Advertisement
Are you mourning or vilifying him?
Does his sad, weird, dysfunctional private life negate the value of the music he created?
Was he a victim as well as a predator?
Opinions please and not rants.
Does his sad, weird, dysfunctional private life negate the value of the music he created?
Was he a victim as well as a predator?
Opinions please and not rants.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, June 25, 2009 - 5:17 PMHe was brilliant, as a musician, and sadly dysfunctional as a private individual. Unfortunately, he was surrounded by bloodsuckers who never had his best interest in mind, and he was ill-equipped to deal with it, having never had a "normal" life. I feel sorry for him. And I feel sorry for all of us, who were robbed of his future musical ability. I can still listen to "Thriller" and never grow tired of it. One of the best compilations of musical genius of all time. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, June 25, 2009 - 6:11 PMi did not like his music.,though you could listen to some of it.,i had a friend-D.,hes on tribe here send me a ytube of michael jacksons-jackson 5 in 72 they did a video called rockin robin.,it put him on the charts.,and to hear he died today.,so sad.,im gonna miss the jerk-- -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, June 25, 2009 - 6:25 PMHe was a genius who wasn't understood. I liked the energy he projected when he performed, magical! His personal life was painful to watch, but I can separate the two. i don't know what he did or didn't do with kids, only the universe knows for sure. After Farrah Fawcett died today I was wondering who was the third (death comes in threes, remember Ed McMahon). So sad Al Sharpton spoke at the Apollo Theater and said MJ was hurt that people stayed away from him, those same people now are singing his praises. Bloodsuckers is right.
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, June 25, 2009 - 6:51 PMI appreciated his music, but I do remember with sadness and outrage his involvement with children. Itis hard to juxtapose the two.
I am deeply saddened by Farah's death. He smiling face and her go fo rit attitude was a part of positivity in my life.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 12:10 AMI thought Michael was a brilliant dancer & musician. I don't know if he had a sad, dysfunctional private life, I only know what was sensationalized in the media. I do think he was quite eccentric, his lifestyle was eclectic & that he aged backwards. I don't know about the allegations with children. I believe his future music will be missed. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 3:17 AMYou're right Scarlet, he was a Benjamin Button of sorts. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 4:03 AMHe was a pediophile. What is it when a guys ability to sing & dance over rides the ethics of nations? All that saved him from jail was money & connections. The sad thing about the music indistry as with religion & politics they hide a huge amount of pediophilia. It sickens me to see the short memories or willingness of people to over see the real issues at hand here. The power play that disguises & protects what we as nations should be discussing, then acting upon..the safety of our kids of the future.
i don`t hate anyone..well not at the moment, but think we should be frank about how we see sex & what its boundaries are & the social & family implications that are there which create a world where we hide from the dark issues around sex...& yet they still call women like me a whore??? Women like me (prostitutes/sexworkers) have so much information about the relaities of sex..but instead we are cast into the realms of `she has nothing we want to hear, slut!`..tut, tut..I think somewhere, someone has got this one wrong! -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 4:11 AMaye sister.,your on to something there--jackson was queer boy bait--sicko pedophile trash--
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 4:08 AMSome of his music I really love...think it's great....
A lot of his music...I think is "just more fluffy pop" and have a kinda "who cares" attitude toward.
As for his personal life...don't get me started. I'll just say it is a wonder that nobody ever had this nutbar committed to a mental institution. He seriously needed professional help. He probably should have been locked up for his own good many years ago...on the basis of the fact that he had a problem with mutilating himself by proxy through unethical plastic surgeons. Wow. What a freak.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 4:16 AMThe guy was a brilliant performer and singer, I love his music. And I' ll leave it at that!!
It didn't take long for the amount of "jokes" coming out about his death. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 4:57 AMNo maybe we should`nt `leave it at that`...sorry Matt..but this is one of those times things like this should be discussed intelligently..jokes aside...though jokes will come fast & furious. comedy is peoples way of dealing with dogy subjects that we don`t like to face or are not pc. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 4:58 AMDodgy subjects not dogey..slipped!
