What religion are you?

topic posted Thu, April 24, 2008 - 9:57 AM by 
What religion are you? And why?
posted by:
  • Re: What religion are you?

    Thu, April 24, 2008 - 10:20 AM
    I am not a religion, I am a human being.
    • Re: What religion are you?

      Fri, April 25, 2008 - 1:01 PM
      I subscribe to no religion because there's no reason to.
      • Re: What religion are you?

        Fri, May 2, 2008 - 12:31 AM
        I actually join, and become brainwashed by, most every religion,
        at one time or another. Rather than be "spiritual instead of religious,"
        I'm patently religious and really join groups and sign up and donate
        and volunteer and all that. I notice that when I date women that
        belong to traditional religions, (even very liberal versions), that are
        blatantly organized, I have better luck. They tend to stick around
        longer and tend to be more open-minded about problems. If I date
        a woman who says, "I'm spiritual, not religious," she almost always
        dumps me at the first sign of any health or money problems.
  • I am a religion unto myself

    Mon, May 5, 2008 - 2:24 AM
    As was pointed out, the question is poorly posed. I *am* not a religion, I might (but don't) *subscribe* to one. And by putting it in those terms, it becomes much clearer that it is a (conscious?) choice, competing for resources with other subscriptions (say, the 'Illustrated Moat Builders Bimonthly Digest', or the 'Two-for-the-price-of-one fast food outlet of the month package club'). I must admit that I'm a bit in an awkward situation to discuss this topic, being happily surrounded as I am by heathen and slightly puzzled by the whole concept of religion - I can't just go out and chat up the first person I come across for enlightenment, can I? Is it akin to other things one catches, like viruses? If a priest sneezes in my vicinity, will I be infected? Should I donate monies to my local pharma industry so that they can market expensive antidotes? Can I participate in a field study on the efficacy of different pharmacological agents (and pray that I will not be given a placebo)?

    Alternatively, I could say that I am a religion unto myself, no worthier object of worship having come my way, daily lighting a candle to ensure that I (capitalization intentional) may grant my prayer. The success rate is *way* higher than for any other religion that I have come across ;)
    • Re: I am a religion unto myself

      Mon, May 5, 2008 - 2:18 PM
      Yes, yes, we know the question is poorly phrased. Would anyone perhaps have something genuine to say about their religious beliefs?
      • Re: I am a religion unto myself

        Mon, May 5, 2008 - 3:47 PM
        What do you mean by genuine? I do not subscribe to any religion, and am fact a tolerant atheist. I won't argue that stance unless pushed into a corner by some rabid proselytizer, but they tend to be rather rare here in Europe. I appreciate different aspects/rites/characteristics specific to different religions, but on an aesthetic level. I cannot fathom how one can subscribe to a single dogma, or believe that historical texts have any higher authority beyond what can be explained on a purely humanistic and historical basis.

        I'll second Fifi: let's see yours, so that I can understand what you are looking for.
  • Re: What religion are you?

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 6:34 AM
    Mickey - You're moderator of the Atheists tribe, right?
    • Re: What religion are you?

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 8:08 AM
      We've discussed religion in here before so you already know quite a few of us aren't religious, so I'm a bit surprised by the apparent assumption off the top that people have/are a religion...particularly by the moderator of an atheists tribe! It's what makes me curious about your own religious background....were you raised in a religion and a believer that you no longer believe in? Do you consider yourself an atheist?

      I was raised godless. I've noticed that it's usually people who are or have been believers who have a hard time understanding that one can simply be godless. I suspect being raised godless made me more interested in understanding religion, well that and the pervasiveness of religion and it's cultural side-affects which are pretty hard to ignore if you're interested in art and culture.
      • Re: What religion are you?

        Tue, May 6, 2008 - 1:34 PM
        I do moderate the Atheists tribe. It's turned into a fun bunch of folks! I have no agenda with my question either, except to learn things about and from other folks. So then. My turn:

        I was raised Hindu, and went to private schools throughout my educational career which mandated some education in the Judeo-Christian heritage (grad-school did not). I don't really "own" or subscribe to a religion or religious practices these days, though I do find myself saying prayers sometimes, mostly just for personal peace and comfort. To describe my current stance, I like the term "nontheist" as explained in the intro to Jack Huberman's book, _The Quotable Atheist_. I'll try to paraphrase:

        "[Huberman uses] 'atheist' as shorthand to indicate any nonbeliever in the existence of a diety or deities. This includes both the agnostic (who thinks there's no evidence to decide one way or the other--thus remaining a nonbeliever), the atheist proper (who believes the Supreme Being does not exist--in other words DISbelieves), and the nontheist (who considers the question meaningless and irrelevant--in comparison to the agnostic, who considers the question unanswered but important)."

