For a a poster of these events see:
www.labornet.org/news/0000/nopaz.htm
********
Tuesday, April 8, 2008 (SF Chronicle)
Longshoremen to close ports on West Coast to protest war
by Jack Heyman
(Jack Heyman is a longshoreman who works on the Oakland docks.)
While millions of people worldwide have marched against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and last week's New York Times/CBS News poll indicated that 81 percent believe the country is headed in the wrong direction - key concerns being the war and the economy - the war machine inexorably grinds on.
Amid this political atmosphere, dockworkers of the International Longshoreand Warehouse Union have decided to stop work for eight hours in all U.S. West Coast ports on May 1, International Workers' Day, to call for an end to the war.
This decision came after an impassioned debate where the union's Vietnam veterans turned the tide of opinion in favor of the anti-war resolution. The motion called it an imperial action for oil in which the lives of working-class youth and Iraqi civilians were being wasted and declared May Day a "no peace, no work" holiday. Angered after supporting Democrats who received a mandate to end the war but who now continue to fund it, longshoremen decided to exercise their political power on the docks.
Last month, in response to the union's declaration, the Pacific Maritime Association, the West Coast employer association of shipowners, stevedore companies and terminal operators, declared its opposition to the union's protest. Thus, the stage is set for a conflict in the run up to the longshore contract negotiations.
The last set of contentious negotiations (in 2002) took place during the period between the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the invasion of Iraq. Representatives of the Bush administration threatened that if there were any of the usual job actions during contract bargaining, then troops would occupy the docks because such actions would jeopardize "national security." Yet, when the PMA employers locked out the longshoremen and shut down West Coast ports for 11 days, the "security" issue vanished. President Bush then invoked the Taft-Hartley Act, forcing longshoremen back to work under conditions favorable to the employers.
The San Francisco longshore union has a proud history of opposition to the war in Iraq, being the first union to call for an end to the war and immediate withdrawal of troops. Representatives of the union spoke at anti-war rallies in February 2003, including one in London attended by nearly 2 million people, the largest ever held in Britain. Executive Board member Clarence Thomas went to Iraq with a delegation to observe workers' rights during the occupation.
At the start of the war in Iraq, hundreds of protesters demonstrated on the Oakland docks, and longshoremen honored their picket lines. Without warning, police in riot gear opened fire with so-called less-than-lethal weapons, shooting protesters and longshoremen alike with wooden dowels, rubber bullets, pellet bags, concussion grenades and tear gas. A U.N. Human Rights Commission investigator characterized the Oakland police attack as "the most violent" against anti-war protesters in the United States.
And finally, last year, two black longshoremen going to work in the port of Sacramento were beaten, Maced and arrested by police under the rubric of Homeland Security regulations ordained by the "war on terror."
There's precedent for this action. In the '50s, French dockworkers refused to load war materiel on ships headed for Indochina, and helped to bring that colonial war to an end. At the ILWU's convention in San Francisco in 2003, A. Q. McElrath, an octogenarian University of Hawaii regent and former ILWU organizer from the pineapple canneries, challenged the delegates to act for social justice, invoking the union's slogan, "An injury to one is an injury to all." She concluded, "The cudgel is on the ground. Will you pick it up?"
It appears that longshore workers may be doing just that on May Day and calling on immigrant workers and others to join them.
May Day protest
WHEN: 10:30 a.m., May 1, followed by a rally at noon.
WHERE: Longshore Union Hall, corner of Mason and Beach (near Fisherman's
Wharf).
WHAT: March to a rally at Justin Herman Plaza along the Embarcadero.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: www.ilwu.org/ and www.transportworkers.org/ or call (415) 776-8100.
Jack Heyman is a longshoreman who works on the Oakland docks.
Copyright 2008 SF Chronicle
Also see:
ILWU to Shut Down Ports May 1 Demanding End to War in Iraq, Afghanistan
tribes.tribe.net/nobloodfo...817def77c0
This has been distributed by Liberation News, subscribe free:
lists.riseup.net/www/info/...ation_news
Join the Cool Earth Party
tribes.tribe.net/coolearth
www.labornet.org/news/0000/nopaz.htm
********
Tuesday, April 8, 2008 (SF Chronicle)
Longshoremen to close ports on West Coast to protest war
by Jack Heyman
(Jack Heyman is a longshoreman who works on the Oakland docks.)
While millions of people worldwide have marched against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and last week's New York Times/CBS News poll indicated that 81 percent believe the country is headed in the wrong direction - key concerns being the war and the economy - the war machine inexorably grinds on.
Amid this political atmosphere, dockworkers of the International Longshoreand Warehouse Union have decided to stop work for eight hours in all U.S. West Coast ports on May 1, International Workers' Day, to call for an end to the war.
This decision came after an impassioned debate where the union's Vietnam veterans turned the tide of opinion in favor of the anti-war resolution. The motion called it an imperial action for oil in which the lives of working-class youth and Iraqi civilians were being wasted and declared May Day a "no peace, no work" holiday. Angered after supporting Democrats who received a mandate to end the war but who now continue to fund it, longshoremen decided to exercise their political power on the docks.
Last month, in response to the union's declaration, the Pacific Maritime Association, the West Coast employer association of shipowners, stevedore companies and terminal operators, declared its opposition to the union's protest. Thus, the stage is set for a conflict in the run up to the longshore contract negotiations.
The last set of contentious negotiations (in 2002) took place during the period between the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the invasion of Iraq. Representatives of the Bush administration threatened that if there were any of the usual job actions during contract bargaining, then troops would occupy the docks because such actions would jeopardize "national security." Yet, when the PMA employers locked out the longshoremen and shut down West Coast ports for 11 days, the "security" issue vanished. President Bush then invoked the Taft-Hartley Act, forcing longshoremen back to work under conditions favorable to the employers.