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 9:30 AMI usually keep my opinions about the deviant behaviors exposed by the media, since after all its in the business of selling news and sweet news seldom makes as much money as deviant and dirty information.
I don't know him personally so I can't judge him. And I will say he couldn't have been too horrible of a person in his private world since he did have the support of so many individuals. Perhaps there is some truth to his bizarre tendencies or perhaps he was just a public puppet for media amusement. Who knows.
What impacts me most about his death is not him per say since I don't know him from a hole in the wall. What I look at is the fact that he was a back drop to my youth. He was a consistent piece of my own personal history, especially the many nights I went dancing during the 80's and 90's. It was difficult to escape his music since it infused 40 years of my life one way or another. As a kid I grew up listening and watching him on TV. As a young adult I danced to his music.
Personally, because his music was a backdrop to my life, a part of me feels strange in the sense that I feel as a part of my youth is forever gone. No longer will he write or sing new music or be part of my new cycle of life.
I mourn my youth through his music....in some strange way when things from our past remain consistent we tend to overlook the fact we are aging...but yesterday it was clear I too will be 50 soon.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 10:16 AMI was talking about this with my roommate Mike this morning. We both thought that while he could sing, Quincy Jones deserves more of the credit for Thriller in that he produced the album. It was, without question, the apex of MJs career. Even that though relies on obvious ryhthms.
Anyhow, I commented to Mike, "I don't know why everyone thinks he's so great, the guy is a train wreck"
Mike just said, "...was."
We laughed. Talented? Sure. Genius? not in my opinion. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 11:08 AMI never cared for the Jackson 5 in the slightest, in fact found their whole style annoying, so Michael Jackson was meaningless to me until Off the Wall came out and then the dancing began. Then Thriller sealed the deal for me and to this day, "Billie Jean" is in my Lifetime Top 10 of best dance music: extremely complex, extremely inciting and exciting. I still remember the exact first time I ever heard it, crossing the Charles River and realizing I've got to get off this bridge before I drive off it, this is the most exciting song I've ever heard. IMO Michael Jackson literally created, opened and walked through the doorway into the entire world of dance that we have now, where people can initiate moves from body parts and muscles that have never ever been used before in the whole history of dance. He began this. As a dancer, I was stunned to my very core by the moves he came up with. It did change dancing, massively--there just was no concept of this kind of movement before in the public mind. Combined with this particular music it was absolutely transformative; it's etched on my soul and in my cells, and I can't think of any other public figure that's had that effect on me.
But I did realize early on that the guy had serious emotional problems. I believe, frankly, that he was a very highly refined and powerful soul, on earth specifically to push the envelope, that in the end could not deal with life as a human, and the way the human world works--souls can withstand a lot of damage but eventually, they start to warp under too great a load. His habit of self-deception (which became insistence on the truth of things that obviously-----to anyone taking note------obviously were not true, was dangerous to him and let him go too far in a number of areas he should never have gotten into. (But there are many people this self-deceptive, many--just not in the public eye.) He didn't quite have the courage of his true nature--so he tried, really hard, to be normal and do normal things but was just unable to do them. (Like marriage.) Yes, Quincy Jones was a great factor in the success of his music----but I often noticed in the lyrics (composed by Michael) that there seemed to be a very autobiographical component, deeply personal. When the single glove came, it bothered me a lot -- I could feel its symbology to Michael. I believe that single glove, and his habit of wearing other restricting items on just one hand, had a sexual, "you will not do this" significance. That he wore it as a secret message to himself, a reminder to himself, of things he saw wrong in himself---even if he only saw these subconsciously. The people who practice extreme self-deception still are aware that someone nearby is engaging in acts that should not be done. Often they then turn around and project these acts onto other people. There's no evidence Michael ever did this. The turmoil--the part-light part-dark part-known part-unknown part-admitted part-denied--all stayed within him and was expressed in his many attempts at flight from reality, at a way of life that tried to deny reality, physicality, sexuality.
