life outside our planet

topic posted Mon, May 5, 2008 - 9:48 PM by 
Do you think there is life outside the planet? Or do you think we're it?

Give us your explanation for either belief..
posted by:
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Mon, May 5, 2008 - 9:59 PM
    It all has to do with statistics. I don't purport to know the numbers, but suffice it to say that it would be extremely unlikely that Earth is the only orb in the universe with some form of life on it. There is probably an amazing array of life "out there."
    • Re: life outside our planet

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 12:01 AM
      I honestly think we lack the imagination to think outside the container we know as earth.

      However I believe and think 110% there is definitely life outside the planet earth....just think about the mere fact that our body chemistry is not even from stuff found in this solar system....our sun is not even capable of manufacturing anything higher then helium, which is the second element in the periodic table...hydrogen is the first and lightest makes 90% of the universe by weight...

      web.visionlearning.com/custom...e.shtml

      if we simply think in terms of atoms...protons and electrons, we can definitely understand there is life outside this blue planet...even perhaps just as complex, since chemically it is possible....
      • Re: life outside our planet

        Tue, May 6, 2008 - 12:19 AM
        if we really want to understand how we come from outer space...read how the body is made of...

        By mass, human cells consist of 65-90% water (H2O), and a significant portion is composed of carbon-containing organic molecules. Oxygen therefore contributes a majority of a human body's mass, followed by carbon. 99% of the mass of the human body is made up of the six elements oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus. 65%-90% water (2 hydrogen atoms and oxygen atom). Keep in mind that helium and hydrogen are abundant throughout the universe....but oxygen which is 8th on the periodic table is not easily manufacture

        Element Percent by mass
        Oxygen 65
        Carbon 18
        Hydrogen 10
        Nitrogen 3
        Calcium 1.5
        Phosphorus 1.2
        Potassium 0.2
        Sulfur 0.2
        Chlorine 0.2
        Sodium 0.1
        Magnesium 0.05
        Iron, Cobalt, Copper, Zinc, Iodine <0.05 each
        Selenium, Fluorine <0.01 each


        Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the known Universe; helium is second. However, after this, the rank of abundance does not continue to correspond to the atomic number; oxygen has abundance rank 3, but atomic number 8. All others are substantially less common


        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abun...Human_body

        the sun does produce other elements...but not in the same manner as helium and hyrdogen...

        library.thinkquest.org/15215/...ts.html

  • Re: life outside our planet

    Mon, May 5, 2008 - 10:04 PM
    Like BadAss said the odds that we are it are so small not even worth counting. Not to mention the ego to assume that we are it!

    No there has to be life beyond earth.
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 1:11 AM
    I think the odds are that there is/was life on other planets but it is/was so ( light years) distant as to make it impossible for aliens to have visited Earth.

    I do *not* believe there are aliens who appear as humans and run the gov't.. as consoling a thought as that might be. No, incompetent and greedy human beings run the gov't.

    but opinions will differ.
    • Re: life outside our planet

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 6:16 AM
      Skylar what about the aliens running out country who are missing human parts?..lol
      • Re: life outside our planet

        Tue, May 6, 2008 - 8:52 PM
        you know...I don't understand why anyone would think we're the only creation

        it makes more sense to have other planets full of life then to assume we're alone....why would we be alone? what makes us to unique that there can only be one of our kind?

        if we look at it scientifically its completely possible without a single doubt...

        if we look at it spiritually its also completely possible....

        its only when we look the world from our ego that we assume we're the center of the universe...
        • Re: life outside our planet

          Tue, May 6, 2008 - 9:00 PM
          I bet...and this might get me in trouble...

