I completly agree with lobocita.

Here is an example why....

A few years ago somene I knew wrote this really nice 3 page letter/speach that they translated using the software and did not use a human backup though it had been strongly recommended. They printed 200 copies and started giving them out to this group as referenced the letter during a walking tour. It seems no one had the courage to stop and correct the person until the walking tour was over and tell the person of a HUGE glaring error that insulted most of the group both of the error and that it was obvious it hadn't been reviewed for accuracy.
In the translated to language if the word "mother" is translated one way it means "mother" but if translated another way it means "whore"... I'm sure you can guess which one was the wrong translation that got included into the letter.

Pay the extra and use the human translator... at the very least to review and make corrections to the computer generated translation.

Lobocita, it sounds like you are taking offense at my trying to make myself clearer. None was meant, I just realized that I had not phrased the question properly. I had not given all of the information.

Thank you for your suggestions. I was actually agreeing and saying that yes, you are right, one should never bypass human efforts for machine or mistakes will be made. I was merely trying to cut down on some of the initial set-up time invested and therefore the end cost.