If I hadn't noticed the self-deception in the face of all evidence that went with the plastic surgeries, I might not have believed the child-molestation allegations---and I do think these were probably exaggerated, but I do think they were based at least on the fact that he did have an unhealthy attraction to young boys, at minimum. He may not have actually acted on it but I think he came as close to it as he could allow himself, and people close to him knew this. It made me feel sorry for him; his sexuality was indeed his cross to bear on this planet, probably more than anything else. I felt he obviously had gender issues too. He was very immature psychically--didn't have the experiences that cause maturity except in business matters. Yet I believe he truly was a gentle person through and through, longed for love, lived in almost constant desperation for the last years, was sincere when he sang about "The Man in the Mirror" (obviously himself)--gonna make a change. He did try. Awfully hard. He had an absolutely independent powerful spirit in a surprisingly conventional mind--he admired authority figures, military regalia, stars of the past, he was like a little Republican 10-year-old in those ways. You could never imagine him growing old, in fact it would have been an obscene cruelty to have that happen, and I'm actually surprised he made it to 50. I'm glad it was quick.
Yes, maybe millions of people who booed him and called him Wacko Jacko will now applaud him. This type of hypocrisy is everywhere -- I see it IRL when people who were actually mean to someone, who actually disliked someone, get all pious and talk about the person's good points and cry fake tears (but only in public) when that person dies. It's endemic.
I haven't listened to any of his music in years now, I didn't care for any of the albums past Bad, and it became painful to see coverage of him, but when I did see him, I hoped for his release from what tortured him and I hoped that some day he would be free of all of it. Now he is. Still, the music and dancing he gave me, the smashing of conceptual limits he gave me--that's a huge and permanent gift, and I'm grateful. That was his own gift, you know -- but nothing else came easy, and much never came at all for him. I'm so glad he lived and I got to benefit from that! -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 1:21 PMWell said Lumiere. I don't agree with everything you said, but you said it well, especially the part about his purpose on this planet. As Black person, I was thrilled as a kid to see someone like me perform with such sincerity and power. To see him perform live I knew even way back then that spirit was with him. He did the job he came to do and now he's elsewhere. He did more to cause people to evolve than we think. Just think of all those groups of people who's parents hated other races, but they (the children) learned to love everyone. While not everyone accepts people of other races, seeing and admiring him made it possible for some. He had problems, yes, but don't we all. It's too bad no one stopped him or that he had no one to feel comfortable with. I think he was a lonely guy who vibrated at a higher level, but was bound with let's say earthly problems. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 3:49 PMHe was obviously a very talented performer. You only had to see the Thriller video to appreciate the professionalism in the choreography that he and his fellow dancers showed.
I'm Going to play devils advocate here, but do any of us have a right to call him a paedophile? After all wasn't he found not guilty of all charges, or should we just assume that if someone has been charged with something that there is no smoke without fire. In that case, anybody that has been found not guilty of something should be treated with mistrust.
I personally wasn't a huge fan of his music, but I cannot deny that the man had huge talent and I'm sure whatever he did or did not do, Karma will work it's circle in the end. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 7:20 PMI once heard Joe, the father was so abusive, that he, for instance, would wake "them up" at night with a knife and such??
Anyone know if it's true??
If so, no wonder he turned out to be like that...I mean, the guy was obviously soooo sensitive etc...
Very talented but most likely a pedophile...
Not sure though...
Anyway, I don't really miss him...or his music...at all... -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, June 26, 2009 - 9:17 PMI rarely listened to Michael Jackson music, though I do recognize that he was extremely talented. His death does not affect me much, other than he is the same age I am, and that my own length of life seems more likely to be cut short. A reminder that it could happen just like that during a year that seems healthy enough.
As someone who entered stardom at an early childhood age, I am inclined to give a certain amount of leeway regarding his alleged pedophile qualities. Likely, but not proven. Becoming famous at such an early age and being a performer all one's life, who can say what that does to one's mind? He was not like average people. Not an excuse, I am just saying we don't understand what that does to someone.