          I bet that creation is a mixture of the earth evolving and stars exploding releasing vital elements that help form our bodies,....which explains the idea we are made of dirt....

          there is more....but I shall stop now...
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 5:17 AM
    i do believe there's life outside out planet.........i think it would be presumptious of us to assume that we were the only life forms in the universe.......we're not the only life forms on earth after all.
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 6:00 AM
    I'm waiting, if I should live so long, for a manned expedition to Mars. The discovery of the past or current existence of any form of life on Mars would settle the question. If life got started on a second planet out of two samples, one can assume that anywhere in the universe that life can begin, life will begin.
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 6:35 AM
    Yeah, I find it extremely difficult to believe out of the hundreds of billions of solar systems in hundreds of billions of galaxies (quick, do the math on that one...lol) that there is not at least one other planet in the universe that contains some kind of life.

    Plus given that our galaxy has been around for hundreds of billions of years, and we've been around for a mere fraction of that time, I just can't comprehend that we're the only planet with any kind of life.
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 6:59 AM
    I WANT there to be life out there...but we haven't found any yet. And we've been looking...pretty hard.

    Stephen Hawkins suggests that if there is the potential for life to emerge elsewhere, it may be that evolved life forms exist so briefly that they fail to be detected by others. He suggests that evolved life may have the property of destroying itself before it can establish connections beyond its local environment.

    I think there might be other life out there, and there might not. I think there is potential for life, yes. But as to whether another form of life exists in a form we might recognize and interact with...shrug. I don't think it really matters much.
    • Re: life outside our planet

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 10:29 AM
      Believe there is almost a certainty there is life elsewhere. But, probably most of that life is rather simple - maybe akin to algae or bacteria.

      I think there are undoubtedly civilizations as well. Finding them is another question, the Universe is a big place while we, and they are very small. Earth has had life for an extremely long time, we are, so far, only a sentence in the last chapter of time.

      In the end, unless "Warp Drive" is discovered, fro practical purposes, we're going to be alone.

      Science Lecture supporting the above
      :
      The Drake equation, formulated by frank Drake at Green Bank in 1960/61 is the most well known estimate of the prevalence of civilizations. Basically, they are inevitable, but finding one concurrent with our own is another problem.

      Alongside the Drake equation is the Fermi-Hart Paradox. Fermi came up with the idea, and Mike Hart expanded thereon. The argument is simple, If there are many, many, other civilizations, then we should find some evidence of them - we don't. So, why not?

      Enter Steven Hawking, who reminds us that the possibility of life does not demand intelligent life. There has not been shown an evolutionary value in intelligence. Perhaps advanced civilizations carry the seeds of their own destruction (Nuclear war, Global Warming, etc.) and only last for a short time, decreasing the chances of one nearby reaching it's peak at the same time as we.
      • Re: life outside our planet

        Tue, May 6, 2008 - 12:38 PM
        But the Drake equation uses made up numbers because the parameters that must be plugged into the equation can't be measured (yet). At best the Drake equation is a guess, a total shot in the dark. It's like arguing that just because the DNA evidence says there is a 1 in a billion billion billion chance that someone else commited the crime, then you must be considered innocent. Earth is that 1 in a billion billion billion...and that, essentially suggests that the probability of intelligent life existing concurrently somewhere reasonable close enough to be considered "real" is nil.

        But hey, just because I doubt I'll win the lottery doesn't mean I don't buy a ticket now and then. Ya gotta dream!
        • Re: life outside our planet

          Tue, May 6, 2008 - 1:16 PM
          They are made up, and for the reason given.

          I wonder, if maybe he's stuck with what he came up with back in 1960? Before we had actually found planets orbiting other stars.

          Would have to dig to find reference, but I understand a "Star/gas giant planet" combo may be essential for the formation of rocky bodies between the two. We are finding just that combination.

          So far the gas giants have been too big, too close, or the combination otherwise flawed (under the current theory) to allow Earth type bodies to form. Think it's only a matter of time until one shows up. Even if an Earth like planet is found, there's no guarantee life arose there.

          My personal opinion is that life has arisen in just about every location where possible to exist. There are living "things" on the Titanic hulk, boiling hot springs, ocean vents, etc. Sorta like, wherever there is an external energy source to provide a local decrease in entropy.
          • Re: life outside our planet

            Tue, May 6, 2008 - 1:56 PM
            Life forms are pretty tenacious on this planet. They resist suppresion, that is for certain.