The San Francisco longshore union has a proud history of opposition to the war in Iraq, being the first union to call for an end to the war and immediate withdrawal of troops. Representatives of the union spoke at anti-war rallies in February 2003, including one in London attended by nearly 2 million people, the largest ever held in Britain. Executive Board member Clarence Thomas went to Iraq with a delegation to observe workers' rights during the occupation.
At the start of the war in Iraq, hundreds of protesters demonstrated on the Oakland docks, and longshoremen honored their picket lines. Without warning, police in riot gear opened fire with so-called less-than-lethal weapons, shooting protesters and longshoremen alike with wooden dowels, rubber bullets, pellet bags, concussion grenades and tear gas. A U.N. Human Rights Commission investigator characterized the Oakland police attack as "the most violent" against anti-war protesters in the United States.
And finally, last year, two black longshoremen going to work in the port of Sacramento were beaten, Maced and arrested by police under the rubric of Homeland Security regulations ordained by the "war on terror."
There's precedent for this action. In the '50s, French dockworkers refused to load war materiel on ships headed for Indochina, and helped to bring that colonial war to an end. At the ILWU's convention in San Francisco in 2003, A. Q. McElrath, an octogenarian University of Hawaii regent and former ILWU organizer from the pineapple canneries, challenged the delegates to act for social justice, invoking the union's slogan, "An injury to one is an injury to all." She concluded, "The cudgel is on the ground. Will you pick it up?"
It appears that longshore workers may be doing just that on May Day and calling on immigrant workers and others to join them.
May Day protest
WHEN: 10:30 a.m., May 1, followed by a rally at noon.
WHERE: Longshore Union Hall, corner of Mason and Beach (near Fisherman's
Wharf).
WHAT: March to a rally at Justin Herman Plaza along the Embarcadero.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: www.ilwu.org/ and www.transportworkers.org/ or call (415) 776-8100.
Jack Heyman is a longshoreman who works on the Oakland docks.
Copyright 2008 SF Chronicle
Also see:
ILWU to Shut Down Ports May 1 Demanding End to War in Iraq, Afghanistan
tribes.tribe.net/nobloodfo...817def77c0
This has been distributed by Liberation News, subscribe free:
lists.riseup.net/www/info/...ation_news
Join the Cool Earth Party
tribes.tribe.net/coolearth
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Tue, April 22, 2008 - 4:18 PMI've noticed as of late that people who would not normally vote Democratic are thinking of voting that way come November; regardless of what the polls say. That is where their protest is going to be...
-
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Tue, April 22, 2008 - 6:57 PMThe ballot box is a lame place to protest. The candidates of both parties have their money on the cookie jar. Obama, while I prefer over Hillary are McCain, still has indicated that he will leave most of the troops in Iraq.
There must be a complete pull out. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Tue, April 22, 2008 - 9:37 PMAlso, historically most real changes occur when there are major protest, especially when there is direct action involved. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Tue, April 22, 2008 - 11:04 PMNixon was a real asshole, but public pressure eventually made him deescalate the war. I doubt he would have done so if public pressure was not so severe.
Slavery was abolished on paper a long long time ago, but its only recently that the civil rights movement won some of its most significant victories...and they were not won by voting. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Wed, April 23, 2008 - 3:59 AMThe voting part was included in the protest and call to action as we attempted to get the right to be registered to vote. Or did you think we took that risk just to protest. And what would you have done instead?Voting remains the bulwark against ideas of repression. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Wed, April 23, 2008 - 10:20 AMI'm all for voting. But the Democrats will never end imperialist war. It is also unlikely that the Democrats or McCain will even pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan without major pressure, including strikes. So I'll vote, but I'll only vote for anti-imperialist socialist candidates, and I'll promote other actions that, if they escalate in numbers, can stop the war. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Fri, April 25, 2008 - 6:34 PM>>>The ballot box is a lame place to protest.<<<
In a sense your quite accurate -- however, I just do see people giving a damn right now to go out and protest. That fault lays with the American populace in and on itself... -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Fri, April 25, 2008 - 6:59 PMLike Steve said, the Democrats aren't going to end the war. The Democrats could have not bothered to vote for any appropriations for the war and BushCo would have no choice but pull out the troops. Obama, who happens to be the better alternative of the two Democrats, already indicated that he will still keep most of the troops in Iraq. That is why I don't think that voting will be considered a protest. The only way we can end the war is sock it to the very companies that benefit and hurt them in the only place that will hurt them, their bottom line.. That involves direct action that involves disrupting them as often as possible.
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Fri, April 25, 2008 - 7:01 PM..........voting is leveraging of opinion at the feet of the money classes....yet that....and lobbying...still seem to work at a more localized level. Voting as a mass in some situations combines the best of both worlds. Beyond that, I find myself still agreeing with Tedster and Steven. Voting is a good first step....... -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Sat, April 26, 2008 - 4:59 AMI agree. As Saul Alinsky advised, work from the inside while being an activist in the community. Don't concede the place of power and action to them. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Sat, April 26, 2008 - 7:49 AMI'm sorry but, it's not possible to "work from the inside" when the doors are locked shut and under armed guard. -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Sat, April 26, 2008 - 9:05 AMin some cases , that may be true but it isn't true in all situations. Some have been very effective from the inside.As George Washington said, "You needn't win every battle as long as you persist and act with more wisdom than your opponent" -
-
Re: Strike Against The War, All Out Mayday
Sat, April 26, 2008 - 10:38 AM"Some have been very effective from the inside."
Who? How? Where?
Let's get specific.
There are leftists who've been able to do things on the inside of parliaments in other countries. In the United States, so far, the principled left is excluded from office.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