I came across him once backstage at a Grateful Dead concert. I was (unexpectedly) hugely impressed by his presence and unpretentiousness at another band's show. I respect him. And as a dancer he started a whole trend in a new style of dancing.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 7:13 PMis it me or is there an overdose of MJ??? I done with his tribute...the truth be told I barely listened to his music. Had a few favorite songs...but he was never on my top ten favorite singers.
As far as his abusive father...PLEASE. My mom did a tad bit more to me then MJ will ever be able to top. And I didn't get stuck on the Peter Pan syndrom or speaking in a unnaturally high pitched voice. I had to work at age 10 in my mom's factory, among other things....I was seldom allowed to go out and play with other kids or even watch tv..the only opportunity I had to engage with other kids was when I was in school.
The fact is, he was not the only child being abused in his household and yet none of his other siblings behaved the way he did...ever wondered why the other kids seldom speak to him? I strongly suspected he was a media whore who used everything and anything to get media attention, including "milking" his awful childhood.
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 9:16 AMYes, something feels slightly askew.
After a while, you must own everything in your life or it or it owns you.
There was something very narcissistic about him and I wonder if he was not a crazy perpetrator too, this from an intuitive tuning on (weird vibes).
His mother got custody of the children so they will get a chance to live in a saner environment than if he had lived.
Oh, and I found where he now:
people.tribe.net/71246863-...6052a31b13 -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 5:00 PMI do agree that there is an overload of MJ going on. Does anybody care to give Farrah Fawcett her time? I mean she did battle a strong bout of cancer. But no... it's all about MJ.
It's funny, though. I was having a conversation with somebody about the whole thing. Could it be possible that this death is just a fraud? He was found dead not at home, but at the home of a long-time friend who recently had become his personal physician. How do you be an old friend and "recent" patient? Then there's the whole debt thing. Keep in mind, though that his assets (including half of the Sony Publishing rights) are worth way more than his debt. He just owes a helluvalot of money to other people that will take up more than half of his net worth. There's also the upcoming tour. It's been noteworthy that despite not being in the spotlight for awhile, MJ was not looking forward to the upcoming tour. In all honesty, he was tired of being in the spotlight since the whole child molestation thing. That's why he turned down an offer to take Prince's short lived job as a Vegas headliner.
For somebody like Michael Jackson, going out means going big or not at all. Nothing more eccentric than attending your own wake in an assumed identity to dodge all the media attention and to wipe out your debt - all in one shot. I mean here's the points that we had brought up that could imply a false death...
1) He would need a reason to consolidate his assets to pay of his debtors.
2) MJ was noted to have the desire to want to retire and take care of his children.
3) His children are going to his mother and are still young enough to assume new identities (a'la witness protection style).
4) His personal physician (of less than three months), claims that MJ had NO previous medical history record.
5) The doctor, who has stated that he was a long-time friend of MJ, found him dead at his home.
6) The doctor continued to ride in the ambulance to the hospital where MJ was declared dead.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but there are many loose ends going on. I watched Larry King Live on CNN a couple days ago (I was in hotel, it was the only thing on) and the doctor's lawyer was being interviewed. He kept defending his clients innocence even though the doctor was not a suspect. When asked about the relationship between the doctor and MJ, the lawyer was sketchy in his answers as if he was hiding something. I think the doctor knows much more than he's saying. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, July 3, 2009 - 9:28 AMyou mean Elvis hasn't really left the building? hehehehe
I believe he died in his rental home in Holmby Hills. This is where he'd been living for some time while preparing for the tour. It was his home; he didn't live at Neverland any more, for years now.
The thing that nobody mentions, and something that displays a phenomenon common to kids with an abusive father: his mother did not stop his father, ever. Never stood up to him. The kid is left with this love of the mother that nonetheless, deep down, conflicts with the expectation they had that the mother would protect them, and did not. Living with his mom and dad now, of course, probably OK -- tyrants get tired when they get old, plus there's been light shone on what his dad did, enough to make him potentially keep out of things. Debbie Rowe? will only go for $. I don't believe for a moment she actually wants those children. (And I sure hope they don't grow up to look like her, jeez.)