            I love the idea of solar systems like ours forming up out there. I want my own planet.
        • Re: life outside our planet

          Tue, May 6, 2008 - 2:02 PM
          There isn't a human on this planet that can truly understand just how "big" the universe is. The brightest and most out-of-the-box thinkers included. Example: The Hubble's million second deep space exposure that was done on the darkest part of the night sky, the most empty (next to Orion) showed galaxies and proto-galaxies densely packed and extending off into the unsee-able regions behind them...40 billion light years at a minimum.

          Forty billion light years AT MINIMUM. That's 186,000 miles x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 24 hours x 365 days = the miles of just 1 light year. Then multiply that by 40 billion to get the miles to one of those galaxies. My calculator won't even go high enough to do one light year much less show how many miles 40 billion light years represents. Anybody got the time to figure that number out on paper? LOL

          We're so far away that those galaxies may have exploded into dust by now and we wouldn't know it. Entire civilizations spanning a galaxy or two or ten gone in a poof of stardust.

          Why is it that our species thinks we're such fucking smart know-it-alls? A hundred years ago our relatives were riding around on horses laughing at them new-fangled horseless carriages. Jules Verne was a sci fi writer publishing whacked-out theories of ships that sailed under the sea and flew through outer space (pretty crazy shit, eh?). Five hundred years ago we were hanging and burning witchs, dragons lived beyond the horizon and you'd fall off the earth if you sailed too far, and religion/governments were destroying the lives of scientists who said the sun didn't revolve around the earth. A thousand years ago it was the gods that were throwing lightning at us, sent diseases and droughts and locusts to kill us off because they were pissed at us little humans.

          We are in diapers; ignorant to the extreme but far too puffed up on ourselves and egotistical to admit it. Bluntly, we don't know jack shit about the universe.

          We haven't even BEEN in outer space yet! The moon isn't outer space, it's in near-earth space!! Outer space is beyond the Oort Cloud between stars. We're in preschool and think we're doing university work. Such silly little monkeys!

          Life out there? Undoubtedly. Will we ever meet? Seeing as how we're on a tiny microscopic grain of dust on the far edge of a spiral arm far out from the middle of our medium to small-sized galaxy, (sort of like living in the boonies beyond Timbuckto) very doubtful unless they come to us. If there has been "visitors" they must have been lost. The technology required that we can now imagine-shades of Jules Verne again- to travel these incredibly enormous distances is a long way from our reality. We're still using internal combustion engines that were invented over a hundred years ago. Isn't that hilarious? LOL
          • Re: life outside our planet

            Tue, May 6, 2008 - 2:59 PM
            well said, seal, well said.

            i chuckle every time i hear some human assert some recently-figured-out "science" that says how it's unlikely there is other life. steven hawking is a brilliant man, and he and people like him are pushing the boundaries of what we understand... like little fleas jumping just a tad higher to see over that bump in the carpet, thinking the one who jumps highest becomes the expert on what the rest of the world is like.

            and that doesn't even take into account dimensions that we are not aware of or are unable to sense.

            it's pretty mind-boggling... every time we begin to think about it (and i was on a mountaintop in the night a few days ago, looking at the stars and thinking just that), it gets very big, and there feels like a glimmer at the scale of it all... and then we shake ourselves and look around, and keep on worrying about the price of gas or some mundane drama, and we get all human again.

            one of my recurring moments is when i realize that if you took my great-great-grandmother and dropped her in the middle of 2008, she would think that thousands of years had elapsed... high-rise buildings, strange automobiles moving on freeways above, odd bird-like machines in the air, people in odd uniforms hurrying to and fro. we are our own science fiction society... and we're still just fleas on a carpet.
    • Re: life outside our planet

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 4:57 PM
      I think this theory of Hawking's makes the assumption that all other life will be as agressive as human life is. In wargames you tend to have two viable strategies, attacker or "peaceful explorers". These two models basically mirror human life to an extent anyhow, but once population density reaches a certain mass peaceful explorers are forced to attack.

