transcendingheteropatriarchalconditio

topic posted Thu, July 3, 2008 - 9:26 AM by  jeanette
ningandmergingintotribaltranssexualpolyamory.....

and this has much less to do with sex than it does w the subconsious politics of sexual conditioning.

alliances of friendship, which are built on trust and information sharing, create bonds more powerful than mating. the common duration for the mating cycle in the hetero-nuclear family is aproximately 2-5 years. and it is endured w an intensity that seeks to own that which is temporary and beyond our control. this mindset promotes the illusion that our love, our lives, our children, our community, and our resources are separate; to be shared or withheld based on our fickle understanding and faulty reasoning.

male-hetero conditioning has us busy purchasing love w a down payment in the form of the cost of our time and gifts to lay at the feet of our new idol. but it is a down payment toward "ownership". if the recipient accepts, then she accepts the terms of ownership. it is understood that her friendship is not what is being purchased. if she dares to offer friendship, then consumer consiousness will emerge in the form of hostility.

these terms of agreement are unconsious. they have been acted out for miscegenations, by far preceding the days when the "bride" was purchased from the father in trade for material goods.

in order to keep "the feminine principle" powerless, she was offered "security" and the allegiance of mating while being deprived of her essential nature, which is to network. any attempt at networking was kept in check by the exclusivity of male bonding. which is why men are still so threatened by m-f transexuality. at an unconsious level it represents and end to the world as we know it. and we are on the way to decontructing our unconscious psycho-sexual mechanisms. it is time that they were thouroughtly explored, and, time for the apparent inherent limitations to be questioned. exclusions have not yet been eliminated with this new paradigm, but will hopefully lighten as coupling no longer becomes the norm. think about it: what if women in estrus copulated w everyone she shared attraction w n her tribe. who's children would they be? and how does homosexuality and transgenderism affect the new generations and tribal reconstuction? and this is not a green light for "free love". love w/out boundaries comes w a cost: it is not free. and this is not a promotion for mindless, uninhibited orgies which promote std's.
posted by:
jeanette
Seattle