        I was a solid "believer" until maybe a few years ago. And not until sometime in the last two years did I start to call myself a nontheist, in that it took some time for me to really get clear on the idea that God did not create man, than man created god. And for a variety of very real, non-divine reasons (anxiety, economics, superstition, control of a populace...).

        Technically, I guess I'm still a Hindu, as I've been told there is a school of thought that in accepting religious plurality (which Hinduism does), one seemingly paradoxically accepts the possibility of atheism. I still need to research this, as I'm sure it is a hotly debated statement on Hinduism. But as I said before, the question is irrelevant.
        • Re: What religion are you?

          Wed, May 7, 2008 - 5:53 AM
          Mickey - Thanks for sharing your history. Interesting isn't it that "atheist" has become synonymous with "antitheist"? Back when I was a kid (long, long ago) atheist just meant someone who didn't believe in god...."not a theist". I guess to some people it may be an active "disbelief" but for some of us it's not an anti or subtractive thing but more of just an understanding that god is just as silly as the tooth fairy or Santa Claus. I've found that sometimes people who grew up with god as being important in their life take on atheism as an anti-belief rather than merely non-belief *shrug* "Atheist" seems to have taken on rather evangelical connotations - so much so that it appears that someone moderating an atheist's tribe feels the need to distance themselves from the term! (Back when I was younger an agnostic was someone who believed in god but though it inexplicable and unprovable, or someone who didn't know one way or the other, there weren't quite so many subsets...I wonder if that means more people want to identify as some form of atheist?)

          As someone who was brought up as godless, I can only imagine (and probably not very well) what it's like to be a believer and then lose faith. Is it a bit like falling out of love with someone? Would you be willing to talk about your experience and how it came about?

          • Re: What religion are you?

            Wed, May 7, 2008 - 8:28 AM
            One of the reasons why I never bothered joining any of the atheist groups on tribe is that when I checked them they just seemed to be full of believers and atheists arguing about whether god existed or not. There's just not much point in discussing evidence and non-theistic explanations with people who base their beliefs in faith, don't understand the scientific method and that it was created because of the inherent subjectivity of personal experiential observation and isn't just another version of their faith, and who have a deep emotional need - not only to believe themselves but to also get everyone else to confirm their beliefs for them. Most of my friends believe in some version of god, which is how it's been my whole life. It's actually how I found out that people believed in god/s, from friends. Some of my friends listen to really bad music or have no style too, but I still love them and value their talents and knowledge in other areas ;-)

            I'd be totally fascinated by anyone's stories of how they transitioned away from faith and a belief in god/s, if they'd be willing to share (or from atheism to faith if anyone has such a story). Was it one incident? Was it something that was like a flash of inspiration or a slowly sneaking suspicion that god is created in the man writing the story's image? A by product of becoming educated about science? Or some other process?
            • Re: What religion are you?

              Wed, May 7, 2008 - 9:35 AM
              Just for the record: The Atheist group now is nothing like the combative, troll-infested place it used to be. Topics are sometimes serious, but there is laughter there, too.
              • Re: What religion are you?

                Wed, May 7, 2008 - 10:01 AM
                Mickey - It did seem slightly less contentious than when I first checked it - so congrats on doing a good job - but it still seems to be a lot of pro/anti atheism and religion talk - but I guess that's going to happen if it's an open group. Granted religion permeates our culture but I'm more interested in talking with other atheists about stuff other than god/religion. Not because other atheists would necessarily share my views about life, the universe and everything, just that it's nice to talk about things with people who don't put god into the equation. I mean absolutely no personal insult or dis to the tribe you moderate, just saying it doesn't really seem to be my cup of tea.
                • Re: What religion are you?

                  Wed, May 7, 2008 - 12:43 PM
                  < it still seems to be a lot of pro/anti atheism and religion talk >

                  LOL! What is any tribe on atheism supposed to be? "Hey gang, let's get together and talk about atheism, but you can't mention atheism or religion."
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: What religion are you?