      What if you had a species that only posessed the peaceful explorer instinct? Noit the attacking one. They could explore the seas or the skies of their planet and eventually progress to space travel without wasting their intelligence in pointless material acquisition or agression.

      I think Hawking's theory models life on human life and doesn't admit the possibility of any other form of natural selection other than conquest. So that any intelligent life needs must consume itself before it contacts other forms.

      The trouble is that must peaceful explorer forms of life aren't really going to be interested in Earth as it stands, they'd take one look at us and just say, "We can't deal with these crazy Humans" and just zip off elsewhere. We might have been visited a multitude of times already and just politely ignored.

      There might be a whole system of resourse and idea exchange going on "out there" without us being in the slightest bit aware of it. We could have been "flagged" during the second world war or the cold war.

      You also have to consider the risk of diseases. Any species visiting our planet might have found the common cold fatal to them. It could be that our bacteria are what keeps us "flagged". Assume there's an aggressive species that has somehow achieved interplanetary travel, they might be waiting for humans to invent a cold remedy before they invade or even be researching one themselves.

      Peaceful explorers might be researching ways of curing all their viruses for us and ours' for them before they contact us.

      If this idea seems complete wacko to you then consider HIV / AIDS as a virus, it's a peaceful explorer in the sense it doesn't do any damage in itself to its host, just lets its attacker cousins in, eventually to destroy us, hopefully, from its point of view, positing one up it, propogating itself in the process.

      There you have another aspect of this theory, that iun tandem with the evolution of conscious life there mighbt always go the evolution of viral and bacterial life, and there the "real" competition might exist. Any species that attains the capacity to meet other forms of consciousness must do so before its parasitical life forms evolve to a sufficient extent to wipe it or any life it contacts out.

      Humanity might evolve to a state whereby it contacts another intelligent lifeform and immediately wipes it out with the common cold. Or, like you say, we might not recognise it as intelligent because of its sheer alien nature. We're looking at Wales and Dolphins as mere animals, more or less, when you could argue that they possess consciousness as we know it.

      Also ants communicate electronically much like a human brain, for we all know ants might be conscious in another sense - a consciousness spread among a whole swarm, the queen being the id.

      Just messing about with the theory. I've actually experimented with ants before, fed them honey and watched them invade my flat is great trails headed for the kitchen, once they'd exausted all the resources or found something better they returned to their garden dwellling, or maybe something toxic in my kitchen wiped them out (a distinct possibility, I'm a slob).
      • Re: life outside our planet

        Tue, May 6, 2008 - 7:15 PM
        "I think this theory of Hawking's makes the assumption that all other life will be as agressive as human life is."

        Hawking assumes that most all life found would not necessarily possess much intelligence at all. His major point was that intelligence has not been shone to be of evolutionary benefit. The Opossum, and the ubiquitous cockroach have been around longer.

        We (homo sapiens) haven't been around long enough to tell.
        • Re: life outside our planet

          Tue, May 6, 2008 - 8:37 PM
          "We (homo sapiens) haven't been around long enough to tell. "

          I'm not so certain of that. We have been around very briefly on the planetary scale, even shorter on the galactic scale of time....

          Yet, on the other hand, we've survived some planetary changes in our past that caused the extinction of other species. I find it likely that one of the primary reasons humanity survived hard times where other species did not is due to our large cortexes.

          Of course, there is really no way to measure if that is the case...but it sure seems that way....
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 2:31 PM
    We can't be it. In an infinite universe, there has to be life on more than one planet. On pure mathematical odds alone, it is unlikely we're the only living planet.

    And on the other hand, most folks don't understand just how many factors are needed to produce life-as-we-know-it.