What I do find very suspicious is that the doctor is claiming he just happened to be there. No appointment? No response to a call? Just drops by? And somehow knows to go straight to the bedroom? And nobody, in a house with staff, goes in first and announces him? And then sees the body in the bed? Before the doctor does? No, somehow it's to be believed that the doctor just went straight to the bedroom and walked in, alone, and found a dead or dying man. Began to administer CPR without calling for an ambulance or help. Then -- implying there was no phone in that bedroom? oh, get real! -- then has to leave the body and go downstairs and wander around until he found staff to call 911? And then we hear the 911 call, where the 911 operator is going to guide the caller on how to do CPR. Yet supposedly there's a doctor right there who knows how to do it and has been doing it quite awhile. Same doctor who hires an attorney immediately. I do not buy any of this, because it isn't how things work in wealthy stars' homes with security staff. Security is there for a reason. No way Michael Jackson would have a home where any person could walk in unexpectedly and go straight to his bedroom--except immediate family.
I think the doctor responded to a call for drugs, gave him something, and the something went wrong. And, fearful for himself, the doctor tried to save him, without calling for help, and then, only when it was clear he couldn't save him, alerted others. Funny how everybody keeps assuring everybody the doctor's not a suspect, when obviously, he is the prime suspect. But probably very valuable to the Hollywood community. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, July 3, 2009 - 9:46 AMGood guesses, Luminiere..................I smelled a rat when the 911 call said the doctor was performing CPR on Mr. Jackson while he was in bed - I've been certified for over 20 years and you can't do sufficient chest compression if the recipient is on a soft surface, you have to get the recipient onto the floor, or, in hospitals they have removable headboards on the bed that can be put beneath the patient.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 10:11 PMthe doctor had been on a retainer and basically living in the premises according to statements made by his best friend, MIco during a week long interview on the Larry King Show, MIco also was part of his permanent group of inner circle who dropped by often and were both friends and staff -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 10:13 PMhere's my two cents...we will only know what is available for public knowledge. At the end of the day if no one is being charged with any underhanded actions, the truth will be buried.
All I can say...RIP Michael. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, July 10, 2009 - 2:11 PMHe was just a guy, now he's dead....bury him !
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 7:57 AMChildhood abuse rips your body and soul at an age where you are not equipped to deal and makes you the terrorized stranger in your life.
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 8:53 AMIt's in the raggedness in the performance.
I am not surprised that he died at this relatively young age. He had nowhere to go. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 8:55 AMI don't mean god...Jai, I mean Michel Jackson.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 2:31 PMENIAD, "he had nowhere to go"..
I had not thought about it in that way.
Youare right.
there is all kinds of news now that he owed 500 million.. to whom? where did his fame and royalties go?
In a way I am blessed that I am nto yet that famous.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Fri, July 3, 2009 - 11:15 AMHe was an abused and exploited child who grew up to continue the cycle. He died a long time ago. What remained was the eccentric musician. I was sad to see what he became as a person. I always felt pity for him. His music was obviously very good. I wasnt a huge fan of it as I prefer country, metal and blues.
