion. . . .
Palin’s ratings continue to be much better among conservative Republicans (80%) than among moderates and liberals in the party (62%). And while positive views of Palin have slipped among non-evangelical Republicans (from 77% to 67%), they remain overwhelmingly positive among white evangelical Republicans (84% now, 85% last October).
Notably, as was the case during the election, Palin is rated somewhat better by men than she is by women. About half of men (48%) say their overall opinion of Palin is favorable, while 40% say it is unfavorable. Among women, the picture is reversed: 48% offer an unfavorable view, 41% a favorable one. This difference largely arises from gender differences in party affiliation. For instance, among Republicans, men and women express similar views of Palin (73% favorable).
Palin receives a more favorable rating from those with a high school degree or less (48% favorable, 36% unfavorable) than she does from college graduates (41% favorable, 52% unfavorable). Regionally, she is somewhat better regarded in the South (49% favorable) than she is in the Northeast (39% favorable).
people-press.org/report/52...vorability
Vote Palin, the candidate of uneducated Southern white male evangelicals . . .
-
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 12:09 AM"Palin receives a more favorable rating from those with a high school degree or less"
Of course.
-
-
Re: Palin: Mixed Messages
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 1:37 PM