                    Thu, May 8, 2008 - 4:44 AM
                    Mickey - How about just talking about things without having god in the conversation? I'm not suggesting atheism or religion shouldn't be mentioned - it just gets boring to me. Kinda like how people who were brought up in mildly religious households generally aren't that interested in religion because it's not that big a deal in their life (or so I've found amongst my friends). I guess I thought it was a tribe *for* atheists rather than a tribe dedicated to the topic of atheism - or at least that's what I was hoping for when I first checked it I guess. It's obviously an interesting tribe to others, so that's great and you're offering something people are interested in and a place to discuss and explore their atheism.
  • Re: What religion are you?

    Tue, May 6, 2008 - 9:04 AM
    I have a friend that's atheist and we were discussing the work of Antoni Gaudi. She couldn't wrap her head around how he could have been such a creative genius. I think that sometimes when you believe in something greater than yourself and what is around you, you can have less limits on what you believe is possible since this inspiration is coming from outside and supernatural forces. i used to be totally cynical about religion, having been raised as an evangelical pentecostal christian, but as I've gotten older and hopefully wiser I think that it can be of great benefit as well as detriment and is not inherently bad. It's all in how you use it.

    Personally, I am agnostic. My beliefs are mutable and unstructured because something so lofty cannot possibly be understood in one lifetime, I think. At least not by me or anyone I've ever met. I think we get glimpses of the unexplainable at times, but there are no words or rationale... yet.
    • Re: What religion are you?

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 9:31 AM
      quel - "you can have less limits on what you believe is possible since this inspiration is coming from outside and supernatural forces."

      That's an interesting take on it. I've noticed that some people who believe inspiration (or intuition, love or any other similar quality/experience) is supernatural have a hard time even considering other possible explanations. For me, I tend to attribute human qualities/experiences to be an aspect of being human not supernatural (whether we understand them yet or not). I've noticed I'm different than quite a few people who identify as atheists though, particularly people brought up with religion who see it all as a bit more of an either or thing. Being godless just isn't that big a deal to me or that prominent part of how I identify myself, generally speaking. I find us humans endlessly fascinating! Plus religions tend to have all kinds of shiny pretty things to look at.....mmmm....sparkles ;-)
    • Re: What religion are you?

      Tue, May 6, 2008 - 12:29 PM
      >> I have a friend that's atheist and we were discussing the work of Antoni Gaudi. She couldn't wrap her head around how he could have been such a creative genius.

      That really sounds like someone who has no confidence in the human condition. In other words, absent God or any "higher power," humans are just too puny and limited to come up with anything as remarkable as great art. Well, I respectfully disagree. Divine inspiration is not a precondition for achievement.
      • Re: What religion are you?

        Tue, May 6, 2008 - 2:31 PM
        I think that's reading too much into it... that's not her take on people at all. I don't think I was making an argument such as the one you stated at all, it's just that for some, the inspiration they get from faith may be their catalyst... there's no one saying you can't achieve that without faith.
        • Re: What religion are you?

          Wed, May 7, 2008 - 5:23 AM
          quel - Oh, I kinda got the impression that you were saying something along the lines of Dr Yo's interpretation....not that she didn't like or have faith in humans so much but that she didn't look at humanity and human potential/achievement with much wonder or, well, acceptance of what humans are capable of creating. Though considering she had the evidence of Gaudi's work in front of her, it sounded a bit of a strange position for an atheist! ;-) This is a subject that marries my two passions - art and the brain - so pardon me if I ramble on!

          I have found that sometimes people like to weave overly romantic ideas about artistic creation (and artists for that matter but they're usually the one's doing the weaving and positioning themselves as exceptional beings, or their agents are ;-). I would suspect that the history of the various churches as patrons of the art sand the traditions of art being in service to God(s) has something to do with the language and memes that position inspiration as divine. Well, that and the fact that when highly concentrated it's easy to get into a flow state (just like athletes or meditators); there's a cyclical aspect to creativity (and many highly creative people are a bit left of "normal" to begin with) that tends to be pretty manic; and artists and their dealers tend to like to create a mythology around an artist (and some artists just don't understand their own creative cycles or are insecure about their skills, it's hard to be creative on demand and this creates a certain mysteriousness to inspiration). Inspiration isn't rational but that doesn't mean it's suddenly all about god! ;-) Kinda like intuition :-)

          I'd actually suggest that art attracts people who are prone to religiosity due to certain mental features such as schizophrenia or OCD (you really can quite often tell something about the artist's physical body and the internal experience it creates via their work). What came first? OCD repetitive soothing rituals or religious ones? (Most of us find repetition soothing in that it lulls us into a hypnotic state but someone who's extremely OCD HAS to constantly repeat their rituals to keep the demons at bay.) Of course, most of the time being extremely OCD or schizophrenic tends to get in the way of actually being able to create art that communicates to others and sustaining the practice needed to develop the skills, or sustain art as any form of career. Inspiration is actually only a tiny part of creating art and is often the result of lots of groundwork.
        • Re: What religion are you?