As for the children he had contact with, I blame the goddamned PARENTS for that. Who leaves their child with someone like MJ? I have often pondered the anomole of the transition that takes place with people who have been abused. Have you ever noticed that they go from the poor victem to sorry sonofabitch? People say "If they knew, they should have got help". Where? How? Through who? I have seen two people trying to seek help and do you know what they got? A huge doctor bill, the police harassing them, and the State attempting civil committment. Those "sorry bastards" never loose their status as victems. They are victems FOR LIFE. And the only way they could possibly victemize someone else is if a child is not properly supervised. Society needs to rethink how these victems are dealt with... -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 10:42 AMyeah, those parents -- who continued to let their sons sleep over even after the first round of accusations. There's this fawning drooling greedy phenomenon where if somebody's rich and famous, people want to get next to them, people hope some of that wealth and fame will drop their way from the table, they just need to get themselves into what they see as the banquet hall. All principles go out the window. This is why people continue to elect people to office who oppress and steal from them: they just want to be under that table, they just want to be next to the winners somehow, no matter who the winners are. Greed, greed, greed, put all those kids into that situation and kept them there. And there's that one boy whose family got $20 million from it, not bad at all. Paid off. I'm not saying he ever actually molested anybody, but kids know when somebody's doing something that they feel isn't right. When a neighbor molested me (luckily he was interrupted and I got away quickly) when I was really young, I had zero idea of what he was up to, and in those days you had to always obey any adult, too, and do what they said--but I could tell from *him* that what he was doing was wrong, the feeling was very powerful and something I'd never encountered before. It interested me, actually, but didn't traumatize me, and I experimented afterwards, I messed with his mind. He came over to our house on a pretext and, though I'd said nothing whatever to my mother (there would have been no point in that), I acted afraid of him and hid behind her, you should have seen the terror in that man: Did she tell them??? He didn't know. Served him right. Then I forgot all about it (though I never played around his house again) until I was an adult and one day recalled it and, now that I knew about sexual stuff, it all suddenly got clear. Oh, so *that's* what he was up to!! Made me laugh and still does. Lucky, though. -
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Thu, July 9, 2009 - 6:06 AMAnyone who does anything worthwhile and differently draws attention. It reminds us that we are wallowing in the swamp.
www.youtube.com/watch
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 2:56 AMFarrah died and went to heaven, and God said he'd grant her one wish.
"Please, protect all the children," requested Farrah.
So God killed Michael Jackson. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 5:46 AMclever--a little mean but clever--
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 8:19 AMGod is a Djinn? Since when do dead people get wishes? Is this new or did I miss something about christianity?
I am entertained how we change the myth to fit our beliefs and desires. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 11:55 AMLOL
It is a joke dude. But hey...as you point out...it's a myth. We change it at will because it is...well...fiction. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 3:13 PMthat "Earth Song" is wonderful, Eniad - I've never heard it before, because I never heard his later music -- I saw the video you linked to and then started looking at more videos of that song and finally remembered to come back here! -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 3:30 PMhopefully they will catch the doctor who gave mj the lethal dose of demerol--there is a warrant for his arrest--hes probably been disposed of quietly so it gos-- -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 1:28 PMI'm more for going after the FDA who okayed the use of demerol in the first place. The doctor himself was providing what he believed to be a safe drug. Medical schools in America are filled with the same sort of distorted education for future doctors. It's the FDA that needs to go to prison. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 2:23 PMFor me, the subject of Michael Jackson has always been about measuring the good one has done in this world as compared to the bad. I cannot deny that in his latter years, he was (we'll call it) an odd individual. But the music he created inspired and moved many people throughout the span of a few decades. I don't blame the father for such odd behavior, because we are all free to break the shackles that bind us and the lifestyles he chose, he did on his own accord. But that doesn't dictate that he was a talented performer and truly excelled in the things that made him his mark on this world.
To break it down... It's about numbers and the qualities of those numbers. Billions of people worldwide have listened to and/or been inspired by his music. To demean that by giving more weight to the allegations of a handful of people, whether they are just or not, is not fair.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Sat, June 27, 2009 - 11:05 PMMichael just was who he was. No matter his private life, he made music that influenced us all.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 7:40 AMHonestly, I don't get what all the fuss was about. His music was mediocre at best....yes, he had some talent, but he made some pretty shitty pop music, and not much else. Feh....later dude, you are not missed.
:-\
But yes, I think his dad messed him up beyond repair... -
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 1:22 PMYet his father is friends with some top politicians like jessie jackson etc..it seems that money & power allows people to nicely delete certain `delicate` issues...hypocrisy..if this was a poor guy, the community would never forgive him & he would of been hounded all his life..but guys like mj etc..just buzz about continuing adoration from the fane..weird.
Don`t get me wrong..I am not hateful about guys like him..the shit starts very early in life..but rarely is there personal accountability for stuff like this, either from the father or from mj.
What a confusing world we live in.
-
Re: Michael Jackson
Mon, June 29, 2009 - 7:13 PMI gotta say, as pop music, it was brilliant. Rivaling Elvis and the Beatles.
-