    To produce the type of life on this planet, the following were required:
    - That the earth be roughly the size that it is, producing the right amount of gravity, but not too much or too little.
    - That the earth have a LOT of water.
    - That the earth has a moon the size and mass of our moon. Without tidal forces, our atmosphere would likely not support higher life forms.
    - That the earth be roughly the distance from the sun that it is.
    - That the earth not have any large planets like gas giants between it and the sun. (These could produce eclipses lasting days, weeks, or months...which would be devastating to life on earth.)
    - That the earth not be in the path of any major debris fields in the solar system. (For example, if our planet's orbit passed through an asteroid field every X number of years or something....)
    - That the earth have a powerful dynamo at its core, supporting our electomagnetic field and shielding us from the sun.

    I remember seeing a program about this issue on Discovery, or some other cable network. It is actually quite astounding the number of factors that, if you changed them, would have made life here (or at least higher life forms) impossible.
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 3:10 PM
    I think there will inevitably be life outside of our planet because the sea floor is about as alien to the Sahara as a lot of planets will be compared to Earth. I think for certain there'll be conscious life too because of the sheer size of the universe.
  • Re: life outside our planet

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 9:05 PM
    Are we talking metaphorical planet, here?
    • Re: life outside our planet

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 11:08 PM
      I read a couple articles (maybe a NASA link, maybe another science site) that Hubble has discovered planets in nearby solar systems. Numerous nearby systems as a matter of fact. Nearby being relative I guess but one in particular stuck in my brain because it has gas giants and definitely planets in the "life zone" around that sun. Wish I had kept the link. Sorry.

      Now if there was a civilization on that planet at our tech level, we'd never know it nor would they know about us. Just that there were planets in this system in the life zone if they were using their version of Hubble!

      Here's the Deep Field Galaxies picture from Hubble. Look at it and think that it is just a section of one degree of arc in the night sky...

      people.tribe.net/8049d455-...3e2a328ae8
      • Re: life outside our planet

        Wed, May 7, 2008 - 8:56 AM
        I also believe Earth has been quarantined, a very long time - hence the closed system we have here, which we assume would be a constant universally, but why would it be so? Don't know if the quarantine was because of the suffering, or whether it has caused the suffering by cutting us off from Elsewhere so severely - but that it was for the good of the greater Body, I have no doubt. What we have here is probably contagious. And I believe that soon it will be lifted. Even now, that's happening. However, until it's safe to let us out, we definitely will not be successful in interstellar travel.

        But we are loved nonetheless, despite our condition.
        • Re: life outside our planet

          Wed, May 7, 2008 - 1:19 PM
          Or...maybe they're waiting for us to invent Warp Drive. ;)
          • Re: life outside our planet

            Wed, May 7, 2008 - 9:00 PM
            Evan...I think holograms will make space travel possible...
            • Re: life outside our planet

              Thu, May 8, 2008 - 1:02 AM
              So far, I think the most likely routes to deep space travel are:

              1) wormholes - we'll probably eventually learn to create and control them
              2) nanotechnology - could be used to keep humans alive for the decades or centuries required using more conventional propulsion
              3) some as-yet-undiscovered loophole in physics outside of wormholes
              4) transdimensional travel - pop into another dimension, travel a short distance in that dimension that equates to a massive distance in our own dimension, then pop back
              5) superconsciousness - not actually traveling in a vehicle, but only sending the mind/thought energy across the galaxy/universe

              Not sure what you mean by holograms making travel possible. They're only 3D photographs, really...how could we use them to travel?
      • Re: life outside our planet

        Wed, May 7, 2008 - 8:59 PM
        Seal...the way I look at it...if they have the same technology we have...we'll never meet then. Cause our technology is not advance enough for us to travel and visit other planets with life forms...if they are at the same level of intelligence as us...again they will not be able to meet us since they too will have problems traveling this way.

        In fact if any life form is out there that's capable of traveling fast enough to reach us, it means they are fairly advance since their technology would have to endure the distance and speed to travel this far....which means when they reach us they will view us as primitive compared to them...

        And now, at the rate we are consuming vital elements and destroying our planet we would have to have some pretty fast thinking inventors to create anything that will allow us to travel fast and far into another planet, since our time and resources are getting pretty limited...