          Wed, May 7, 2008 - 8:45 AM
          quel - "it's just that for some, the inspiration they get from faith may be their catalyst"

          I suspect that this is once again a case of attributing something that's not understood as being supernatural. If we don't understand where inspiration comes from, attributing it to an outside, omnipotent force offers an explanation and - through various means - a potential for controlling/petitioning the source of inspiration. Having just recently suffered from a creative block, I can certainly understand why people resort to prayer!

          I don't know, and absolutely nothing personal against you here nor am I saying you believe this, I get a bit sick of god and believers trying to claim all the best parts of being human for god (and blame the rest on the devil or that other god over there who's really the devil, etc). If believing in god allows someone to be personally creative and gives them ideas for art projects, that's great and really pretty much a personal thing as far as I'm concerned. Same goes for taking psychedelics, and so on.
          • Re: What religion are you?

            Wed, May 7, 2008 - 9:15 AM
            I don't see what's offensive about attributing things to one's God. People cope with the harsh realities of life and it's wonders the way that best suits them, it doesn't rob any of the value or wonder from it... and it's US that have the ego and need to attribute credit, the abilities or wonders themselves need nothing of it. Really, the same people attribute the worst human attributes to the devil, but what can you say to a determist?

            As far as my friend goes, she was expressing herself in awe of his talent. I guess I didn't convey my complete thought. I bet if you asked Gaudi, he would say God inspired him or gave him the ability. To me, I don't care why people do things, I care what they do and I'm glad he did it.

            As far as my own beliefs go, I realize there's a lot I don't know but I do think people have a predisposition to certain things. Even if there is a God, who is to say the same gift to two people would be used by both? I think you either have it in you to do and receive or you don't whether it's physiological, spiritual, emotional or mental. Usually, I think it's never just one thing.
            • Re: What religion are you?

              Wed, May 7, 2008 - 9:47 AM
              quel - "As far as my own beliefs go, I realize there's a lot I don't know but I do think people have a predisposition to certain things. Even if there is a God, who is to say the same gift to two people would be used by both? I think you either have it in you to do and receive or you don't whether it's physiological, spiritual, emotional or mental. Usually, I think it's never just one thing."

              Oh, I readily acknowledge that there's a lot I don't know and lots we collectively don't know. There's also just a lot more we DO know than many people realize. Would you be into talking about his more? If so I'll start another thread so we're not hijacking Mickey's!

              Gaudi was quite an ardent Catholic (particularly towards the end of his life, even celibate) so no doubt he would credit god with his achievements (let's not forget the Spanish Inquisitions and the role of religion in Spanish culture). He also quite strongly disliked the surrealists because of their atheism. He and his work both come out of a time and culture when religion dominated all aspects of life - which meant that many people understood the world as taught to them via religion since there were few other available explanations at the time (Gaudi died in the 1920s). Certainly some great art and architecture has been created in praise of god and to decorate "his" house. The Greeks created some great temples and art so as to have representations of their gods and goddesses too. As an institution, they could afford to do this (just as in the secular realm royalty has been responsible for commissioning fantastic art and architecture, or these days corporations). It seems to me that nature was a great inspiration for Gaudi, as well as may other artists in the art nouveau style.
            • Re: What religion are you?

              Wed, May 7, 2008 - 9:50 AM
              quel - It's not that I find it offensive for individuals to attribute their personal inspiration to god - that's their own business, it's their inspiration so it's their's to attribute :-). What irks me is that religions sometimes like to claim certain things are the domain of god - love, inspiration, etc because humans couldn't have created this out of their humanity (it has to come from god).
              • Re: What religion are you?

                Wed, May 7, 2008 - 12:07 PM
                I can understand that beef, I just don't see the purpose in having one. I wonder why it is that bothers you. Do you think it limits people or is it just a 'credit where credit is due' thing?
                • Re: What religion are you?

                  Thu, May 8, 2008 - 2:07 AM
                  I'll tell you why it bothers me. It robs people of their essential humanity to have their best qualities ascribed to a mythical, inaccessible, undetectable, and for all practical purposes nonexistent figment of overactive imagination. To say that all good things come from God makes us mere puppets who have no intrinsic merit. As a good secular humanist, this pisses me off and makes me want to start smashing churches.

                  They say that God put a little bit of himself in each one of us. Well, I can only recall the statement of a young man I knew in college. I showed him a painting of an Indian guru meditating, and the image of Vishnu appeared in the guru's chest. My friend said, "I don't want that thing in me!"

                  www.asitis.com/gallery/plate21.html
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: What religion are you?

                    Thu, May 8, 2008 - 7:30 AM
                    <<To say that all good things come from God makes us mere puppets who have no intrinsic merit.>.

                    I have to disagree with this. I think this is personal opinion and has little to do with what those who believe in God think of themselves and other humans. You seem pretty angry about the topic in general though and it feels like it comes from a negative personal experience. Smashing churches is just as offensive as condemning those who don't believe in going and don't believe in God. Having been raised in a Christian hone, I can tell you that the Bible does teach that people have value. You may be misinterpreting things a bit. I'm not preaching here, I'm no Christian.

                    I have to say, I don't really get what there is to be so upset about. It doesn't rob you of your value and doesn't keep anyone from doing anything, does it? When has someone's opinion of your humanity hindered you from fulfilling your potential?
                    • Re: What religion are you?

                      Thu, May 8, 2008 - 10:44 AM
                      Obviously none of that rubbish robs *me* of my potential, because I don't believe in it. But religion is always limiting everyone's potential in some way. For example, to be elected President of the United States, one must appear pious and speak of the Almighty in reverent tones. So we're always stuck with either a God-fearing religious idiot, or a manipulative liar.

                      If I have to listen to one more person tell me about how I need to be tolerant of others' idiotic beliefs, I'm going to barf. It seemingly never occurs to anyone that those same irrational beliefs are responsible for the vast majority of suffering on the planet. Whenever anyone wants to start a war and kill off a lot of people, the first order of business is to convince the masses that God is on our side.

                      Really, the traditional role of religion in society has been to enforce political control, and to do it in a stealthy manner that most people don't even comprehend. People are so easily manipulated through lies and through appealing to the most atavistic impulses. And yet somehow my horror and rage at all this is perceived as inappropriate.

                      When I said I wanted to start smashing churches, that was rhetorical. However, there are plenty of precedents for that. Certainly I don't advocate hurting anyone, and that's where secular revolutions have gone wrong... persecution is no good. I'd like to see religion smashed by reason rather than bombs.

                      Religion is poison, God is a weapon, people are idiots, and that's all there is to it.
                      • Re: What religion are you?

                        Thu, May 8, 2008 - 12:27 PM
                        Everything is relative. People may be idiots, but compared to who?

                        Practically every animal on this planet is murderous, ravenous and barely conscious. We humans at least KNOW we're fucked up. Chimps don't get on their global information network and bemoan the idiotic state of chimpkind.

                        MOST people are insensitive to the majority of problems in the world, yes, but on the other hand, the majority of problems in the world are known and understood by large minorities of humans. That cannot be said of any other animal.

                        And that includes problems caused and not caused by humans.

                        if an asteroid is going to hit this planet and wipe out 90% of the life, the only hope of deflecting it lies in humanity, for example. That single act would more than balance out the books for us, including all the genocides, industrial holocausts, environmental devastation and useless, illegal war we've initiated.

                        None of that has had the effect of even one Yucatan impact. Nothing we've ever done as a species could come close to the potential we have to preserve this planet by preventing or mitigating such an event.

                        99% of all animal and plant species that have EVER lived are extinct. Much of what we're doing now is driving this extinction, but even if we were just ordinary tribal animals, the cycle of extinction would continue unabated.

                        IF there's a hope for preserving species as they go extinct, it lies in humans. No other animal has the capacity to preserve the DNA of other animals the way we do.

                        The glass that is half empty is also half full. Or maybe the glass is just too damn big.
                        • Re: What religion are you?

                          Sat, May 10, 2008 - 12:29 AM
                          Yeah, that's all true. I'm fully aware that humanity is acting as the superego of Gaia, whatever that means. But it's not happening quickly enough for me. Can I fast forward a few hundred or thousand years? We've got 6.66 billion people on the planet, according to my trusty friend Slashdot. I think we can do better than just consume and pollute, and leave the tough questions to the eggheads. For this thing to work, the general population has to wake the fuck up, otherwise I'll surely advocate a "Marching Morons" solution.

Recent topics in "Say something intelligent or leave"